Comments on: Hitler

By: John Saintclair

John Saintclair — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:58:18 +0000

Generally, I would not respond to a waste of space, but in your case, I will make an exception: my brother discussed Germany’s role and the role of the Axis powers in the defence of Western Europe against Bolshevik Communism with a congenital retard who responded that Adolf Hitler was the most evil man in the history of the world, and the agitated response from this congenital retard was no different to yours.
Adolf Hitler was destined to become Germany’s greatest leader (Fuhrer) which was confirmed in his birth chart.
April 20th 2013 will be 124 years since the birth of Adolf Hitler, and I hope you kneel before a picture of Adolf Hitler and pay homage to the greatest Supreme Leader (Fuhrer) of Germany, Adolf Hitler (1933/1945, (12) years the significance of which you could not begin to understand or comprehend). Stick to watching Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse cartoons. Jomi

By: Chechar

Chechar — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:50:55 +0000

…you are forgetting to listen to the other side of the story:

http://chechar.wordpress.com/2011/12/10/hellstorm-book-review/

By: Kevin Groom

Kevin Groom — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 02:11:56 +0000

Wow you people are sick and disgusting people. Hitler was a killer. He was a sick person. He had to be taken out. And you should be too.

By: John Saintclair

John Saintclair — Sun, 30 Dec 2012 18:58:03 +0000

As above:”To those Americans who are too fat and lazy to get off their back sides and STUDY, a history lesson:”The German Reich of the National Socialist revolution has prided itself on being a fair and decent partner, offering in exchange high-quality products instead of worthless democratic paper money.
For these reasons the Reich was interested in only one thing if, indeed, there was any question of political interest, namely, in seeing that internally the business partner was firmly established on a sound and healthy basis.
The application of this idea led in fact not only to increasing prosperity in these countries but also to the beginning of mutual confidence. All the greater, however, became the endeavour of that world incendiary, Churchill, to put an end to this peaceful development and by shamelessly imposing upon these states utterly worthless British guarantees and promises of assistance to introduce into this peaceable European territory elements of unrest, uncertainty, distrust and, finally, conflict.
Originally, Rumania was first won over by these guarantees and later, of course, Greece. It has, meanwhile, probably been sufficiently demonstrated that he (Churchill) had absolutely no power of any kind to provide real help and that these guarantees were merely intended to rope these States in to follow the dangerous trend of filthy British politics.
Rumania has had to pay bitterly for the guarantees, which were calculated to estrange her from the Axis Powers.
Greece, which least of all required such a guarantee, was offered her share to link her destiny to that of the country that provided her King with cash and orders.
Even today I feel that I must, as I believe in the interest of historical accuracy, distinguish between the Greek people and that thin top layer of corrupt leaders who, inspired by a King who had no eyes for the duty of true leadership, preferred instead to further the aims of British war politics. To me this is a subject of profound regret.
Germany, with the faint hope of still being able to continue in some way to a solution of the problem, had not severed relations with Greece. But even then I was bound in duty to point out before the whole world that we would not tacitly allow a revival of the old Salonika Scheme of the Great War.
Unfortunately, my warning was not taken seriously enough.
That we were determined, if the British tried to gain another foothold in Europe, to drive them back into the sea was nat taken seriously enough. The result was that the British began in an increasing degree to establish bases for the formation of a new Salonika army. They began by laying out airdromes and by establishing the necessary ground organisation in the firm conviction that the occupation of the airdromes themselves could afterward be carried out very speedily.
Finally a continuous stream of transports brought equipment for an army which, according to Churchill’s idea and plans, was to be landed in Greece. As I have said, already we were aware of this.
For months we watched this entire strange procedure with attention, if with restraint.
The reverses suffered by the Italian Army in North Africa, owing to a certain material inferiority of their tanks and anti-tank guns, finally led Churchill to believe that the time was ripe to transfer the theater of war from Libya to Greece.
He ordered the transport of the remaining tanks and of the infantry division, composed mainly of Anzacs, and was convinced that he could now complete his scheme, which was to set the Balkans aflame. Thus did Churchill commit one of the greatest strategic blunders of this war. As soon as there could be no further doubt regarding Britain’s intentions of gaining a foothold in the Balkans, I took the necessary steps.
(The Duce did not even request me to place one single German division at his disposal for this purpose. He was convinced that with the advent of good weather his stand against Greece would have been brought to a successful conclusion.
I was of the same opinion. The concentration of German forces was therefore not made for the purpose of assisting the Italians against Greece. It was a precautionary measure against the British attempt under cover of the clamour caused by the Italo-Greek war to intrench themselves secretly in the Balkans in order to force the issue from that quarter on the model of the Salonika army during the World War, and, above all, to draw other elements into the whirlpool.)
(Churchill who started this struggle, is endeavouring, as with regard to Norway or Dunkerque, to say something that sooner or later might perhaps be twisted around to resemble success.
I do not consider that honourable, but in his case it is understandable.
The gift Churchill possesses is the gift to lie with a pious expression on his face and to distort the truth until finally glorious victories are made out of the most terrible defeats.
A British Army of 60,000 to 70,000 men landed in Greece.
Before the catastrophe the same man maintained, moreover, that it consisted of 240,000 men.
The object of this army was to attack Germany from the south, inflict a defeat upon her, and from this point as in 1918 turn the tide of the war. I prophesied more correctly than Churchill in my last speech, in which I announced that wherever the British might set foot on the Continent they would be attacked by us and driven into the sea.
Now, with his brazen effrontery, he asserts that this war has cost us 75,000 lives. He causes his presumably not over-intelligent fellow countrymen to be informed by one of his paid creatures that the British, after having slain enormous masses of Germans, finally turned away from sheer abhorrence of the slaughter and, strictly speaking, withdrew for this reason alone.)” Adolf Hitler – 20-4-1889 (6.30:20)

