Colhaze’s missing article

I have added a new page for the forthcoming, printed version of my book; a page that will appear by the end of the section on “Christian axiology”:

One ring darkred

After seeing the PDF of the first version of The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour, Michael Colhaze, a featured writer of The Occidental Observer, retracted his previous permission to include his piece Lords of the Ring in the present compilation. Colhaze, whose native language is German, explained that he is a dedicated Christian and that he has written criticizing Hitler.

While I complied and removed Colhaze’s piece from the present edition of The Fair Race, as will be seen in the next section by doing it some architecture of the book needs a little restructuring or explanatory notes. On the positive side of this small affair, Colhaze’s change of mind has moved me to add this page on white nationalist Christians.

Kevin MacDonald’s first book of his trilogy opened the door to my understanding of the “Old Testament,” the sacred book of the Jews. The Old Testament message promises a racial ethno-state for a Semitic tribe: a message by Hebrew writers for the Hebrew people. On the other hand, in the New Testament the Jew Saul (“Paul”) teaches universalism for gentiles. Even though some neochristian exegetes like Albert Schweitzer distinguish between the historical Jesus and the Christ of dogma, it is not possible to ascertain whether a historical Jesus even existed. Nonetheless, the gospel, even if wholly fictional, presents us Jesus as a Jewish liberal who promises us post-mortem survival. This seems to be the biblical message of both Testaments in a nutshell: “An ethno-state for me but not for thee; your reign is not of this world…”

Pierce said that if our race survives this century it will only be because we have gotten the monkey of Christianity off our backs. In my own words I would say: Pace white nationalist Christians, the prize to save the white race from extinction is apostasy from our parents’ religion.

Published in: on April 30, 2014 at 7:20 pm  Comments (13)  


  1. Chechar, where you say:

    “Pace white nationalist Christians, the prize to save the white race from extinction is apostasy from our parents’ religion.”

    I think you are misusing the word “pace”. Here [link] is the definition of the word “pace”.

    If you think you are using the word “pace” correctly above, then what does “Pace white nationalist Christians” mean?

    I’ve seen you misuse “pace” before, so I don’t think you made a typo here.

    • It’s Latin, not English:

      Pace = “With all due respect to”, “with due deference to”, “by leave of”, or “no offense to”. Used to politely acknowledge someone with whom the speaker or writer disagrees.

      Source: List of Latin phrases (P).

      But I see your point and I’ll italicize the word.

      • Very few English speakers know Latin, and “pace” is also an English word and will still be read as the English word “pace” even if you italicize it.

        I suggest you simply rewrite using English, not Latin, to convey the meaning you want.

      • I have read popular writers like Arthur C. Clarke using phrases such as “Pace John Doe” meaning what the above definition says. It would be interesting to make a poll in this thread asking visitors if they were familiar with the Latin term in similar phrases.

        By the way, the coming edition of FRDH has included footnotes on the dates of each article, as you requested.

    • I’m not a native speaker of English, but I have no problem with the Latin expression “pace”. Its meaning is clear and non-controversial for me.

      Off-topic: A very good article [Racism: The Eighth Deadly Sin] for regular folks to be introduced to the topic of the “anti-racism” charade.

      • I have read it. It’s a nice piece. But I don’t believe that the elites are doing it out of conscious domination of the world. It is far more primitive than that. The whole process seems (at least to me) more unconsciously than consciously motivated: the result of the three main culprits mentioned in my PDF, the “Ring”, neo-Christianity and the overbearing stupidity after the French Revolution of letting the Jews take over.

  2. Quit busting his balls, he used it correctly; most English speakers today are just too fucking fluorided and stoopid to get it. I don’t speak Latin and even inebriated am more than lucid enough to understand so easy a statement: peace.

    Not all our White brothers speak the forked tongued language of English. As a matter of fact, the most racially aware Whites today, don’t speak English at all. A little fact the so called White nationalist, in his smug hubris, shall have to bear in mind, if he hopes to have any brothers stand with him.

    It is not the arrogance of youth that should ask our elders to stoop to our level, but rather it behooves the youth of the white race to rise up to the standard and the excellence of our forebears.

    Remember the days of old;
    consider the years of many generations;
    ask your father, and he will show you,
    your elders, and they will tell you.
    When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance,
    when He divided mankind,
    He fixed the borders of the peoples
    according to the number of the sons of God.
    (Deuteronomy 32:7,8)

    Scott’s verses from the Lay of the Last Minstrel:

    Breathes there the man, with soul so dead,
    Who never to himself hath said,
    This is my own, my native land!
    Whose heart hath ne’er within him burn’d,
    As home his footsteps he hath turn’d,
    From wandering on a foreign strand!
    If such there breathe, go, mark him well;
    For him no Minstrel raptures swell;
    High though his titles, proud his name,
    Boundless his wealth as wish can claim;
    Despite those titles, power, and pelf,
    The wretch, concentred all in self,
    Living, shall forfeit fair renown,
    And, doubly dying, shall go down
    To the vile dust, from whence he sprung,
    Unwept, unhonour’d, and unsung.

    Having said that, Chechar, am really looking forward to your book. And I would like to bring to your attention, there is a branch of ‘Christianity’ which is in full agreement with all of your views, so I have observed, it’s called Christian Identity or Racial Identity, and they believe with conviction and fervor, in fact state emphatically that they can prove, that the Israelites of the Bible are in fact Whites, and that the Jews, or Edomites, Canaanites, etc, stole the identity of the White Israelite Hebrews in I think it was, 700 BC, mistranslated the bible, inserted the word “Lord” which properly means “Ba’al” or “Devil” – ie, Christian Bale, another kike, typical in-your-face gloating, for you can’t be a Christian and a John 8:44 devil at the same time.

    Whether or not the claims of the CI/RI followers are historicitically factual, is a matter of sufficient research that few of us have the time for. Suffice to say, their hatred of the Jew, or White race traitors/proselytes, belief in the Old Testament, suspicion of the New Testament, leaves no doubt in my mind that they are our unshakeable allies.

    I have learned from experience, that it is the modus operandi of the demons, to murder the saints, impersonate, dopplegang, usurp, and play the victim. The Polish have a saying about the jew “The jew cries ‘victim’ while clubbing you on the head”.

    In any case, your comments on the great William Pierce are correct, and your hatred of the parasite’s anaesthetizing venom known as “turn the other cheek” are all perfectly sound. I would admonish you to, take a closer look, before dismissing the whole lot of White Christians, many of whom have already suffered in dungeons for our cause.

    I direct your attention to a few notable sites:

    I was also utterly repulsed and disgusted by judeochurchianity for many years, but after I found these guys, it got me to thinking perhaps I should take a closer look before dismissing them. Whatever anyone may say, their level of racial awareness, hatred of the jew, and understanding of the perilousness of the hour, are without peer among any, I repeat ANY, other “religious, spiritual, belief, whatever” community, and that includes, Asatru, Wotanist, Wodanist, blah blah blah, groups I’ve come across. And I’m not too proud to learn, should any of you be able to PROVE ME WRONG.

    I am aware of what Charlemagne did to the Germanic pagan nobility of Europe. I am not interested in settling accounts of the past. I am interested in the NOW and in the FUTURE. We the White race as a people need the spirit to power the flesh; the animalism, might is right, philosophies, fail to inspire the fanaticism necessary to prevail, survive, and thrive. Nor does the church of creativity, however useful in pointing out the obvious, produce UNIFYING results. I am further aware of Pellas Athena, and the gods of our fathers before Christianity. And before the Greeks we had the Zoroastrians, and before them, we had the Sanskrit speaking White Aryans, the “civilized ones” who used the chariot, bow, and rode the horse, taught to “speak the truth and shoot the bow”. Has anything changed? Now it’s English and AR15’s and submoa sniper rifles, and a man’s word is still his bond (which means debt, for all you illiterates). Just how far back shall we go, seriously. But let me repeat myself, I DON’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE PAST. If you go back long enough, we had a different name for God and Gods, and before that, other names still. Men do not argue about God because God enjoys the arguing; men argue about God and everything else because they love to argue, period fullstop. Arguing men produce no results, other than arguments. The ruler seeks riches, the lover the eye of the beloved, the pundit the fine quote, the bee honey, flies festering soars, low minded ones seek quarrels, and good men, peace, and the valiant, victory. If we survive, IF we survive, we will have time enough to settle grievances amongst ourselves, for amongst each other, at least, we can reason, that’s what the White flag was meant to symbolize, not ‘surrender’ but rather “only Whites here, we can reason with each other” and also what the phrase “beyond the pale” refers to.

    Yes. Much venom in churchianity. “Communism shall ride in on the wings of Christianity” Lenin.
    But no time for Christian bashing.
    In the words of David Lane, whom we all, owe more than a little “If it looks White, acts White, fights White, then for all intents and purposes, it is White, until proven otherwise.”
    Notice, he mentioned not, religion.

    • Yes: I have seen debates of Christians vs. anti-Christian WNsts (the most recent I read on VNN: here).

      My take on the subject appears: here.

  3. Vigithuno

    Well said.

    Yes, come up to the level of our forebears.

  4. It is very possible that our enemies do have eternal souls, but can be lawfully killed anyway. The more they resist, the more they will be punished in Hell. Conversion may only save the soul, not the body…

    That is the trick our enemies pulled on us: Turn that other cheek, or burn in Hell!

  5. “…it is not possible to ascertain whether a historical Jesus even existed.”

    It is odd then, that Jesus is not only mentioned in the Talmud, but also vilified there to an unbelievable degree (you can easily find references to the passages in the Talmud online wherein Jesus is said to be “in hell and boiling in excrement there” : (Git. 56b-57a). See here, for instance: here

    Were it not for the hatred that Jews have for Jesus, I would also doubt that the man ever existed, but such is their hatred that they do everything in their power to discredit him. As a matter of fact, it is incumbent on every Orthodox Jew to spit in the direction of any Christian church and its cross when he passes by one. It is no accident that porn actresses wear a cross while “doing their thing” in porn films (the porn industry is Jewish, by the way). Christianity is made fun of at every turn in the American mainstream media. Israeli fighter pilots have shot directly at the red cross on ambulances during Israel’s many conflicts in the middle east, wherein the Red Cross has been present trying to give medical attention to Israel’s Palestinian, Lebanese, Syrian and other victims. If Christianity is a weapon fashioned by Jews to destroy the White man, then all the forgoing Jewish anti-Christian behavior is strange indeed. Jesus is also mentioned by the Jewish historian Josephus (yes, I know that there are critics who have discredited him).

    • It is a complex issue. See the other entries tagged under the category New Testament.

    • Jesus is also mentioned by the Jewish historian Josephus

      Yes, and that person, Josephus Flavius (a Jew adopted into the imperial family, the Flavians) was supposedly writing decades later than Jesus lived. But if, as Joe Atwill claims, Josephus was the scholarly team leader in writing the New Testament for the Roman government in order to create this new, peaceful version of “Judaism,” then writing openly about Jesus as an historical figure some years before would be a deft, finishing touch on the fraud, a seemingly independent corroboration that there had been such a person.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: