Media, as in Medium. This is basically akin to the ‘Holy Spirit’, and even those who criticize think it’s merely an entertainment or agenda issue. No, this your actual ‘soul’ being programmed.

http://goo.gl/1ZimZ

Now, one might think that this rather obvious fact, and very pro-Jewish statement, would at best be lauded by the pro-Israel faction, and then quickly forgotten. However, immediately, the American media mostly came down on him, with CNN’s Howard Kurtz accusing Murdoch of “shameful anti-Semitism”.

The reason has nothing to do with Israel. It has to do with the fiction that there is no Jewish owned press. For his part, Murdoch quickly issued an apology of sorts: ” ‘Jewish owned press’ have been sternly criticized, suggesting link to Jewish reporters. Don’t see this, but apologize unreservedly.” He also sent the obligatory letter to Foxman, an organization that had previously given him an award of some kind.

The “Jewish Owned Press” went lengths to show that they are actually large corporations “owned” by stockholders, etc. They overlooked, however, the now common slang use of the word “owned,” popular within the negro styled ebonic dialect, and now, unfortunately, often used by whites. This meaning tells a different story altogether.

Obviously Murdoch knows the truth, but also knows which side of the bread is buttered. Personally, I suspect that he is likely seething inside over it all. But it has not been his year. His Chinese wife, Wendy, would have aggressively smacked those who are now ideologically attacking him, as she did the pie thrower a year or so ago, if she’d have had half the chance.

http://goo.gl/Cnn3R

http://goo.gl/USttW

The only jew of whom I am aware who defended Trifkovic in the wake of the symposium, was the neocohen Julia Gorin, who has denounced the word “neocon” as an anti-Semitic slur, and who, perhaps more importantly, shares Trifkovic’s support for Kikistan, Russia, and Serbia, and his obsessive hatred of Albanians (as well his preoccupation with Mohammedanism in general) and Croats, which, in Trifkovic’s case, are probably understandable legacies of the Ottoman occupation and of the atrocities inflicted on Serbs during WWII and during the American-sponsored breakup of Yugoslavia:

http://goo.gl/zNczu

http://goo.gl/Aq9Vt

http://goo.gl/HYu6B

http://goo.gl/OU6Rx

http://goo.gl/sP0Zj

http://goo.gl/8rgIQ

Of course, in reality, both judaism and mohammedanism are criminal conspiracies.

Auster, for instance, can rightly criticize negro nature, but does not seem to recognize the “nature” of his own people who have enabled the negro. For him it is “liberalism” that is the problem.

Seiyo, for his part, is distasteful. He has written that the Dresden massacre was essentially karmic retribution for European mistreatment of Jews. In his mind, I suppose, Jews are eternally blameless, but at the same time eternal victims of an ever present European holocuastic mind-set.

And then there are the obfuscators, such as Paul Kersey from Stuff Black People Don’t Like. Everything Paul writes is true, but he only tells half the story, and refuses to allow his commenters to fill in the blanks. Negroes by themselves do not have the ability to inflict societal-wide destruction. They are too simple minded, and too ineffective. It is only their “handlers” who facilitate it, but for SBPDL they are “those who must not be named.”

One must realize that no one starts out with the truth. I suspect that most who have a keener insight likely progressed by way of people like Auster, Fjordman, SBPDL et. al., until they finally realized that there is more. Then they go on to seek further understanding. So, for that, perhaps it may be that some help along the way, even if it is flawed, is better than none at all.

That being said, in my own view, there are many dead ends along the way, and one must always remember to discriminate. Often this means taking certain ideas from one source, while discarding others from that very same source.