On American capitalism

“Cultural Marxism is a code word for American Capitalism.”

White nationalists have been deceiving themselves with their single-cause hypothesis, i.e., an omnipotent tribe and the utter innocence of poor little whites. Yockey, O’Meara and Sunic on the other hand have seen capitalism as the main etiology of Western malaise (the non-Gentile, merely a secondary infection).

Below, no ellipsis added between the unquoted phrases or excerpts taken from pages 93-99 of Michael O’Meara’s Toward the White Republic, a must-read for any nationalist still stuck in “monocausalism”:

 

>Toward the White Republic, essay 2Corporate capitalism, in tandem with the new managerial state, began redesigning American culture and society to accord with its specific social-economic imperatives. The country’s historic racial hierarchy was overturned; cities, in the name of “urban renewal” (i.e., social engineering) were ethnically cleansed and white communities destroyed; masses of Negroes were not just allowed into, but imposed on, white society to resocialize whites as mindless, deracinated consumers; most cultural and educational institutions were taken over by Jews or market forces hostile to tradition.

Our people will survive only if white men, in struggle, learn again to stand, like their ancestors, on their own two legs and fight for a land of their own, free from everything associated with the monstrous Leviathan that has become the United States.

Almost as depressing as the thought of our people’s extinction is that of the white opposition to it. It’s not just that this opposition is minuscule in number, confined to the internet, and attracts a great many asocial, dysfunctional types incapable of sustaining any sort of nationalist resistance. Our people face extinction not because the Jews or the liberals monopolize the media, force feed us anti-white ideas, control the leading institutions, and wield all the power and influence. This is a big part of it, to be sure, but to see things solely—or principally—in these terms is to overlook the last two or three centuries of Western history.

As for the white masses—whose vegetative existence is lived unconscious of the higher forces governing them—they’ll never be moved by ideas and principles openly challenging the existing order. Only a social crisis set off by some cataclysm that makes their normal way of life impossible will cause them to look for alternatives. And at that point, what matters most will not be ideas and principles, but men and organizations whose exemplary stature instills in them the confidence for decisive action.

The white race will be reborn, then, not by electing Congressmen, hiring lobbyists, and participating in a system that seeks its destruction, but by returning to its original self—and to the challenge of creating a new elite, a revolutionary vanguard morally and organizationally armed to stand against the Jewish age—so that when the foul system supporting it collapses in decay, there will be someone around to fight for our fair share of the spoils.

If our people are to restore European America it will be in the Aryan way.

_______________

Postscript:

See also my translation of a Manu Rodríguez article, re-baptized here as “The Aryan problem.”

Published in: on July 22, 2014 at 10:46 am  Comments (12)  
Tags: ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://chechar.wordpress.com/2014/07/22/on-american-capitalism/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

12 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. O’Meara pretty well nailed the White apathy problem here. Whites are unlikely to act, except as a response to dire economic, social and political crises. They really have to realize that they are threatened, dispossessed and hungry, before they will act.

    • I doubt Whites will act even in the face of “dire economic, social, and political crises.” Look at what’s happening to Whites in South Africa. Unfortunately, the race-instinct has been ripped out of most Whites after half a century of intense brainwashing by Jews, in addition to centuries of breeding inspired by Christian moralism.

  2. Jews act, white people react. Jews lead, white people follow. This is the fundamental problem. White people are natural followers who demand leadership, a demand Jews are only too happy to fill with their own corrupt version. Absent the Jew’s pernicious influence, the present social malaise seen among white culture would disappear. Just a few short decades ago it would have been unthinkable for the average white girl or woman to have a tattoo and the only acceptable piercing was seen in the ear lobes. Yet today, females of all ages sport so many tattoos they look like ambulatory, graffiti-covered billboards with faces that often resemble pincushions. How did this happen? Who made tattoos and skin piercing fashionable among white woman? Perhaps the idea gained traction with that thoroughly Hollywood horror character called “pinhead.” More likely, one might ask, who controls the fashion industry? Who controls the media that sets up role models for the culture? Who revels in white shiksa sluts and whores? Whose culture has tattooed and pierced their slaves and whores for millennia? What Middle Eastern culture eschews the use of tattoos among their own people, and where did the evil Nadzees come by them for their prized lampshades? What about “Tiaras for Toddlers”, from whence did the sexualizing of prepubescent white girls arise? What about these clues straight from what Jews claim is the most holy of all books:

    Sanhedrin 55b . A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years “and a day” old).

