Who needs Jews when you got Christianity?

G-loves1

White-Hand-African-Child2

Barack Obama,  Jill Biden, Joe Biden, Michelle Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton

OasisLandingPage4

uganda.us_.evangelical.nyt_5

Karaikudi ADP:  Sponsored Girl Chitra

kristi-and-bishop-christopher-sonjonyo

biracial

evangelical with Negroes6

Published in: on February 15, 2013 at 5:05 pm  Comments (25)  
Tags: ,

25 Comments

  1. The Swedish Public Employment Service plans to open an office in Ethiopia to prepare emigrating Somalis for life into Sweden. Yes: Swedes handed over most of their media to the Jews. But what is preventing the Swedes from seeing the utter madness of their ethno-suicidal policy?

    Couldn’t it be that, as Tom Sunic said in Scandinavia, modern egalitarianism (and deranged altruism, I’d add) is a secular modality of much older Christian values?

    Something similar of course happens with the American, whether evangelical or secular: both love niglets, the New Jesus.

    • Were the Swedes more ethno-suicidal, a century ago, when church attendance was higher, or is the tendency greater today when only 4% of Swedes attend their church? How do we understand the Swedish policy of ‘ethnic hygiene’ in a strongly Protestant Sweden of the 1930s if in fact Sunic is correct? The simple answer is that it can’t be reconciled and that Sunic’s (and Pierce’s) blatant attempt to twist the historical record is in aid of his febrile desire to build a monolith of mendacity that is white nationalism.

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/mar/06/stephenbates

    • “Yes: Swedes handed over most of their media to the Jews. But what is preventing the Swedes from seeing the utter madness of their ethno-suicidal policy?”

      Maybe what prevents a proper reaction by the Swedes is precisely the Jewish control on the media?

      Actually, normal White people in Sweden are not blind to the race replacement crisis. The real question is why are they not taking to the streets. The simple answer is that they are being intimidated. Western countries have become soft dictatorships. The problem doesn’t come from the population but from the entrenched minority dictating the policy in the government and the media.

      The solution is not to change White people. After all, the Swedes were doing all right in the 1930s, as DJ says. The proper solution is to get rid of the current government and media, no matter whether they are controlled by Jews or by a minority of White leftists.

      • I agree with you on this one. Still it amazes me that there is so little resistance in the West today. I wish I could go to Sweden and talk to hundreds of Swedes and feel what’s happening in their little brains.

  2. The Roman Empire tried to destroy Christianity, but the Roman Empire survived through this day thanks to the Vatican.

    • What you said…

  3. Love your enemies and baptize ethiopian eunuchs. Maybe if we castrated the africans before we baptized them, they wouldn’t breed so quickly.

  4. Today’s version of “christianity” is in blind ignorance, and like they who say they are jews, but are not ,but are of the synagogue of satan, cannot be “fixed” by reason and logical argument, but only by violent overthrow in their daily circumstances, which will destroy all their present mental disease; ie, their so-called loving fixation on the jew and the dark skinned races.

  5. The abnegation of white Christians towards themselves and their race, their own families, goes alot deeper than the jew propaganda in the media, and deeper than living in soft dicatorships.

    All of my church-going neighbors here in California love the jews, and love the “minorities” more than they love their own families, heritage, and culture. It’s very deep-seated. Citing jew propaganda — while it plays a big role — doesn’t exactly, or truly, explain the phenomena of the massive collective abnegation taking place throughout the West.

    While it’s true California is a type of soft dictatorship, no one is putting guns to the heads of these church goers and forcing them to adopt african & oriental children. No one is forcing them to give all their charity money to foreigners. No one is forcing them to go to Africa and build missions.

    They have “outreach” programs for all the foreigners here in California, none for their own kind. No “outreach” for the less fortunate whites. No fund drives for poorer whites stuggling to make ends meet, for example. Plenty of fund drives for the blacks and mexicans though. All of their charity money goes to non-whites.

    No “outreach” programs for all the confused and lonely Christian children from divorced/broken-homes : Their own children !!!!

    They Only out-reach to the foreigner.

    My church going “christian” neighbors worship the jews more than anything else. They wince and they squirm when I mention the word,
    ” Christ “. Christ is verboten — jews don’t like Christ.

    They continue to call themselves “christ”-ians, yet they can’t even bear to hear the word “Christ” without a qualifier. Major cognitive dissonance. The cognitive dissonance comes from all the mixed messages contained in the bible.

    The white race desperately needs a finer Holy Book , one that resonates with true feeling for family and kin, not a book conjured up for us by the sanhedrin. The concept of Christ can be retained while throwing out all the jew rabbinical influences.

    The Light of Christ existed before the sanhedrin. The rabbis had to find a way to usurp true spirituality, and direct the collective religious/spiritual desire of mankind back into the fold — back into the court of the pharisees.

    Read Eustache Mullins’, “Curse of Canaan”. [ It’s online in pdf format ].

    In the Light of Christ, Charity Begins At Home.

    • Joe: “no one is putting guns to the heads of these church goers and forcing them to adopt african & oriental children.”

      I hear the same argument in Brittany about the loss of the Breton language. One hundred years ago, everyone in Western Brittany spoke Breton. Today, only old people speak Breton. But we are told that no one put guns to the heads of Breton parents so they would suddenly stop speaking Breton to their children. Of course, the government didn’t put guns to people’s heads. It didn’t need to. But it is still responsible for destroying the language.

      “Citing jew propaganda — while it plays a big role — doesn’t exactly, or truly, explain the phenomena of the massive collective abnegation taking place throughout the West.”

      What I find remarkable today, much more than the adoption of African children, is the massive oppression of White people.

      Maybe Jewish influence would be a better word than propaganda. The problem isn’t just direct propaganda through television. It’s an influence that trickles down from the top, associated with direct ruling through government. What happened in the last hundred years is that anti-White Jews have become gradually more powerful and have pushed aside our former White elites. What other big change do you think took place in the last century that could explain why it has become fashionable to adopt African children?

      “Read Eustache Mullins’, “Curse of Canaan”

      You don’t believe that Jews have a crucial influence in today’s problem. Even so, you tell me to read a crazy book by Eustace Mullins, about the (d)evilness of Jews!

      • @ Armor

        I’m not one to down play the jew role in world affairs, or jew influence. I know the jewish role in all this fully well. So do you. So do many who come to this website.

        If we – me, you, and so many other readers here — can work through all the jewish influence and propaganda of the matrix, why can’t so many whites do the same? That’s the issue for me, that’s the question I keep asking myself.

        I never once said, or implied, the ” jews don’t have a crucial influence ” .

        I’m tracing the collective abnegation back to the bible itself. I mentioned the bible was written by the rabbis of the sanhedrin, so I am indeed recognizing jewish influence — very much so.

        Still, through all the mixed messages of the bible, there is The Light of Christ there. I’m wondering why so many whites disdain the Zoroastrian/Hindu influences in the bible, and seem to have a burning desire to retain the jew rabbinical strain that runs through the book.

        And there’s nothing about Mullins’, “Curse of Canaan” — or any other of his works — that can rightfully be labeled “crazy”. You denigrate an earnest historian. You completely overlook that I acknowledged the bible was written by jew sanhedrin rabbis as you overlook my main point, and then you label a very sincere and honest historian’s work as “crazy”.

        For readers who may be interested , Google :

        ” The Light of Christ in The Vedas ”

        Zoroastianism is a dynamic in Christianity. Zoroastrianism was influenced by Hinduism. Christianity comes to us from the Aryans of India via Zoroaster, greatly usurped of course.

        It seems to me that alot of white Christians don’t have enough gratitude in their hearts to have curiosity about their own faith they profess, to actually learn The Faith. It’s not that I’m so smart, it’s just that I was always curious about my religious inheritance — it’s called gratitude.

        And by the way, our White elites during the times of Luther fomented a 100 year war that took the lives of one-third of the white race at the time. Both Catholic and Protestant white elite leaders are culpable. The collective abnegation has been going on for alot longer than the last 100 years. You also overlook that it was “christian” lawmakers who actually signed the Federal Reserve Act. No one put a gun to their heads, all the jews had to do was to put some dollar bills in front of their noses.

        The world is the way it is because of all of our collective thinking — not only jewish influence/ jewish thinking.

        As it is, my Christian church-going neighbors couldn’t care less about going to any of the websites, or read any of the books, I recommend so maybe they can learn more about their religion. I read all the books they give me, but they won’t read anything that’s not “approved”. I truly can’t blame the jews for my neighbors lack of curiousity. It’s something deep in the blood.

  6. All of my church-going neighbors here in California love the jews, and love the “minorities” more than they love their own families, heritage, and culture.

    And the more they do this the more unlikable they themselves become. Sometimes I think its just not worth trying to save them.

    • @ AngloAmerican

      I feel the same way as you do, yet I keep trying — I’m not sure why exactly. I guess it’s from a sense of loyalty and respect for what I do appreciate in the faith that was my birth inheritance. Still, I do feel, many times, “its just not worth trying to save them”.

  7. It’s a perverted status/survival game stemming from WW2’s outcome. Spout enough equalitarian garbage and nobody will force non-Whites upon you…until some traitor takes it seriously and does.

  8. On theme with this post is the upcoming recital of Bach’s St John Passion, at the Berliner Dom.

    Here is the online schedule.

    Note the picture of “Christ”. This is the picture used in street advertisements throughout Berlin at the moment.

    The Berlin Cathedral was Lutheran but is today ” the parish church of the Evangelical congregation Gemeinde der Oberpfarr- und Domkirche zu Berlin, a member of the umbrella organisation Evangelical Church of Berlin-Brandenburg-Silesian Upper Lusatia.” (Wikipedia).

    Berlin, of course, itself was Catholic prior to the Lutheran schism, so the antecedent chapel was Catholic.

    Of religious belief in Berlin today:

    More than 60% of Berlin residents have no registered religious affiliation and Berlin has been described as the atheist capital of Europe.

    The largest denominations as of 2010 are the Protestant regional church body of the Evangelical Church of Berlin-Brandenburg-Silesian Upper Lusatia (EKBO) (a church of united administration comprising mostly Lutheran, and few Reformed and United Protestant congregations; EKBO is a member of the umbrellas Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) and Union Evangelischer Kirchen (UEK)) with 18.7% of the population… (From Wikipedia)

    Also note:

    Approximately 80% of the 12,000 registered Jews (0.3%;[3] real number of Jewish people is estimated to be up to 50,000)[6] now residing in Berlin have come from the former Soviet Union (Now Russia). Additionally, Berlin is considered to be one of the fastest growing Jewish communities in the world due to Russian, Israeli and German Jewish immigrants, whose ancestors fled Germany during the Holocaust(World War II).[7][8] (Wikipedia)

    Here is an interesting article from The Times of Israel with regard the 2012 recital of Bach’s St John Passion.

    Precis:

    …this year, a new version of Bach’s St John’s Passion is raising heckles among the faithful.

    Three Jewish intellectuals — a philosopher, a composer, and a musicologist — have replaced some of Bach’s texts with their own selections of Jewish and Muslim poetry and liturgical excerpts. On Friday, the new version will be performed in Berlin’s Dom, the capital’s cathedral. Some members of the congregation are calling it “musical sacrilege.”

    Read on for the full detail of how and why Western culture is being defaced, re-interpreted, and replacing our traditional core.

    With regard “Christianity” in general, and the ongoing “anti-Christian” premise of this blog’s author, I would like to point out that “Christianity” is not a monolith. Obvious as it seems to me, it also seems to be drawn to your attention that “Christianity” comprises many varieties, some similar and many theologically and in practice opposed to each other.

    It is absurd and ahistorical to treat the subject of “Christianity” as a monolith that has betrayed Western people (by which we mean White). Certainly today Christianity has become somewhat a monolith of allied liberal/leftist anti-White forces, but this was not the case historically. One cannot treat “Christianity” as a monolithic force historically without understanding the development and schisms that are what constitute “Christianity”. I myself do not consider most so called Christians, Christians.

    The Christianity of today in the Roman Catholic Church is a heretical formulation of what is was at the beginning of the 20th Century alone. I would contrast those leaders then with the like of the heretics John Paul II and Benedict XVI for instance.

    Furthermore, most of these critiques of “Christianity” stem from the likes of William Pierce, that is, from Americans. Their understanding of Christianity has been tempered in that unique Puritan born nation of the U.S.A. and as such cannot but help be somewhat Judeocentric in their approach. After all, their formative religion can be characterised as Judeo-Christian whereas the “Christianity” they oppose, and blame, for example Catholicism, has historically opposed, for instance, Judaism and seen that religion as “anathema”.

    • But remember that even before Vatican Council II, in 1938, in light of eugenic and racial laws adopted not only in Germany and Italy, but also in America, Pope Pius IX made his famous statement: “It is forgotten that mankind is one large and overwhelming Catholic race.” This statement was to become part of his planned encyclical under the name The Unity of the Human Race.

      And there are other fundamental problems even in pre-Conciliar Catholicism.

      • I’ve never heard of that and, looking it up now, I see that it was never published. I also note that “Humani generis unitas was written by three Jesuits under the leadership of John LaFarge.” The Jesuits are a problematic group within the Catholic Church.

        I would further add, as intimated above, that the snowballing modernist revolution that had its culmination in Vatican II had begun prior to 1900, and was warned against.

        In any case, my point is that “Christianity” is not monolithic. I can cite you numerous denunciations of Judaism for instance, promulgated by Popes. We can also cite Luther on the subject. Yet, we can also cite the inherent philosemitism of the Puritans and to a lesser extent the Anglican Church in later day England.

        The overwhelming point being that, though Catholicism would traditionally condemn “racism” as characterised by hatred of and violence towards other people on account of their race alone, the Catholic Church has not, until recently, urged the disintegration of national homelands on any pretext.

        I don’t understand what these Jesuits mean that “It is forgotten that mankind is one large and overwhelming Catholic race.” Are they noting that mankind has a common interest, that we are all bound together under God with exactly the same requirements to serve Him? That I would agree with.

        I fail to see how having a nationalist outlook on like breaks any bond between mankind. If anything I only see nationalism as a political expression of mutual respect for the catholic nature of man, whilst at the same time respecting racial, and thereby national, distinctions.

        I also fail to see that a violent response to those not of our kind must entail from nationalism. Quite the opposite. It is those leftists and Jews who have infested everything due to the Judeo-American victory over the world in the middle of the 20th Century that promulgate such notions.

        Somewhat related, Chechar, I know you hold that Catholic Spain caused race mixing in Mexico and as a result we see the problems in that nation today. However, in my readings of late I came across what is termed “The Terrible Triangle” which includes the persecution of the Catholic Church and Catholics in Mexico.

        What effect did this as well as the Mexican Revolution have on the current national disintegration of Mexico, and the subsequent immivasion of the U.S.A. in your opinion?

      • Mexico was already a melting pot of Amerinds, Whites and Negroes—:

        —centuries before that nasty and unjust persecution of Catholics in the 20th century. Remember that Pope that, in the 1530s, allowed mixed marriages right after the Conquest of the Aztec Empire.

      • With respect, you haven’t answered my question.

        That Mexico was “a melting pot of Amerinds, Whites and Negroes” prior to the Mexican Revolution and the subsequent persecution of the Catholic Church, we can agree on.

        What I want to know is, when did Mexico become the problem that it is today and what were its causes. Given that prior to the Mexican Revolution and post revolution the ethnic makeup of that nation was the same, what caused today’s problems?

        Were today’s problems existing prior to the revolution? Did the disintegration of the Catholic Church in the nation at the hands of the state lead to the present day problems in that nation, contrary to your conjecture that “Christianity” is to blame?

        I know every little about Mexican history, and ask you as one who knows a lot.

      • Mexico’s really big problems started within my lifespan: the population explosion. And you know what do others and I blame for that calamity.

        Click here and scroll down until you hit the phrase “Thus the Western Christian civilization caused the population explosion in the Third World…”

  9. I would like to add, as I get into many arguments with fellow “Christians” and non-Christians alike on this subject, that nationalism entails violent persecution of “the other” is a false dichotomy.

    One does not follow from the other.

    Yet, that is the perverse conclusion placed in people’s minds due to Judeo-American cultural ascendancy.

    Read again my opening comment. Was it the “Christians” of the Berliner Dom who demanded that their religious and cultural expression in the recital of Bach’s St John Passion be perverted into “Jewish and Muslim poetry and liturgical excerpts”?

    As the article details, the answer is a categorical no!

    Is it these very same “Christians” who opposed that perversion the ones who now cast a muscular sexualised negro with crown of thorns in place of the crucified Christ?

    No!

    Much can be layed at the foot of various traditional Christian churches, but the effect we have today cannot! be attributed to Christianity qua Christianity.

    What we have today is a defeated Roman Catholicism, the various schismatic Protestant faiths almost vanished in the West, all replaced with heretics at the helm and a confused, bewildered and dwindling congregation.

    Christianity is not your or my problem. Judeo-American hegemony is every nations problem, not just those of ours, i.e us White people.

    • Much can be layed at the foot of various traditional Christian churches, but the effect we have today cannot!

      In my own words:

      “Mental AIDS” is the collapse of a people’s immune system in the face of their enemies. Practically all whites throughout the West suffer from mental AIDS insofar as they are not defending their sacred lands against an invasion of millions of non-whites. However, some white nationalists get mad when hearing the expression “suicide” as a value judgment about the pathological passivity among present-day whites. Most nationalists speak, instead, of “homicide”: the Jews being the primary infection that infected the white soul.

      But what if they are a secondary infection? After all, the white people contracted Christianity (HIV) in the 4th century, which after a long incubation period eventually developed into liberalism (AIDS) during the Enlightenment and the French Revolution. Liberalism, or Neochristianity as I like to call it, weakened the West’s immune system. After Napoleon, Neochristians opened the door to the subversive tribe throughout continental Europe—Jews—: a “mental AIDS”-related opportunistic infection, such as pneumonia is an infection of the somatic equivalent of AIDS.

      See the HIV link above. If Christianity and its secular offshoots are massively involved in the West’s darkest hour, and I cannot conceive a biggest blunder than emancipating the Jew, why not start diagnosing the situation as “assisted suicide,” with the Jew only being too happy to comply the deranged Neochristian’s will to bring about his own death?

      I am not alone in this apparently wild opinion. Below, my abridgment of Tom Sunic’s “Race and Religion: Awkward Friends of the White Man,” published in three parts at The Occidental Observer

      Read the rest of the article:

      https://chechar.wordpress.com/2013/02/02/assisted-suicide/

      • I will read the article, but I don’t think it will change my opinion that your blaming of “Christianity” for our national problems is a false path.

        Having just toured Germany, including Dresden, and going through Cathedral after Cathedral, what made an impression upon me, amongst other things, was the lack of church attendance.

        These Cathedrals are historical monuments, barely living. The Lutheran more so than the Catholic.

        Yet, you want to blame Christianity against all evidence. You want to lump in those insane Zionist Christian churches of Judeo-America with traditional Catholicism as if they were one and the same. You want to cast the modern race mixing, even ecumenical (a heresy) Catholic Church of today with the Church of 2,000 years.

        You want to blame Catholic universalism for our problems, the very same universalism that held together the various disparate White tribes during the transition of Rome from a pagan empire into Catholic Chrsitendom. Obviously, the two universalisms are not the same. Today’s universalism is a leftist tyranny whereas the universalism at the end of the pagan Rome was a binding force that preserved our people.

        The two are not the same.

        It seems to me all you are doing is antogonising those who would be otherwise on your side for no good purpose. You treat “Christianity” as if it were some great oppressive force in the world whereas it is not even a shadow of its former self. Today, Christianity has all the force of a wet lettuce. The Catholic Church herself has allied herself with the Jewish led forces of modernism and leftism, and, as a result, she is in what seems a decline into oblivion.

        Anyway, I’ve said my piece.

      • Yet, you want to blame Christianity against all evidence. You want to lump in those insane Zionist Christian churches of Judeo-America with traditional Catholicism as if they were one and the same. You want to cast the modern race mixing, even ecumenical (a heresy) Catholic Church of today with the Church of 2,000 years.

        How many articles of my updated entry “The Christian problem encompasses the Jewish problem” have you read?

        You want to blame Catholic universalism for our problems, the very same universalism that held together the various disparate White tribes during the transition of Rome from a pagan empire into Catholic Chrsitendom. Obviously, the two universalisms are not the same. Today’s universalism is a leftist tyranny whereas the universalism at the end of the pagan Rome was a binding force that preserved our people.

        I agree that Christianity was healthy, in the sense that whites didn’t ruin their genetic heritage, until Europeans started to interact massively with non-whites right after the Conquest of the Aztec and the Inca empires. But…

        It seems to me all you are doing is antogonising those who would be otherwise on your side for no good purpose. You treat “Christianity” as if it were some great oppressive force in the world whereas it is not even a shadow of its former self.

        …the fact that the Iberians so horribly messed their gene pool even inside the Iberian Peninsula (are you familiar with my post on Portugal?) proves that even when Catholicism was very healthy (I do admire and am proud of Spain’s Golden Age, especially the literature of that century) white Christians committed the Sin against the Holy Ghost.

  10. For the record, the modern day church is a jesuit run construction. They were excommunicated forever and so their presence in the catholic church signifies that they won against the traditional order (not that the traditional order was great by any means, it was ignorant and corrupt as hell most of the time). Things got really blatant in this regard with John Paul II who made many may statements that are blatantly pro new world order:

    Catholic Catechism

    “839 “Those who have not yet received the Gospel are related to the People of God in various ways.” The relationship of the Church with the Jewish People. When she delves into her own mystery, the Church, the People of God in the New Covenant, discovers her link with the Jewish People,”the first to hear the Word of God.” The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God’s revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews “belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ”, “for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable.”

    “841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.””

    ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PAUL VI
    ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PEOPLES

    ““62. There are other obstacles to creation of a more just social order and to the development of world solidarity: nationalism and racism. ”

    “83. Finally, We look to all men of good will, reminding them that civil progress and economic development are the only road to peace. Delegates to international organizations, public officials, gentlemen of the press, teachers and educators—all of you must realize that you have your part to play in the construction of a new world order.”


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: