Comments on: The West’s Darkest Hour

By: Owlbear

Owlbear — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:00:43 +0000

@oogen: Why asking evidence from the New Testament. most Christians are no Marcionites (sadly), so they , especially and particulary the big churches accept the authority of the Satanic Testament (‘old testament’). That tehre are PLENTY of examples in there, you know. This is why you were asking from the New Testament. But even the New Testament contains the book of Revelation which is good enough to justify any war. By the way, the New Testament clearly dismisses large families (Marcus 10,28).

By: starera

starera — Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:44:04 +0000

@oogen, yes, show me in the New Testament where “wars of conquest” are forbidden. You are making that stuff up as you go along.

By: oogenhand

oogenhand — Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:47:51 +0000

Proof from the New Testament, please. And how to get around the Sermon on the Mount?

By: starera

starera — Tue, 04 Dec 2012 05:43:05 +0000

@oogen, re “Oh, how true. Christianity is inherently contradictory. It requires large families, but forbids wars of conquest.” Nonsense, Christianity does not forbid wars of conquest.

By: oogenhand

oogenhand — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:36:59 +0000

Spread it like the Mantra.

By: Chechar

Chechar — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 01:18:39 +0000

The link you provided is great. Thanks!

When in Pierce’s chapter I read, “They must be prepared to outgrow all baggage of superstition…” I immediately thought on how pious WN Christians will have to give up their cherished beliefs once the convergence of catastrophes hits mankind later in this century.

By: oogenhand

oogenhand — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:11:04 +0000

"—which would require that they act contrary to the dictates of the religion—"

Oh, how true. Christianity is inherently contradictory. It requires large families, but forbids wars of conquest. [link]