Such was the infantile paralysis of the drunkard who spent virtually the entire war in an alcoholic haze, and most if not all of Churchill’s speeches from 1940 were made by an actor who mimic’ed Churchill’s voice and the so-called: “greatest” speech ever made by Churchill:”We will fight them on the beaches” speech of 1940, was made by the actor referenced above because Churchill was almost certainly in an alcoholic coma in his private bunker some 350/400 feet below 10 Downing Street. Jomi

By: Chechar

Chechar — Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:04:34 +0000

You’re wrong. I am not an American and don’t live in the US.

By: John Saintclair

John Saintclair — Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:56:51 +0000

It speaks volumes of your intellect if you believe this is a great blog.
Chechar is just another American white nationalist fantasist who has adopted European National Socialism as a smoke screen to disguise his narrow minded aspirations for a white America – dream on Chechar. All but those Europeans who have a good understanding of the factual history of European National Socialism who contribute to this blog are worth reading – all other contributions are total crap like to contribution by rudd69 which I intend replying to if only for my own gratification.
To those Americans who are too fat and lazy to get off their back sides and STUDY, stick with your own Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse Communist version of the European history of National Socialism which has been cannibalised into a sick mockery by brain dead Americans who know nothing of the hidden spiritual meaning of German/European National Socialism. Jomi

By: rudd69

rudd69 — Sun, 30 Dec 2012 01:33:12 +0000

Lets not foreget Hitlers Italian El Duce Macaroni who made constant military blunders which Hitler had to bail him out of. From Greece to North Africa was a major distraction.

By: Hyperborean

Hyperborean — Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:18:01 +0000

“He was a visionary, and a statesman—but no general,”

I automatically assume the exact opposite of any claims the Jewish media makes against Hitler. Hitler as buffoon, trying to play general is a perfect example of one of these myths, one which is quickly dispelled upon reading David Irving’s “Hitlers War”.

Perhaps the greatest criticism that can be leveled against Hitlers handling of the eastern front doesn’t lie in his military strategy; but rather his anti-slavic policies which drove millions of Russians (who initially greeted the Germans as liberators) back into the arms of Stalin.

Of course it is easy to criticize this policy in hindsight; after the initial success of Operation Barbarossa Hitler assumed he could quickly defeat Stalin and colonize all of Eastern Europe with NS, but he ended up overplaying his hand, and his excessive ambition ended up costing Germany the war.

Chechar, great blog. You are one of the few white nationalists i find myself agreeing with on almost every issue. Keep up the good work.

By: starera

starera — Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:44:58 +0000

@John, now that is a nearly perfect ramble, well done.

By: John Saintclair

John Saintclair — Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:59:00 +0000

Starera: Your comments are typical of that American mentality that seeks to deny or obscure the communist history of America and the political administration of that congenital retard Franklin Delano Rosso-Campo Rosenfelt who was complicit with Winstein Jacobson (fake Churchill) and Josef Stalin in instigating a policy of genocide against the German people during & post WW2.
I quote from the book:”Unconditional Hatred” by Russel Grenfell:” From the beginning of the war, and more especially since his accession to the Premiership in 1940, he (Jacobson) had assailed the Germans with a verbal cannonade of abuse and threats.
There was nothing too bad he could say about them. Twice running they had been the criminals who had turned Europe into a slaughterhouse, their present leader was a “bloodthirsty guttersnipe,
they themselves must “bleed and burn,” and there were “no lengths in violence” to which the British would not go to destroy their wicked power. After years of listening to and reading such sentiments about their principle enemies from their Prime Minister and his host of imitators, the British people had naturally come even before 1945 to regard the Germans as first cousins of the devil.
Therefore, for Mr. Jacobson (fake Churchill) to have suddenly come out with an announcement that Britain was dropping out of the war because the Russians and the Americans were proposing to treat the Germans too harshly after their defeat, and still more that Britain might join Germany against them, would have struck the British public dumb with a combination of astonishment and horror.”

“Everything in this world has its price; and the price of the hatred propaganda so sedulously disseminated among the British people in the Second World War turned out to be a very heavy one, in the shape of an inflamed rigidity of mind about the Germans that left the British an easy prey to their more calculating Russian allies.”
“If, however, a resort to war does not mark a continuation of policy but, instead, an abrupt change of policy from whatever it was in peace time to the achievement of military victory, then the gaining of that victory can only mean the opening of a door onto a political black fog.

And since Mr. Jacobson (fake Churchill) seems to have made this abrupt change, it is hardly surprising that the victory he sought at all costs has proved almost entirely sterile. To achieve this victory he was prepared to sacrifice everything, and the sacrifices he did make then left the British co-victors semi-bankrupt, rationed, financially imprisoned on the island concentration camp, their Empire disintegrating, their own country occupied by American troops, and their national economy dependent upon American charity.
And what for? That the Germans might be permanently disarmed?
Within three or four years, we were begging the Germans to rearm as quickly as they liked. But If Mr. Jacobson (fake Churchill) pursued the wrong object, based on the false premise that Germany was the butcher-bird of history, how did he come to make that elementary mistake?”

The above question give its own answer:Winstein Jacobson, together with Franklin Delano Rosso-Campo Rosenfelt represented the Western Communist Alliance to Josef Stalin & Soviet Communist Russia. This is equally confirmed by Grenfell’s remark:”Their Empire disintegrating, their own country occupied by American troops.”
The occupation of Britain by Communist American troops was the result of the unforeseen military and economic destruction of Soviet Russia by Jacobson and Rosenfelt who had convinced themselves together with Josef Stalin, that Soviet Russia would launch a pre-emptive attack against Western Europe after Germany had been defeated by Britain & France.
The defeat of France and the occupation of Europe by German forces as the Protectorate of Western Europe against Bolshevik Communism, shattered the fantasy illusions of Jacobson, Rosenfelt & Stalin and compelled Stalin to forward his policy for the invasion and conquest of Western Europe by amassing 30 Soviet armies on the Western borders of Finland, Poland, Germany and Rumania which was pre-empted by the strategic genius of Adolf Hitler.
The hoped for plan of a Russian Soviet occupation of Western Europe was simply substituted by Soviet Communist American forces because Soviet Russia was systematically and surgically annihilated militarily and economically.
As far as jew controlled Rosenfelt was concerned, what Soviet Russia failed to achieve, Soviet Communist America would achieve as far as the implementation of a Global Communist World Order was concerned, and this is why Communist America continues to occupy European countries since 1945, including Britain, a so-called ally.
The mythical:”Cold War” between Soviet Communist America and Soviet Communist Russia was implemented to ensure that there was no effective rival to Soviet Communist America, and Lyndon Bains Johnstein’s Vietnam war against Vietnamese communists was nothing more than a pretext for genocide against the nation and people of Vietnam and war profiteering and the continuance of the American Communist Policy of terror politics.

Starea: Please do not try to impress me with your more than vague
interpretation of Adolf Hitlers war plan Operation Sickle Stroke, for which Manstein took the credit.
Your comments about Moscow are equally vague and incorrect for the reasons I have already stated. Read Suvorov’s “Icebreaker.”
The decision to attack Moscow was made by the German High Command against the better judgment of Adolf Hitler, but once the decision to attack Moscow was implemented, there was little Adolf Hitler could do. It was elements within the German High Command who were convinced that the fall of Moscow would result in complete victory for the German forces.
Stalin had transferred much of Soviet Russia’s industrial capacity (what was left of it) beyond the Ural Mountains and beyond the reach of German forces, hence the flawed logic of elements of the german High Command. Soviet Communist America & Britain were sending war material to Soviet Russia via the Atlantic Convoy System which kept Soviet Russia in the war.
It is quite possible that elements within the German High Command were deliberately seeking to sabotage Operation Barbarossa either because of communist sympathies or jealousy of Adolf Hitler’s strategic genius. Remember, Adolf Hitler was a Corporal in WW1.
I should also point out that the German Campaign against Poland was won because of the strategic genius of Adolf Hitler who implemented a policy of ariel pincer movements, West and East, to encircle Polish forces and Polish cities through the policy of Blitzkrieg.
The Stand Fast Order that you ramble on about with regard to Moscow, simply illustrates that the German forces should have retreated before the onset of the severe Russian winter,but in itself, the Order did not seriously impact on German victories because Moscow was completely degraded. The Soviet pyrrhic victory at Moscow was just that, a pyrrhic victory that owes more to the severe Russian winter than to the much vaunted fighting prowess of Soviet forces.
As for the use of Sarin gas, I consider the suggestion to infantile to merit a response, but just for the record: Adolf Hitler and Germany strictly adhered to the Geneva Convention with regard to the use or non-use of poison gas which, if it had been used by Germany in the Eastern Front Campaign, Communist Britain & America would almost certainly have retaliated by using the same against German military and civilian targets. Don’t forget, Communist Britain & America had no compunction against the bombing of civilian cities in Germany which constituted a policy of genocide, and I ask the question: did any Americans blink a eyelid in protest when Soviet Communist America dropped nuclear bombs on the only two Catholic cities in Japan: Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
German’y tragedy was a congenital retard afflicted with infantile paralysis of the body and mind:Franklin Delano Rosso-Campo Roesenfelt, and a psychotic alcoholic neurotic: Winstein Jacobson (fake Churchill) and a sub-human anti-human beast: Josef Stalin, who presided over a policy of genocide that resulted in the deaths of over 50 million people for International Finance & International Communism.
Starera: I hope you enjoy more of my idle ramblings. In the meantime, try to make the effort to educate yourself and familiarise
yourself with the historical facts of WW2 instead of parroting the communist garbage that has been rammed down the throats of most Americans since 1933.

Jomi