Has Christianity…

been good for the White race?

by AAB

1) No it hasn’t. It has been far from good for the white race.

Internal warfare and external threats to the White Race in Europe were not abated by Christianity. Some of Europe was converted by 5th century by the Roman Empire, which saw the enslavement and death of 3 million White Gauls, and then their slow spiritual degradation.

The rest of Europe was converted to Christianity circa 11th century (by the point of the sword I might add). Over the next millennium there was much internal warfare which led to the destruction of people, property and ideas. What’s more is that Christianity did a poor job of defending White Christendom from invaders. So not only did it cause internal warfare, but it failed to defend the Christians from external threats, thus it was a double-edged sword of evil against the white race.


Muslim Expansions in 7th & 8th Centuries

Auburn – Muhammad’s conquests, 622–632
Atomic tangerine – Rashidun Caliphate, 632–661
Amber – Umayyad Caliphate, 661–750

Remember that it was nationalists who defended White Europe from invaders. Not Christians but nationalists. Christians had no desire to help one another despite the pleas that were sent by Kings from the Balkans when the Muslim Turks were invading. Europe was defended by Stephen cel Mare of Moldavia, Vlad Tepes of Wallachia, Ivan the IV of Muscovy, Ferdinand of Spain, amongst others. These men were nationalist champions first and foremost. They fought for their kin, for their family. Nationalists were the ones who fended off the invaders, not Christians. Christianity has done nothing to give internal security, nor external security. It’s crap as a police force, and worse as a military force. It causes destruction of all those who believe it. Other races would be wise to give Christianity a wide birth also, as it would likely have the same effect on them.

2) Christianity left the White Race genetically impoverished (as it does to “all races” who believe it). The most intelligent men and women were sent off to monasteries and nunneries to study instead of raising families and being innovators (like Farnsworth, Darwin, who had families and children) which means that the race didn’t benefit from their excellent genes. Obviously a race that degrades is only going to get worse. Is that what God intended when he created the universe: That we all end up thick, and physically unfit? I doubt it.

3) Christianity has achieved next to nothing in technological terms. Compare the Christian Civilisation / Empires that sprouted circa 1500, to the Pagan Empires of the Middle-East. The Christian Empires were obsessed with “making money,” hence the phrase “the Protestant Work Ethic” which is about being nothing more than a money grubber. Here are some of the achievements of the Pagans: the library at Alexandria, the Pyramids, Agriculture, Metal working—from the R1b Hittites, and astronomy. Now what have the Christians added to that in the millennia that they’ve had cultural dominance? Where are the pyramids, where is the great library? There are none of these things. As Arthur Schopenhauer pointed out the achievements of Europe during the Enlightenment era were made “in spite” of the faith known as Christianity.

Your life and happiness will be better served by believing that which is true, and that which begets good works. You’ll get neither of these things from Christianity, but both from truth. Whether that truth lays solely in spiritual-paganism or hard-headed science I don’t know. Uppsala Online is an intelligent website that straddles both worlds: the world of science and the world of spirit, and shows that you don’t have to fudge words or babble in order to defend your position like so many Christians seem to do. The truth serves you well and is simple and crystal-clear.

Anonymous said…

Under Christianity Europe gave us modern firearms, Gothic Cathedrals, modern medicine (to be fair the Romans were far ahead of Medieval Europeans) and the printing press. Unless you’re referring to a time when Europe was 100 percent theocratic. In that case, Christianity achieved very little. The good in Christianity was put there by White men, as was the good in Paganism. Paganism, by being intrinsically ours, is the healthier/better fit.

AAB said…

Though all races adhere to similar laws (logical, physical, biological etc., we’ve all got to eat and sleep!), there are differences between the races, and those differences are best satisfied by a belief system that is unique to them. A belief system along the lines of the Proto-Indo-European religion will probably be best for the White race. hyperborearising.wordpress.com seems to have a good grasp on such matters.

Finally, here’s the quote from Schopenhauer on “Christianity and Civilization”:

The reason civilization is at its highest point among Christian peoples is not that Christianity is favourable to it but that Christianity is dead and no longer exercises much influence: as long as it did exercise influence, civilisation was at a very low point among Christian peoples. All “religion” is antagonistic towards culture.

(Essays and Aphorisms, Hollingdale translation.)

Published in: on September 27, 2013 at 5:00 pm  Comments (6)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://chechar.wordpress.com/2013/09/27/has-christianity-been-good-for-the-white-race/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

6 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Pace AAB I agree with Anonymous that the Christian cathedrals represent a much higher stage of the vertical, white spirit of transcendence than the pyramids.

    • Thanks for the reblog.

      It’s true that the white stoned Gothic Cathedrals are vertical symbolising a more advanced mindset. It reminds me of the ‘church of light’ that the NAZIs used during the 1930s, which used powerful spotlights to create the impression of a church.

  2. Reblogged this on murderbymedia.

  3. First, Christianity is called a slave religion of weaklings, then Christians are condemned for slaughtering pagens. Make up my mind.
    I highly recommend the ” slim book” below. Part of it describes the perversion of Classical Greek religion. Study Rome and you will find the same thing. Study Egypt, Persia, India,… study any white civilization you want. You will find the same thing. As with Sparta, when a people allow their culture to degrade, religion being part of the culture, the people are doomed. As with Sparta, when a people hold themselves to an iron discipline the people will thrive.

  4. Christianity in any sense is certainly a mutable religion; it may not always be anti-white … that is once pro-whites have power i.e. become Caesar.

    The type of Christianity which you seem to describe is really a result of Wesleyanism, which was the beginning of the marxification of American Protestantism from its strict deterministic, inegalitarian Calvinist, Lutheran, and Anglican roots. Of course Wesleyanism, with its emphasis on free-will and social justice, became highly popular in all three Great “Awakenings” and is currently mainstream in non-Wesleyan(i.e. Methodist) denominations.
    [I was raised a Methodist; the Marxism turned my stomach after a while and I am now only nominally a Methodist]

    You should consider that some forms of Christianity still act as a bulwark against the sexual revolution, and (as I have observed) many conservative white Christian families are an enormous asset to our race, as they are very prolific at producing white Children.While you may not like Christianity, a victory in WN over Christianity could very well be a Pyrrhic victory for these reasons.

    Another reason being that there are still some traditional form of Catholicism, Orthodoxy, Anglicanism, Calvinism and Lutheranism which instill a sense of discipline along with a hierarchical, and patriarchal worldview. These denominations are in the minority, but they do exist.

    The atmosphere of traditional Christian worship is also the antithesis of the degenerate culture [produced by non-whites], and a child with a stable upbringing in, for instance, traditional Catholicism, is likely to look in disgust at the degenerate culture [produced by non-whites] in the U.S., and therefore, come to have disdain for non-whites themselves.[Traditional Christianity can inadvertently produce racism]

    It is my current opinion that religion in WN should generally be regarded as a private matter – if a person’s urge to preserve his race is strong enough, it is doubtful that he will allow religion to get in the way. He may even voluntarily ditch his religion (as many have done) for the survival of his race. WN is a political ethnonationalist movement and when it aligns with, or against a certain religious ideology which is popular among whites, things will only go downhill – this is something Uncle Adolf understood well.

    [btw, I speak as an American, and Christianity is still very common among non-degenerate, non-suicidal whites here]

    • All mainstream churches are pro-immigration and anti-racist today. No Christian has challenged my observation that Christianity started by mongrelising Constantinople and that “healthy” forms of Christianity sans Jew, such as the conquest of this continent by the Iberians since early 16th century, involved mestization as well. No universalist creed is compatible with Aryan preservation in the long run.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: