Pierce’s speech the year he died

pierce(Note of June 13, 2014: The thoughtpolice at YouTube has axed the account that harbored this clip, which is why I am now removing what was the embedded YouTube link.)


“Jewish control of the media… is no excuse” for white treason in America (minute 7:27).

“There are several ways one can look at our problems…. One could say that everything is the fault of white American man. We used to run this country. If the Jews have taken over our mass media it is because we (emphasis in Pierce’s voice) let them do it… it is because we let the System become what it is today. So we can blame ourselves instead of the politicians or the Jewish media… We let the Jews and the politicians get away with what they are doing… It is good to look at our problems from every viewpoint (from minute 7:45 to 9:30).

What I liked most of the speech was the very end: a mention about the Holocaust committed by the Judaized allied forces.

12 Comments

  1. Duck-Rabbit_illusionPierce’s statements of don’t missing the other viewpoint reminds me a post of mine, “Paradigm shift”.

  2. But William Pierce didn’t really made the absurd suggestion that, in the name of antimonocausalism, people should stop blaming the Jews and start blaming the non-Jews who are afraid to blame the Jews.

    I think the JQ is like the TQ (=Termite Question): if, out of neglect and laziness, I let my house be infested by Termites, people may blame me for failing to use an adequate anti-Termitic treatment. But I will keep blaming the Termites, and I will resent being called a monocausalistic anti-Termite.

    I agree that people who refuse to blame, name, or resist the Jews are part of the problem. But it seems absurd to use that as evidence that Jews are not the only agent of destruction of the White race and of White civilization. When you say that White people are guilty of ignoring Jewish collective malfeasance, it still means that you see the Jews as the main problem.

    If we are looking for non-Jewish causes of today’s disastrous situation, it would make more sense to mention the changed social and economic environment that helped destroy traditional society. But even there, Pierce’s opinion is that those changes in themselves only caused limited damage. The real problem according to him is that those changes facilitated the Jewish takeover: (8:20) “We also could blame the changed social and economic environment in America for softening us up to the point that we left the Jews and the politicians get away with what they are doing.”

    • But William Pierce didn’t really made the absurd suggestion that, in the name of antimonocausalism, people should stop blaming the Jews and start blaming the non-Jews who are afraid to blame the Jews.

      And who has made that absurd suggestion?

      I think the JQ is like the TQ (=Termite Question): if, out of neglect and laziness, I let my house be infested by Termites, people may blame me for failing to use an adequate anti-Termitic treatment. But I will keep blaming the Termites, and I will resent being called a monocausalistic anti-Termite.

      That metaphor comes from Linder (who is not monocausalist but bicausalist Type-A). He’s right of course about final solutions to the termite problem. Have you noticed that at the end of both The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour and Day of Wrath I praise Himmler’s ways?

      I agree that people who refuse to blame, name, or resist the Jews are part of the problem. But it seems absurd to use that as evidence that Jews are not the only agent of destruction of the White race and of White civilization. When you say that White people are guilty of ignoring Jewish collective malfeasance, it still means that you see the Jews as the main problem.

      I disagree. Read the article linked beside the duck/rabbit on why I flipped paradigms.

      If we are looking for non-Jewish causes of today’s disastrous situation, it would make more sense to mention the changed social and economic environment that helped destroy traditional society. But even there, Pierce’s opinion is that those changes in themselves only caused limited damage. The real problem according to him is that those changes facilitated the Jewish takeover: (8:20) “We also could blame the changed social and economic environment in America for softening us up to the point that we left the Jews and the politicians get away with what they are doing.”

      Agreed. In that speech he said that. That’s why I am also balancing that speech with what he said in Who We Are (again, see the article “Paradigm shift”).

      • “Monocausalism” … lol …. sounds like some sexual affliction.

        The kikejew being Enemy #1 does not mean there are no others, as those whose goal is to win arguments rather than uncover truth often insinuate.

        Problem #1 and Enemy #1 are different, as again explained on today’s Fourth Position show (“Why WTC-7 Matters”).

        RESIST !!!

      • This is no place to discuss 9/11 “truth”.

      • Thank you for your interesting blog and books. My show #90 “Universal Spartans” used your 92 page history of them as a ‘homework assignment’.

        Yesterday’s topic was not “9/11 Truth” but “Why WTC-7 Matters”, where the basis was not 9/11, but the flaw in thinking of some leaders which make them susceptible to further manipulation. Of course, at the start some aspects were recounted. However, this was not to make a case but merely to refresh memories.

        Pragmatically, 9/11 as a cause célèbre is over. There was always enough evidence for an honest government to issue indictments. That’s the rub!

        Discussed Sunday was the difference between Enemy #1 and Problem #1 (note my comment here: http://www.dailystormer.com/fourth-position-radio-why-wtc-7-matters/).

        RESIST !!!

  3. Read the First Commandment and then recognize that there is no right/ left paradigm because ALL in the West have a fundamental belief in the “right” to “love, f&$k, screw” whomever one pleases. Now, whether such a belief is inherent to the white man or simply a mimicking of the Jew qua Jew remains unanswered. But it leaves no doubt that such an across the board “highest value” entails absolute disloyalty for your fellow white man at the most basic level.

  4. Dear Chechar, as I read your comments about the Holocaust, I find you apparently accept the claim that it actually occurred. One should begin this discussion by defining what the Jews mean when they say “Holocaust” i.e. a purposeful attempt by German National Socialist to commit “genocide” against the Jewish race. No one denies the existence of concentration camps, but the planned extermination of six million Jews? First there are no written records by the Germans clearly addressing either a plan or the infrastructure to commit such an attempt. Documents, like the minutes from the Wansee Conference had to be carefully reinterpreted by the Jews to uncover the plan. The Jews counter the lack of documented evidence by saying it was so heinous and terrible a crime the Germans feared discovery and reprisals. For this reason alone the Germans ran the entire Holocaust program by means of a “Whispered campaign”; a campaign whereby nothing was ever committed to paper. Considering the German penchant for documenting everything every jot and tittle of their system, this is a major stretch of credibility to say the least. Then there is the fact that the Holocaust occurred during the last few years of the war. Basically, the majority of Holocaust claims occurred very in late 1943 and ’44. The war was going badly for the Germans by this point in time, so if the Germans ran the whispered Holocaust campaign in such great fear of discovery, why would they commit such an indictable act in the first place? Empirical evidence, like the plaque at Auschwitz, where the number of “victims” has been downplayed by some 2.5 million, clearly show the falsity of the Jews claims of six million victims. Denierbud did a fine job of dissecting the Jew’s claims one by one in his videos, using interviews from Jews like Abram Bomba. Bomba claims he was cutting hair INSIDE the gas chambers, where a new group of “victims” would be brought in every five minutes or so. Anyone with the slightest inkling of the HcN gassing process used by the United states penal system knows this is pure bullshit. Other claims like Elie Wiesenthal’s “geysers of blood” contend that blood of the victims continued spurting from the ground months after the mass graves were covered over. Such a fantastic claim might have been taken straight from the Book of Ezekiel. Then there are the “eyewitness” descriptions of SS guards laughing and SMOKING as they pulled the bodies from the gas chambers. Considering the flammability and toxicity of HcN, once again this beggars any possibility of credibility. What about the “RJF” soap bars made from Jewish fat that even the Yad Vashem now admits were complete fabrications, and well they should considering all those photos of emaciated inmates. To paraphrase Clara Peller, “Where’s the fat?” What about the official Red Cross figures taken from Soviet archives, are these naught but forgeries? Schopenhauer called the Jews the master of lies. Yet their fantastic claims for the Holocaust prove they are not so much masters of the lie as they are psychopathic liars, a fact proven out time and again throughout their history. The main problem with accepting the Holocaust story is that it is the lynchpin of Jewish power, which is why the Jews viciously protect it with laws and imprisonment. If the Holocaust lie is exposed, the Jews will most assuredly lose all credibility and fall from grace in the eyes of even the most programmed non-Jew. The Jews are well aware of this fact and so will not tolerate the slightest questioning of their Holocaust claims or even its now firmly debunked six million figure. Thus the Holocaust provides one major lever for non-Jews to identify both friend and enemy. Public refusal or acceptance of this myth clearly defines which side one has taken on the Jewish question. There are many, like Alex Jones, who claim to expose Jewish complicity in government crimes and yet refuse to discuss the Holocaust. Years ago when everyone was saying that Alex Jones was a “truther” I used this very yardstick as a measure of his honesty in claims for uncovering government conspiracies. I said he was a disinformation agent from almost the beginning and sure enough that has now been proven out. Mr. Jones is now pretty much viewed as yet one more disinformation agent working for the Zionist government. On the other hand those openly refuting or even inferring Holocaust claims are false are attacked, vilified and destroyed. People like Ernst Zundel, Fred Leuchter and David Irving (who has now backtracked on the matter in order to survive as a historian) are mercilessly attacked and ruined by the Jews. To my knowledge, no one refuting the Holocaust claims has ever been uncovered as an agent of any kind working in the Jew’s interests. So why mitigate the one accurate yardstick that can measure the honesty of people who say they are working against the Jews or for white interests?

    • “who has now backtracked on the matter in order to survive as a historian…”

      Nope. Sorry. He changed his mind because he’s honest. Wait and see what’s coming in his book on Himmler.

      • So the Holocaust happened?

      • Not the 6 millions; that’s an invention.

      • The ‘holocaust’ is just another conspiracy theory!


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: