The new racial classification (first part)

The blogsite Evropa Soberana still has to publish the second instalment studying other ethnic groups (Mongolid, Congid and Australid) with photos of their diverse admixtures with the white race.

ES

Note: This article has been translated (and adapted and abridged for this site) from the original Spanish version, which was first published on July 28, 2009. There is also a Polish translation. We’re interested in having it translated also to Russian, German, French and other languages. Contributions are welcomed in the inbox of europa_soberana (at) hotmail.com. Some data of this article are out-dated and are yet to be updated. The acronym “WN” does not mean white nationalist in the following article, but White Nordid.

 

___________________________________________

 

“All truth passes through three stages: first, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident.”

—Arthur Schopenhauer

For decades, following the criteria of German, English and American physical anthropologists, the division of the European “sub-races” was as follows:

Nordic: high stature, rosy skin, athletic build, straight nose, well-developed chin, dolichocephalic, fair hair and light eyes.

Dalic or Falic: high stature, robust and heavily built, rosy skin, blond hair, light eyes (blue, grey or green), dolichocephalic or brachycephalic cranium, big mouth and thin lips.

Dinaric: high-medium stature, brown skin, slim build, aquiline nose, brachycephalic, dark hair and eyes.

Alpine: medium stature, fair skin, heavily built, brachycephalic, brown hair, brown or light eyes.

East Baltic: medium to low stature, fair skin, strong build, brachycephalic, light hair and eyes.

Mediterranean: low stature, brown skin, physical constitution varying from gracile to slender, straight nose, regular features, dolichocephalic, dark hair and eyes.

1-es

At the beginning of last century, these faces were designated plainly “Nordic,” although it is clear that they do not constitute an anthropologically homogeneous group. Back then, they were grouped to put some order in the foundations of the young raciology. Today, we already are in a position to know the remarkable differences between these types.

This classification is obsolete. Although those who made it were on the right track. It has been fully improved, as could be expected after a century. The quantum leap has been made due to three factors:

Thanks to globalization and technical advances whereby we have easy access to high quality colour photographs of persons from different ethnic backgrounds worldwide. This is a luxury that physical anthropologists at the beginning of the past century (who had to content themselves with a very limited and black-and-white photographical supply) could hardly dream of. Due to this free access to physical-anthropological features, an update of the old racial classification was bound to occur sooner or later.

The overwhelming advance in Genetics in the past years, specifically in human lineages (paternal and maternal) research from ethnic groups world wide, and their distribution in haplogroups. This research is still advancing steadily (e.g., X-chromosome haplogroups are in the process of being identified).

The long, valuable and monumental investigation made by my contributor Valg in the field of Physical Anthropology [1], and its meticulous verification with scientific data provided by Genetics (which has gone deeply into the origin of the different human ethnic communities, separating lineages), Palaeoanthropology (which studies the physical-anthropological features of prehistoric men), Archaeology and History. Thanks to this ever-progressing work, Valg has been able to separate the current components in modern mixes, isolating the original features and finally going back to the lost primal races. Long before finding photographs of pure specimens, he already had in mind the features he was looking for. This search, which exceeds all previous ones and sets Physical Anthropology on a solid and totally new basis, has led him to discover that:

- What yesteryear was called “Nordic race” is actually a mix of White and Red Nordids, with an Armenid and, to a lesser extent, Mongolid influence.

- The “Mediterranean race” is a mix of Red Nordids, Armenids, White Nordids, Congids in small proportion and sometimes Mongolids in a minimal proportion.

- The “Dinaric race” is a mix of White Nordids and Armenids, usually with Red Nordid influence.

- The “Alpine race” is a mix of Red Nordids, Mongolids and generally, to a lesser extent, White Nordids and Armenids.

- The “East Baltic race” is a mix of White and Red Nordids, and Mongolids.

- The primal “European races” are three: the White Nordid, the Red Nordid and the Armenid.

This article has not been written to promote divisions or discriminations, or to heartlessly catalogue the human being like cattle or as a mechanical entity, but to understand better the biodiversity we are carriers of, the necessity of preserving it and its meaning, as well as to heighten the people’s racial instincts in order to achieve a selection of the best genomes. This is especially important when the vast majority of individuals are totally lacking an ethnical instinct, while the Western Civilization is undergoing an aggressive invasion and colonization process that threatens to drown forever its valuable autochthonous genetic diversity, and when the biological degradation brought about by civilization (hazardous substances, pernicious habits, lack of natural selection and of a eugenic mentality) is making the West cry out for new identitary feelings and associations based on Genetics. Therefore, I want to make it clear that if I think about these matters it’s because I honestly think that they will contribute to strengthen our Western Civilization, our “white race”—which lives within it and is its base—and all mankind. This is about the history of our blood. Those who think we are all equal or that all this is nonsense, are kindly invited not to read any further. We are not interested in convincing, but in providing the facts whereby clearly and free-thinking individuals can convince themselves if they deem it appropriate to do so.

To finalize this introduction, it is recommendable to deepen in morphopsychology, that is, analysing the psychology of an individual using his physical features, especially of his face. It will be found that pure races, having particular features, have also a particular collective psychology, which is perfectly in accordance with brain configuration being inherited genetically.

 

 

Features to analyse

In order to familiarize the reader with some terms, I would like to briefly explain the relevance of some features we will be paying attention.

Physical constitution: We don’t pay attention to whether an individual is thin, fat or muscular, but to his skeletal structure, his “framework” and his natural tendency of being thin, fat or muscular. With regard to the three races, the most corpulent is by far the Red Nordid. The Armenid has a gracile build, and the White Nordids an intermediate athletic type. During Palaeolithic times, skeletal broadness was surely larger in all human races due to the strongly mineralizing diet.

Eyes: The eyes’ colour is determined by the melanin content, a pigment produced by melanocytes in the eye’s iris. The “pure” eye colours are: dark brown (almost black), brown, light grey and dark blue. Green is actually a depigmented brown due to mixtures with lighter tonalities. Pale “bright” blue eyes are a mixture between light grey and dark blue (we do not take into account the pink and red colours of people with albinism, who are not a particular race).

Two (probably more, although they are not yet known) are the genes that influence the iris pigmentation: HERC2 and OCA2. The OCA2 gene encodes/synthesises a protein that transports tyrosine (precursor of melanin) and therefore determines eye pigmentation through the content of melanin in the iris (highly active OCA2 = large amounts of melanin: dark eyes. Scarcely active OCA2 = small amounts of melanin: green eyes). HERC2 (a gene that regulates OCA2 activity), in its mutated form, disconnects totally the OCA2 mechanism, hindering its expression, which in turn produces the light colour due to the lack of melanin.

How does the blue colour occur? In brown eyes, light is absorbed by the melanin contained in the external layers of the iris. However, in blue eyes, the outer layers have hardly any melanin, so that the light passes directly into the inner layers. There, light is scattered by proteins in such a way that, when reflected back out of the iris, it gives a blue tonality. This is the same optical phenomenon that makes the sky look blue. All colours between brown and blue (like hazel, amber or green) are determined by the amount of melanin involved in the process as well as the number and size of the proteins inside the eye.

2-es

A careful look at the iris can be almost as revealing as the facial features when it comes to appreciating racial contributions. None of these eyes has a “pure” colour, but mixtures between pure colours. The relatively “pure” traits displayed in these eyes are brown eumelanin, dark blue and light grey, in varying proportions.

Obviously, we will also pay attention to the shape of the eye sockets, supraorbital arches, the size of the eyes and the distance between them.

Nose: The nose says a lot about a race’s environmental adaptation. For example, in the case of White and Red Nordids (with slight differences between them), their nose—large when compared with negroid varieties and Mongolids, and small when compared with Armenids—is adapted to heating cold air in the nasal passages before introducing it into the lungs. In the case of the Armenids, their large noses were useful to increase oxygen intake in a rarefied air environment such as mountainous terrain, since Valg believes the Armenid race developed in mountainous regions (e.g., in chains like the Haraz mountains, Zagros, Taurus, Alborz or around the Caucasus). Another plausible theory is that it was advantageous for dampening the dry desert air and filtering positive ions and dust particles before introducing it into the lungs. However, world climate was different when the Armenids appeared (during the Würm glaciation), and their regions (the Near East) where not deserts at that time. By contrast, the negroid races, which did not need to warm or dampen the air because rainforests are already warm and humid, have big nostrils and small nasal bridges.

Ears: The “pure” types will be described, but we have to bear in mind that mixes produce a lot of “abominations,” like protruding ears, very big ear lobes, etc.

Teeth: Dental configuration is very related to craniomandibular configuration, which has a decisive influence on the brain and is the result of dietary adaptation. The origin of the human teeth lies in frugivorous apes, whose teeth had great differences between them (well developed canines and molars, under-developed incisors). During subsequent evolution, our ancestors began to use stone tools to butcher meat (and later on, by cooking it, they made it more bio-available and soft), and as a result, molars and canines lost prominence in favour of incisors. This resulted in more balanced and equated teeth, and in a more even distribution of the chewing force, which in turn freed the cranium from the “cage” of chewing muscles, allowing the brain to grow. Therefore, we must pay attention to the differences in shape and size between teeth, but also to the shape of the dental arch (e.g., a U, C or V-shaped “bite”) and if the teeth grow angled outwards, vertically or tend to angle inwards.

Skin: Everybody knows that melanin is the pigment responsible for darkening skin, eyes and hair, yet we are going to be more specific, and handle little known concepts of eumelanin and pheomelanin.

- Eumelanin is the well-known dark pigment that people refer to when they speak of “melanin.” It is to be found in skin and hair: the most abundant kind of melanin and there are two different varieties, black and brown. In hair, eumelanin produces colours like grey (small concentration of black or brown eumelanin, absence of other pigments), black (high concentration of black melanin), blond (small amount of brown eumelanin in the absence of other pigments) or mixes of these types (the different shades of brown, with or without grey hair, etc.).

- Pheomelanin is also found in skin and hair, and is especially abundant among thin-skinned people. This pigment imparts a pink to red hue and it becomes most apparent when little or no eumelanin is present. The highest concentrations of pheomelanin occur in the lips, nipples, penis glans, foreskin and vagina of individuals of Red Nordid influence, so it is not necessary to describe the sensual connotations of tissues with this pigment. Pheomelanin reaches high levels in the hair of redheads and in rosy areas, or areas with a tendency to blush, of people with fair features—not only among eurodescendants, but also among individuals from Eastern Asia who carry some Red Nordid traits. As a matter of interest, there are distant Red Nordid traces in Africa (high levels of R1b can be found in Cameroon, split off the main R1b trunk 15,000 years ago and mixed in the maternal lines with the indigenous population), which show up in a slight tendency to maroon in the black skin of several ethnic groups, as well as in their facial traits. In the hair, high levels of pheomelanin produce an orange colour, which changes to a “fire” colour (when mixed with blond), to red (when mixed with black and brown) or to auburn (a bit of everything).

- Another gene that we will talk about here is the MC1R. This is a key gene in the regulation of hair and skin colour in mammals, particularly by controlling the eumelanin production. It is thought that mutations in the MC1R gene are responsible for fair hair. This is the first evolutionary step towards hair adaptation to an Arctic environment. The following step to this eumelanin depigmentation would be a higher pigmentation of pheomelanin.

How did fair skin develop, and why? White skin is the result of the adaptation to the lower intensity of sunlight in Arctic conditions, as well as to the reduction of skin surface exposed to the Sun, due to the necessity of using animal skins to keep warm. In a Nordic climate, the excess of melanin of dark skins does not allow enough sunlight to pass the skin and enter the body, which is essential to catalyse Vitamin D synthesis (skeleton robustness, immune system, mother’s and foetus’ bones). That is why, in Arctic climates, dark races (such as the Congid race) can only survive if they have a very plentiful and well-balanced diet, in addition to enough sunlight exposure. Otherwise, they may suffer from Vitamin D deficiency: weakness, decalcification and/or bone deformity, rickets, growth stunting in children, osteoporosis, bone fractures, predisposition to malnutrition, immune system collapse and other disorders. Dark races need high amounts of sunlight exposure (and/or a very complete diet) to produce enough Vitamin D, whereas fair races can get by with less light and food.

This is the reason why the Canadian and US health authorities [2] have advised dark-skinned people—mainly Afro-Americans and Hispanics, but also dark individuals from Southern Europe—to consume between 1000 and 2000 IU (International Units) of Vitamin D from Autumn to Spring, when sunlight is weaker. Perpetually dark skin is disadvantageous in any place that is not sunny and warm.

Skull: Cranial morphology is important because it houses the brain and thus its shape has a direct influence in brain conformation and the development of certain areas and mental capabilities. We will talk about curvoccipital and planoccipital skulls (i.e., the shape of the rear part of the cranium) and about dolichocephaly, brachycephaly and mesocephaly (the ratio between cranial length and width).

3-esDifference between brachycephalic (left) and dolichocephalic (right) cranium, lateral and zenital (from above) view. A lateral view is not enough, as it only reveals if it is planoccipital (flattened occipital bone) or curvoccipital (prominent occiput). Only a zenital view can clearly reveal the cranial type. Notice that the dolichocephalic cranium is not only elongated but also the perception of its length is magnified by the narrowness at the temples (temporal bones) compared to the roundness of the brachycephalic, which is broader and has more prominent temples. An intermediate cranium is called mesocephalic.

Profile: The evolution of the human profile is very interesting. It started from a primitive model with snout and no forehead. Thus, gracile mammals such as Plesiadapis, Smilodectes, or the more ape-like Aegyptopithecus, are thought to be ancestors of the hominids. As we move into the hominid branch, that primitive “snout” (subnasal prognatism, or frontal projection of the lower facial parts) receded, the profile started to lift and straighten up and, gradually, a verticality of the profile was developed (orthognatism). The typical features of an evolved profile, far from the apelike origin, are considered to be: a straight vertical forehead, a well developed nasal bridge and chin, and a lower jaw which is narrow when seen from the side, yet broad when seen from the front. In modern human races, the receding forehead is due to the Neanderthal influence (as in the case of the Armenid race), as well as probably Erectus and others. The Red Nordids, Congids and Pygmids have perfectly straight and vertical foreheads, while the White Nordids have it faintly sloped. The most advanced chin morphologically would be that of the Red Nordid, followed by the White Nordid, Mongolid, Khoisanid and Armenid. The most advanced nasal bridge is without question the Armenid (Neanderthal in origin), followed by the White Nordid and the Red Nordid.

4-es

Curvoccipital cranium (we don’t know if it’s dolichocephalic because we can not see it from above or from front to know its width) and orthognathous profile (vertical red line).

Paternal lineage: It is traced through the Y-DNA (DNA of the Y chromosome) analysis. As is well known, a woman has two sex-determining chromosomes XX, whereas a man has an XY pair. The Y chromosome is exclusive of males and is passed on from father to son, so that analysing Y-DNA provides useful information about our direct paternal line, i.e., “your father’s father…” etc. Grouping diverse paternal lineages resulting from the genetic analysis of the Y-DNA of various populations, paternal haplogroups were formed. Women do not have a Y chromosome, so they can’t know their paternal lineage unless they analyse the Y-DNA of a family male (father, paternal grandfather, brothers, paternal-side cousins or any other family member who shares direct paternal line—assuming that the family’s women have been faithful).

Maternal lineage: It is traced through mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA). mtDNA is located in the mitochondria, cellular organelles involved in metabolism and energy production, and is passed on exclusively through the female line, so that an analysis of the mdDNA reveals the maternal line. All of us have mitochondria in our cells, hence women, as well as men, can know their maternal lineage.

Y-DNA and mtDNA are non-recombinant, so they remain identical cross after cross, except when mutations take place. However, we Homo sapiens have, apart from the two sexual chromosomes, another 22 pairs of chromosomes (the autosomes). Moreover, if we go back just 300 years we will see we have more than a thousand ancestors; knowing them is merely indicative but nothing else.

How to know your own haplogroups? There are numerous companies which analyse genetic samples worldwide [3]. Some companies compare the results with databases, giving percentages of similitude with ethnicities and individuals from the whole world and providing the possibility of sharing genetic data to find family members. A basic analysis can reveal which is your paternal lineage (if you’re a man, or a woman who has analysed a man of her family) and which is your maternal lineage. For instance, the present writer has a R1b paternal haplogroup (a Red Nordid line) and maternal H (idem).

However, let’s get one thing straight about haplogroups. As I already hinted, if we go back thousands of years, we have literally thousands of ancestors—although certainly many of them vanish from our genetic pool, as each parent only passes on a half of his genetic inheritance, while the other half is lost forever. Doing research on the paternal lineage speaks only about one of them, and maternal lineage about the other. Therefore, it provides just knowledge of only two ancestors—two of thousands. Obviously, this helps yet it is not 100% reliable because in order to appreciate all the genetic contributions an analysis of the indirect lines, that is, of the autosomes, is required.

Just in case it is not clear, let me give a simple example to “demystify” the haplogroup issue. Let’s imagine a horde of Vikings (I1 haplogroup) who disembark in Maghreb and sexually cohabit with some Moorish women, later leaving them behind and pursuing their expeditions. It is clear that the descendants will be of mixed race, and as they will breed on, their Viking contributions will be diluted more and more as time passes on. But they will still carry the paternal I1 haplogroup (as long as they have male descendants) as well as certain genome regions originally associated with the I1 stock, which will manifest in extremely residual “Viking” features.

Something similar happened with the Indian and mixed populations of Latin America and the brave but senseless Spanish conquistadors: many South Americans that are clearly very dark and Indian-like, carry the R1b haplogroup, passed on by a Spaniard who did what he shouldn’t with whom he shouldn’t. This would explain the fact of clearly non-Red Nordid persons carrying the paternal R1b haplogroup like an inactive “souvenir” (though it’s understandable that some vestiges of Red Nordid traits will be present, because 22 autosomes and a maternal lineage are also transmitted). The high frequencies of R1b found in certain ethnicities of northern Cameroon with clear residual Red Nordid traits, is another eloquent testimony of this same phenomenon. The opposite case is also possible: people that have a non-European direct lineage (like J2 or E1b1b) but are racially very European, because most of their “indirect” ancestors (neither paternal nor maternal direct lines) belonged to European lineages.

Many individuals with completely European features carry non-European haplogroups (e.g., the Italian painter Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio had the Congid E-V13 and Thomas Jefferson the Armenid T). To the contrary, these three examples which come from zones of Sub-Saharan Africa with extremely high R1b frequencies, and display very apparent Red Nordid features may well trace their paternal lineages to the R1b haplogroup, which in no way means they have “European genetics,” but that, on their paternal side, they descend from Red Nordids (R1b1*) that reached that area 15,000 years ago, mixing subsequently with the native Congids and leaving scattered pieces of genetic information, like the shape of the skull, lips, jawbones, etc. The same way, many South Americans with indigenous blood carry the haplogroup R1b, and nobody would think that it’s an Amerind lineage, but that it was introduced by a remote Spaniard centuries ago. This is a lesson for those who insist on that “haplogroups have nothing to do with races or physical features”—of course they do, but only in origin.

Similarly, I know that my father’s father… etc., was R1b, and that my mother’s mother… etc., was H, but what happens with the other thousands of ancestors that I have? One should not get too “excited” about haplogroups, because things are not so easy and one must interpret them. Only a deeper genetic analysis, and/or an expert exam of the anthropological-physical features of a face, can determine reliably the racial contributions that run through somebody’s veins.

Let’s now see the racial types that have taken part in the sculpting of what we understand today as the “white race.”

 

 

European White Nordid race

(from now on, White Nordid race or WN)

nordic
 
A pure White Nordid. Notice his skin is neither pale, nor milky-white, nor rosy or ruddy. It is rather “golden,” in harmony with the hair, and seems suitable to get a moderate tan without getting burned when exposed to sunlight. Forehead is high but not completely vertical. Psychologically, this is a noble, harmonious, serene, serious, patient, well-balanced, martial, honourable, disciplined, efficient and racist race, but also somewhat naïve, too angelic and not very cunning in many ways. Contrary to what his clothing might suggest [Note of the ed.: see one of the pics below] he is not Jewish, as there are various photographs of him wearing liturgical outfits from different religious confessions.

5-es

Stature: Very high.

Physical constitution: Slender, athletic. Well-shaped, broad and straight shoulders. Long neck. Although it is a “thin” physical type, tends to develop musculature under proper conditions of diet and exercise.

Eyes: Ice-grey, very light, almost whitish. Sky-blue eyes are mixes between the light-grey shade of White Nordids and the dark blue of Red Nordids. This tone, very light grey and near the colour of ice, is the eye colour par excellence of a pure White Nordid.

The grey eye colour is most common in Finland, the Baltic countries, Belarus and the European part of Russia. These eyes have even lower levels of melanin than “conventional” blue eyes, and the optical phenomenon that makes them look grey is the same that makes a cloudy sky look so. Elongated eye shape. Eyes deeply inserted in face under eyebrows that are low, narrow, moderately bushy and bring a thoughtful and audacious expression and a penetrating, aquiline and intense stare. Large pupils, short-medium distance between eyes. Small eye sockets. Moderately prominent supraorbital arches.

Nose: Narrow, straight, not very fleshy, harmonious. The key of the White Nordid nose is that its “root” lies very high, almost in the forehead, so that the space between the eyes does not look deeply-set like that of Red Nordids. The White Nordid nose corresponds to the well-known “Greek profile” of classic statues, except that these present a slight armenization, revealed by their forehead inclination and a slightly higher nasal bridge.

Ears: Thin, elongated.

Mouth: Thin and dark lips, with a clearly “sketched” outline. The philtrum (the medial cleft extending from the nose to the upper lip, dividing the moustache in two, also known as infranasal depression) is broad and clearly marked, in such a way that the central tips of the upper lip look separated and confer a slight “fed-up” expression, in the style of classic statues.

6-esHere, the individual has his eyebrows slightly raised. When relaxed, the superciliary arches form a T with the nose. This imaginary T has its horizontal lines turned slightly downwards (something similar to the shape of an arrow pointing upwards).

Teeth: Lined-up set of teeth, hardly much difference between the shapes and heights of each tooth.

Hair: Platinum blonde, almost white, straight, thin and lank. When it grows, it tends to stick to the head.

Body hair: Same colour as hair, very thin and sparse.

Skin: Ivory-white, clean appearance. Pale when no suntan is involved. Low levels of eumelanin and pheomelanin, but the White Nordid race has the MC1R gene activated and the skin is thus able to synthesize melanin so, unlike the Red Nordids that we’ll see later, this race can get a tan.

The White Nordid race is thus adapted to either letting the sunlight penetrate to the deeper layers of the skin (winter, pale skin) or to restrict its absorption (summer, suntanned). Unlike the Red Nordid race, which has undergone a more severe Arctic selection (they would be the real “ultra-Nordic” race) and has permanently lost the ability to produce melanin.

Skull: Dolichocephalic (long seen from the side, little width, narrow temples) and curvoccipital (highly convex occipital and parietal bones). This race has developed cranial capacity backwards and forwards.

Face profile: Not totally vertical but almost (forehead and chin scarcely receding). Straight and progressive (orthognathous, straight facial angle).

7-es This is not a perfectly caught profile (the individual is somewhat turned backwards and his face is looking slightly upwards) but it is very indicative.


Forehead: Straight, broad and almost vertical.

Jaw & chin: Harmonious and well-developed jaw. The chin is between the prominent and massive type of the Red Nordids and the retracted one of the Armenids, but closer to the RN model.

Other features: Facial features transmitting kindness, benevolence and balance. Neoteny: a very youthful appearance, maintained until a very advanced age (although not as much as the Red Nordids). Pale and golden image. Abundance of athletic and active women, attractive and of great beauty, which have resulted in a very high reproductive success of White Nordid maternal lineages. Distribution of White Nordids could be vaguely connected to the A blood type.

Paternal lineages (Y-DNA): I (I1, I1b, I2a, I2b, etc.). Valg believes that the I2 lineages could be Armenid and not White Nordid. (For a map of approximate distribution of paternal I lineages in Europe, click: here.)

Maternal lineages (mtDNA): U, K. Not all U sub-lineages are White Nordid in origin. We believe many of them (particularly the oldest ones) to be Armenid. (For a map of the K maternal lineage distribution in Europe click: here.)

Spirituality: Related to the sky. Worship of ancestors and fallen in combat. Cults of war and virility. Gods of justice, honour, war and order. Esteem for a short and glorious life, ended with a mors triumphalis or “triumphant death.”

Psychology, idiosyncrasy and racial character: Love for honour, attachment to order, respect for authority and seniority, warlike and military vocation, courage, altruism, loyalty, racism, heroism, self-control, discipline. Intelligence, thoughtfulness. Highly developed willpower, leaning to sports training. Eagerness to explore.

Also innocent, unable to cheat, and useless in diplomacy. This race is not shrewd, not because it lacks intelligence but due to an “angelical” way of understanding the world. This makes them vulnerable in a degraded and debased modern society, so that darker and more primitive racial types tend to take advantage of them. It’s the myth of the unworried and trusting Siegfried and the “stab in the back” archetype.

Distribution: The White Nordid race has its heartland in the Scandinavian countries (being Southern Sweden the purest core), and also in North America, Oceania, Great Britain, Netherlands, Germany and Poland. However, its heritage can be found in all Europe, both Americas, Middle East, Southern Asia, Siberia and North Africa.

5This map shows the distribution of White Nordid traits by country. Countries with larger quantity and/or purity of White Nordids are darker. Although this map is very general, it needs no further comments, everyone can recognize it in general terms. (It would be interesting to make this kind of maps by regions, not by countries, but it poses too many complications.)

Brief history: We think this race arose approximately 40,000 years ago, when most of Northern Europe was covered by ice. In that period, human groups gathered in geographical pockets of Southern Europe (especially in the Franco-Cantabrian region, the Balkans, and to a lesser extent, Italy and Eastern Europe), which were ice-free. We call this race “Nordid” because during the glaciations, temperatures were much colder on the entire planet. The Sahara was a fertile region, whereas Southern Europe was under pure Arctic conditions, very similar to present-day Northern Finland.

Haplogroups genetics indicates that White Nordids—associated with I haplogroups—mutated and therefore evolved from Armenid ancestors. The IJ lineage (that appeared 40,000 years ago), split in two parts, giving rise in the Near East to the J haplogroups (“Semitic”), and in Europe to I haplogroups, which resulted from Arctic natural selection and are dated in 25-30,000 years (see chart in the “evolution of lineages” section).

It is not exactly known which was the first Cro-Magnon culture, as many doubts linger as to whether the Gravettian culture belongs to Neanderthal man. The Aurignacian culture, on the contrary, does seem to be clearly Cro-Magnon. Either way, we should not confer excessive importance to material cultures. The simple fact of using the same lithic technique to make spearheads (or later on, pottery decoration) doesn’t make them all belong to the same people, but rather points to the spread of knowledge—cultural, not genetic, in nature. To consider all these people part of the same population on the basis of inanimate stones would be the same mistake as assuming that during the late 19th Century, the English and the Japanese belonged to the same people just because they had adopted the industrial-technological system.

During the Last Glacial Maximum (approximately 23-17,000 years ago) there must have been a high mortality rate, many communities probably became extinct, and no trace was left of the Gravettian and Aurignacian cultures. The Solutrean culture would flourish during these harsh millennia. As proof of the devastating effect of cold, the Solutrean territory was reduced—further to the South than its predecessors. The Solutrean-Clovis theory suggests that, during the Solutrean, the North-Eastern American coast was colonised by European Cro-Magnons, who sailed along the border of marine ice that connected Europe with North America.

At the end of the Würm Glaciation (10,000 BC), the polar icecaps melted, retreating northwards and causing a sharp rise on the sea level which flooded some Cro-Magnon territories, especially in the French Cantabrian regions that are now part of the coastal bed-continental platform (some references to floods found in ancient myths could come from this event). During this period of climatic change which marked the end of the Pleistocene and the beginning of the Holocene, the White Nordids in Northern Spain, Southern France, Belgium and Southern Germany, synonymous with the Magdalenian lithic culture and with Cro-Magnon man, migrated to the North (as hunters, chasing animal packs adapted to cold, but perhaps also fleeing from the floods), crossing France and gathering mainly in Holland, Denmark and the Scandinavian peninsula (which was united with the rest of the continent until at least 8,000 BC), the German-Polish Plain and the Baltic basin, and gradually sweeping into modern Belarus, Ukraine and Russia. Another land to be populated must have been Great Britain, which, unlike Ireland, remained joined to the European continent until after the Neolithic migrations. In these geographical spaces, the Mesolithic Maglemoisian culture thrived, and would be replaced over time by the Fosna-Hensbacka, Kongemose, Ertebøllian, Nøstvet-Lihult, Pitted Ware (still hunter-gatherers) and Funnelbeaker (Neolithic) cultures. These were societies with a clear seafaring vocation, dedicated mainly to navigation, fishing, hunting (especially marine mammals) and gathering. In many ways, they were precursors to the Viking societies that would flourish many millennia later. Some very convincing linguistic studies (such as The Indo-Europeans by Adriano Romualdi) prove that the mentioned territories should be regarded the homeland or Urheimat of the Indo-European languages.

Probably some communities remained in the ancestral Southern territories, being the main characters of Mesolithic (between Palaeolithic and Neolithic) horizons like the Azilian, Asturian, Geometrical Complex, Tardenoisian, Castelnovian or Sauveterian cultures. Something similar must have happened in the Balkans. It is not yet clear if the subsequent Megalithic culture is to be attributed to these residual White Nordic tribes, or to the new Red Nordid invaders (who arrived around the Neolithic), or to both of them.

After some mix with Red Nordid and, to a lesser extent, Armenid elements during the Neolithic and the age of metals, the WN race would be present in the great Indo-European invasions and in the expansion of patriarchal, aggressive, warlike, solar and “Olympic” cultures. As a redoubt of the original European hunter-gatherer heritage, there remained a White Nordid pocket in Germania and Scandinavia (not counting communities in other regions as the Balkans or the Canary Islands) wherein the Cro-Magnon human type stayed essentially unaltered until relatively recent times. We accept that the Germans of the Roman period, as described by Tacitus in Germania, where still pure or almost pure White Nordids, since according to the author:

For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities appear throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, fair hair, and huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. (Germania, IV).

These individuals’ descendants, crossed with Red Nordids and Armenids (and to a minor extent also Mongolids and Congids), gave rise to the modern Germanic populations, mostly brown-haired. Nowadays there are no 100% pure White Nordid blood cores. The only option in this regard would be biopolitics, biosocial engineering, and a positive eugenics program to rescue the hereditary information that remains, hidden and badly combined, in the genetic pool of the modern “white race.”

Present context: Among all original human races, the WN is the one that has at present larger quantities of completely pure individuals, partly because it is probably the youngest race, and partly because historically it has displayed more racism than other races. Although it is extremely hard to find highly pure White Nordids (the photographs we use as examples are real jewels of Physical Anthropology) the purest individuals and the largest proportion of them are to be found in Southern Sweden and south-Eastern areas of Norway, which matches roughly the distribution of the I1 haplogroup. However, numerically, we find more White Nordid blood in United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Holland, Great Britain, Germany and some countries of Eastern Europe like Poland, Belarus, Russia, Lithuania, Ukraine and others. Such people descend almost always from relatively recent Germanic waves, as the Barbarians, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans.

 

 

About Cro-Magnon man

Cro-Magnon is related to the White Nordid race and with ethnic groups like the blond Gouaches of the Canary Islands (mtDNA U6b1), and is the oldest Homo sapiens of the European continent. Cro-Magnon appears in Europe about 40,000 years ago, during the period known by the Hindus as Krita Yuga or Satya Yuga, equivalent to the Greco-Roman “Golden Age” concept.

Its origin is at present clear: today, no serious paleoanthropologist asserts that Cro-Magnon comes from Africa. The African hypothesis has not a solid foundation because, among other things, during a glaciation it makes no sense to migrate northwards, where the environmental conditions become harsher, but southwards. Keeping this in mind, Jean-François de Quatrefages believes the Cro-Magnons to have come from Siberia in pursuit of big mammals, like bisons and mammoths, while others, as is represented in the Currat & Excoffier simulation (here), believe Cro-Magnon’s ancestors came from the Near East, entering Europe through the Danube corridor.

This last theory is consistent with Cro-Magnon’s almost certain membership of the IJ lineage (which at that time was located in the Near East, i.e., a region whose nomadic tribes have always tended to penetrate Europe through the Balkans’ “geopolitical magnet,” just like the Red Nordids and Armenids would do later), and with the high levels of I paternal lineages found nowadays in the Balkans (with record frequencies amongst the Croatian population of Bosnia). It also coincides with the fact that the first most likely Homo sapiens archaeological sites within our continent are precisely located in South-Eastern Europe (like Peştera cu Oase in Romania, dated back to 41,000 years). The entrance in Europe may not have taken place through the Danube corridor. Cro-Magnon’s ancestors might have crossed the Caucasus going along the Black Sea and sweeping over Ukraine before they arrived in Romania. This theory would be supported by the Gravettian sites found in Moldova, and by some indications suggesting some maternal U haplogroups could have crossed the Caucasus.

This map shows (red) the most probable route taken by Cro-Magnon and/or his ancestors to enter Europe. Another possibility includes a migration coming from the Caucasus, crossing Southern Ukraine and Moldova, bumping into the Carpathian Mountains and then heading towards the South, which would eventually lead them into the Danubian corridor. Most Cro-Magnon archaeological sites are located in territories classified here as steppes or tundra. Most likely, Cro-Magnons remained in these territories because the game (macrofauna such as mammoths, bisons, aurochs, etc.) was much better than in the Southern forests. Furthermore, the distribution of the hunter-gatherer sites of the European Palaeolithic does not lead to a Southern origin at all.

The reason why Cro-Magnon can be related neither to the Red Nordid race nor to the R1b lineage is that during the period that Cro-Magnon appears in Europe, the K haplogroup (early precursor of R), was to be found nothing less than in Central Asia. Although a genetic analysis of the Cro-Magnon’s Y-DNA hasn’t been performed so far (Y-DNA decays faster over time than mtDNA), the scientific community accepts today that the only reasonable candidate for the Cro-Magnon paternal lineage and most of the hunter-gatherers of the European Upper Palaeolithic, is the IJ haplogroup, wherefrom the I haplogroup split off. It is then clear that the Cro-Magnons where an ethnic group of the White Nordid race, which evolved from Armenid ancestors (as a remote possibility, from Khoisanid ancestors, as we are not totally sure whether the IJ was already Armenid or if the armenization of the lineage took place later and only in the K haplogroup branch). It is possible that some genetic contributions of the European Neanderthal race passed on to the White Nordid genetic pool, just like the Eastern Neanderthal race was present in the origins of the Armenid race.

If we look at the skull reproduced below, we will essentially see White Nordid features: dolichocephalism, a not totally vertical forehead, squared jaw, sharp chin (a well-developed chin is a relatively recent evolutionary feature) and a tall stature. With regards to Cro-Magnon’s broad face and the heftiness of this type when compared to modern White Nordids, there is a simple explanation: Cro-Magnon’s nutrition consisted of fresh products obtained from hunting, fishing and gathering—in other words, he had a hunter-gatherer diet, or paleodiet, which is by far the most complete form of nutrition. This diet, along with a more natural and healthy lifestyle, builds a stronger skeletal consistency, a higher muscular development and a wider face than the later cereal-based diet imported from the Near East during the Neolithic, which tends to blur sexual dimorphism (morphological difference between male and female). In his interesting study Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, Weston A. Price shows that people with “primitive” diets develop perfect dental arches and above all, have wide faces and a healthy appearance, whereas people feeding on “modern” processed food develop uneven teeth and narrow faces, let alone general health deterioration.

8-esThis treasure or Palaeoanthropology is the skull of Cro-Magnon 1. It dates back to 30,000 years, yet his features and cranial capacity place him way ahead most modern Homo sapiens from an evolutionary viewpoint. The more robust constitution and the square jaw of Cro-Magnon are due to a nutrient-dense Palaeolithic diet which promotes optimal skeletal mineralization and bone density. Other morphological differences with the modern White Nordid race (large nose with a low nasal bridge) could hint towards the existence of various Cro-Magnon varieties, of which only the correspondent to the White Nordid race has survived until our days.

Aurignacian culture was pretty much like an empire. The lithic industry was identical from Eastern Europe to the Iberian Peninsula. The Solutrean was a lesser culture, for it took place during the Glacial Maximum which must have dramatically reduced the population, driving them southward. The Magdalenian was the last great hunter-gatherer culture of the European Palaeolithic, and the tendency its communities would follow during the end of the ice age, could already be foreseen: heading towards the Northeast, crossing France in direction to Friesland, the German-Polish plain and Scandinavia.

 

 

Reflections on the White Nordid race

The White Nordid race, even before being identified as such, has been taken in many cases (the classical era, the Renaissance, neoclassicism, German Nazism) as a prototype and an ideal-goal to achieve. Hence, it is not out of place to provide various reflections, some of which may also apply to the Red Nordid race.

The culture of predation and meat. Thriving in an environment similar to modern Finland, Cro-Magnon culture was, out of pure necessity, “the” hunter culture par excellence (spearheads, arrowheads, richly decorated spear throwers, harpoons, assegais, cave paintings filled with hunting scenes, whistles, horse head figures). For this reason, we should imagine them living a life of violent and constant physical activity outdoors. This developed them as an athletic, graceful, gymnastic human type, and when the climatic conditions got milder, this probably became more apparent. It is in the Cro-Magnon communities of Spain, France and the Balkans where we have to look for the origin of Greek athletic traditions like races, javelin throwing, hunting, fighting and archery.

Because of the environment they inhabited, gathering was reduced to its minimum, whereas hunting and fishing were preponderant together with a massive intake of animal fats and proteins. In turn, hunting pre-eminence is closely connected to predatory and masculine behaviour and psychology. (For more information on the evolutionary effects of this diet see Evropa Soberana’s article in Spanish on the carnivorous revolution).

9-es

Cro-Magnon reconstruction,
American Museum of Natural History.

 

Ethnic conflicts

Undoubtedly, the White Nordid Cro-Magnon had territorial conflicts with reproductive communities of other races. The first race they came into conflict with was the Neanderthal, which had been around in the European continent for 200,000 years and had evolved from earlier populations, such as Homo heidelbergensis. The sudden disappearance of the Neanderthal (the theory of “extinction by climate change” is very feeble because Neanderthals had already survived climate change—the Riss-Würm interglacial period—, and they became “extinct” in the middle of the ice age, 16 millennia before the deglaciation) suggests that both races waged an arm-wrestle (something completely normal in Nature when two different groups compete for the same territory) in which finally the Cro-Magnon triumphed. Without doubt, some interbreeding must have taken place between both races in Europe (apart from the mixes in the Near East, which are already proven genetically), as hybrid craniums have been identified. In any case, it is possible that there was a minor European Neanderthal contribution to the development of the White Nordid race.

10-esTwo great human races that undertook a real titans’ duel on European soil. The Neanderthal (left) had been in Europe for 200,000 years. He had overcome both glacial and interglacial periods successfully and occupied a territory spanning from Portugal to Central Asia. Despite his fabulous environmental adaptation, when Cro-Magnon (right) showed up, it took Neanderthal only a few millennia to become extinct—suggesting that Cro-Magnon set very high standards in the territorial struggle.

Nevertheless, Cro-Magnon’s struggles did not end with Neanderthal’s “disappearance,” as it has been proven by mtDNA traces that other races entered Europe, specifically the Khoisanid and the Congid. The statuettes of steatopygic Venuses (steatopygia is a very common deformation in certain African khoisanized ethnicities) bear witness of such a presence, as well as some cave paintings similar to those found in Khoisanid Africa. The Congid contribution to Europe is visible in some unmistakably “negroid” skulls found in Italy and Southern France—like Grimaldi man.

Despite being cases of race-mixing during the European Palaeolithic, the fact that nowadays there are still some pure White Nordids means that there were entire clans free from foreign genetic influences. (We have to keep in mind that the Palaeolithic must have been the most racist and ethnocentric era in human history.)

 

Acquisition of Nordid traits was very fast—possible causes of this accelerated evolution

Geneticists believe that 850,000 years (!) of isolation and segregated selection to be necessary for the development of the extraordinary White Nordid phenotypic traits (and this also applies to the Red Nordids). There are several plausible explanations for this unprecedented case of “accelerated evolution”:

a) This 800,000-year distance was cut down and sped up in time due to the fact that a strict conscious self-selection reigned among the White Nordid ancestors. This kind of selection intentionally tended to promote and increase only the genetic traits they wanted the future generations to carry. This race (as well as probably the Red Nordid) could have had leaders who watched over the quality of the stock and who submitted their people to a strict upwards evolutionary regime, similar to what a stockbreeder does with his flock. Also, the community itself would have been strongly aware of their evolutionary role.

b) A great relevance of sexual selection [4], besides the natural selection working under the rigors of an Arctic climate; although that does not suffice to explain by itself the fast evolution of the Nordic races. Even so, it seems difficult that a race like the WN has arisen randomly and by chance: it seems to be the result of a “directed evolution.”

c) The White Nordid ancestors acquired their traits due to a mix with an unknown race. It is possible that the modern, pure WN has part of the genetic contribution of a European Neanderthal race.

d) The existence of “benign viruses” within the reproductive community. A virus is simply an infectious agent (it is unclear whether they should be regarded as living beings) with an interesting geometrical morphology and that, despite having its own DNA, lacks the autonomy and the “machinery” to replicate it and thus is unable to reproduce alone. It needs to enter other organisms to use their cellular replication “machinery.” Afterwards, it can inject its DNA in portions of the host’s genome and infect another individual, repeating the same process. The virus itself can mutate and evolve through these processes, as it takes different portions of the genome of different hosts. It is necessary to remember that there are millions of viruses in Nature and that most living beings are carriers of diverse viruses which are totally harmless for them, and whose role is unknown to a large extent because Science hasn’t yet paid much attention to them. That a virus ends up killing its host is an anomaly, since the most affected is the virus himself, which looses the genetic means to reproduce and survive. Most viruses are, if not beneficial, totally neutral; they just transport and transform DNA from one place to another. Today it is clear that viruses are an important natural means of horizontal genetic transference, and that they greatly increase genetic diversity [5]—producing an ample amount of traits over which natural selection then acts to multiply only the advantageous ones. However, the most important role of viruses is to force their carriers to develop genetic adaptations to them. In a reproductive community subjected to natural selection and carrier of a certain pathogenic virus, every genome unable to develop congenital resistance against it would die out—in one phrase, the alleles (variants of a same gene) which are advantageous to fight a certain infection, get promoted thanks to natural selection. From then on, the survivors will be carriers of the virus they have adapted to. Thus the virus has improved the reproductive community’s environmental adaptation, killing off those who were not up to the circumstances and turning into another of those “harmless” viruses (only for the community) but with an important evolutionary role in the past. “Instinctive racism,” or phobia to physical contact with other reproductive communities, might be motivated by the intuitive fear of being infected with other viruses one is not adapted to. It must not be forgotten that all the gestures of sharing skin and breath, from a pat in the back to a sexual relation (and shaking hands, hugging, kissing, caressing, etc.) are potential methods for interchanging viruses and therefore genetic material to a certain extent. In fact, if viruses had an important role in human evolution, we can imagine the catastrophe of mixing, through usual physical contact with other reproductive communities, “tribal viruses” that encouraged opposed adaptations (e.g. glacial vs. tropical or desertic).

e) Another factor that, in my opinion, is underestimated in human evolution is the common spirit and will at a community level, generation after generation, but obviously there is no scientific evidence to prove it or even hint at this factor.

f) A combination of all or some of the previous points.

 

Consequences of the deglaciation

The evolutionary effects of cold are treated in my article “Los misterios del hielo: efectos evolutivos de la glaciación.” We know that 12,000 years ago, the ice age ended, the Pleistocene gave way to the Holocene and the Palaeolithic to the Mesolithic. Nevertheless, the thaw did not result only in the migration of the WN northwards: it also brought about a series of changes that somehow heralded the advent of civilization.

11-es

Possibly the most evolved human type ever to have lived on Earth: Cro-Magnon 1

To begin with, the climate change took the White Nordids out of the environment they were adapted to. Although they travelled towards Northern Europe, this would no longer be the land of steppes, tundra and frosty plans they had known before, but of densely wooded areas with milder temperatures. The fauna likewise changed: mammoths died out and megafauna was replaced by more modest creatures, with thinner layers of body fat. Furthermore, with the replacement of ice by boreal forests, the supply of vegetable products increased enormously. This entails that the gatherer role (associated with women) rose, while the prestige and dependence on the hunting role (associated with men) fell. The combination of climatic, nutritional and lifestyle variations must have had a pronounced metabolic and psychological change that brought the harsh Palaeolithic world to an end; enhanced social feminization and predisposed whole communities to the advent of civilization and more crowded, herbivorous and populous ways of social life.

Despite this process, hunting was kept until very recently as a tradition within the social elites. The subsequent historical record of Indo-European tribes (being the Vikings a very notable and recent case), as well as the presence of hunting deities, proves that predation was still deeply embedded in the psyche of these ethnic groups.

 

 

Central-Asian Red Nordid race

(from now on, Red Nordid race or RN)

 
C1

This man, from Southern England, is a pure Red Nordid. Noticeable traits are orange hair, spare eyebrows, very dark-blue eyes and a completely red skin.

Nose with a low nasal bridge and a fleshy tip. Squared features, prone to gain body mass. Notice a harder, broader, more robust and “en bloc” facial complexion than the White Nordid. If the WN inspires certain serenity, lightness and gracefulness, the RN inspires restlessness, impulsiveness, brutality, aggressiveness and explosive force, as well as a higher tendency to tyranny and abruptness. It is also a more passionate, less agile, les ethereal and more dense race than the White Nordid, with a stronger character and temperament, as well as more muscular strength. Presumably higher testosterone levels and more attachment to Nature—which could have driven them to develop natural medicine and body knowledge.

Stature: Medium-low.

Constitution: Massive and compact. Strong and broad bones. Prone to gain body mass (muscle or fat, depending on conditions). Short and powerful legs. Short, strong and wide neck.

Eyes: Wide. Dark navy blue, small pupils, middle distance between eyes. Big sockets. Straight, horizontal, very sparse and almost white eyebrows. Less pronounced supraorbital arches than White Nordids.

Nose: Shorter, wider, more rounded and in general, fleshier than the WN. The key of the Red Nordid nose is, in addition to its fleshy tip, that its “root” is not located between the eyebrows but lower, so that it is “deep set” between the eyes. The nose has thus a less vertical, lower, more compact, aggressive and forward-projected appearance when looked from the side.

Ears: Thinner and smaller than the White Nordid ones.

Mouth: Extremely thin and narrow lips. Narrow philtrum. The outline of the lips is not clearly defined, nor differenced from the rest of the skin, as in the WN case. Big mouth.

• Teeth: Lined-up set of teeth, smaller differences in height and shape than in WN. When mixed with Armenids, the separation between teeth tends to increase. This can be due to the heredity of a big, spacious mouth which cannot be fully “filled” by Armenid teeth. Probably C-shaped dental arch.

• Hair: Orange, straight. Tends to stand up instead of falling.

• Body hair: Medium-scarce, although in mixes with Armenids hair turns very dense, especially if some congization is added to the mix. Bushy sideburns and goatee.

• Skin: In pure RN, the MC1R gene is deactivated, so unlike pure WN they’re unable to produce melanin. Very high levels of pheomelanin. Red, rosy and bloody skin. In mixes with other races, the bloody appearance tends to retreat to the face—and on the face itself onto cheeks, ears and under the eyes. People with a tendency to blush (be it of anger, heat or embarrassment) have RN contributions, as well as higher risk of skin diseases when exposed to the Sun. This is because they descend from ancestors who almost never received sunlight exposition due to their necessity of protecting themselves from the cold with animal skins.

• Skull: Brachycephalic, flattened occipital bone but prominent temporal bones. Larger cranial capacity and broader face than the WN race. This race has developed its cranial volume forwards (frontal bone) and sideward (temporal bones).

C2Pure Red Nordids have planoccipital cranium and this, in combination with the width of their temporal bones (temples) makes them the brachycephalic race par excellence, responsible for the cranial type previously known as “Alpine.” They also usually have strong nuchal muscles and tend to accumulate fat around the cervical (neck) area.

Face profile: Very vertical, ultra progressive and very straight (orthognathous, very open-obtuse facial angle), more than the WN race.

• Forehead: Very high, straight and vertical. Again, more than in White Nordids.

• Jaw & chin: Strong, squared, broad and robust jaw. Prominent and sharp chin which seems to end in a fleshy ball.

• Other features: Accelerated metabolism, very active blood circulation. Neoteny: very youthful look, whose freshness is even better preserved than in White Nordids. Tendency to perspiration and sweating.

Higher sensitivity to pain (see here). Redheads usually need more anaesthesia (about 20% more, though this can also be due to a faster metabolization) than the rest of persons. This fits well with the idea that the RN lost skin pigmentation and toughness by protecting themselves with animal skins, which ended up making their skin tissues look like subcutaneous tissues, losing their hardness. Other studies suggest higher sensitivity to thermal pain and lower sensitivity to electric pain.

Higher lactose and alcohol tolerance than any other race, what would lead us to think that Red Nordids were the first ones to consume milk and alcoholic beverages, as well as cattle meat. (Here it is worth mentioning that what is now sold in supermarkets is anything but proper “milk”.)

Freckles are not a Red Nordid inheritance, neither are they of any other pure race. They are common in Red Nordids mixed with Armenised White Nordids. We must remember that freckles (as well as spots) are little marks appearing due to higher eumelanin or pheomelanin concentrations. Fair-milky skin, unable to synthesize melanin, does not correspond with a pure racial type either, but with a mix Red Nordid + White Nordid, with a RN predominance.

Armenized RN have their orange hair get darker, turning to red and then auburn, while when mixed with White Nordids they have a sandy, somewhat flaming hair colour.

Green eyes are not an asset of any pure race either, but of mixes: green eyes are really low-pigmentation brown eyes (the same applies to amber eyes) mixed with grey and blue eyes. We have already seen that green corresponds to a “little active” OCA2 gene, while blue and especially grey, are the result of a “deactivated” OCA2.

• Paternal lineages (Y-DNA): R (R1a, related to Slavs and Aryans, and R1b, the predominant haplogroup in Western Europe). R2 is also probably Red Nordid in origin. There is a possibility that all these lineages are Armenid. In such case, other possible candidates to paternal RN lineages are I2b1 and G.

This map shows the lineage R1a frequency per regions—linked to Slavic and Aryan tribes. Notice that the largest concentrations of this haplogroup occur in places like Poland, Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, considered the Urheimat of the Slavic peoples. There is an abrupt decrease in R1a concentration in countries (Serbia, Bulgaria) that, despite being of Slavic heritage, came into contact with other tribes (Illyrians, Byzantines, etc., while Thracians and Dacians were probably of I stock) and lived under the Ottoman Empire. In this context, see the difference between Croatia and Bosnia, or between Ukraine and Romania. The few R1a contributions in Spain may have come along with the Alans and with the later Slavic mercenaries employed by the Córdoba Caliphate, as well as with Moors with Persian heritage, at least on their father’s lines. Another interesting detail is the R1a frequency in countries like Syria or Iran, which were under Persian dominion and therefore received a significant Iranian flow. This map shows R1a distribution in Eurasia. The highest R1a concentrations are to be found amongst the Brahmin castes of some Northern Indian regions. This map shows R1b distribution in Europe.

• Maternal lineages (mtDNA): HV, H, V. Probably not all HV descendants are Red Nordid, many of them can be Armenid. This map approximate shows maternal H lineage distribution. Radiating from Spain, this haplogroup gets gradually lost as we move southwards and eastwards from the Iberian Peninsula.

Spirituality: Connected to Nature. Fire cult. Worship of the spirits of water, air, fire and Earth. Plenty of “phallic” constructions related to heavenly bodies. This race seems more gifted for esoteric and “magic” issues than the WN. Gods of the Earth, vegetation, waters, homes and families.

Psychology, idiosyncrasy and racial character: Love for Nature, patriotism, attachment to the homeland, intelligence, impulsiveness, unpredictable personality, prone to fits of fury and sudden uprisings, proclivity to excesses in violence matters, but also to overwhelming joy. Traditional Western medicine considered redheads as “blood” tempered individuals, whereas the ancient Indian Ayurvedic medicine describes them as being Pitta types (associated with fire; this also proves that ginger hair was not unknown in India and that there were redheads during the Indo-Aryan migration). Strength, roughness, fierceness, very developed character, individualism, strong temperament, good memory. This is doubtlessly the race of passion, fire, anger, extremism and even of some cruelty.

A more noisy and Dionysian personality than the White Nordids, which is one of the reasons why Spaniards usually say that they fit better with the Irish (which have a great Red Nordid heritage) than with populations with a larger cultural and genetic White Nordic imprint that are more serious—like Englishmen, Germans or Scandinavians.

On the basis of evidence in archaeological sites and mummies, as well as descriptions of Scottish Picts (which were probably of Red Nordid heritage), it seems this race was inclined toward tattoos (even in the face) and corporal paintings, utilizing a blue pigment called woad in Scotland.

Distribution: This race has its purest stronghold in Scotland and Northern England. In Spain, from a physical-anthropological point of view, the purest R1b-Red Nordid core is located in Navarre and sub-Pyrenean areas of Aragon. There is not a known pure R1a core as happens with R1b.

As a matter of interest, the distribution and abundance of redheads could be vaguely related to blood types 0 and -Rh, frequent in Western Europe and decreasing the further eastwards we move.

15 Red Nordid genetics distribution per country. Countries with larger quantity and/or purity of Red Nordids are darker. White Nordid distribution is pretty clear and needs no further explanation, but this map does require it. First, there are also deep RN infiltrations in Africa. For instance, in Northern Cameroon there is an extraordinary quantity of paternal R1b lineages, although they are obviously (as in the case of mixed South Americans) extremely mixed. Second, and probably most striking, is the presence of Red Nordid genetics in Eastern Asia, but it is not so hard to believe if we remember the tendencies that some of these populations have towards fair skins and blushing, especially Japanese, Manchu, Uyghur and Korean types, in opposition to Vietnamese and Cantonese types. And third, we must also remember the cases of red-haired mummies found in China—which confirm an ancient European penetration in that land—and the presence of ancient R1a lineages in Western Mongolia.

Brief history: The Red Nordid race is probably around 50,000-30,000 years old. For the moment, it seems clear that the R haplogroups stem from one or two Armenid lineages by mutation and evolution (see chart in the “Evolution of lineages” section). Most likely, the glacial mountain ranges in Central Asia (e.g., Altai, Hindu Kush, Tien-Shan, Pamir, Kunlun or Sayan) acted as natural barriers, blocking reproductive communities who were escaping southwards from the cold, and thus imprisoning them in a confined geographic pocket with a tremendously hostile climatology, though with excellent hunting game.

From the Armenid P haplogroup, the Q as well as the R haplogroups derived. Such lineages originated in Siberia-Central Asia, from where the Q headed eastwards until they crossed the Bering straight and colonised America. The R ones headed south and westwards and gave rise to the R1 and R2 haplogroups (around Afghanistan). R2 remained in India, while R1 split into R1a lineage (towards the steppes of Southern Russia) and the R1b (towards Mesopotamia).

Ydna-of-R

Y-DNA phylogenetic tree of the Red Nordid race. It is hard to determine with certainty which was the first RN haplogroup, though it was probably R. If it was P, the Q haplogroup would also be Red Nordid and the armenization and mongolization would have appeared later due to mixing. It is also possible that these haplogroups were originally “pseudo-Red.” Valg considers G to be another possible candidate to RN lineage. We leave open the question mark as to whether the Denisovan hominin had something to do in the conformation of the RN racial type. The same can be said about the Central Asian Neanderthal race. Another interrogation is the apparent physical-anthropological link between Red Nordids and certain ethnic groups carrying the D haplogroup (Andaman Islands, Ainu, Tibet—we will see this in a future article) that suggests a possible genetic interchange in the distant past, before the rise of the Red Nordid race.

R1a spread through the Russian steppes and Eastern Europe, creating pastoralist societies like Yamna (or Yamnaya), Poltovka and the Volga battle-axe culture. Subsequently, the Sintashta-Petrovka and Andronovo cultures would flourish. Afterwards, with the Aryan invasions (and already with White Nordid and Armenid contributions), the R1a societies would expand through the Middle East and other regions of Asia. R1a is associated with Slavic, Aryan and Indo-Aryan populations.

R1b’s history is rather more complex. After its long journey across the Middle East, R1b carriers entered the Danube corridor from Anatolia. In Europe, the former hunting territories of the Cro-Magnon communities (with the exception perhaps of the Bosnian-Croatian zone) were deserted. The White Nordid race, identified with Cro-Magnon man, the archaeological Magdalenian culture and I1 haplogroups, had moved north with the thaw. R1b, thus, occupied the Franco-Cantabrian pocket (probably also another Central European one, from which the Halstatt culture and the Celts arose, already with WN and Armenid contributions) and subsequently settled throughout Western Europe, coming into contact with White Nordids and mixing with them.

This map shows the “glacial refuges” theory. According to it, R1b rose in northern Spain, I in the Balkans and R1a in Southern Russia, and all of these populations simply moved north during the deglaciation, colonizing all Europe. This theory has become obsolete.

18This map shows the R1b migratory route, from its origin as R1b around current Afghanistan, through all the Middle East, until its arrival in Western Europe. R1b probably had an important role in the rise of the Neolithic (especially stockbreeding) and sending through Africa a lost migration to north Cameroon, where some ethnic groups still preserve surprising Red Nordid traits. The R1b1b1 projection to China is also interesting. Not all R1b migrations in Europe were Danubian, some took place through the Mediterranean coast, by land and by cabotage navigation. To explain the R1a journey, we should think in an arrow starting in the original R1 homeland [orange is seen if you click on the map for close-up] and ending in a multiplication zone between the north of the Black Sea and the north of the Caspian Sea. From there, and already carrying WN contributions (Archaeogenetics has proven the presence of maternal U haplogroups in European Russia since the Palaeolithic), the R1a lineage extended westwards to Poland, and eastwards through the Kazakhstan steppes to the Kashmir region. From there, a branch (Aryans) would head to Iran giving rise to the Persian civilization, while the other branch (Indo-Aryans) would end up in the Indus, where it destroyed the cities of the Indus civilization (mainly L and R2 haplogroups) and established the Vedic culture.

We doubt whether it was the Red or White Nordids who played the predominant role in the Megalithic culture (Stonehenge, Carnac, etc.). What is clear is the decisive influence they had in France, Spain (in its Celtiberian element), Britain, Phoenicia and Palestine, North Africa and also, very mixed with Armenids, in ancient Egypt (see Evropa Soberana’s article on Egypt and compare Karnak to Carnac). We believe that the Basque culture and language, despite having possible Finno-Ugric contributions, is probably the last cultural vestige of the Red Nordid race.

Mixed with White Nordids and Armenids, the Red Nordid blood was present in the formation of India, Persia [see also Evropa Soberana's absolutely fascinating pics within a couple of articles here and here], Greece and Rome. Its heritage is to be found in distant areas such as Eastern Siberia, Mongolia (Genghis Khan was a redhead with blue eyes, significant amounts of R1b and Red traits in present day Mongolia), China (red-haired mummies, residual Red Nordid traits in many modern Chinese), North America (the Si-te-cah, previous to the arrival of the later “mongoloids”), South America (red-haired mummies) and even the Easter Island (documented by Thor Heyerdahl).

• Present context: The Red Nordid race corresponds to the hefty, short, brachycephalic and ruddy human type. They are known as daring people, with a strong temperament and prone to outbursts and impulses in general. The Red Nordid heritage is well known in Scotland, Ireland, Wales, England, United States, Canada, Norway, Australia and New Zealand. There is much Red Nordid blood in Spain, yet it is rather more diluted than in the previously mentioned places. Even though, cases of men with reddish shades in the beard are very common. The same happens in all the Middle East. It can be said that this race constitutes the foundations of the Celtic heritage nations in Western Europe. The purest Red Nordid core is to be found in the British Isles, Norway, Iceland to a lesser extent and those countries (United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand) which hosted people coming from these lands.

 

 

Reflections on the Red Nordid race

At present times, a racially pure individual is always very striking, no matter which race he belongs to. However, the ones who stand out the most are the pure Red Nordids, with their orange hair, bright red skin, corpulence and incandescent appearance. It is very significant that the glacial ices gave rise to a fiery human type, so I will provide some ideas about this peculiar race.

 

“The” Nordic race par excellence

(Note: Valg does not consider the Nordic origin of the RN an absolute certainty.) It is impossible to locate ourselves in the RN race context if we don’t think about the environment they inhabited. We are talking about Central Asia (Southern Siberia or ex-Soviet republics) during the Würm Glaciation, that is, similar conditions to present day Greenland, yet with a strong continental environment as an aggravating factor. (The geopolitical Heartland of Eurasia, the geographic centre furthest from any coast especially during the ice age, was located when the sea level was 120 metres / 400 feet below the present level.) Under these conditions, having the slightest patch of melanin was probably the worst of curses. In plain language, this race had a hard time with heat and sunlight. It must be emphasised that the Red Nordid race is “more Nordic” than the White Nordid. This variety either lived longer under Arctic conditions, or the conditions (probably Siberia, Central Asia) were tougher than those suffered by the WN (Europe). Red Nordids represent cold adaptation taken to its extreme. Thus, the White Nordid race is in many aspects between Armenids and Red Nordids. For instance, the WN has not developed such a prominent jaw, nor such a strong skeleton, nor such spare eyebrows, nor certainly such a short stature, as the RN race. Also, WN were in the process of eumelanin-depigmentation (they are still able to get a tan), but the RN are directly unable to produce melanin and, instead, they have extremely high levels of pheomelanin.
 

A reduced, decimated and isolated clan

An important idea we have about this race is that, in its origin, it must have been made up by an extremely reduced community, maybe about a few hundred individuals, highly bonded to each other, geographically concentrated, constantly hounded by the elements and thus about to perish in many occasions, so that everyone had to pay the terrible toll imposed by the cold, some with the death of their lineage and some with a permanent biological adaptation to the new conditions.

Because of their current complexion, it is reasonable to think they spent most of the time inside shelter-caves (legends about subterranean cities or Shangri-La, found throughout Central Asia, like Shamballah or Agarthi, could come from this), and that they developed great muscular strength and a tradition of toughness, stubbornness—relentlessly facing the elements and all kinds of adverse conditions. Likewise, Red Nordids are well adapted to alpinism.

This constant harassment by the environment must have sharpened their inventiveness to manipulate the means at their disposal, preparing them for the advent of technology. It is also likely that the first Red Nordid community, after its formation, did not mate individuals from other ethnic groups in tens of thousands of years—again in contrast with Cro-Magnons, who surely came into contact with other racial communities (by interbreeding and fighting), as they were more geographically scattered than Red Nordids.

 

The ills of the thaw

The deglaciation must have had a very remarkable effect on the Red Nordid race. It was not only the climate change, but also that many RN clans (especially R1b) started to settle regions (Middle East) where the environmental conditions were radically different from those they were adapted to, in contrast with the White Nordid I1 branch that moved northwards. Due to their vulnerability to warmth and sun, we believe the Red Nordids to be the first ones who used clothes that covered their entire body, including their faces, as well as garments intended to protect them—e.g. turbans and veils.

Similarly, milk and alcohol consumption and the subsequent introduction of cereals (an inferior food compared to the hunter-gatherer diet, and whose adoption responded to the requirements of overpopulation and/or hunger) and the sudden rise in temperature (not only because of the deglaciation, but also due to the movement of these communities to southern regions) brought about obesity, a very common illness among Red Nordids, though this characteristic tends to get out of control with racial mixes.

Cold consumes many calories and this race was adapted to a plainly gelid environment, where the accumulation of a moderate amount of fat helped them to survive. When cold stopped all those calories remained unburnt, and when we add to the equation starchy foods with a high glycemic index, alcohol and racial mixing (not to talk about the new sedentary lifestyle), obesity is the result. We have to bear in mind that the human being is made to obtain most of his energy from fat. This is particularly true in the North, where animal fat intake must have been through the roof. When starches substituted fat and natural sugars (e.g. honey, fruit or wild berries) as the main energy source, the immediate effect was that the body lost the capacity to burn fat. High insulin levels (at the expense of growth hormone, which promotes fat burning apart from skeletal and muscular consistency), insulin resistance (and other related ills, such as diabetes) and obesity, were the inevitable result of this bad step, particularly in those reproductive communities most adapted to burning fat as their primary energy source.

The psychological imbalance produced by subjecting this people to mild temperatures cannot be underestimated. They started protecting themselves from the cold, and ended protecting themselves from the heat. They did well in occupying Europe, but this race will never achieve inner balance and harmony unless exposed again to strong Arctic conditions, where snow rarely disappears. Canada, Iceland, Greenland, Northern Scandinavia, and Siberia, as well as the extreme South American Cone, would be the most suitable regions for them—and even so, this is probably not even close to the Siberian conditions of the Würm Glaciation.

 

Medicine and body alchemy

Red Nordids are probably the main ancestors of yoga, magic, sexual metaphysics and inner cultivation systems. In India, these issues are previous to the Indo-Aryan invasion, which could mean they date back to the R2 lineage, which, together with the L lineage (probably Armenid or pseudo-White) led the development of the Indus civilization before the arrival of the Aryans (who carried the R1a lineage, but already had significant White Nordid contributions, acquired in Eastern Europe). The original Red Nordids might have developed these methods (especially breathing control, breath retention and cellular respiration) in order to generate inner heat in that cold environment, as well as to prevent their body from stiffening up and atrophying due to joint damages and the lack of flexible and fluid movements (in Europe, Cro-Magnon probably kept these functions fit thanks to the intense activity he naturally had in his daily life, though it should not be ruled out that he also had his “tricks”). This tradition, gathered during millennia, is probably the origin of the detailed knowledge about the human body and spirit that certain Eastern religions (Taoism, Hinduism or Buddhism) display.

Because of the deep body awareness and consciousness that this presumably implied, Red Nordids could have acquired important medicine knowledge and, at present, they seem to manifest an innate inclination towards this kind of discipline. The connection of Red Nordids with medicinal and “magic” systems might have echoed in Medieval Europe, when redheaded women were considered more prone to “witchcraft” than the rest.

 

Neolithic civilization and the Great Mother

Now it seems evident that the journey of the R1b lineages throughout the Near East played a crucial role in the expansion of the Neolithic. The overlay of a Red Nordid social stratum over an older Armenid (and Congid, Mongolid, etc.) could have been what gave rise to civilization.

A sign that hints in this direction is the Göbekli Tepe sanctuary, a complex built by a hunter-gatherer society in present-day Turkey 11,000 years ago, and thus before the appearance of agriculture. Human representations found there (statues and statuettes) seem to depict an essentially Red Nordid tribe. That would confirm the presence of R1b lineages roving through the Middle East before entering Europe. This statue found in Göbekli Tepe and sculpted about 11,000 years ago by hunter-gatherers, has Red Nordid features, like planoccipitaly. A little Dea Mater (the well-known fat Mother-Goddess) statuette has also been found, that displays some Red Nordid traits. Although the Magna Mater or Great Mother is a religious archetype that sinks its roots in the Palaeolithic times (including European Palaeolithic), the RN race could have been particularly devoted to the Mother archetype.

 

The problem of the Red Nordid ancestors

In the same way that Cro-Magnon is related to the WN race and the Eastern Neanderthal with the Armenids, it could be possible that the recently discovered Denisova hominin (South Siberia), or some other Central Asian hominid, could have something to do in the development of the RN race. Central Asia was inhabited by different hominid types (Denisova, Neanderthal, Sapiens); a certain degree of crossbreeding must have taken place. The problem of finding precursors of the RN race is the region, extremely vast and scarcely populated and explored. In densely populated Western Europe, archaeological sites are frequently found (many of them, like Atapuerca, by sheer chance). However, Central Asia is an immense region, poorly communicated, barely populated, hardly civilised (and therefore hardly excavated), and overwhelmed with geopolitical instabilities and conflict threats. Moreover, we are talking about a race that probably lived strongly bonded in some places; the number of sites must be very reduced.

Because of this, the archaeological remains of the Red Nordid ancestors haven’t yet been found, but if researches direct their efforts towards Siberia and Central Asia (like the team that found the Denisovan hominin in the Altai mountains), they will likely find these remains sooner or later. The Shangri-La or sites belonging to this race must be between the former polar caps limit and the northern face of mountain chains such as Altai, Hindu Kush, Tien-Shan, Pamir, Kunlun, Sayan and the so-called Kazakh Shield among others. This yields territories belonging to Siberia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Xinjiang, Tajikistan and Kirghizstan, and the sources of rivers like the Irtysh and the Ob. We could also consider the Sibirische Tasche (Palaeolithic Siberian pocket) that anthropologist E. F. von Eickstedt wrote about. The Chinese region of Dzungaria (confined in mountain ranges and separated from Central Asian plains by a narrow passage, the Dzungarian Gate or Alataw Pass that must have been blocked during the glaciation) is another possibility. As in Europe, the mentioned mountain ranges would have acted as natural barriers, forcing the Red Nordids to remain and evolve in high latitudes.

 

Stockbreeding

The areas with most Red Nordid racial contributions (Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Basque Country) have high lactose tolerance frequencies, which fits well with the possibility of them being the first race to practice stockbreeding and pastoralism. In the Basque Country, 91,7% of the population is lactase persistent (mutation -13,910*T of the MCM6 gene), and in Ireland, the percentage is 96%. The European zones with lower rates of lactase persistence are Sardinia, Greece and Southern Italy. Red Nordids could have developed lactose tolerance after incorporating it to their diet for a long time, or maybe it was already part of their genetic pool for some other reason. We should remember that lactase persistence is actually a neoteny (youth conservation) trait, as digesting lactase is undoubtedly a childish trait and that Nordic races, especially the Red, fit well in this profile. It would be interesting to verify the symbolic role of the aurochs and, later, of the cow and the bull in Red Nordid cultures like some Near Eastern Neolithic societies (Çatal Hüyük), the Indos, Hindu civilization, Persia and even Spain. In Central Asia (where herding probably originated) the yak is the main character of this tradition.

In Asia (except in Central Asian steppes and in Tibet and Mongolia, where it’s normal to drink the milk of mares, camels and yaks), the lactose intolerance rate is around 50%, mounting to 100% in some zones. Africa (with exceptions such as Saharawi and Masai) and the native populations of the Americas, have also very high lactose intolerance rates.

In the First Neolithic of the Near East agriculture and pastoralism are never found together: agriculture appeared in Israel and the origin of herding and pastoralist cultures in the Zagros Mounts and Upper Mesopotamia. Afterwards, in the first Mesopotamic civilizations, stockbreeding was distinguished from agriculture and was related to predatory mountain-folk and leadership traditions: the kings saw themselves as shepherds of peoples and tribes. This tradition is still perceived in the Jewish Talmud, where cultivating the soil is seen as a lowly occupation.

 

Agriculture?

Considering the Eastern origin of Red Nordids and some studies that link R1b with the expansion of agriculture (not necessarily with its origin), Valg defends the theory that RN, apart from being responsible of stockbreeding, are also responsible of agriculture. I do not share this point of view, due to the clearly ethnic distribution of celiac disease-gluten intolerance, which I further develop in the article on the dietary damage done by the Neolithic revolution, together with the separated origins of agriculture and stockbreeding. The mentioned disorders are a symptom of rejection to cereals, especially wheat, and their frequency in Ireland (at least 1%). In Scotland it is so high that in the United States it is called “Celtic disease.” After the Celtic regions, the highest levels of cereal-related intolerance are found in Scandinavia. The lowest levels are found in Greece, specifically in Thessaly, that hosted the first Neolithic cell of continental Europe (Sesklo-Dimini sites) and was the gateway for agriculture in our continent. At the same time, Greece and Southern Italy are the European regions with a higher occurrence of lactose intolerance. Celiac disease is related with the presence of some DQ genes, especially with DQ2.5. This gene reaches its highest frequencies in the Basque Country and Ireland.

Another interesting issue is that the capacity to process cereals seems to be related with the amount of copies of the AMY1 gene. The highest number of AMY1 copies seems to culminate in Eastern Asian populations with a rice-based diet. These populations are also highly lactose intolerant.

If at the beginning of the Neolithic agriculture and stockbreeding never appear together; they were practised by different peoples. If RN are lactose tolerant but cereal intolerant, regarding them as the first stockbreeders would automatically rule them out as the first agriculturalists. Celiac disease cases are the tip of the iceberg. The data suggest that a much large percentage of the population would actually improve their health if they eliminated gluten out of their diets. The obesity trait in Red Nordids is a clear symptom of intolerance to the modern diet, strongly based in starches, hydrogenated fats and refined sugars. The idea of RN being the first in systematically cultivating and massively consuming cereals is in flagrant contradiction with them being the population with the highest levels of gluten intolerance and celiac disease in Eurasia and both Americas.

 

Other ideas

• Red Nordids probably inhabited even colder regions than White Nordids, so they must have been even more dependant on hunting. They must have been perfectly adapted to processing large amounts of animal proteins and fats coming from Central Asian megafauna such as mammoths and giant unicorns (Elasmotherium).

• The need of protecting their skin from the cold sabotaged their capacity for synthesizing Vitamin D, and also made their skin lose its functionality. In order to produce Vitamin D and obtain calories to generate heat, they must have depended on dietary sources rich in animal-origin saturated fats. The broadness of the RN skeleton bears witness to the success of this strategy.

• The first evidence of alcohol production could date back to the Natufian culture (present-day Israel) where cereals were harvested, allegedly to feed cattle and brew beer rather than for direct human consumption. Nevertheless, it is plausible that alcohol was already produced during the Palaeolithic, fermenting certain herbs, honey, fruits or wild berries—in such a case, Red Nordids must have been the greatest consumers, otherwise they wouldn’t presently be the most tolerant race to alcohol.

• Because of the cold and dry environment they probably inhabited, and because of the need of warm and humid air from time to time in order to hydrate and clean the respiratory system, Red Nordids might have been the creators of the first forms of sauna, which might have simply consisted in evaporating water over hot stones in closed rooms located inside caves or shelters.

 

 

Near East Armenid race (from now on, Armenid race)

 
C3

This individual, an ethnic Armenian from Syria, is a pure Armenid. The German anthropologist Hans F. K. Günther bequeathed us (Rassenkunden Europas) this exceptional photograph of a human type he called “Armenoid” or “Hither-Eastern” that Valg prefers to call “pure Dinaric.” Wedged profile shape, receding forehead, huge nose with a very high nasal bridge (almost at the eyebrow’s height), weak jaw, receding chin, dolichocephalic, high cranial vault, gracile physical constitution. This type is opportunistic, astute, dreamer, nervous and calculating. In Europe, such pure types probably no longer exist (certain regions in the Balkans and Italy would be the purest European cores), but the great majority of us are “Armenised” to some extent.

• Stature: Medium-low.

• Constitution: Slim, gracile. Resistant to scarcity. Extremely fibrous, lean and vascular.

• Eyes: Brown, medium-sized pupil, short distance between eyes.

• Nose: Big, tall, aquiline, narrow, “sharp” arch. As has been said before, one theory is that natural selection shaped this race’s nose in order to dampen the dry desert air before introducing it in the lungs, while another valid theory is that they developed larger nasal passages to increase oxygen intake in a mountainous environment with rarefied air. The latter is more probable since during the last glaciation the Near East was not a desert zone. We thus see that the big and aquiline nose is not exclusively Jewish or Semitic. Due to armenization and independently of its origin, the typical Semitic “hooked” nose is wider and fleshier due to RN and Congid influence. Were it not for the influence of the Armenid aquiline nose, many “Mediterranean” types of Southern Europe would have snub Congid-like noses.

• Ears: Large. More elongated and rounded than either Nordic varieties. Tendency to stick out.

• Teeth: Small mouth, narrow set of teeth and irregular outline (differences in heights and shapes of each tooth). Probably the shape of the “bite” or dental arch tends to look like a V.

• Hair: Black, thick, bushy, and straight-wavy, probably quite greasy. Curly hair is due to Congid influences. Tendency to receding hairlines in the top corners of the forehead.

• Body hair: Very bushy moustache.

• Skin: Light brown. Clean and uniform appearance. MC1R gene active, tendency to suntan.

• Skull: Armenid-type dolichocephalism. Higher and more vertically-oriented curvoccipitaly than that of White Nordids, it is the typical dolichocephalism of the “gracile Mediterranean” type. Very high cranial vault. This race has developed cranial capacity upwards and backwards. As happened with the Neanderthals, the receding forehead was compensated by a voluminous parietal region.

13-ESEgyptian Pharaohs Ramses II and Seti II. Despite having other racial influences (for instance, Ramses was a redhead), they can be described as belonging to the Armenid racial base. They display the typical elevated Armenid curvoccipitaly that makes the neck look longer.

• Face profile: Shape of a wedge with its tip at the nose. Rat- or shark- like profile, primitive-ish. Forward projection of central parts of the face (nose) and receding peripheral parts of the face (chin, forehead, but also regions in the horizontal axis, like cheekbones and zygomatic arches). If the Armenid face is placed looking upwards, the shape would be similar to that of a cone with its apex on the nose tip. For this reason, the Armenid’s wedged shape can not only be seen from a lateral view, but also when looked from above or below. Long face when seen from the side (great distance between nose and ear in the profile view).

If we observe the above profile and compare it to the profiles seen above, we can see that the facial angle is closed and more acute, and the vertical straight line has turned into an “aerodynamic” wedge. In some ways, this race inherited the subnasal prognatism of former hominids, but the centre of maximum frontal projection (the angle’s vertex) is raised from the teeth to the tip of the nose, becoming nasal prognatism. “Armenization” manifests itself through a wedged profile, or in scattered traits such as receding forehead or chin, protruding nose, and an inverted-triangle shape of the lower half of the face (from a frontal view). Thin, “sharp,” bony faces, jaws with the shape of an inverted triangle, are Armenid heritage. It is frequent in China, where the most characteristic Armenid features (like the nose) are blurred by mongolization (the Armenid and Mongolid races are somewhat opposite morphologically and tend to “cancel out” each other). This is consistent with the fact that the paternal O lineage, probably an Armenid haplogroup, is predominant in China.

• Forehead: Receding (sloping backwards).

• Jaw & chin: Thin, small. Has the shape of an inverted triangle when seen from a front view. Weak and receding chin.

• Other features: “Aerodynamic” face not only at the vertical axis but also in the horizontal. Central facial parts projected forwards (with zenith at the nose), receding peripheral parts. Sharp, edged, dry, hard and bony facial features.

• Paternal lineages (Y-DNA): F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, S, T. There are particular doubts about the racial affiliation of the LT and MS branches, which could be different races derived from the Armenid though not yet identified. Valg has also noted a lacuna in the J lineages, as Yemen, the zone where these haplogroups reach their highest frequency—not a particularly armenized region, but there is an NR or pseudo-NR influence. If it were so, it could be a link between the NR and NB races.

See this chart of Armenid origins based on paternal lineages. Again, we do not know which was the first Armenid haplogroup. The first option is F, that could have formed after CF (Khoisanid) intermixed with the Eastern Neanderthal race. This would imply that all haplogroups derived from F would be Armenid, except for White and Red Nordids, and maybe the LT and MS branches. The second option is that F was still Khoisanid and that the interbreeding took place only in one of its branches. Thus, GH and its stems would still be Khoisanid haplogroups, while IJK would have been the first Armenid lineage. This interesting map combines the distribution of all J lineages, which seem to have their strongest core in the “Yemeni” type of the Southwest Arabian Peninsula. J haplogroups are often related to Semitic heritage. Each of these maps corresponds to a different J sub-lineage. Pay attention to the second one in the first row (J1), which is the typical paternal haplogroup of Jewish Kohanim priestly families. Its highest concentrations seem to be found in the Sinai, Egypt and South Israel (“Judea”).

• Maternal lineages (mtDNA): A, B, F, I, J, N, P, Q, R, S, T, X, Y. It will be noticed that, in Europe, Armenid maternal lineages are more common than paternal ones.

• Spirituality: Related with the Earth and home. Cult to a long and prosperous life. Tendency to asceticism. Fanaticism, intransigence, human sacrifices. [Editor's note: see here]

• Psychology, idiosyncrasy and racial character: Liking for personal benefit, love for short-term utility, astuteness and shrewdness. Calculating character, predisposition to materialistic intelligence, commerce, diplomacy and search for personal advantages. Easiness to spot and prejudge people; ability to detect an individual’s weaknesses. In civilised multiracial societies, slave trade, white slave trade, smuggling, piracy, legal and illicit business, “organised crime.”

• Distribution: This race, mixed as it is, was immensely prolific and successful, being extended all over Europe, North Africa and from the Near East to India and beyond. The purest cores correspond to the greater-Armenian sphere, the Caucasus, Syria, the Balkans and Italy.

25Armenid genetics’ distribution by country. Darker the countries with higher quantity and/or purity of Armenid heritage. One thing that might surprise about this map is the similar level of armenization in North Africa and Southern Europe. It must be clarified that in North Africa Armenid blood is heavily mixed with Congid traits, while in Europe it’s mainly mixed with Nordid ones. The Armenid influence in China may also be noted. Although in this country (depending on regions and ethnic groups) Armenid features might not be so apparent (mongolization considerably “blurs” Armenid features since they are very “opposite” races) the fact remains that the paternal O haplogroup (an Armenid lineage) is predominant. So we have a region where the direct paternal lines are Armenid, but the indirect or autosomal contributions are full of Mongolid, Red Nordid and other influences.

Brief history: Armenids originated circa 60,000 years ago from the proto-Khoisanid race (a primitive human model from Africa, of which few remain today). This proto-Khoisanid race, from Eastern Africa, with an extremely delicate constitution and a straight facial profile, entered the Arabian Peninsula and the Near East, where it received genetic contributions from the Eastern Neanderthal race. With time the hybridization stabilised, natural selection acted over, there were mutations and changes in the adaptation functions and, finally, the Armenid racial type was minted.This map shows the development and expansion territory of the Armenid race. The main Eastern Neanderthal sites are marked as an orientation. The most important is Israel, and groups of many different sites. According to paternal lineages, CF (proto-Khoisanid) derived on one side to C (giving rise to C3 and the Mongolid race) and on the other side to F, giving rise to the Armenid race and all its lineages, including the Nordid races, which almost certainly descend from Armenids. Thus, the Armenids probably had their origin in some place of the Near East, probably in connection to the Neanderthal sites in the Eastern Mediterranean.

The Armenid race has an overwhelming success, which is manifested in the dispersion of its lineages in uncountable branches, and in the diffusion of its physical-anthropological traits in all continents. Its diversification was such that we doubt if it could have produced other non-identified races (especially in the LT and MS branches). Armenids correspond to the great social mass of the first civilizations in the Near East. They would also correspond to the so-called “Neolithic Europeans” (the popular “gracile and dolichocephalic Mediterraneans”), related with Near Eastern cultures that started to enter Europe circa 7-8,000 years ago (this map shows the Cardial Ware).

The J2 haplogroup, considered “Arabid,” might be a good reference to located the Urheimat from which Armenids entered Europe. It could also be indicative to locate the first Semites (after J1, J2 is the most typical haplogroup of Kohanim or Cohen priestly Jewish families). Minoans and Etruscans also had high frequencies of this haplogroup.

The aforementioned Neolithic cultures spread throughout the whole Mediterranean, intermixing with Red Nordids, and penetrated the Danubian corridor towards Central Europe (present-day Hungary and Austria, where they came into contact with White Nordids—this also happened in the Balkans). It is believed that the Etruscans, Minoans (bull worship reminiscent of Eastern populations), Phoenicians and Carthaginians predominantly carried J haplogroups, though apparently their ruling castes were further mixed with R1a and R1b and there would have been certain amount of E1b1b (Congid) too. In Egypt, the paternal T lineage prevailed, though there must have also existed Red and White Nordid contributions judging by some mummies’ appearance and some genetic analyses (e.g., Tutankhamen was R1b1b2). The Indus civilization was probably predominantly Armenid (L) with some Red Nordid (R2) contributions.

14-ESEarly Minoan cranium, Greece, circa 2500 BC. Although it’s risky to draw racial contributions and this is not a pure specimen, this cranium presents a high cranial vault, receding forehead, a high and protruding nasal bridge and Armenid curvoccipitaly.

In North Africa, Armenids produced the “Moorish” type by interbreeding with Red Nordids and especially Congids, while the further we move eastward, the less Congid influence is found and the more other races (Mongolid, Australid) are present. Nowadays there is Armenid blood in almost all Eurasia, North, East and even Central Africa, and also in pre-Columbian America (noses that are not Mongolid at all can be observed in many Native Americans or in certain Aztec reliefs).

• Present context: Being an older race than any of the Nordid ones, it is extremely difficult to find pure Armenids, as they have had more time to crossbreed, and might have been less racist by nature. The Armenid heritage is what gives typical “Semites” their large noses and receding foreheads—but what we understand as “Semitic” is usually an individual with more Red Nordid than Armenid contributions.

 

 

About Neanderthal man and the Armenid race

Neanderthal is a human race that arose about 230,000 years ago, “became extinct” 28,000 years ago, and spread mainly between Europe and the Middle East. Mitochondrial DNA (maternal line) analyses show their lineages to be very distant and apart from modern humans (something normal for a race that scattered and lived for 200,000 years, most of the time living under hard natural selection and isolation of entire clans). Paleoanthropologists have identified at least three Neanderthal races, one of which was red-headed, though due to a different mutation than modern Red Nordids.

Although it was always clear that, because of chronological, geographical and logical matters, Neanderthals had coexisted with Homo sapiens for millennia, the possibility of racial interbreeding (suggesting modern humans could have Neanderthal blood) was not accepted until very recently. Mainstream science decided Neanderthals belonged to another species and that, even if anatomically they met standards for modern humans, their descendants would have been sterile, as they allegedly belonged to different species. The Neanderthals “became extinct” in this scenario because of climatic change or due to competition with modern humans. From time to time, some voices raised suggesting that there was enough evidence to seriously consider the possibility of modern humans having Neanderthal traces in their genome. For instance, in Lagar Velho, Lapedo valley (Portugal), remains of a hybrid Neanderthal/Sapiens child were found. This child was dated back to 24,500 years—at least three millennia after the alleged Neanderthal “extinction.”

Valg noticed long ago that, on the basis of cranial morphology, there was a particularly clear Neanderthal contribution in many Middle Eastern individuals, that Varg associated with the Armenid race. He also considered that another different Neanderthal race could have had something to do in the conformation of the Red Nordid race. Because of the advances in the field of Genetics, it was a matter of time that further evidence would substantiate these voices.

These maps show the area inhabited by the Neanderthals. Due to the great isolation of reproductive communities (forced by geography and the glacial rigours) Neanderthals diversified and gave rise to, at least, three well-differentiated races. On account of its connection with Armenids, we’ll pay attention to the Eastern Neanderthal race, with a more gracile constitution than the massive European type.

Thanks to mtDNA analysis it is confirmed that Neanderthals and Sapiens did interbreed, and that this took place in the Eastern Mediterranean, probably when Sapiens coming out of Africa stumbled upon Neanderthal populations such as Skhul, Kebara, Hayonim, Tabun, Qafzeh, Amud, Zuttiyeh (Israel), Dederiyeh (Syria), Shanidar (Iraq), Kermanshah (Iran) or Karain (Turkey). There must also have been plenty of Neanderthal sites in what now is the undersea, off the coast of Israel, Turkey, etc. This map shows the most significant Neanderthal sites in the Near East. It is considered that the Israeli core was the epicentre of interbreeding between native Neanderthals and “modern men” coming out of Africa.

Neanderthals, with their high cranial capacity, strength, corpulence and adaptation to such a tough and resource-scarce environment as the glaciation, were evolutionary ahead the “archaic Homo sapiens” they encountered—probably the ancestors of the modern Khoisanid race (an African variety, perhaps the most ancient human race that remains today). As a result of this interbreeding, nowadays Eurasian populations have between 1 and 4% of genetic Neanderthal contributions. With no hesitation, we affirm those contributions to be even more important in highly Armenid individuals.

On the basis of Physical Anthropology applied to the study of ethnic groups carrying certain haplogroups, the first Armenid lineage was F or IJK (less probably, K). Therefore, Neanderthal interbreeding in the Near East must have taken place within the time period stretching from before the appearance of the F haplogroup to before the appearance of the K haplogroup, which gives us an interval of 70,000-45,000 years bp. In some places, the interbreeding has been given an antiquity of 65,000 years, in others 65,000 years and in others it has been dated back to 80,000 years. Interbreeding in Asia is reported to be 45,000 years old. We will see this more clearly in the diagram dedicated to paternal lineages [6].

More important than the Neanderthal’s role in the formation of the Armenid race are the implications entailed by admitting that Homo sapiens interbred with Homo neanderthalensis. On the one hand, terms such as “species” and “race” should be reconsidered. If both had fertile descendants, then they were not different species, yet they were different enough to be considered races. The same can apply to Homo erectus and the various pseudo-Erectus (Ergaster, Georgicus, Pekinensis, maybe Antecessor and Heidelbergensis). These might have been several races of a same species, as we have no proof to assert that Erectus (or even Homo habilis) was a different species from our own. On the other hand, if it has been finally accepted that there are other hominids’ contributions in the current Eurasian gene pool, we could direct our attention to Africa and to human races like the Congid, Pygmid and Australid. All humans probably descend from a pseudo-Khoisanid race with a straight profile. We have accepted that the angulation of the facial axis (for example, a receding forehead) was acquired by interbreeding with another hominid; in this case, the Neanderthal. We should note the subnasal prognatism of “Negroid” races, and conclude that this trait was also acquired by interbreeding with other hominids. This fascinating topic will be discussed in a future article dedicated to the rest of human races.

 

 

Reflections on the Armenid race

It’s easy for the Armenid race to fall into stereotypes and misinterpretations, so it is important that we provide some information to put the Armenids in the right place.

 

The “Semitic” label must be avoided

It is tempting to link the Armenid race with Jews, Arabs, Judaism, Christianity, Islam and gypsies, thus identifying them with historical trends that have traditionally acted against the Palaeolithic genetic legacy accumulated in the European continent. This is an oversimplification. These historical forces did indeed renew the Armenid flow towards Europe, and they originated in a region with a predominance of Armenid paternal lineages, yet they were not born in pure Armenid cores, but rather in areas where civilization had been deeply-rooted for a long time (ergo, regions of ethnic chaos), where Red Nordid and Congid influence was very important, and where intolerant creeds were necessary to unite human masses who otherwise lacked ethnic cohesion.

 

The birth of agriculture

Civilization is inevitably bonded to cereal agriculture and the sedentism it produced. The use of wild cereal grains is proven in places such as Ohalo II, an Israeli site dated in 23,000 years. Moreover, the expansion of rice cultivation in Eastern Asia is related with the paternal O3 haplogroup, an Armenid lineage. Considering that, as said before, the lowest celiac disease, gluten intolerance and lactase persistence frequencies in Europe are to be found in Greece and Southern Italy, I’m inclined to consider cereal cultivation as Armenid in origin. Another fact that supports this idea is that presently highly Armenid individuals maintain a slender and lean physical constitution despite having a strongly cereal-based diet; this implies they assimilate starches better than, for instance, Red Nordids.

Another fact that could confirm this relation is that the agrarian settlements of the first Neolithic are characterised by gracile and dolichocephalic skeletons, something clearly contrasted by Archaeology. Valg does not share this opinion and relates Red Nordids with agriculture as well as stockbreeding.

Civilization probably can’t be attributed to any pure race, as it is a product of alienated and genetically mixed societies, but it is probable that the inflection point in civilization’s development was the moment certain Red Nordid clans came into contact with Mesolithic Armenid communities of the Near East (e.g., the Geometric Kebaran culture). This is a photograph of a fragment of the Stele of Vultures, a well-known Sumerian relief (present-day Southern Iraq) sculpted circa 2500 BC to commemorate the victory of the city-state of Lagash over the city-state of Umma. It represents a phalanx of soldiers advancing over the corpses of their enemies. Although Sumer has other artistic pieces that depict individuals (the social elite: priests, ladies, etc.) of a clear Red Nordid base, it can be inferred—judging by the noses and the general profile of this group of soldiers, very homogeneous racially—that the great popular mass of their civilization had an Armenid racial core. It can also be deduced that the origin of closed combat-formations shouldn’t be looked for in the European past, but in the ancient Near East.

 

The Armenid race has played a major role and has been present in all civilizations

It can be said without exaggeration that the Armenid race has been present in absolutely all human civilizations. The great mass of ancient Egyptian population belonged to the T lineage, and even the Pharaohs, among whom Red Nordid contributions were important (abundance of blonds and redheads, Tutankhamen R1b paternal lineage), were strongly Armenized. As of Rome, there was such a strong armenization (Cato the Younger, Julius Caesar) that individuals of a very pure Armenid stock could be found in Italy during the rise of Rome.

16-ES The dominant racial contribution among the Roman ruling caste was clearly Red Nordid, followed by some White Nordid (more apparent in individuals such as Vipsanius Agrippa or Caesar Augustus). The Roman populace must have had higher Armenid contributions. As evidence that the Armenid blood was strongly represented among the influential class, we have the bust of a Patrician (left) and Cato the Younger (right)—though it must be remembered that Cato had plebeian ancestors. This entails that during this period, there must have been very pure Armenids in certain regions of Italy, and that within the legions (whose combat tactics weren’t different from the Sumerians we have seen above), much Armenid blood must have been present.

 

 

Evolution of lineages and the future of the human

species in the globalization era

We now face a great current which is trying to create a genetic levelling, in order to turn mankind into a flock suitable to subjugation by a plutocratic elite, and to increase some points the intellectual quotient of border-line races by mixing them with intelligent races. Now, in the time of fights over resources and the poisoning of the Earth and of the genetic code of all human varieties, it will be necessary to establish a new selection and a new evolutionary leap in order to render obsolete not only all previous human races, but all Homo sapiens as a species. Everything that is now brewing in terms of changes and agitations, will find a meaning in the birth of a new variety, fathered by the European kind. The tree of the human species is ready for the ripe fruits to fall from its best branches, and whose seeds will give rise to a new tree.

arbol FILOGENETICO

This diagram displays and summarises the new racial classification from the phylogenetic perspective—in this case, through the evolution of paternal lineages. Its free distribution is encouraged. Content modification is not allowed. There are some branches we do not know what race to assign them to; Valg expects to elucidate most of these doubts by the physical-anthropological study of certain ethnicities, especially from the Indo-Pacific region. Many relevant aspects on the first stages of evolution will be discuszed in the second part of the present article, dedicated to the rest of human races. Images of pure Khoisanid, Pygmid, Congid and Mongolid specimens are yet to be found. Some branches are yet to be defined, for instance, C2 could correspond to an Australid race. This diagram will be further updated along with the advances we make.

 

 

General reflections

The original, pure racial types present a harmonic coherence in all their traits. Each race, when pure, has an inner harmony manifested by the congruent personality of its external features. Red Nordids are incandescent, red, corpulent and orange-haired, whereas White Nordids are golden, athletic and blond; Armenids brownish, gracile and with black hair, and so on.

Everything is in its place. There aren’t any dissonant traits that seem “out of tune” in the general arrangement, or that appear to contradict the rest or struggle against each other. This harmony is also interior. Only racial interbreeding disturbed this primary equilibrium. The first effect of racial mixing is to destroy the integral consistence of racial features, and that has its echo in the psychological and spiritual fields. Mixes are indeed contemplated by Nature: the Armenid race comes from one of them—but this mix subsequently evolved, muted and underwent natural selection by the environment obeying the tough laws of Darwinism, until it stabilised in a new racial type many millennia later. Disordered mixes, typical of globalist civilization, have nothing to do with this natural laissez-faire envisaged by the natural order.

Race mixing is an attack on human biodiversity and an aggression against dozens of millennia of evolution. Each race is the result of long and ruthless processes of refinement, tuning, honing, isolation, adaptation and natural selection. In the times when life was pure and Nature followed her path unaltered, each race was walking its own path, straight ahead to become a different species. This was before the rise of materialistic civilization, which perverted the natural order, consuming its hatred towards Nature and mankind, and materializing its resentment towards biological nobility by preaching equality and promoting chaotic crossbreeding. To mix with another variety—the further in the evolutionary scale, the worst—is an abomination and an affront against all this work of perfection and natural / sexual / artificial selection of dozens of thousands of years.

Primitive races feel sexually attracted to modern ones—a threat to evolution. Primitive races have an instilled instinct to procreate with the modern ones. This has been ever translated into millions of rapes and kidnaps of European women [7], including the unprecedented rape epidemics suffered nowadays “thanks” to mass immigration into Europe and Oceania, and to “integration” in North America and South Africa. This responds to the instinctive desire to improve the genetic code without evolution, that is, without the lengthy effort of undergoing a severe natural selection. It also responds to an indiscriminate sexuality, developed to compensate with numerical quantity a lesser individual quality.

The genetic code is not improved by this kind of attacks on Biology. The cross would only “benefit” the most primitive race involved, whereas the modern becomes debased: being the primitive the ancestors of the modern, the Nordids can only expect a backward leap of dozens of millennia in the evolution of their genetic code, and traumatizing their genome forever if they crossbreed with other reproductive communities. If we additionally consider how innocent and carefree modern races are (self-confidence in one’s capability tends to relax defences against much shrewder races), we are faced with a serious threat of human involution.

Summing up, the promiscuity of primitive races (also of the most dysgenic and defective individuals of modern races) is a threat towards the genetic integrity of modern races, and thus to the evolution of all mankind.

Oestrogenization and feminization of the modern races—another threat to evolution. It is undeniable that since the Neolithic brought along the grain-based diet—a nutrition that tends to blur sexual dimorphism and therefore to wipe out differences between sexes—civilization has pulled the hunting man away from Nature and wildlife, from natural instincts and from original savagery, and this has resulted in a castration of the species. Obviously, this process has been stronger in the civilised regions, which in the long term, hosted the most gifted races. On the other hand, the less-civilised areas have remained closer to the natural state, better preserving their instincts and “authenticity.” This threat is the flip-side of the previous point. On the one hand, these societies are capable of competing, not economically or militarily, but demographically and socially, with the most civilised societies, which they despise for their softness. Finally, women tend to feel attracted to well-androgenised and well-sexed men, with traces of hunting and warlike behaviour. The feminization of the Western Civilization and of the white man—a process sponsored by multinational corporations—has the effect of throwing the women of the modern races into the hands of primitive races. The “new masculinity” of the working white man, of the “gentle-man,” obsequious and servile, is a failure from the reproductive-evolutionary perspective, and the time is ripe to see a rebirth of the instincts that civilization stole from the European hunter. The difference between him and the modern bourgeois European is not less than the difference between bulls and oxen, or between wolves and lapdogs.

When one side of the scale falls, the other rises: the taming of modern races runs parallel to the galvanization and bolding of the primitive races, that under the protection offered by our civilization’s naïve generosity reproduce, in ghettoes and non-droit, zones turned into real fermentation tanks of violence, resentment and instincts. It is not required to be a prophet in order to foresee that nothing good for Europe will come out from this situation.

The isolation and constitution of closed reproductive communities played a key role in evolution. For a population to mutate and thereby to evolve (since mutation and natural selection are the leading ingredients of evolution), it is essential not to mix with genetically different populations. For this reason, as all farmers and stockbreeders very well know, the formation of isolated populations (i.e., unique reproductive communities) is a vital step for evolution, Within these communities mutations occur at a higher rate, and the selection of the desired and advantageous traits is minted more effectively. Under the rigors of natural selection, this is the first phase for the constitution of a different race. Moreover, the formation of a new race is only the prelude of the formation of a new species.

Some day, when Genetics and the study of the human races flourish, or simply under the pressure of new general circumstances, new reproductive communities will have to be formed to save human evolution. For that goal it is vital to learn from those who, in the past, tried to do the same.

Diversification and evolution go side by side. I have never seen a tree whose branches, once a certain height is achieved, converge to form a common, “mixed” trunk. Normal is that, as any tree grows, its branches split from the common trunk and diversify more and more. That is what life and evolution involve. Branch convergence only takes place when, instead of upwards, we take the downwards direction and operate a backwards step, pulling back the most advanced branches and the most near to the Sun: now the tree has stopped growing and has begun declining.

Marriage is a biological mission—evolutionary importance of mate selection. Nowadays, when the great majority of European population can be considered mixed, the least we can do while genetic engineering, “designer babies” and the like advances don’t prevail, is to chose well the person we are going to have offspring with. Being “white” is not enough; he/she must be genetically compatible, which can be ascertained by a physical-anthropological study and a genetic analysis. These options amply surpass the possibilities of the arduous genealogic research of older times (like those conducted by the Spanish Inquisition or the Nazi SS). The ancient Caste System must be followed: similar joins similar.

In order to fulfil this, the sad, monogamous, bourgeois modern marriage, based on material profit, prostitution, parasitism, indolence and domestication, must disappear in favour of the idea that marriage is, first and foremost, a mission on behalf of the species and the improvement of our descendants’ genome. The aim of marriage is to join two compatible beings to father children with a good genetic quality, so that they can take evolution another step forward. When this premise (the individual is nothing, the species is everything) is unfulfilled, marriage makes no sense and is not admitted as valid by the natural law.

It is necessary to regenerate the genetic heritage of the West to avoid the biological collapse of mankind. Embryo selection, eugenics and genetic engineering could be fabulous tools to regenerate the “white race,” but for this to happen we must first knock over the anti-evolution, anti-natural selection and egalitarian obscurantism of the mass media, manipulated by international finance—which is not concerned with evolution, but with corrupting anything noble and pure and burying it in the rotten matter of an inferior world order. The current system takes delight in dysgenics and is not interested in improving the species but in making money without working (that is, profiting from somebody else’s work: usury) and obtaining pleasure in a quick, cheap and immediate manner which has nothing to do with improving the genetic code or surpassing the limits of the human being. It’s worth remembering that to help less intelligent races only helps them, whereas to help intelligent races helps everyone, as problem-solvers are most likely to come up with solutions.

Nowadays, nothing selects us; human reproduction in modern society doesn’t differ much from a mass in fermentation. Perhaps it can be said that we are not selecting a human type convenient for the species, but one convenient for the economic system: a tame, obedient, consumerist and submissive workforce, endowed with the qualities expected from slaves, cattle and domestic animals. Usurer, globalist and neoliberal capitalism wants a rootless, mixed, unidentified, herd-like, equalised and highly predictable flock, whose behaviour can be manipulated easily. With this goal in mind, the modern financial-commercial system might feel tempted in the future to use genetic engineering to manipulate the natural parameters of human behaviour and the racial composition of mankind. Nobody needs to be a genius to see that all this process is extremely dangerous, that it attacks the foundations of evolution and that the peoples of the world must revolt against the parasitical, financial, media and political mafias that are keeping us in the dark.

The creation of man is not complete—races are the first step of the creation of new species. The fact that races can still interbreed and produce fertile offspring implies that the creation of races (which is only the first step of the development of new species) is not yet finished, and thus the creation of the human being is not yet complete. Man himself is nothing more than a provisional link to the creation of something that will surpass him. Human races were on their way to speciation until the Neolithic opened the era of migrations, which meant a decline of the European genetic code and probably a compatibilization of it with other races.

In turmoil yet to come, new leaders, enlightened by a biological mission, must stand out, draw science towards them, and separate the sheep from the goats taking up again the upwards evolution of mankind from where it was left; carrying out a massive mutation in the West, and promoting the rise of a new and better endowed species. This would complete the cycle of human creation, rendering the ancient Homo sapiens into a human “version” as obsolete as currently Homo habilis is. As spontaneous providence does not work anymore to favour evolution in an artificial world devoid of natural selection and submitted to the totalitarian principles of media and the financial mafias, the so called conscious evolution must be established. This is a directed process for genetic improvement, conducted under the umbrella of Eugenics and genetic engineering.

Civilization must not exist to promote the advance of matter, but the advance of man. Crucial importance of the development of Genetics and health knowledge: the development of a society is not measured by its development of inanimate matter, but by its development of alive matter. Civilization is the result of evolved races, living under mild conditions thanks to the end of glaciation and the availability of the workforce of other races. We must be grateful to Nature and not take advantage of an interglacial period to attack her premises or question her paths. We should, therefore, bear in mind that civilization must not exist to promote the development of culture, technology, luxury o comfort, but to promote the development of man himself: the evolution of the genetic code. For civilization depends on genes, not the other way round, so it’s ridiculous that civilization turns against the genetic heritage that created it, like a snake that bites its tail.

From this perspective, furthermore, culture, science and technology are aspects that cannot be maintained indefinitely because they depend on the genetic capability of a minority within mankind, a minority that is not unlimited, has been wasted with no pause and has undergone a great degeneration after thousands of years without been cared for or renewed. Therefore, technology must be at the service of the advancement of mankind, not the other way round. With this is mind, Genetics is with no doubt the scientific branch which, apart from being growing and advancing faster than any other branch, offers the most fantastic possibilities for regenerating Western Civilization. Like any double-edged weapon, Genetics also has a dark side: to allow the global financial elite to manipulate human nature itself in order to make it fit in the socio-economical model they desire.

To know other races is important. As a final reflection that will announce the next article on the same subject, it may be remembered that I mentioned other racial contributions in Europe. We will pay attention to the rest of the branches of the human tree in a future article, and we’ll see to what point there are small quantities of Mongolid and Congid traits in the heritage of many Europeans considered perfectly white and even “Nordic.” This article is incomplete without the future second part. Until we learn how to distinguish the contributions of the Khoisanid, Pygmid, Congid and Australid, our thesis will not be complete. All human lineages are interwoven in such a way that understanding one helps to understand the rest.

 

 

Live samples

The fact that these racial types barely appear in a pure state and only in very restricted areas, can make racial facts difficult to understand for anyone lacking a properly trained vision. Indeed, most Europeans currently have traits from two or three—if not more—racial types, and only a good anthropological knowledge, together with a certain personal intuition, can help to read racial stratifications.

—Adriano Romualdi

Analysing features from a racial perspective is not a theoretical issue, but rather a practical one, in a visual way. It is all about gaining a racial sensitivity towards facial traits, developing a natural and instinctive suspicion, and deciphering a sort of universal code embedded in people’s appearance, especially in the facial features. Someone who knows how to analyse facial traits can be almost as good on genetic analysis or even more, as up to this date genetic analyses do not include detailed racial information.

The way to improve skills in the racial analysis of human physiognomy is to carefully examine countless human portraits and everyday faces, if possible, from persons with a strong “racial personality,” and to make the most out of it. In order to identify human races, Valg studied literally hundreds of thousands of portraits from ethnic groups worldwide for years, paying attention to traits inherited from relatives, and to the most insignificant details. He did it in such a way that, before finding portraits of pure specimens, he already knew perfectly the sort of features he was looking for as he had mentally isolated them.

Obviously, it is extremely hard to find pure specimens from the various races, but we need to recognize different races, even if they are diluted. It’s necessary to learn how to identify an Armenized forehead or nose, the strong chin of Red Nordids, the piercing stare of White Nordids, the dark skin and protruding mouth of Congids, the prominent cheekbones and slanted eyes of Mongolids and Khoisanids, etc.

In this section “easy” examples will be provided of individuals with, as aforementioned, a strong racial personality easy to identify without much effort. They are not common racial types not to be found everyday on the streets, but the obviousness of their traits makes them suitable to start practising the new Physical Anthropology. In future articles I will use more common, and thus harder to decipher, examples as well as “white” individuals with non-“Caucasian” influences. Whoever has an interesting portrait can share it in the e-mail [at the top of this post], and if it’s representative enough it might be added to a future article.

As will be immediately seen, we can’t say “this individual belongs to X race,” but rather “this individual has a mixture of X, Y and Z in such proportions.” Also, it will be noticed that even those racial types traditionally deemed pure are, in fact, “contaminated” to a lesser o greater extent. Presently blood is so mixed that only an in-depth genetic job could clean each mixture. Nevertheless, things are not as easy as saying, “We are all mongrels,” for there are highly different mixtures and proportions.

It is very striking to verify the extraordinary morphological diversity of the presented array of individuals (according to the official version, all of them are “Caucasian” and belong to the same “white race”), and this diversity will reach paroxysm when, in a future article, we handle the rest of the human races.

 

C41- This impressive individual, from Denmark, is a highly predominant RN. However, his eyes are not perfectly inserted in their sockets, his superciliary arches have become slightly deformed do to mixing and his skull, though broad at temple height, gets narrower towards the top: White Nordid and Mongolid influence, though very residual.
 

C52- Interesting highly Armenid individual with WN admixture. Extremely residual congization and redization. He is most probably from the Balkans or from the Armenian and sub-Armenian regions of the Near East

 

C63- Successful Swedish athlete Carolina Klüft is a highly pure White Nordid, though she has slight armenization and redization. Her eyes are mixed: closer pictures reveal them as being mottled with grey as well as navy-blue.

 

 

C74- Basque singer Germán Lizárraga is an interesting admixture of highly predominant RN, some WN, Armenid and residual mongolization.

 

 
 

C85- Russian Alexander Godunov, a White Nordid with hardly any Armenid contribution. Very slight RN influence. Some extremely residual component of another race.

 

 

C96- A rather balanced mixture of White and Red Nordid and Armenid, with a slight predominance of the Armenid part.

 

 

 

C107- Prominent nose, receding forehead, receding chin, “aerodynamic” profile and ruddy skin: this man is mainly Armenid, with some Red Nordid and, to a lesser extent, White Nordid blood. As a marginal observation, it’s curious how men with a strong Armenid influence tend to grow moustaches, as their moustache is especially bushy.

 

C118- Peasant from Northern Friesland. Predominantly White Nordid with some Red Nordid contribution. Very slight armenization.

 

 
 

C129- Very Armenized WN, or very whitened Armenid. Slight RN contributions.

 

 

 

 

C1310- This Englishman is RN, but not perfect (not completely red, skin tends to be paler and he has freckles). Observe the navy-blue colour of his eyes. A lateral view could tell us more. As extremely residual influences: mongolization, armenization and “whitization.”

 

 

C1411- Highly Armenid. White and Red Nordid admixture. Probably very slight mongolization.

 

 

 

C1512- This German is a White Nordid with some armenization (nose), slight mongolization (eyes) and slight redization.

 

 

 

C1613- RN with WN, very slight armenization and residual mongolization. Eyes are of RN heritage (dark blue, small pupil). Notice that this kind of mixture is mainly found in Anglo-Saxon countries.

 

 

C1714- German football player Ramelow. Despite his pure hair colour and his clean features, he has some armenization (forehead, chin and other features). Residual RN influence, extremely slight mongolization. Otherwise, a very pure WN for our times.

 

C1815- Harder to identify mixture, as it is more balanced, but the picture is good: this Italian is a Red Nordid and Armenid mixture, with less Armenid and more RN than example No. 7. Small WN influence. His red side is manifested in the brown-reddish hair and beard, the rosy skin tending to have freckles, etc., whereas the Armenid part is clear in his forehead, nose, curvoccipitaly and in general, in his “aerodynamic” profile.

 

C1916- Highly RN. Slanted eyes: clear mongolization. Very residual whitization. No armenization.

 

 

 

 

C2017- English athlete Iwan Thomas. Highly White Nordid. Slight redization, visible in jaw, chin, shape of superciliary arches and freckles, upper chest and arms. Residual armenization. Residual mongolization.

 

 

C2118- This Swede is a highly predominant Red Nordid (jaw & chin, facial shape, mouth, dark-blue eyes, fleshy nose, rosy skin), yet with some White Nordid influence in the skin and hair colour, and in the eye’s outline. Abundant type of mixture in Anglo-Saxon, German and, to a lesser extent, Slavic countries.

 

C2219- Highly Armenid Italian. RN influence which is manifested in freckles, jaw and a nose with a lower root than what would be normal in a pure Armenid.

 

 

 

C2320- English football player Danny Clay. Red Nordid, high WN influence. Residual mongolization and armenization.

 

 

C2421- Highly Red Nordid, but significant Armenid influence, would be interesting to see a side view.

 

 

 

C2522- Swedish model Carolina Winberg. Very WN. Slight RN influences: note her profile, her forehead is so vertical it almost seems to form an inverted, “negative” angle. The jaw zone is redicized. Freckles. Very light mongolization. No armenization at all.

 

C2623- Highly Red Nordid Norwegian. Armenid and Mongolid influence.

 

 

 

 

C2724- White Nordid with an obvious armenization (observe facial angle). Also residual mongolization.

 

 

 

 

C2825- American comedian Darren Marlar. Highly predominant RN, with Armenid, WN and Mongolid contributions.

 

 

 

C2926- Welsh singer Rhydian Roberts. Highly WN, with a slight redization and a residual mongolization. As a matter of interest, and despite how slight his RN admixture is, Rhydian was ginger-haired as a child, and his chest hair is still reddish.

 

 

C3027- Swedish model, highly WN. Very slightly redicized and with residual mongolization and armenization.

 

 

 

C3128- WN and RN with armenization. Possibly, extremely residual congization. Interesting to see how his hair tends to the WN colour and his beard to the Red Nordid.
 
 
 
 
C3229- Canadian actor Zack Ward. Predominantly RN, with WN, Mongolid and Armenid contributions.

 

 

 

C3330- Mongolized Red Nordid.

 

 

 

 

C3431- This Albanian football player is WN with RN, armenization and mongolization. Notice very wide philtrum and characteristic shape of the upper lip (WN influence).

 

 

C3532- RN and WN admixture, with a clear predominance of the RN element. Possible extremely residual armenization.

 

 

 

C3633- Girl from the Kalash ethnic group (Northern Pakistan). Strongly White Nordid, slight Mongolid admixture. Residual armenization. Her purity is astonishing, especially taking into account the region she is from.

 

 

C3734- WN with some RN. Residual armenization and mongolization.

 

 

 

 

C3835- Chris J. Evans, English radio and TV host and producer. Highly RN (the hair colour is not to mislead us, as it is an isolated feature, and otherwise his eyebrows, sideburns and probably beard are reddish), with WN contributions, and residual armenization and mongolization.

 

 

C3936- Spencer Wells, American geneticist and anthropologist. RN with WN. Not much armenization, residual mongolization.

 

 
 

C4037- Highly Armenid individual from Kiakhta, Kurdistan. Residual WN and Congid contributions.

 

 

C41

38- Pure RN.

 

 

 

 

 

Acknowledgments

I do not want to conclude this important article without expressing my gratitude to those who made its publication possible.

I thank Valg for the trouble he has taken and the patience he had to show me, sceptical at the beginning, all the progress he made in raciology matters. I also thank him for his incredible daily work, meticulously studying hundreds of thousands of pictures and never-ending genetic data from ethnic groups worldwide over many years—an arduous and totally selfless task that will benefit mankind. I am convinced that his work will one day be acknowledged as it deserves. Valg, who is impassioned about biodiversity at all levels, has a blog where he shares his notes and opinions, and that I recommend visiting to know his perspective, which is not always the same as mine.

I have to give a special thanks to a collaboration that has not only helped me out in some tricky biological matters, but has translated the present article from Spanish to English. This work will endow the classification with a larger diffusion, and from English it may also be translated to other languages (especially Russian, German and French).

For providing some information, I also thank Arminius, an anthropologist, who provided some interesting references in my dossier on Eugenics.

I also keep in mind those who have indirectly contributed to enrich our knowledge on human biodiversity: photographers, geneticists, models and especially the men, women and children who have reached our days triumphantly with their genetic heritage intact.

 

 

Endnotes

[1] Physical Anthropology became a solid discipline in the 19th Century, along with the expansion of the European colonial empires, as part of the natural interest in understanding each race and the will to distinguish one from another, both physically as well as psychologically and socially. This discipline reached its peak with Anglo-Saxon and German nordicists and eugenicists, and especially during the Third Reich. After 1945, Physical Anthropology became a “heretical” discipline, it was separated from Social Anthropology (which was completely taken over by cultural Marxists) and incorporated into the Biology degree course as Biological Anthropology or Bioanthropology. Nowadays there are bioanthropologists who ask for Bioanthropology to be included again as part of the degree in Anthropology, turning it into a shared speciality. This issue is complex, as Physical Anthropology would end up touching social, psychological, genetic, etc., factors, which could take a very politically incorrect path.

[2] To check out the warnings that health authorities in America have given to dark-skinned peoples… [Evropa Soberana’s link on this matter is now defunct].

[3] The most well-known is probably the Swiss company Igenea.com (though its basic test is not very reliable), but there are also more complete tests where, apart from the paternal and maternal lineages, autosomes are analysed revealing many things about indirect genetic lines such as DNAtribes.com or 23andme.com, where a more detailed analysis provides percentages—though not very exact—of “European Palaeolithic,” “Near Eastern,” “Asian,” “African” and other genetic contributions.

[4] Sexual selection implies that the social pressures exerted to select a partner on the bases of tribal agreements negotiated by the parents, or on socio-economic criteria, are replaced by a partner-selection based on physical appearance and attraction. This is the most vivid expression of a purely genetic criterion, and thus of the criterion of the species. Knowing that women are, under proper conditions (i.e., a society without artificial products or commercial fads) real machines of instinctive genetic selection, in order to achieve an efficient sexual selection capable of radically changing the genetic make-up of a population for good, two factors are required:

a) To instil a taste for biological quality and racial purity—in other words, for genetics—in the entire population, but especially in women of reproductive age.

b) (Would only work in combination with the previous). Giving young couples in general, and young women in particular, a greater sexual and partner-selection freedom than in other societies, so that the male genetic taste and the female genetic instinct can manifest themselves without hindrance. The consequence would be that carriers of traits considered undesirable would die without offspring, whereas those with desirable traits would have an overwhelming reproductive success.

Ancient Sparta is the best example of sexual freedom combined with genetic taste: parents had no say about their offspring’s’ marriage and it was only the young couples who decided upon their union, on the grounds of attraction. “Partner changing” was allowed if one of the members within the marriage was ill, unfertile or sterile. Vikings are another example: adultery was not punished if it had taken place between a woman and a man who was better than the legitimate husband. Such a social-reproductive strategy tends to improve the genetic make-up of the population, generation after generation.

This contrasts with peoples such as Jews, Gypsies or Arabs, wherein unions are settled with parental consent and are based on sordid tribal, social or economic interests, which means that even paedophilic and/or incestuous marriages are allowed (this happened in decadent Greece) that attack the genetic quality of the lineage. The consequence of this aberrant state of affairs is that the primitive races have been developing beauty and physical attraction at a slower pace than modern races. Today, European races have also fallen into the dysgenic curse of socioeconomic marriage and materialism. In such a state of affairs, a race does not evolve, simply because the finest specimens within such societies have a very high probability of, either breeding with partners who are not up to their genetic level, or marrying much older partners, whose seed is less fresh, so that the offspring will tend to deteriorate rather than improve. All of this is now added to some modern factors (pollution, Oestrogenization, deviant nutrition, alcohol, smoking, medication, physical inactivity, official enforced ideology, mental programming techniques used by the mass media, and pernicious daily habits) that erode even more the genetic quality generation after generation.

“Sexual freedom” does not mean promiscuity, but choosing whoever you want to have children with; let’s recall that within the Germanic tribes having sexual intercourse before being 20 years old was frowned upon, and that their women were regarded as sexually “pure” compared to the “impure” Roman women. It is also clear that the greater sexual liberty traditionally present in the North since ever has been used by the modern world against these people, in order to promote mixture and dysgenics among the “white” population—which appears to be very important for the modern system judging by its propaganda. Within a healthy society with good instincts sexual freedom is the ideal situation, yet in a society dominated by media, money, ceaseless images that give a distorted vision of the world and the human being, materialism, hedonism, comfort, convenience, aberrant fashions, socioeconomic interests and the apology of crossbreeding, sexual freedom is the worst of poisons. Sexual unions under psychological pressure inflicted by such coercive circumstances, are far from being spontaneous, natural or instinctive, are similar to the unions between third-world peoples, and giving rise to a more and more degenerated progeny.

To sum up, only when people have pure racial instincts, procreation issues can be left up to free-will. Today, we are far from having a population with that instinct; a dictatorship that promotes partnerships based on biological heredity is needed, along with the State-sponsored creation of homes and families of this kind. At least, we would need social systems and institutions to work on genetic grounds and promote the recovery and protection of the legacy of all human races.

[5] Thus, in the Wikipedia article dedicated to virus, we can read: “In evolution, viruses are an important means of horizontal gene transfer, which increases genetic diversity.”

[6] This link is important, as it confirms that the mixture happened essentially in the Near East. The information of this study fills two important gaps: first, it justifies the cranial models half way between Neanderthal and “modern man” found in the Near East (mainly in Israel, but also in Maghreb) and second, it explains certain features of the Armenid race that arose in that region.

[7] There are numerous and illustrative examples, such as the Huns, Mongols, Turks, Tatars or Bolshevism. Another oriental occupation—Jewry—has behaved in a similar way in the Western World with pornography, social politics, white slave trade, nightclubs, the fashion industry, music and subliminal propaganda. The purpose is turning the European woman into a commercial product and open her to the capitalist market, “globalizing,” her. This behaviour is well understood taking into account the desires of primitive races for enslaving the modern ones, acting in a vampirical manner over their genetics and obtaining economical benefits in the process.

For those who repeat the media meme “we’re all equal,” “races do not exist,” “there’s only one race, the human” and similar slogans, see this [Evropa Soberana adds here some links to articles in Spanish].

Finally, as many have sent me their own portraits to analyse them, I will give some guidelines: The pictures shouldn’t depict a fashionable pose. You should have a natural and relaxed posture—one full-face photo, a profile one, one half-profile, and there must be a good illumination.

The Ukrainian crisis

ukrainepro


Michael O’Meara said yesterday:

Beyond the distortions and misrepresentations of this series, there remain the fact that the Ukrainian crisis is essentially a proxy war between Putin’s Russian national government and the Evil Empire of the Washington / London / Tel Aviv axis.

By championing the Ukie thugs, who lick up the vomit of their CIA / Mossad handlers, certain “white nationalists” are once again demonstrating their utter ignorance of world realities by inadvertently supporting the very forces they ostensibly oppose: the Judeo-monied elites controlling the banking system known as the United States. What a sad joke.


Greg Johnson responded:

I challenge you to document a single “distortion” or “mis-
representation” in this series.

While Putin jails genuine Russian Nationalists, outlaws historical revisionism about WW II, and professes to be fighting against fascists, racism, Nazism, and anti-Semitism in Ukraine, what explains his continued popularity among Western anti-Semites and fascists?

It is simply a delusion to claim that what is happening in Ukraine boils down to a proxy war between Jewry and its opponents, since Putin is in bed with Jews as well. Nor is it a battle between globalization and Russian nationalism, since Putin suppresses Russian nationalism in favor of his own form multicultural imperialism. The only actor in this mess with bona fide anti-Semitic credentials is Svoboda. The only real nationalists in this whole mess are the Ukrainian nationalists. Principled White Nationalists should be far more sympathetic with Ukrainian nationalists than with Putin.

Putin-philia is just the latest version of Ron Paul mania or Tea Party mania. White Nationalists need to stick to their principles, not engage in yet another adventure in wishful thinking and cuckoldry. White Nationalists need to grow up.

If Ukraine is to pursue its own destiny, its first priority is to deal with the Russian threat. Then it can deal with the EU. It is folly for the US to be guaranteeing the borders of the Baltic states, but I completely understand why the Baltic states were happy for such guarantees. If Ukraine had been part of NATO and the EU, it would still have Crimea today. Any sensible nationalist would take the same course.


Karen Toffan commented:

Greg Johnson: it’s unnecessary for Michael O’Meara to document a single distortion or misrepresentation in this series, Askold has already done so [in the TOO threads].


Hadrian concluded:

If Jews are on both sides of the conflict, that means that the conflict itself has been created by Jews, and that both sides are controlled by them. We should be on our own side, not whatever side they offer us because any side they offer us is going to benefit them, not us.

How can you possibly call these Ukrainian nationalists “principled” when the first thing they did when they took power was install a bunch of Jews into high government positions? Why didn’t they install Ukrainians into these positions?

Real Nationalists must first and foremost be opposed to Jewry because Jews are the number one threat to any and all White nations. Any Nationalist movement that is not openly anti-Semitic is not for real. You cannot simultaneously be a Nationalist and ignore the Jewish problem, because it is the problem that Whites face today.

Putin destroys Russia

Since both Solzhenitsyn’s Archipelago and Goodrich’s Hellstorm are pivotal to understand the West’s darkest hour (both recount the unexpiated sins of the Allies and Russia in particular), I always resented the infatuation of Michael O’Meara in Counter-Currents with that nation.

But only today I corroborated my hunch with facts of present history, which corroborate my view that a nation’s unatoned sins only create social and political symptoms that won’t go away until actual expiation takes place.

Igor Artemov wrote:

Putin destroys Russia with unprecedented speed.

Multiculturalism (“multinationality”) is the official Putin ideology. Ten years ago there were virtually no alien migrants in Russia. Now there are 15 millions of them, mostly Central Asians—10% of the total population. Most of them are males of military age. In Moscow they commit around a half of all violent crimes. Moscow is no longer a Russian city.

Now not a single month passes without some minor ethnic riot occurring in some part of the country, triggered by the depressingly similar scenario: a migrant kills a Russian, police either let the murderer go or don’t do anything, local authorities blame Russians for xenophobia, locals arise and protest. This is in fact good development as Russians learn that only rioting makes authorities listen. Unfortunately, as a result, the most active members of such events then go to prison.

Read it all on The Occidental Observer.

Uncle Adolf’s table talk – 2

“I have dipped into Mein Kampf but never read it: it was written only partly by Hitler, and that is the problem. More important are… Hitler’s table talks: daily memoranda which first Heim (Bormann’s adjutant, whom I interviewed) and then Picker wrote down at his table side”. —David Irving


the-real-hitler

Night of 5-6 July 1941
11.30 p.m.-1:50 a.m.

[The shortening of space by roads - The frontier of the Urals - Moscow must disappear - The treasures of the Hermitage.]
 

The beauties of the Crimea, which we shall make accessible by means of an autobahn—for us Germans, that will be our Riviera. Crete is scorching and dry. Cyprus would be lovely, but we can reach the Crimea by road. Along that road lies Kiev! And Croatia, too, a tourists’ paradise for us. I expect that after the war there will be a great upsurge of rejoicing.

Better than the railway, which has something impersonal about it, it’s the road that will bring peoples together. What progress in the direction of the New Europe! Just as the autobahn has caused the inner frontiers of Germany to disappear, so it will abolish the frontiers of the countries of Europe.

To those who ask me whether it will be enough to reach the Urals as a frontier, I reply that for the present it is enough for the frontier to be drawn back as far as that. What matters is that Bolshevism must be exterminated. In case of necessity, we shall renew our advance wherever a new centre of resistance is formed. Moscow, as the centre of the doctrine, must disappear from the earth’s surface, as soon as its riches have been brought to shelter. There’s no question of our collaborating with the Muscovite proletariat. Anyhow, St. Petersburg, as a city, is incomparably more beautiful than Moscow.

Probably the treasures of the Hermitage have not been stored at the Kremlin, as they were during the first World War, but in the country-houses—unless they’ve been shifted to the cities east of Moscow, or still further by river.

Uncle Adolf’s table talk – 1

“I have dipped into Mein Kampf but never read it: it was written only partly by Hitler, and that is the problem. More important are… Hitler’s table talks: daily memoranda which first Heim (Bormann’s adjutant, whom I interviewed) and then Picker wrote down at his table side”. —David Irving


PART ONE: 1941

the-real-hitler
 
Saturday, 5th July 1941

[Aryans and Russians - Necessity of the mailed fist in Russia - Deterioration of soil]
 

What we need is a collective view of people’s wish to live and manner of living.

We must distinguish between the Fascist popular movement and the popular movement in Russia. The Fascist movement is a spontaneous return to the traditions of ancient Rome. The Russian movement has an essential tendency towards anarchy.

By instinct, the Russian does not incline towards a higher form of society. Certain peoples can live in such a way that with them a collection of family units does not make a whole; and although Russia has set up a social system which, judged by Western standards, qualifies for the designation “State”, it is not, in fact, a system which is either congenial or natural to her.

It is true that, in a sense, every product of human culture, every work gifted with beauty can be born only of the effect of the constraint which we call education.

The Aryan peoples are peoples who are particularly active. A man like Krümel works from morning to night; such-and-such another person never stops thinking. In the same way, the Italian is as diligent as an ant (bienenfleissig). In the eyes of the Russian, the principal support of civilisation is vodka. His ideal consists in never doing anything but the indispensable. Our conception of work (work, and then more of it!) is one that he submits to as if it were a real curse.

It is doubtful whether anything at all can be done in Russia without the help of the Orthodox priest. It’s the priest who has been able to reconcile the Russian to the fatal necessity of work—by promising him more happiness in another world.

The Russian will never make up his mind to work except under compulsion from outside, for he is incapable of organising himself. And if, despite everything, he is apt to have organisation thrust upon him, that is thanks to the drop of Aryan blood in his veins. It’s only because of this drop that the Russian people has created something and possesses an organised State.

It takes energy to rule Russia. The corollary is that, the tougher a country’s regime, the more appropriate it is that equity and justice should be practised there. The horse that is not kept constantly under control forgets in the wink of an eye the rudiments of training that have been inculcated into it. In the same way, with the Russian, there is an instinctive force that invariably leads him back to the state of nature. People sometimes quote the case of the horses that escaped from a ranch in America, and by some ten years later had formed huge herds of wild horses. It is so easy for an animal to go back to its origins! For the Russian, the return to the state of nature is a return to primitive forms of life. The family exists, the female looks after her children, like the female of the hare, with all the feelings of a mother. But the Russian doesn’t want anything more. His reaction against the constraint of the organised State (which is always a constraint, since it limits the liberty of the individual) is brutal and savage, like all feminine reactions. When he collapses and should yield, the Russian bursts into lamentations. This will to return to the state of nature is exhibited in his revolutions. For the Russian, the typical form of revolution is nihilism.

I think there’s still petroleum in thousands of places. As for coal, we know we’re reducing the natural reserves, and that in so doing we are creating gaps in the sub-soil. But as for petroleum, it may be that the lakes from which we are drawing are constantly renewed from invisible reservoirs.

Without doubt, man is the most dangerous microbe imaginable. He exploits the ground beneath his feet without ever asking whether he is disposing thus of products that would perhaps be indispensable to the life of other regions. If one examined the problem closely, one would probably find here the origin of the catastrophes that occur periodically in the earth’s surface.

March of the Titans

The following sentences of March of the Titans: The Complete History of the White Race by Arthur Kemp caught my attention:

Russia 

The land which ultimately comprised the Russian Empire (which lasted for 1055 years before transforming itself into the Soviet Union) was hugely significant for three major reasons:

• it included the Caucasus area, the original source of the Indo-European peoples;

• it was the White peoples of this area who bore the brunt of the great Asiatic invasions of Europe; and

• it was this region which was the first important power to be seized by the Communists, which had ramifications far beyond Russia itself.

For these reasons alone, an understanding of the origins and tribulations of this great nation are vital to any understanding of world history.


Ancient Russia

The south of Russia, in the region between the Black and Caspian Seas, has the distinction of being the original source of the Nordic Indo-European peoples who came to dominate Europe and much of the world. Unfortunately, the great Asiatic invasions which swept up out of the east overran this region, starting during the time of the Western Roman Empire, and most traces of this original White homeland were destroyed by the Mongolian invaders.

vsevolod-ivanov_art_drevnyaya-rus

Nonetheless, the name often used to describe Whites: Caucasians; is derived from the Caucasus mountains in this region and serves as a constant reminder of this first and original Nordic homeland.

Amongst the Indo-European tribes who made up the early inhabitants of the vast stretches of Russia were the Cimmerians, Scythians, and Sarmatians, as well as the easternmost branch of the great Celtic peoples, the Slavs. All of these groupings were overwhelmingly Nordic in sub-racial make-up, although in scattered regions mixing did take place with some Old European types who had established small Neolithic settlements, mainly in the south.

Some of the Indo-European tribes who settled in Greece and who established the Classical Grecian culture, themselves created isolated colonies back up into the Black Sea region and on the Crimean peninsula. One of the last great Indo-European tribes to emerge from southern Russia were the Goths, who established their first state, on the Black Sea Coast.


Asiatic invasions

The 4th century AD invasion by the non-White Asiatic Huns destroyed the Black Sea Gothic state, pushing the survivors westwards where they were eventually to sack Rome and settle Spain. The Huns pushed as far west as Vienna before turning back, but continued to occupy a large part of southern and central Russia for several hundred years.

After the Huns, came further Asiatic invasions, including the Avars, Magyars, and the Khazars—the last of whom converted to Judaism and provided many of the Jews of Eastern Europe and Russia and then, after a further period of assimilation with the Europeans, many European Jews.

By the time of the Asiatic invasions, most of Russia’s White population in the south had been either killed or absorbed into the waves of Asians: in the north the Slavs and other Indo-European tribes existed as vassals, paying annual tributes to the Huns in the south.

It is unknown how many Whites perished—either through being killed or being absorbed into the Asiatic gene pool through this invasion: but it was certainly hundreds of thousands, if not millions; bearing in mind that the original source of the Indo-European peoples in the south, which had produced almost all the people of Europe, was extinguished in the course of the Mongol invasion.

It was perhaps the single most important racial genocide in history.

Esau’s Tears

Excerpted from Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews (Cambridge University Press, 2009); a book that could have been subtitled “Jewish takeover (‘rise’) and Gentile reaction (‘anti-Semitism’)”.





Preface

That I have devoted many years of study to anti-Semitism underlines how important I think it has been and is.

Expressing irritation with Jews, as a number of prominent Germans did—and so did prominent figures, including Jews themselves, in nearly every country—is one thing; calling for their systematic murder is quite another. In many accounts (Goldhagen’s is the latest in a long series) such distinctions are blurred; some writers go so far as to condemn the distinctions as morally dubious, thus making any irritation with Jews or criticism of them “anti-Semitic,” a conclusion that takes on extraordinary dimensions when linked to such assertions as “all anti-Semitism is as dangerous as a little bit of cancer.”

I cannot accept such reasoning, which seems to me facile, especially insofar as it implies that Jews, unlike other human groups, cannot provoke legitimate irritation.

Indeed, the opposite position, that Jewish conduct is the main cause for hatred of Jews, has been described by Edward Alexander (disapprovingly) as “an argument of wide and enduring popularity,” which it certainly is. It was even more popular in the nineteenth century when it was almost universally assumed, by both Jews and non-Jews, that Jewish behavior was the all-too-obvious cause of the appearance of modern anti-Semitism.

Chapter 1. Anti-Semitism before the modern period: overview and definition

Esau’s tears: the deepest roots of anti-Semitism

After the fall of the Roman Empire, the Gentile rulers of Jews in Europe generally became classified as “Esau.” Anti-Semites of various stripes have drawn upon the Jacob-Esau tale, that Jacob will always hurt Esau.

The Esau-Jacob story and Jewish commentary on it, however, suggest a number of provocative points in conceptualizing the nature of anti-Semitism. In a central passage of the Hebrew Bible, Esau’s angry tears were presented as perfectly understandable; they were not the result of some mysterious fantasy about a wholly innocent Jacob.

As a reader of the Hebrew Bible must recognize, brutality was hardly an invention of the Other Nations; the biblical Jews committed, and their spokesmen afterwards glorified, unspeakable bestial acts. The inclination to picture Jews as perennially helpless victims, in no sense responsible for the ills that have affected them, has often been part of an unsophisticated and transparently defensive reflex. The popular writer Howard Fast concludes his book The Jews, The Story of a People, with this remark: “Such despair and agony as the Jewish people had to endure over the past thousand years is the result, not of what they are, but of what the Christian world has inflicted upon them.” This is by no means an isolated or unusual comment. Critics have charged that women, workers, or minorities have been portrayed one-dimensionally by some historians, as utterly helpless, uncomprehending, and pitiful victims of history, in no way responsible for their misfortunes (and to assert that they were responsible would be to commit the cardinal sin of blaming the victim).

The sheer horror of the Holocaust has made it understandably suspect or even unconscionable in the opinion of some observers to suggest that Jews themselves may have had a degree of responsibility for that catastrophe. Study of the sufferings of Jews is now advocated mostly as a way of preventing suffering in the future, largely by exposing the sinful or corrupt nature of Gentile society and its responsibility for Jewish suffering and almost never as a means by which Jews could become aware of their own sins. The following pages will provide evidence that anti-Semites were frequently less simple and occasionally less morally corrupt than they have been generally presented.

The Rise of the Jews

Arthur Koestler has stated the matter with characteristic bluntness: “The Jewish religion, unlike any other, is racially discriminatory, nationally segregative, and socially tension-creating.” The same Ruth Wisse who was earlier quoted as describing anti-Semitism as functioning “independent of its object” observes at the same time, without apparently sensing any contradiction, that “the dynamism of the Jews in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is almost unparalleled.” The rise of the Jews, notes Paul Johnson, was above all the rise of the Jewish intellectual, whose “shattering importance to modern history” can hardly be exaggerated in nearly all realms but perhaps most strikingly in that of the left-wing and revolutionary politics.

A once despised and legally set-apart group seemed to be prospering more than others, and, more to the point, it seemed to be assuming power over non-Jews. A few scandals or frauds involving Jews, Jewish braggarts, or strutters—and there was no lack of them—set off poisonous spirals of anger, indignation, and envy.

Chapter 2. Modern Times (1700 to the 1870s)

The French Revolution and the Jews

Opponents of Jewish emancipation retorted that Judaic belief, included the belief that Jews were a separate nation, was not then merely a private affair. Jews could not serve in the army because they could not be depended upon to defend the French nation; they were potential enemies of France.

The liberal years of Midcentury

Legal restrictions concerning Jews were lifted, and many Jews became prominent politicians. This period of liberal triumph has been referred to as the “honeymoon years” of Jewish-Gentile relations. [But] honeymoons always end, sometimes with bitter reflections concerning the flawed beliefs and naive expectations upon which the union was initially conceived.

Backward Russia in Ostjuden

Russian Jews throughout the nineteenth century remained a nation most emphatically apart from the dominant Great Russians. Historians now doubt that hundreds of thousands of Jews were killed by Chmielnicki’s forces, as earlier stated.

By the end of the [18th] century Jews had sufficiently recovered economically and demographically that they represented ten percent of Poland’s population.

By the middle of the [19th] century, the Jews of Posen and Galicia were awarded Prussian and Austrian citizenship, including the right of free movement.

Russia’s “Liberal” Experiment

Jews became prosperous industrialists, merchants, bankers, doctors, and lawyers in proportionately much larger numbers than did Great Russians, Byelo-Russians, Poles, or Ukrainians. Jews also entered white-collar employment in sharply disproportionate numbers.

Eastern European Jews were also infamous in the nineteenth century for involvement in activities associated with the saloon, as pimps, or in the language of the time, on “white slavery,” but also in other illegal activities.

Anti-Semites in Russia were inclined to perceive yet another area of Jewish vice, one that emerged from the destructiveness of Jewish character, in the unusual proclivities of Jews to engage in subversive activity.

Revolutionary Agitation and Tsarist Reaction

Arrests and repression followed, and thereafter activists took a more violent and terroristic direction. When Alexander II was assassinated by revolutionary conspirators in 1881, much attention was drawn to the Jews involved in the conspiracy. Following the assassination, popular rioting against the Jews, or pogroms (the word originated in Russia), broke out in many areas.

The May Laws of 1882, not formally repelled until 1917, were designed to bring Russia’s Jews under control; control [of] what was considered the increasingly unscrupulous exploitation by Jews of peasants. Quotas on the number of Jews allowed in higher education were established to reduce and stabilize the numbers of Jews in the universities. The new goal was around ten percent, since by the 1870s the percentage of Jewish university students had grown much beyond that figure in many areas.

The 1880s marked the beginning of a massive Jewish emigration out of the Russian Empire. Now opportunities to get out of Russia opened up as never before, especially for those willing to go to the New World. Jews from eastern Europe arrived in floods.

The Concept of Race

By the middle years of the nineteenth century, the term “race” came to be commonly and unapologetically used by nearly everyone in western Europe. In stark and revealing contrast to the situation by the mid-twentieth century, few questioned that there was a Jewish race.

A Gentile child, adopted by Jews at birth, can never qualify for priestly status. His moral probity or fidelity to the beliefs and rituals of Judaism, no matter how perfect, cannot alter his lower status. Nazis, too, said that one is born a Jew and Jewishness could never be relinquished.

Blood Imagery

In the nineteenth century, the word race began to replace blood. The English politician and writer Benjamin Disraeli (prime minister, 1868), in spite of having converted to Christianity as a child, emphatically insisted that he remained a member of the Jewish race. In his novel Coningby, Disraeli depicted a vast and secret power of Jews, bent on dominating the world. His noble Jewish character, Sidonia, describes race as a supremely important determinant (“all is race; there is no other truth”). He wrote that if the “great Anglo-Saxon republic” (the United States) allowed its white population “to mingle with its negro and coloured populations” it would be the beginning of the end for the new country.

Racism and anti-Semitism

It is significant that racism in its nineteenth-century form had no single theorist whom most racists recognized, in the way that Marx was recognized by socialists or J.S. Mill was recognized by liberals. Racism did not become a movement in the way that socialism and liberalism did, nor did racists–even specific kinds of racists, such as anti-Semites–form coherent, durable parties comparable to socialist and liberal parties.

There seems little question that increasingly systematic observations about various human societies had important implications for the growth of racism in the nineteenth century.

The Evolution of the Vocabulary of Race

Johann Gottfried von Herder (1744-1803) developed the concept of Volkgeist. He presented himself as the outspoken friend [of the Jews], yet he rejected Jewish emancipation in Germany, at least in the near future, and termed Jews “parasites.” He wrote that Jews “belong to Palestine and not Europe. Since Israel and its prayers despise all other peoples from which it is set apart, how can it be otherwise than that it is itself despised by other nations?”

A number of influential European anti-Semites arrived at Zionist conclusions: The Jewish problem in Europe could be solved if the Jews would go to Palestine, where they belonged.

Racist Ideas among Jews

There were many Jewish racists in the nineteenth century. As noted, Disraeli was probably more influential in spreading certain general notions about the Jewish race than any of the theorists of race described in the preceding sections. He despised what he termed “that pernicious doctrine of modern times, the natural equality of man.”

Moses Hess (1812-1875), who had worked closely for a time with Karl Marx, later affirmed that the “race struggle is primary, the class struggle secondary.” Judaism would become the spiritual guide of humankind, whereas Christianity, “a religion of death,” would wither. He was a good friend of Graetz, who wrote him of his delight in “scourging” Germans. Graetz added that “we must above all work to shatter Christianity.”

_____________________________________

See the rest of my typed excerpts here
(and excuse me for the typos:
these texts are direct typing
from Lindemann’s book for WDH).

Healing Amfortas (cont.)

wagner-parsifal

Further to my previous post. Below, (1) my presentation of Colin Ross’ cornerstone to understand the trauma model of mental disorders; (2) a translation of “Regaining Self-esteem” by Dr. Claus Wolfschlag—original in German here—, and (3) my views on traumatized Germany.



1.- Ross’ trauma model

Attachment theory, originally developed by John Bowlby, is one of the most fruitful platforms to explain human psychological development.

Evolution always chooses its available mechanisms for its use, and since every living creature has the imperative to survive, hominids developed an unconscious structure to maintain the illusion of parental love even when there really is none.

Perhaps the most accessible way to visualize attachment is through a modern fairy tale: Steven Spielberg’s film Artificial Intelligence. I’m referring to the scenes in which Henry warns Monica not to imprint their adoptive son David with the program of affective attachment if Monica is not completely sure that she will want to reciprocate the love that David would profess, since the program is irreversible (“The robot child’s love would be sealed—in a sense hardwired—and we’d be part of him forever”). After some days Monica nonetheless reads to David the seven magic words that imprint him (“What were those words for, Mommy?”).

The platform which Ross is standing on in order to understand mental disorders is what he calls “the problem of attachment to the perpetrator”:

I defined the problem in the mid-1990s, in the context of the false memory war.

In order to defend myself against the attacks by hostile colleagues, I sought solid ground on which to build fortifications. It seemed like the theory of evolution offered a good starting point. What is the basic goal of all organisms according to the theory of evolution? To survive and reproduce. This is true from amoeba on up to mammals. Who will dispute that all organisms want to survive and replicate? This seemed like safe ground.

Dragonflies, grasshoppers, salamanders and alligators do not have families. They do not send cards on Mother’s Day. Things are different if you are a bird or mammal. Birds and mammals are absolutely dependent on adult caretakers for their survival for a period after birth, which ranges from weeks to decades depending on the species. For human parents, it seems like the period of dependency lasts over thirty years. In some species, if the nursing mother dies, the child dies. But in others, including elephants, if the nursing mother dies, a female relative takes over the care of the young one, and the child survives. In elephants there is a built-in Child Protective Services, and there is a sociology of attachment.

Attachment is like the migration of birds. It is built in, deep in our brain stems and DNA. The infant bird or mammal does not engage in a cognitive, analytical process to assess the cost-benefit of attachment. It just happens. It’s biology. The fundamental developmental task of the human infant is attachment. You will and you must attach. This is true at all levels of the organism. You must attach in order to survive biologically, but also in order to thrive and grow at emotional, intellectual, interpersonal and at all possible levels.

We know the consequences of failure to attach from several sources. The first is the third world orphanage. Orphan babies may have an adequate intake of protein, carbohydrate and fat, and may have their diapers changed regularly, but if they are starved for love, stimulation, attention, and affection, they are damaged developmentally. Their growth is stunted at all levels, including basic pediatric developmental norms.

Ross goes on to explain the body of scientific evidence about the effects of abuse in the offspring of primates: “The Harlow monkey experiments, for instance, are systematic studies of abuse and neglect. Little monkeys cling desperately to their unresponsive wire-and-cloth mothers because they are trying to solve the problem of attachment to the perpetrator, in this case the perpetrator of neglect.” He also mentions experimental evidence that profound neglect and sensory isolation during early infancy physically damage the brain in a measurable way: “The mammal raised in such an environment has fewer dendritic connections between the nerve cells in its brain than the mammal which grew up in a ‘culturally rich’ environment.” It is in this context that Ross states that it is developmental suicide to fail to attach, and “at all costs and under the highest imperative, the young mammal must attach.” He then writes:

In a sense, we all have the problem of attachment to the perpetrator. None of us have absolutely secure attachment. We all hate our parents for some reason, but love them at the same time. This is the normal human condition. But there is a large group of children who have the problem of attachment to the perpetrator to a huge degree. They have it to such a large degree, it is really a qualitatively different problem, I think. These are the children in chronic trauma families. The trauma is a variable mix of emotional, verbal, physical and sexual abuse.


The locus of control shift

For psychiatrists Theodore Lidz, Silvano Arieti and, in a less systematic way, Loren Mosher, in schizophrenogenic families not only one but both parents failed terribly. If the problem of attachment to the perpetrator is a cornerstone for the trauma model of mental disorders, there is yet another stone. Though the number one imperative for birds (and in previous times, the dinosaurs) and mammals is to attach, in abusive families the child makes use of another built-in reflex: to recoil from pain. Ross explains what he calls “The locus of control shift” (in psychology, “locus of control” is known jargon).

The scientific foundation of the locus of control shift is Piaget and developmental psychology. We know several things about the cognition of children age two to seven. I summarize this as “kids think like kids.” Young children are self-centered. They are at the center of the world, and everything revolves around them. They cause everything in the world [“locus shift”] and they do so through magical causality. They do not use rational, analytical, adult cognitive strategies and vocabulary.

Imagine a relatively normal family with a four year-old daughter. One day, the parents decide to split up and dad moves out. What is true for this little girl? She is sad. Using normal childhood cognition, the little girl constructs a theory to explain her field observation: “Daddy doesn’t live here anymore because I didn’t keep my bedroom tidy”.

This is really a dumb theory. It is wrong, incorrect, inaccurate, mistaken and preposterous. This is how normal kids think. But there is more to it than that. The little girl thinks to herself, “I’m OK. I’m not powerless. I’m in charge. I’m in control. And I have hope for the future. Why? Because I have a plan. All I have to do is to tidy up my bedroom and daddy will move back in. I feel OK now”.

The little girl has shifted the locus of control from inside her parents, where it really is, to inside herself. She has thereby created an illusion of power, control and mastery which is developmentally protective [of the attachment].

Ross explains that this is normal and happens in many non-abusive, though dysfunctional, families. He then explains what happens in extremely abusive families:

Now consider another four year-old girl living in a major trauma family. She has the problem of attachment to the perpetrator big time. What is true of this little girl?

This other girl is powerless, helpless, trapped, and overwhelmed. She can’t stop the abuse, she can’t escape it, and she can’t predict it. She is trapped in her family societal denial, her age, threats, physical violence, family rules and double binds. How does the little girl cope? She shifts the locus of control.

The child says to herself, “I’m not powerless, helpless and overwhelmed. I’m in charge here. I’m making the abuse happen. The reason I’m abused is because I’m bad. How do I know this is true? Because only a bad little girl would be abused by her parents.”

A delicious exemplification of the locus of control shift in the film A.I. is the dialogue that David has with his Teddy bear. After Monica abandoned him in the forest David tells his little friend that the situation is under control. He only has to find the Blue Fairy so that she may turn him into a real boy and his mom will love him again…

In contrast to fairy tales, in the real world instances of the locus of control shift are sordid. In incest victims, the ideation that everything is the fault of the girl herself is all too frequent. I cannot forget the account of a woman who told her therapist that, when she was a girl, she took baths immediately after her father used her sexually. The girl felt that since she, not her father was the dirty one and that her body was the dirty factor that aroused the father’s appetite, she had to “fix” her body.

But there are far more serious cases, even, than sexual abuse. According to Ross, in near-psychotic families:

The locus of control shift is like an evil transfusion. All the evil inside the perpetrator has been transfused into the self, making the perpetrator good and safe to attach to. The locus of control shift helps to solve the problem of attachment to the perpetrator. The two are intertwined with each other.

Although Silvano Arieti made similar pronouncements half a century before, these two principles as elaborated by Ross are the true cornerstones to understand the edifice of my work, Hojas Susurrantes. As I mentioned in my second book, when I visited the clinic of Ross in Dallas as an observer, I had the opportunity to observe the therapies of some adult women. I remember a lady in particular who said that if her husband hit her it may be because she, not her husband, behaved naughtily.

In The Trauma Model Ross mentions cases of already grown daughters, now patients of his psychiatric clinic, who harm themselves. These self-harmers in real life exemplify the paradigm of the girl mentioned by Ross: Evil has been transfused to the mind of the victim, who hurts herself because she believes she is wicked. In my previous book I said that in the film The Piano Teacher a mother totally absorbs the life of her daughter, who in turn redirects the hate she feels toward her mother by cutting herself in the genital area until bleeding profusely: a practice that, as I show in Hojas Susurrantes, is identical to the pre-Hispanic sacrificial practice of spilling the blood of one’s own genitals.

In his brief class Ross showed us why, however abusive our parents, a Stockholm syndrome elevated to the nth degree makes us see our parents as good attachment objects. The little child is like a plant that cannot but unfold towards the sun to survive. Since even after marriage and independence the adult child very rarely reverts in her psyche the locus of control shift to the original source, she remains psychically disturbed.

For Lloyd deMause, this kind of super-Stockholm syndrome is the major flaw of the human mind, the curse of Homo sapiens that produces an alter ego in which all of the malignancy of the perpetrator has been transfused to the ego of the victim. In a divided self this entity strives for either (1) substituting, through the locus of control shift, the unconscious anger felt towards the parents onto herself with self-harming, addictions, anorexia or other sorts of self-destructive behavior, and/or (2) harming the next generation of children. In any case the cause of this process is the total incapability of judging and processing inside ourselves the behavior of the parent: the problem of attachment to the perpetrator.

As I said above, I believe that Ross’ class is the cornerstone to understand the trauma model of mental disorders.



2.- Wolfschlag’s translated piece

A note was sent to me about the topic of “Trauma, fear and love.” The psychotherapist Franz Ruppert from Munich has dealt with so called “trauma energies” in his books, a trauma that can be passed down through generations. Because individual psychological findings can at least partially be transferred to collective experiences, I have read the slides on “perpetrators” and “victims” from Ruppert’s website from this vantage point.

A fortnight ago I wrote an article about some recent movies where the subject of the expulsion of civilian Germans after 1945 plays an important role. But such artistic products of processing the trauma are still rare and on individual cases. There is a striking imbalance in the German “culture of remembrance.” Since the 1970s the Holocaust and the persecution of leftist-resistance groups during the Nazi period have obtained a dominant, partly sacralized meaning while German victim stories of those years, which could also incriminate other actors as “perpetrators,” have increasingly been hidden and marginalized.

If occasionally an audible voice rises intending to give these German victims their right in the German “culture of remembrance,” it will immediately be attacked with the rationale of equating “victims and perpetrators” and that the dead Germans are, at most, victims of second or third class. This lesson was learned and requires constant repetition, since it is ultimately a very important tool to preserve the foreign political control over the economically important German industrial base.

Passivity is an emergency response of the victim

In conservative circles it is frequently heard that since 1945 Germany would be in a traumatized phase. In this context the words of Ernst Jünger have been recorded: “From such a loss one cannot recover.”

So now I had this in mind when I looked at the slides of Franz Ruppert, which appeared to me like an incidental proof of the theory of “the traumatized nation.” After Ruppert’s definition of the terms “perpetrator” and “victim,” he goes on to explain that the victim would make the damage even bigger with a stress reaction to the suffering inflicted upon him or her. A failure to react is, therefore, an emergency response of the victim to maximize her chances of survival. The victim gives in to the situation, but experiences herself as helpless and powerless.

Presently this reaction can be seen very clearly in the behavior of the Germans after the end of the War; it partly persists even to these days. One must give up on further acts of resistance and surrender oneself into a feeling of political powerlessness. This in spite of the fact that for some political groups there are now separate possibilities of participation and new beginnings. I speak of the collective, national, fundamental experience. According to Ruppert, the splitting of the personality allows the traumatized individual to live on. It is a survival strategy, and it means the victim’s experience will be suppressed and split off. The traumatization will be denied; memories will be tried to be erased, and impulses of resistance suppressed.

The prosperous Germany is only very moderately happy

The result of this repression, according to Ruppert, are feelings of guilt. In addition to it, it comes the imagination that the wounds, which one has suffered personally, are “fair punishment.” One doesn’t perceive the perpetrator as such, but rather defends him. The individual even identifies herself with the needs of the perpetrator.

As a side effect the traumatization shows itself in constant complaining, suffering, bemoaning without being able to give cogent reasons for it. According to an assessment [linked at the original article], the affluent Germany only takes a middle place on a map of Europe ranked by perceived happiness. And that alongside poorer eastern European countries, which have to process their own traumatizations due to Soviet occupation. The people of the poorer western European nations on the other hand are interestingly almost happier than the Germans. Why?

For the perpetrator the traumatization also has consequences. He denies the injury inflicted on other humans, even feels justified. He blames and ridicules the victim and declares to have acted on behalf of a higher thought. This behavior is often the result of an earlier victimhood of the perpetrator and a misguided coping strategy. It leads to events such as the recent election in the Czech Republic, where Miloš Zeman could win the presidential elections with his defensive nationalistic position against Karel Schwarzenberg, who cautiously reminded us the historic suffering of the Sudeten-Germans.

Learning to mourn, developing compassion for oneself

Franz Ruppert comes to the conclusion that unprocessed experiences of victimization can turn into eruptive perpetrator behavior. The powerlessness can be followed by a furious outbreak of aggression. Victims turn into perpetrators, and the lack of emotion towards oneself leads to a lack of empathy towards the new victim. In this way victim-perpetrator spirals keep running: a power which can be seen interpersonally and also in the larger political conflicts. Innocent people are dragged into the conflicts, and it comes to delusions and acts of self-destruction.

An eruption of violence is not yet to be expected from the Germans in their current state. Perhaps nothing will ever come from them again, except a last gasp on the deathbed. But maybe one can at least try to heal a couple of things.

Healing would, however, require a massive reform of our “culture of remembrance.” This would, let’s not delude ourselves, encounter the most brutal resistance since this is where the core of the trauma is located [emphasis added], in which influential people have a vested interest.

For the healing process one can therefore transfer the problem-solving approach from the individual of Ruppert to the national situation. First of all one has to acknowledge one’s own traumatization and psychological injuries, but also learn to mourn for oneself, to develop compassion for oneself. Finally, although one must refrain from blind vengeance it is by all means appropriate to “demand from the perpetrator a concrete compensation for the damage, if still possible” (Ruppert).

Only compensation can bring healing

One can speak of compensation, and if it only consists of the annulment of the discriminatory Benesch-decrees in the Czech Republic, the construction of memorial sites for the displaced Germans in the Czech Republic and Poland, bilingual place signs and symbolic material compensations, a memorial for the German victims of the bombing campaign must also be constructed in London and Washington; in Moscow, another for the German Gulag-slaves and the women who were raped by the Red Army.

Only then will the false and traumatized relations of today be overcome. Only then will constructive symbiotic relations be possible, from which all participants can profit.

At the end of this process stands for all sides the rediscovery of self-respect. Because for the perpetrator too the acknowledgement of responsibility for his own deeds is a way to inner healing.

The problem of the German process of coming to terms with the past is, after all, not the examination of one’s own crimes but rather the one-sidedness, the political instrumentalization and anti-German manipulation. The healing process, which was outlined here, has for now been delayed in the Czech Republic due to the electoral defeat of Schwarzenberg. However, time and again it will knock against the coffin lid from below, no matter how much earth one hurls onto it.



3.- My 2 ¢

Today’s Germans, so attached to the Judeo-American perp and overburdened with guilt, remind me the character of the badly wounded Amfortas in Wagner’s last opera, Parsifal.

(See YouTube clip of track 7 of Parsifal’s Act I: here)

Unlike Wolfschlag, I believe that only full revenge heals the wounded soul, even if it comes from Above, not from Below. The good news for German nationalists is that they will soon be gloating after the dollar crashes and Murka burns. Together with an England overwhelmed by immigrants, as depicted in the film Children of Men, the fall of the US will do the healing trick with no need of Teutonic violence—insofar as the subversive tribe that my beloved Nazis wanted to deport from Europe is directly involved in their ongoing / coming fall.

I call this poetic justice (Murkans really lost the War because they fought on the side of those who would one day enslave them)…

The Russians on the other hand have already suffered a lot after their incredible blunder: allowing the empowerment of Jewry right after the Bolshevik Revolution, where dozens of millions of Slavs were killed. But yes: the Russians must erect monuments commemorating the German victims anyway.

Only thus can Amfortas fully heal.

Other darkest hours



Excerpted from
March of the Titans:
A History of the White Race

by Arthur Kemp:


The first great race war – Attila the Hun

The Goths and their racial cousins kept up a continuous localized war with the Romans for many years, and would have doubtless continued to do so for even longer had a new powerful racial foe not emerged which threatened to destroy the Goths, Germans, Romans and indeed all of Europe.


Alans – The first victims

Physically described by Romans as being “short, brown skinned and slant eyed” the Huns emerged from Central Asia and burst upon the easternmost Whites, a tribe called the Alans, in 372 AD. The Alans, a Nordic tribe still living in the ancestral homeland between the Black and Caspian Seas, were crushed by the Huns who had developed cavalry fighting to a fine skill. Remnants of the Alans fled south and west—to this day there are traces of this last Nordic tribe to be found amongst the present day inhabitants of the region.

The Alans who fled westwards sought refuge with the Ostrogoths, bringing with them the first news of the new Asiatic terror.


Ostrogoths fall before Hun invasion

If the Ostrogoths wondered what had befallen the Alans, they did not have to wait long to find out. Very soon the Huns swept even further west and invaded the Ostrogothic lands (in modern day western Russia) and defeated them as well.

The Ostrogothic king, Hermanric, committed suicide when the scale of the invasion became apparent, and his successor, Vitimer, was killed while trying to hold back the Huns. The Ostrogothic kingdom in western Russia disintegrated, and its survivors streamed further westwards, into the lands of the Visigoths and Slavs.


Above is a depiction of a scene which befell hundreds of thousands of Whites. A raiding non-White party attacks a Roman villa, killing the males and carrying off the White women for sexual slavery.



Athanaric, king of the Visigoths, engaged the Huns at the Dniester River in modern day Bulgaria, but the Huns defeated the Visigothic army as well. After this defeat, the Visigoths were forced to fall back and beg the Romans for permission to settle inside Roman territory.

This appeal was made all the more remarkable when it is borne in mind that the Romans and Visigoths had been at virtual constant war for near enough to two centuries. So when the Romans finally gave permission to the Visigoths to move into Roman territory, it was at a terrible price—the Visigoths had to surrender all their weapons and hand over large numbers of their women and children as hostages.

Crossing the Danube in 376 AD and settling in modern day Bulgaria, the Visigoths managed to gain a temporary reprieve from the ravages of the Huns. The conditions under which the Romans forced them to stay were such that it was not long before Visigothic resentment boiled over into open rebellion.

The Visigoths secretly re-armed themselves and launched a campaign against the Roman strongholds of Thrace and Macedonia in northern Greece. Finally, in the battle of Hadrianople (378 AD) in modern day Greece, a Visigothic army defeated a Roman army under the personal command of the Emperor Valens—who had been the one to impose the harsh conditions of refuge upon the Visigoths. Valens himself was killed in this battle.

The defeat was all the more ironic as a large number of the Roman army’s soldiers were in fact Gothic mercenaries. The Eastern Roman Empire then accepted the presence of the Visigoths in central Europe, and lifted many of the restrictions placed upon them by Valens.

While the Goths and the Romans were grappling with one another, the former Visigothic lands were being seized by the Huns.

By the time of the Battle of Hadrianople, the Huns had occupied most of Dacia, the land originally seized by the Visigoths from Romans (and which corresponds to the present day country of Rumania).

Europe almost entirely invaded

At this stage the racial balance of Europe could have swung decisively in favor of the Asiatic Mongolians—all the original White ancestral homelands had been either destroyed or occupied by the Huns.

In addition to this, the Huns also physically occupied large parts of western Russia and portions of central and eastern Europe, including entire portions of modern central Germany, Hungary and Rumania, turning them overnight into mini Asiatic states.

Not content with these conquests, the Asiatic Huns began pushing further westwards, causing entire nations to be moved and destroying virtually everything in their path.

In this way the remnants of the Alans, and many other minor Nordic tribes were forced westwards, in turn displacing other already settled tribes. It was this displacement which led to further migrations of assorted Germanic tribes into Spain and even as far as North Africa.

By 432 AD, during the reign of Roman Emperor Theodosius I, the Huns had increased their power base and stranglehold on eastern and parts of central Europe to the point where they actually collected a large annual tribute from Rome. (By this time Rome was totally dependent on “barbarian” or German and Gaulish mercenaries for its defense—the mostly mixed race population of Rome had long since lost any social cohesiveness and ability to provide recruits for the army).

Attila the Hun – brutal leader

In 433 AD, the Huns gained a new king, whose name would become a byword for the Asiatic terror—Attila.

The new Asiatic king established his headquarters at the village of Buda on the Danube River in 445 AD (Buda was later to combine with another village on the other side of the river, Pest, to become Budapest, the modern capital of Hungary).

By this time the Hunnish empire stretched from the Caspian Sea in the east right up to the North Sea. In all of the area the Huns carried out a vicious racial war of extermination against the Whites who militarily were too weak to resist. Countless White settlements were wiped out, with the women routinely being carried off into captivity.

In 452 AD, Attila began moving west again, with the intention of seizing France and finishing off all of Europe.

Hunnish blood enters eastern Europe

By this stage the Huns had started on a limited scale to physically integrate with sections of the peoples they had conquered. Traces of the Mongolian influence can still be seen amongst some peoples in eastern Europe (the so called “Slavic look” which in fact is not Slavic at all, but mixed Mongolian/Slavic.)

Possibly as a result of this limited integration process, the Huns managed to recruit some locals into their army, and units of various eastern European tribes found themselves in the Hunnish army which finally invaded France. They were dealt with extremely harshly by their distant racial cousins if captured. The vast majority of the Hunnish army were however Mongolian and under the ultimate leadership of the unquestionably militarily astute Attila.

The Huns stood poised to push through to the Atlantic Ocean—Europe stood on the very brink of extermination.

The Battle of Troyes – Whites unite to defeat the Asiatics

The threat of the Hunnish army finally forced the ever squabbling Romans and Visigoths into an united front. A Roman army, under the last of the Western Empire’s properly Roman generals, Aetius, joined up with a Visigoth army under their king, Theodoric I, and together they met the Hunnish army in central France near the present day city of Troyes in 451 AD.

In a day long battle, both sides inflicted heavy casualties on the other, with the Visigoth king, Theodoric, being killed in the fighting. By nightfall the combined White army had gained the upper hand over the Asians.

Attila was forced to retreat all the way across Europe as far as Hungary, exacting a terrible revenge in slaughter and looting from those White settlements unfortunate enough to be in his path of retreat.

Defeated in the west, Attila made one last attempt to destroy the Whites. In 452 the Asians invaded northern Italy and razed the city of Aqueila to the ground, massacring as many of the inhabitants as they could find (the survivors fled into the nearby marshes, there to later establish the city of Venice).

Suddenly in 453 AD, the sixty year-old Attila died—allegedly of a burst blood vessel incurred during his wedding night exertions following his marriage to a local German princess. (How much of that story is true is open to question: what is fact is that he took a blond German girl, named Hildico, as his wife, following an example set by many of his Mongolian warriors, whose genetic footprint can be seen on some faces in eastern Europe and Russia to this day.)

The Battle of Nedao – Germanics save the white race from extinction

Attila’s death was the signal for a revolt of the people subjugated by the Huns. In 454 AD, the Goths, Slavs and others in Europe who had managed to survive the nearly 70 years of cruel Asiatic rule, rose up and at the battle of Nedao in that year, defeated the Huns in a straight fight between a Mongolian and a Germanic army. The victory was total and the Huns were finally destroyed.

The battle of Nedao became one of the most significant battles in White history, for without it Europe would most likely have been completely overrun by Asiatics before 500 AD.

The Germans, as victors over the Huns, became famous amongst their Indo-European racial cousins, with the Icelandic word for German to this day translating literally as “peoples’ defender”.

Suffering total defeat at the hands of the Germans, the vast majority of the surviving Asiatic Huns then fled back into the Far East, to the Sea of Azov in Russia—fearing the retribution by the Whites that would follow (a fear which was fully justified, as the enraged and victorious Whites mercilessly put to death any bands of Hun stragglers they found).

The Hunnish legacy

However, the Huns left two significant things behind them—firstly they gave their name to the area which had functioned as their headquarters during their racial war, Hungary.

Secondly, some admixture of Mongolian genes occurred amongst the Slavic tribes which had been under the Asiatic Hunnish occupation for nearly 80 years. This was however by no means complete and only ultimately affected a small, but significant, number of the Indo-European Slavs.

The Slavs then expanded eastward into the regions of Russia which had been overrun by the Huns on their way west. There they also mixed with scattered remnants of the partly Hunnish, partly Slavic peoples the Huns had left behind.

All these mixes contributed towards creating the distinctive Russian “Slavic look” visible to this day in a small percentage of the eastern European population in Russia and elsewhere.

The greatest effect of the Hunnish invasion of Europe was however the extinction of the source of the Indo-European tribes from their ancestral homeland between the Black and Caspian Seas. Never again would this territory produce another Indo-European Nordic tribe—the fountain of new Nordic tribes was forever extinguished, one of the most significant acts of racial genocide ever seen.


The second great race war – the Crusades

• By 700 AD, Islamic armies had occupied North Africa and had destroyed what remained of the Gothic Vandal state.

• As the Crusaders approached Antioch [during the siege of that city], the Muslim defenders under Turcoman Yagji-Shah started killing all the remaining Whites in the city, along with any non-White Christians who had the misfortune to be present… By nightfall of 3 June 1099, the city was in White hands—and every non-White who had foolishly remained behind in the city was dead.

• By the time they [the Crusaders] got to Constantinople however, the wonder on the European faces must have been apparent—they appeared to have as little in common with the Byzantine Empire as with the Muslims, not only racially, but even in language. The Byzantine Christians did not recognize the Pope, spoke Greek instead of Latin and had distinctly Middle Eastern art and architectural forms.

Unlike the Hebrews’ ethnic cleansing policies recounted in the Old Testament, in the Crusades westerners committed the same mistake of all white conquests throughout history, even after capturing Jerusalem. Kemp writes:

However, the Crusader states did not try to change the population make-up of the region by enforced migration or expulsion—nor did they even try to convert the natives. So it was that the first European colonies were created: ironically in the areas where once their now very distant racial cousins had once walked… The Crusaders’ failure to majority populate the areas they conquered with their own racial kind led to their disappearance in a very short while—so that now only their vast empty buildings stand as monuments to the spirit and heroism of the times.

In the 2011, printed edition of his book Kemp adds this phrase about the Crusades:

Never a majority, the white Christian soldiers were overrun, and within three hundred years almost all trace was vanished.


The third great race war – the Moors invade Europe

The invasion of Western Europe by a non-White Muslim army after 711 AD, very nearly extinguished modern White Europe—certainly the threat was no less serious than the Hunnish invasion which had earlier created so much chaos. While the Huns were Asiatics, the Moors were a mixed race invasion—part Arabic, part Black and part mixed race, always easily distinguishable from the Visigothic Whites of Spain.

To give a flavor of the content of this chapter I will add some subtitles to the images that Kemp chose for this specific chapter—omitting the images:

• Above: A dramatic painting—based on actual events—showing Moors celebrating the fall of a White Spanish town, with White females captured alive. For several years the Moors demanded—and received—a yearly tribute of young White girls for use in their harems after the great Moorish victory of 711. This yearly tribute continued until 791 AD when the Whites had recovered their strength enough to break the terms of a treaty with the non-Whites.

• Above: Captured White prisoners about to be decapitated by Saracens: note how the Spaniards are depicted with blond hair.

• Above: The non-White Moorish advance into Europe seemed unstoppable when in 732 AD they launched a massive invasion of present day France. The king of the leading White tribe in that country, Charles Martel of the Franks (who had their headquarters in present day Paris) mobilized a counter attack. A great race battle took place between the towns of Tours and Poitiers in central France in October 732 AD. The battle was one of the most momentous in the history of the White race. Defeat would have meant that all of Western Europe might have fallen under the sway of Islam, and the mixed races from the East would have poured into continental Europe. Accounts have it that 375,000 Moors were killed—the White army was utterly victorious over the non-White army and the Moorish invasion of Europe was halted in its tracks. Charles Martel earned his name—Martel means “hammer”—at this battle—he personally bludgeoned to death a large number of non-Whites with his favorite weapon, a mighty hammer.



The fourth great race war – Bulgars, Avars, Magyars and Khazars

The lands making up western and southern Russia, Asia Minor (Turkey) and the southeastern Balkans were to be the scene of some of the most dramatic racial conflicts between various tribes of Europeans on the one hand, and various Asiatic, Mongol, and mixed race Muslim armies on the other.

These wars started around 550 AD, a century after the crushing of the Mongolian Hunnish invasion of Europe. They only finally stopped with the defeat of new Asian invaders some 400 years later, with the defeat of an Asiatic alliance known as the Magyars, in Bavaria in 954 AD.

This massive struggle against Asian and Mongolian hordes can rightly be grouped into one heading, even though different players acted in the drama.

If these combined Asian invaders had not been turned back, then it would most certainly have given the non-White Moorish invasion in Spain, which took place in the same time span, a far better chance of success. The White race might have been exterminated between the Asians and the Moors—but it was not.



The fifth great race war – Genghis Khan

Genghis Khan’s first raid was into Russia in 1221, when his army smashed their way through several southern Russian principalities who were taken completely unawares by the yellow-skinned Mongolians.

Soon a huge part of southern Russia was under the sway of Genghis Khan—and not even the efforts of the Russian tribes to the north could dislodge him.

The invasion of southern Russian was in fact the only invasion of White held lands in which Genghis himself took part. He died suddenly in 1227, and the Mongolian armies paused for several years in southern Russia while a successor to Genghis was chosen from amongst the leading Mongolian chieftains.

In the interim the Mongols instituted a grim reign of terror over the White tribes they had subjugated. Whole settlements were slaughtered en masse, with lucky survivors barely escaping to the north and west, bringing tales of terror from the new Asiatic invaders.

One tactic for which the Mongols became famous was to sack a town, leave and then a few days later send a rearguard party back to the sacked town to see if any survivors had made their way back—any such unfortunates were put to death on the spot. In this way entire regions were quite literally stripped of all living souls.

Finally in 1236, the Mongol armies moved again, striking westwards in such numbers and ferocity that they reached deep into the Balkans, Hungary, northern Russia, Poland and central Germany.

Under the leadership of one Batu, a grandson of Genghis Khan, the Asiatics resumed their westward invasions in 1237, sacking the Russian city of Kiev in 1240, continuing westward into Poland, Bohemia, Hungary, and the Danube River valley.


Whites defeated at battle of Leignitz

An alliance of Germans, Poles and Teutons under the command of Duke Henry II of Silesia formed a united White army and desperately tried to stem the Asiatic advance. They met the Mongols in battle at Leignitz in what was then Poland in April 1241, but were badly defeated. Henry was beheaded by the Mongolians and for several days afterwards his impaled head was carried around on a spear at the head of the Mongol army until it rotted away.

The southern Indo-European tribes, the Slavs, then put together a new White army and launched an attack on the main body of the Mongol army in southern Europe. The battle, fought just north of Budapest, at the Sajo River in April 1241, saw the White armies defeated once again. The combined defeats inflicted upon the Russians, Germans and Slavs meant that all of Europe lay open to the Mongols.

In 1242, the Mongol hordes penetrated into the suburbs of Vienna itself—at that critical moment the non-White invasion ceased of its own accord.

It was a quirk of destiny which saved Europe and its peoples from complete extermination at the hands of the Mongols. In December 1241, the Asiatic army had just started on their final drive westwards, marching across the frozen Danube River, when a messenger arrived from their homeland in Mongolia—the successor to Genghis Khan had died. Then and there, the Mongol army turned around and withdrew back to the east. Leaderless, they were never to penetrate into central Europe again.

Even though the Mongols withdrew from central Europe, all of eastern and southern Russia remained under Mongol occupation, where Batu created what became known as the Khanate of the Golden Horde—the name originating from an annual tribute of riches extracted from the northern Russians, who only escaped occupation by formally acknowledging themselves as vassals by paying a yearly tribute to the Mongol rulers in the south.

The only eastern European state which was not humiliated in this way was Baltic Lithuania. As Mongol strength slowly declined, the Lithuanians expanded, eventually occupying an area stretching from the Baltic right to the Black Sea in the south. Lithuania in fact became the most powerful state in eastern Europe.

By the early 1300s, the Mongol Empire in the south had been wracked by internal divisions, with rival claimants to the Mongol throne launching a series of fratricidal wars amongst themselves. Seizing advantage of the confusion in the Asiatic ranks, the Grand Duke Dimitry of Moscow led an army against a huge Mongol force at Kukikovo, on the banks of the Don River, in 1330. Although great casualties were suffered by both sides, the White Russians won: the first major reverse suffered by the Mongols since their occupation of southern Russia.


Ivan the Great

The Mongols were then further weakened by renewed internal dissension, with a new Mongol warlord, Tamerlane, conquering much of the original Mongol Empire in Russia in 1395. After Tamerlane’s death, his empire was broken into four independent khanates: Astrakhan, Kazan, Crimea, and Sibir.

So divided, the Mongols were at last weakened to the point where the Muscovite principality, under the leadership of Ivan III, took the opportunity in 1480, to refuse to pay the annual tribute to the Horde.

Ivan, called The Great, who ruled from 1440 to 1505, then followed up the refusal to pay the tribute with a series of localized wars which expanded the borders of his kingdom—some were against other White principalities while some were against local Mongol chieftains. In this way a succession of slow moves south, combined with a process of assimilation, saw the last of the Mongol states vanish another century later, although the names they gave to these regions still persist.

The first major White reconquest of the southern parts of Russia only began in the mid 1500s, when bands of Russian peasants, known as Cossacks, fleeing the autocratic fiefdoms of northern Russia, started settling along the banks of the Don River basin.

The Cossacks engaged in a large clearing operation lasting many decades against the Mongols. By the mid-1600s the majority of Mongols had been cleared from central southern Russia—the remaining minority were for the greatest part absorbed into the new population.


The Mongol legacy

In central Europe, the Mongols were not physically present long enough to have a lasting genetic impact upon the local population, although unquestionably a small amount of Mongolian genes did enter the bloodstream of a tiny part of the population. This took place mainly through the wholesale rape of White women for which the Mongols were also famous. The major impact of the Mongol invasion upon southern and central Europe was that they physically killed huge numbers of Whites in their path, numbers which were lost forever.

In southern Russia however, the after-effects of three hundred years of Mongol rule left a clear genetic imprint upon many of the peoples in that region. Many of the peoples of regions such as Kazakhstan are of clear mixed racial origin. It is these people who are today often mistakenly called Slavs. Even though they were originally the easternmost Indo-European peoples and as such part of the Slavic tribes, their racial identify was completely submerged by the Mongol invasion and it would be genetically incorrect to classify them as Slavic.


The sixth great race war – the Ottoman Holocaust

The Ottoman Empire was the longest lasting non-White invasion of European soil ever. Lasting from the beginning of the 13th Century right to the start of the 20th, this group of mixed race Middle Eastern Turks, driven by a fanaticism molded in their Muslim religion, occupied vast stretches of central and southern Europe, twice being turned back at the very gates of Vienna in their attempts to seize all of Europe.

The impact and legacy of the Ottomans upon central and southern Europe was therefore vast, and crucial to any understanding of the racial and cultural mix which has made south-eastern Europe the volatile place that it is.

After describing the rise of the Ottomans and their first landings and battles on European soil in the 14th and 15th centuries, including how white resistance failed in the battles of Nicopolis and Varna, Kemp writes about the Janissaries, or “stolen white children” who became the Ottoman elite:

One of the more remarkable ways in which the Ottomans kept their fighting strength up was through a unit of soldiers known as the Janissaries. The Janissaries were the Ottoman’s elite forces—and they were also White.

One of the Ottoman leaders, Emir Orkhan (1326-1359), who was the first to occupy European continental soil, issued an edict to the conquered Europeans in the Balkans that they must hand over to the Ottomans 1,000 White male babies “with faces white and shining” each and every year. The youths were brought before the Ottoman sultan, and the best of them—in terms of physique, intelligence, and other qualities—were selected for education in the palace school. There they converted to Islam, became versed in the Islamic religion and its culture, learned Ottoman Turkish, Persian, and Arabic, and were compelled to serve the Ottomans, with their origins being concealed from them. They became the best and most trusted armed unit within the Ottoman Empire—a supreme act of irony.

This yearly tribute—reminiscent of the demand by the Moors for White virgins from the unfortunate Goths in Spain—was continued for an astonishing 300 years until 1648, during which time not only were 300,000 Whites absorbed into the Ottoman hierarchy (and for the greatest part also into the Turkish elite’s bloodstream) but the Janissaries became known as one of the most efficient army of soldiers in the world.

It is no exaggeration to say that they sustained the Ottoman Empire in Europe for much of its existence, playing a not inconsiderable role in many of the great victories of that Empire.

In 1574, the Janissaries had 20,000 men in their ranks—by 1826 the unit numbered some 135,000. The overtly racial make-up of the Janissaries always created problems of its own. Every now and then, the White soldiers would rebel against their Turkish masters—numerous rebellions are recorded, each being suppressed, until a famous rebellion in 1826 saw the unit finally disbanded, with a large number being killed and the rest dispersed into the broader Turkish population.

Kemp proceeds to explain how Jews were privileged under Turkish Rule; the fall of Constantinople; the war at sea when the Portuguese confronted the Turks; how Belgrade was captured in 1521 AD; the two sieges of Vienna; the Ottoman war with Russia, and finally the brutal destruction of Armenia in 1915-1923:

The region of Armenia, situated on the southeastern banks of the Black Sea, contains one of the most tragic and violent anti-White acts ever committed by the Ottoman Empire. Originally one of the earliest Indo-European homelands, Armenia has some of the oldest iron and bronze smelting and cereal grains sites in the world. Shaken by the flooding of the Black Sea basin around 5600 BC, Armenia was then occupied in quick succession by the early Indo-European Assyrians and Persians.

A period of independence followed, and under their great King Tigranes I (140-55 BC), Armenia established an empire which reached from the Caspian Sea to the Mediterranean and parts of modern-day Syria. This empire ended with the invasion of that country by the Romans in 69 BC. Armenia then became the first Christian state in the world in AD 301.

Racially speaking, the inhabitants of the region had suffered slight genetic damage in terms of Semitic infusions, but the country was devastated by the 11th Century invasion by the Seljuk Turks, the forerunners of the Ottomans. The Seljuk Turks’ oppressive rule saw a huge number—possibly even a majority—of White Armenians fleeing the country.

The Ottoman Empire, which took over from the Seljuks, instituted an even greater reign of terror against the remaining Armenians, causing further waves of emigration right until the late 19th Century, with many Armenians settling in America.

Those who stayed in Armenia were subject to the most horrendous massacres and persecution, with hundreds of thousands of Armenians being massacred by Turkish forces, culminating in efforts by the Turkish government to move Armenians to Mesopotamia. Between 1915 and 1923 more than one million Armenians died due to the Turkish attempted forced migration.

armenians
The remains of Armenians massacred at Erzinjan

By this stage, the vast majority of White Armenians had either emigrated, or had been absorbed into the overwhelming numbers of non-Whites in the Armenia itself, so that today very few original White Armenians remain in the country.

Armenia was therefore a entire country and people who were physically wiped out by the Ottomans, one of the greatest hidden genocides of the Turkish Empire.


The Ottoman legacy

The Ottoman Turks were the last of the Asian invaders of Europe to use violence as their passport of entry, but they were also significant for another reason: the sheer length of the time of their occupation of the Balkans left a large number of the inhabitants of the Balkan peoples with Turkish blood in their veins, as can be seen to this day, as many inhabitants of the region are not only Muslim in faith, but are also distinctly darker than other Balkan residents.

All of these racial wars when whites faced extermination are a fascinating read.

Although the racial wars recounted by Kemp don’t end there, I won’t quote more to invite readers to purchase a hard copy of March of the Titans, an updated 2011 edition of the old online edition I’ve been quoting here (recently removed from the internet).

The fact is that unlike other races whites as a people have been an endangered species more than once, and this has paramount importance to understand our times. Personally, I find it outrageous that so few “white nationalists” are truly interested in the history of the white race; proof of it is that books like this are no bestsellers in the community.


Note:

For excerpts of all chapters of Kemp’s book see: here.

Unending Struggle Between European and Asian

Excerpted from the 20th article of William Pierce’s “Who We Are: a Series of Articles on the History of the White Race”:


Today the geographical boundary between Europe and Africa-Asia runs roughly from the Strait of Gibraltar eastward across the Mediterranean to the Aegean Sea, along the eastern and northern shores of the Black Sea, thence along the spine of the Caucasus range to the Caspian Sea, and northward along the Urals to the Arctic Ocean. Somewhat more roughly a racial boundary follows the same course, dividing Whites to the north and west from non-Whites to the south and east.

Throughout history the borderlands on either side of this boundary have been contested between White and non-White, between European and Asian, and the contest has been fiercer, bloodier, crueler, and more unrelenting than any of the wars Europeans have fought among themselves. This is as it should be, considering the vastly greater stakes: when European fought European, the outcome determined which sovereign taxes would be paid to or the language one’s descendants would speak, but when European fought Asian the issue was whether or not one’s descendants would be White.

Race Pollution

Europe managed to stem the Brown tide in each case, but only at enormous cost. Huge areas of Europe were overrun by the Huns and their successors: Avars, Bulgars, Khazars, Magyars, Patzinaks, Cumans, Mongols, and Ottomans. Sometimes it was more than a century before the invaders could be expelled, and a great deal of racial mixing took place meanwhile.

Some European territory was lost permanently. Even today a large section of the ancient Indo-European homeland on the western shore of the Caspian Sea remains racially Mongoloid, while pockets of racially mixed population can be found throughout Eastern and Southeastern Europe.

End of the Golden Age

For more than a century the Scandinavian Goths mixed with the Alans and Slavs over whom they ruled. Then came the Huns. Slavs, Goths, and Alans all suffered mightily, and we have dealt with the ensuing events in an earlier installment. Perhaps the greatest tragedy of the Hun invasion was the disaster which befell the Alans. The godlike race of Odin and Frigg, of Thor and Balder, met its Ragnarok.

Bulgars and Avars

Soon after the Germans crushed the Hun empire in 454, the surviving Huns retreated eastward, eventually regrouping around the Sea of Azov. There they acquired a new name: Bulgars.

Then, in the middle of the sixth century, even before Europe had recovered from the desolation left by the Huns, the next Brown wave struck. Driven westward by intertribal warfare in Central Asia, an amalgamation of Mongol tribes known to Europeans as the Avars invaded the Russian steppe in 560. Conquering the Slavs as they went, they were only halted when they came up against the Franks on the Elbe, in 562.

The Avars virtually annihilated the Gepids, to which nation the noble Ardaric, vanquisher of the Huns, had belonged, and seized the Gepids’ territory in Pannonia (modern Hungary), thenceforth centering the Avar empire there. The Avar strength peaked before 600 and declined quite rapidly thereafter, except in Pannonia.

Green-eyed Mongol

Some of the Asian invaders traveled quite rapidly through the peoples between their own homelands and Europe, absorbing little if any White blood on the way, while others took centuries to make the passage. Even those who did not linger among White or part-White populations often had absorbed some White genes as a result of the slave trade. From the fourth century through the 15th century there was an enormous traffic in White slaves, with millions of Slavs trudging eastward in slave caravans.

Thus, while the Mongols who struck in the 13th century passed like lightning from Mongolia to the eastern border of Europe, their chieftain, Genghis Khan, was described by contemporaries as having green eyes and reddish hair—undoubtedly a consequence of the slave trade. Some Turkish leaders were described as almost White in appearance.

Finally, we must remember that race treason is not a new phenomenon. Conquered Slav, Sarmatian, and German peoples sometimes became military auxiliaries of their Brown conquerors. When Attila was defeated by the Visigoths in 451 at Chalons, his horde consisted not only of Brown Huns but also of a number of White allies from the territories through which he had passed.

The Janissaries

The most effective means which the Ottomans employed in their struggle against White Europe, and the most humiliating to their White adversaries, was their corps of Janissaries. The Janissaries were the Ottomans’ elite army and they were entirely White.

During the reign of Emir Orkhan (1326-1359), the Ottoman ruler who first seized European soil, an edict was issued commanding the Emir’s White subjects to deliver to him each year exactly 1,000 young, male children. These children, who were required to have faces “white and shining,” were torn from their mothers’ breasts and then raised by the Turks with special care and rigor, trained in arms from a tender age and conditioned to give absolute obedience to their masters. Their military discipline was especially severe, but they were liberally rewarded for courage and proficiency.

Turkish Retreat

The yearly levy of 1,000 White children was continued for 300 years, until 1648, and during that period the Janissaries came to be the most efficient and feared corps of warriors in the world. They sustained the Turkish power in Central Europe, while the Mongol power in Eastern Europe withered.

Bastardized Balkans

The Ottoman Turks were the last of the Asian invaders of Europe, but they were certainly not the least. Their occupation has left as severe a racial imprint on the Balkan peoples—Yugoslavs, Albanians, Greeks, Bulgarians, and Rumanians—as the Mongol occupation did on the Russians.

Nevertheless, there remain today many groups throughout the Balkans which are as White as any group in Western Europe: some are immigrants from the north during recent centuries, while others are the descendants of clans and tribes which jealously guarded the purity of their blood and were able to avoid substantial racial mixture even during the darkest days of Asian occupation.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 238 other followers