    Sanhedrin 54b . A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.

    Kethuboth 11b . “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.”

    While you’re at it, take some time and read the rest of the Talmud – it’s only twenty volumes. When you are finished, tell me where one might find a comparable “holy book” among white religion or culture, or something even close, as in the cosmic concept of light years. People are always casting aspersions at the Christians for their dogged belief in their sacred Bible. I suspect it is because they are wholly ignorant of its daughter the Talmud. A downloadable Talmud can be found here: Comeandhear.com.

    Adolf Hitler demonstrated what a modern white society looks like sans Jew influence. How were whites culpable for social rot in the Third Reich? They weren’t because, absent the Jews, there was no social rot. Yet the thoroughly debauched and rotten Weimar Republic cleansed by Hitler, was a product of international Jewry. I just finished watching “Cabaret” again after some 30 odd years. Behind every scene there was the smirking harlequin mischief maker called Jew. Take a look at the scene where the Hitler Youth rises to sing “Tomorrow Belongs To Me”. Watch carefully immediately after the two leading characters leave the biergarten in their car, tell me what you read in that smirking visage. What is the Jew saying about National Socialism decades after the fact? There are few white people who can even approach the average Jew’s naturally twisted, psychopathic, debauched mentality. White people are naturally repulsed by those bloody and horrible things in which Jews revel, which explains perfectly the rising epidemic of white soldiers committing suicide. It takes years of conditioning on the part of the Jew to convince white people to buy into their sick, twisted, perverse mindset. Yet in only few short years, sans Jews, Germans rejected their conditioning.

    Remember the sixties revolution? Remember the leaders of that revolution? Remember the anti-war movement, “free love” and civil rights? Where are those leaders today? Where are the Abbie Hoffmans, Jerry Rubens and Bob Zimmermans ne Dylans leading young white boys chanting “hell no we won’t go” while urging them to burn their draft cards and go to jail? I remember I was there. Within a few years, I had marched on both sides of that dark mirror of revolt. So now that we have endless wars in the Middle East murdering masses of young, white males, where are the anti-war protesters? Where is all the civil disobedience? Where are students being shot for taking over university campuses in protest? Gone! All gone, simply because the present war is good for Jews. Under the present Zionist American Government administration, anti-war protests have now become a terrorist crime. At the very least, discussion of these wars is comparable to breaking wind during a musical rest at the symphony.

    What about the fact that the same social malaise is now occurring among every white culture in exactly the same manner at exactly the same time? Coincidence? Ya sure! You betcha! Can we say planned destruction by an alien race who hates the white man? Replace Jewish leadership with white-male leadership and the vast majority of the social abscesses will quickly heal over and disappear. If one wants to blame white people for being obedient followers, with a slavish tendency to embrace all forms of authority, then no doubt, they will be correct in that accusation. But blame the white race for the intense, pervasive, hatred, filth, perversion, corruption and psychopathy extant throughout western civilization? That’s absurd! Do I blame the Jew? To paraphrase the vulgar, yet expressive, form taught to me while serving in the Marine Corps – Yur fuckin’a skippy I blame the Jew!

    • “Adolf Hitler demonstrated what a modern white society looks like sans Jew influence.”

      Problems with this. The Iberians demonstrated what a society looks like sans kike influence: they just ruined their gene pool in the Americas and in Portugal itself.

      Haven’t you read this blog? Or O’Meara’s book?

    • Agreed. Jews are without question the main problem, and we cannot fix our own problems without dealing with the Jews first..

      • The main problem? Another guy who has not read The Fair Race

      • There are organisms in nature whose sole function it is to take over a host organism and control its behavior, leading to its death. Jews are exactly this type of organism: a parasite.

        Do you blame people for falling victim to parasites? No. The parasite is just fulfilling its purpose, and Jews have eugenically bred themselves over the course of centuries to be parasites.

        We cannot blame what’s happened to us on White greed and altruism, because greed and altruism are moral issues, and what has happened to us is a question of biology.

        Of course Jews exploit the greedy and altruistic tendencies among Whites, but Jews have just as easily infiltrated Muslim (Turkey) and East Asian (China) societies throughout the centuries.

        Jews need to be dealt with scientifically, as if they were a contagion. Hitler, as Jew-wise as he was, unfortunately failed to do this and merely placed them in cushy labor camps instead of doing what was necessary. The solution to the Jewish problem will require utter ruthlessness, the kind that the Jews themselves have.

      • Hadrian: If I remember correctly I already answered that argument in another thread: where I mentioned my exchange rebutting that at Occidental Dissent:

        http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2013/05/26/bicausalism-type-b/

        http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2013/05/27/bicausalism-type-b-part-2/

        Be warned. The first thread contains more than 500 comments…

  3. Chechar: “White nationalists have been deceiving themselves with their single-cause hypothesis”

    The Jews have an overwhelming responsibility in the race replacement crisis and more generally in the destruction of Western society. But you can always find problems in the world that the Jews didn’t cause. In the case of mass immigration and of the Iraq war, K.MacDonald thinks Jewish activism can be presented as a necessary condition. It makes more sense to me than the debate over single or not single cause. The idea is that the Jews played a central role in promoting a number of government policies, but they are not all powerful and they need the right context before they can influence things. According to that view, the Jews can not exactly be described as the single cause of our problems: they are a necessary, but not sufficient condition. But the crucial thing is whether they have been necessary to bringing about our torments. Would we be in this advanced stage of destruction without them? It turns out that the main promoters of race replacement have been Jews.

    In that article about Jews as a necessary condition, KMac provides a video of John Mearsheimer about the neocons and the Iraq war, and he says that Jewish influence over the immigration policy can be presented in a similar way. I think it is largely a matter of presentation. Jewish mischief must often be minimized so we’ll sound more credible.

    Chechar: “Yockey, O’Meara and Sunic on the other hand have seen capitalism as the main etiology of Western malaise “

    Our big problem today is race replacement, not a feeling of malaise. The fact that big American corporations have been hiring massive numbers of useless Blacks doesn’t prove that Blacks are a great asset to capitalism, it simply shows that big corporations have fallen under Jewish control (or under the control of the Jewish controlled government). Blacks, like Jews, are not an asset for us, they are a calamity.

    In the 19th century, railway companies did import Chinamen for personal financial gain, but today’s Jews import immigrants to different reasons. The aim is to destroy White people. Big companies do not need those people at all.

    O’Meara: “This is a big part of it, to be sure, but to see things solely—or principally—in these terms is to overlook the last two or three centuries of Western history.”

    The fact that in the last 2 or 3 centuries, there never was anything like today’s program of wholesale race replacement tends to support the idea that the Jews are indeed THE cause of today’s race replacement. A few centuries ago, they were still mostly living in separate places in Russia, and the West was safe.

    O’Meara: “masses of Negroes were not just allowed into, but imposed on, white society to resocialize whites as mindless, deracinated consumers;”

    The Jews actually caused a collapse of the White birth rate. It has become harder for White people to found families because of the third-world invasion of White cities, the violence and unemployment it brought about, the redistribution of our money to the non-whites, the demonization of White people by the Jewish media and the incitement to racial violence against us… As a result, millions of White people were never born. It is much worse than turning White people into mindless, deracinated consumers, ready to be exploited by the evil capitalists. Millions of Whites were simply never born. And instead of them, tens of millions of low IQ third-worlders have been let in. And Michael O’Meara thinks it somehow made the non-Jewish White capitalists richer? Actually, it made them lose tons of money.

    Economics is the last subject O’Meara should choose if he wants to prove that the Jews are not responsible for everything that goes wrong in the world.

    O’Meara: “Almost as depressing as the thought of our people’s extinction is that of the white opposition to it. It’s not just that this opposition is minuscule in number, confined to the internet, and attracts a great many asocial, dysfunctional types incapable of sustaining any sort of nationalist resistance.”

    Almost as surprising as the lack of White reaction to the Jewish anti-White activism is the failure of many WNs to recognize the obvious fact that mass immigration is a disaster for the capitalist investors. However, all is not lost: many WNs are beginning to understand that what happened to the White birth rate is not completely unrelated to the third-world invasion. So, we are making some headway!

    O’Meara: “most cultural and educational institutions were taken over by Jews or market forces hostile to tradition”

    So, was it the Jews? or was it the market forces? I think it was the former, and the aim has been to destroy the education system, not to make people more amenable to economic exploitation.

    Here is an excerpt from Stanley Hornbeck’s sum up of KMac’s Culture of Critique :

    The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume are:
    1 – Marxism,
    2 – Freudian psychoanalysis,
    3 – the Frankfurt school of sociology,
    4 – and Boasian anthropology.
    Perhaps most relevant from a racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting
    5 – multi-culturalism and Third World immigration.

    Throughout his analysis Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald’s most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty – that WHILE CLAIMING TO BE WORKING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND THEY HAVE OFTEN WORKED FOR THEIR OWN GOOD AND TO THE DETRIMENT OF OTHERS. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.

    The Jews have also been very active in promoting nonsensical education theories. They have contributed to the creation of a debate between the traditionalists and the leftists. They passed themselves off as sincere leftists interested in the good of mankind, and they received plenty of help from crazy leftist non-Jews, even though the leftists are only a small minority among White people. But the truth seems to be that the Jews were really trying to promote their ethnic group by destroying the school system of White children. They were not interested in providing White children with a better education any more than they were interested in improving the lives of the workers. Communism and the workers’ movement were a Jewish tool to destroy White society. The Jews have now given up on White workers, and moved on to defending the non-whites. But they couldn’t care less about the non-Whites, who are just the new tool to preserve Jewish ethnic interests against White people’s interests. In fact, they destroy every group of people they pretend to help. For example, think of their crazy feminist theories and of their defense of homosexual children in elementary schools.

    I don’t have every piece of the puzzle, but my guess is that the Jews have played a central role in the destruction of the school system for the usual Jewish reasons. KMac likes to emphasize the theoretical work and propaganda work that was made by Jewish intellectuals to soften us up before they became able to change the government policies, but he often talks about the Jewish ethnic networking too, and how they colonize the administration. I think that is the important point: how they infiltrate the government and the universities, how they buy up the politicians and TV stations, and so on. That is why the judeo-leftist side always wins fights against the conservative majority. Those fights are phony. They are real but do not decide anything. They are just a pretense of a democratic debate.

    About the school system, Kyle Hunt compiled an interesting case file about “common core” where I think the Jews are mentioned. (here)

    Michael O’Meara: “As for the white masses—whose vegetative existence is lived unconscious of the higher forces governing them—they’ll never be moved by ideas and principles openly challenging the existing order. Only a social crisis set off by some cataclysm that makes their normal way of life impossible will cause them to look for alternatives. And at that point, what matters most will not be ideas and principles, but men and organizations whose exemplary stature instills in them the confidence for decisive action.”

    The lack of popular reaction doesn’t mean that people have a “vegetative existence”. The problem is the lack of leadership. And the lack of leadership is due to the control of the central institutions by the Jews and their allies. We live in a dictatorship. We need White people to rebel against the system. We don’t know at all if a cataclysm of some sort will trigger a rebellion, but if we had a violent rebellion with a few thousand traitors killed in a few days, the situation would be completely turned around. All the Whites would suddenly open their eyes.

    • But the crucial thing is whether they have been necessary to bringing about our torments. Would we be in this advanced stage of destruction without them?

      Short answer: they were necessary condition in the Gulag and the Iraq war you mention, but not in the ethno-suicide of the Greco-Rome & Iberian civilizations. You got to start reading history thru all viewpoints, and not only thru Americanism.

      …not a feeling of malaise.

      You are playing with my words. I didn’t mean that and you know it.

      …it simply shows that big corporations have fallen under Jewish control

      You will continue to be blind, as the rest of monocausalists, that exactly the same happened at the South of Río Grande all the way to Argentina—with no powerful Kike corporations centuries ago. In order to “prove” your pet theory you simply ignore the history of the American continent outside the US; the larger part.

      The aim is to destroy White people. Big [kike] companies do not need those people at all.

      Irrelevant. The fact is that even when the Iberians did not want to destroy their race they fornicated themselves into oblivion because they all were wielding the “One Ring”. And I could say the same of your “response” to the O’Meara’s sentences: whites collapsed their birth rate as far back as the times of the first two Caesars with no kike help. Economics is the subject monocausalists should choose if they want to see if whites are innocent.

      So, was it the Jews? or was it the market forces? I think it was the former

      Nope: it was the latter, the “One Ring”.

      We live in a dictatorship.

      Last year John Martínez responded to that iterated statement of yours. Echoes of his response are even included in The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour under the heading “Informal texts”. Hope you read it…

  4. By googling “Marian Van Court”, whose name currently appears at G.Johnson’s blog, I found this review she wrote in 2003 at Amazon.com about KMac’s books:

    The first 2 paragraphs:

    It is quite apparent to every rational person that the Western world is currently caught in the jaws of some sort of lunatic, left-wing hysteria called political correctness — but why? Do these things just happen, like changes in the weather? Or do people make them happen?

    MacDonald’s trilogy (particularly Culture of Critique) provides a unique, well-documented explanation for nearly all the plagues which have afflicted us in the past century — Marxism, psychoanalysis, massive third world immigration, egalitarianism, the taboo against eugenics, and the profound corruption of the social sciences. These are not independent, unrelated catastrophes which simply descended upon us from nowhere, they are all part of one massive campaign. According to MacDonald, the current Zeitgeist in its various manifestations is the product of Jews and Jewish organizations working for many decades to re-create the social and political world of the West, bit by bit, into one which is maximally favorable to their own ethnic interests.

    That short review gives a good description of the problem that hit us in the 20th century. It isn’t the same phenomenon as the racial mixing that happened in Mexico over the course of several centuries.

    1) The problem in Mexico is that the White elites didn’t take radical action to prevent racial mixing. Human nature did the rest.

    2) In contrast, the problem in the USA and Europe is that the XXXX have recently taken radical action to destroy White society, especially through race replacement and race mixing. It didn’t happen naturally. It is a concerted action.

    Who are the XXXX ? Until I learned about the Jews on the internet, I thought the problem was the leftists: crazy White people with a deleterious ideology. They had taken control of the government, the political parties, the media, the schools… I knew the problem didn’t come from the mass of normal people, except for their lack of reaction.

    Even if you don’t know about the Jews, it should be obvious that :
    – Marxism,
    – psychoanalysis,
    – massive third world immigration,
    – egalitarianism,
    – the taboo against eugenics,
    – and the profound corruption of the social sciences
    [- as well as feminism, gayism, the destruction of the traditional Christian faith, the assault against good taste and civility, and so on. ]
    are not independent, unrelated catastrophes which simply descended upon us from nowhere, they are all part of one massive campaign.

    Once you know it’s the Jews, it makes more sense. The leftist drift is not due to a spiritual disease of White people, it is simply the result of practical Jewish anti-White activism. Of course, many Whites work with the Jews, but they are still a very small minority of White people, and they are mainly followers. The powerhouse of the leftist anti-white movement is Jewish.

    It’s easy to seek confirmation of the Jewish crucial role: they own the media, they control key central institutions, and they are the ones who go after White Nationalists. Of course, we must work to document their role in every field of society. I am particularly interested in knowing more about their role in the destruction of Western education.

    Apart from that, if we are looking for psychological defects in White people, I see two main defects:
    1. The propensity of a minority of crazy White people to believe in lunatic left-wing fads.
    2. The tendency of the majority to ignore the elephant who is staring at them in the living-room (when it is convenient to do so).

    • Since you have been quoting long excerpts, I must return the favor.

      Note of 21 November 2014: I’ve moved the entire comment: here.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: