Apocalypse for whites • XL

 

Law against Christianity

(final page of The Antichrist)

 
Given on the Day of Salvation, on the first day of the year one (30 September 1888, according to the false calculation of time).

War to the death against vice: the vice is Christianity

First article.—Every type of anti-nature is a vice. The priest is the most vicious type of person: he teaches anti-nature. Priests are not to be reasoned with, they are to be locked up.

Second article.—Any participation in church services is an attack on public morality. One should be harsher with Protestants than with Catholics, harsher with liberal Protestants than with orthodox ones. The criminality of being Christian increases with your proximity to science. The criminal of criminals is consequently the philosopher.

Third article.—The execrable location where Christianity brooded over its basilisk eggs should be razed to the ground and, being the depraved spot on earth, it should be the horror of all posterity. Poisonous snakes should be bred on top of it.

Fourth article.—The preacher of chastity is a public incitement to anti-nature. Contempt for sexuality, making it unclean with the concept of ‘uncleanliness’, these are the real sins against the holy spirit of life.

Fifth article.—Eating at the same table as a priest ostracizes: you are excommunicated from honest society. The priest is our Chandala, —he should be ostracized, starved, driven into every type of desert.

Sixth article.—The ‘holy’ history should be called by the name it deserves, the cursed history; the words ‘God’, ‘saviour’, ‘redeemer’, ‘saint’ should be used as terms of abuse, to signify criminals.

Seventh article.—The rest follows from this.

—Friedrich Nietzsche

 
___________

Note of the Editor:

Nietzsche’s ‘Law Against Christianity’ is a piece that has been eliminated from numerous editions of The Anti-Christ: A Curse on Christianity because the editors simply cucked before the Judaeo-Christian ethos.

3 Comments

  1. The year of Nietzsche’s final breakdown was the year of Hitler’s birth. The struggle passes to the next titan. Nietzsche somewhat recanted on jews later.

    ES states that the Romans considered Christianity as a cover for jews. According to Robert Wilkens “The Christians as the Romans Saw Them” Celsus (2nd AD) Porphyry (3rd) and Julian (4th) saw a distinction between jews and Christians. Their criticisms included that Christians were apostates from jewish Yahweh, which is not the case. Julian too had plans to rebuild the temple of Jerusalem. But we only have fragments of Celsus’s, Porphyry’s & Julian’s criticism of Christianity.

    • > ‘Nietzsche somewhat recanted on jews later’.

      He became a sort of what WNsts call ‘anti-anti-Semite’ but only when he lost his mind. Nietzsche was like Phaeton: who reached the heights but lost his wings and fell from the heavens at the speed of 9.8 ms2. Poor Nietzsche…

      As to Julian’s plans to rebuild the temple, it was an astute move: the peril was the Jews on the Diaspora. They should never have left Jerusalem in the first place.

  2. I have few qualms with Friedrich Nietsche’s list although I would add that article four might add the caveat “the teacher of chastity for the sake of spiritual effiniminization in thrall to any sort of Semitic and universalist – and therefore non-Volikisch – ‘heaven’ is a public incitement to anti-nature” as chastity…..we might think of it as admirable Aryan self-control…..was a preoccupation of Pindar and many other Hellene scholars and teachers as well. In the minds of Semitic peoples of course – like everything else that might even be ostensibly noble that is contaminated by their grubby, totalistic, and debased “spirituality” – chastity became a thoroughly laudable concept that was perverted into the typical Semite’s misunderstanding and hated of the body. Added to this was the concept of Essene monasticism which then formed Christ-insanity’s idiocy toward all things corporeal. Rather than seeing chastity as a way to channel the body’s natural and divinely-given appetites and urges into honorable pursuits – the creation of children, scholarship, the warrior’s vocation to protect the volk, the continuation of the very volk itself, family life, et al. – the Church married its crude Semitic dualism present on EVERY stance it promoted to what was even in the Semitic world a relatively fringe world-denying order.

    I am even okay with religious retreat so long as it was of the Dharmic Aryan form…..i.e. everyone is chaste (masturbation, wife/husband-swapping, homosexuality, anything that misdirects the sexual energy or fluids are discouraged and even criminalized) but those with the dharma to be brahmacharya or celibate – whether householders or monastics – should go and do THAT and those with the dharma of marriage and family go and do THAT. One is not invidiously valued over another and they are viewed as both intrinsically and equally – each in their own way – journeys to transcendence. The Church’s Semitic founders and the thinking which possessed them could never countenance or accept as the Aryan can, that two different paths could be separate but equal or that both are sacred paths….no….to them it had to be zero-sum at all times.

    The view of priests being justifaibly being made “our chandalas” is a wonderful one and I cannot agree with it more….in an Aryan future even any Aryan who has even a good word for anything Semitic, to say nothing of a minister or priest, should be forcefully and quickly disabused of this notion up to and including psychiatric experimentation and long periods of re-education carried about by priests of the fourteen words – the TRUE priests of our people …..NOT the propagandists for Semitic filth and insanity that the Christian priests and ministers are.

    Ever since I was a child I have never met a SINGLE believing Christian let alone any Christian leader with whom I have felt I could ever relate to on anything close to an elementally common wave-length. Some Protestant ministers and Orthodox priests are at least married with children so they have some – albeit tenuous due to the nature of the (quasi) spiritual ideology they promote – relationship to reality….Catholic priests I’ve found to be particularly infuriating. However, all of these, even the best of them, are at best conventional thinkers…..gate-keepers for the Semitic prison of our people, spiritual fifth columnists, and many of them degenerates even by the terms of the degenerate religion they serve. At worst they are execrable non-entities as well as everything above. So many times I was dragged to church services by some relative or other, mercifully my own neo-paganish immediate family never went to worship Jesus (Yahweh 2.0), and “pastor so-and-so,” “‘Father’ so-and-so,” held to be so “holy” blabbed forth on some completely innocuous, turgid, piece of Semitic sophistry in a plodding, slow, voice which I guess was supposed to impart profundity on the asinine frequently anti-life, anti-human, and certainly anti-Western fairy-tales upon which they were expounding. I however actually LISTENED TO THE WORDS and found either a whole lot of nothing or only lightly-veiled hatred against the Aryan spirit that sent me into internal peroxysms of existential hatred against the Semitic that have remained with me to today. This has been accentuated all the more as our people remain – whether they are “liberal” or “conservative” or even “nationalist” Christians – wedded to an alien and hostile weltanschaung and most never see that anything is wrong with this un-natural arrangement.

    Today, since the Christian mind-virus still holds sway across the West…..even as the Church is increasingly showing its true anti-Aryan colors and throwing over native Western Christians in favor of the Arab, African, Asian, and Mestizo masses – peoples it has always – deep down – preferred anyway….there is still a certain panache attached within Christian families to those who enter Christian leadership roles. In a hoped-for day to come when this cult is thoroughly despised as the poison it is by all Aryans those few of our people that are, for whatever reason, through personal stupidity, self-hated, or degeneracy, desirous of being Christian or of inhabiting its ministries and priesthoods, will be completely cut-off by their families. Still-believing Catholic families will often desire that the parents be buried with the “holy” oil-soaked manutergium of their son who is a priest. I hope for a world in which parents are interred or cremated with purifying salt and European river-water symbolic that THEIR sons were priests of the fourteen words instead! Those who are crazy enough to join the religion of the enemy as leaders of said religion will, conversely, be spat on by their kin, their very child-hood rooms razed and burnt, and their bodies left out with no one to ever attend to their European last rites, left to molder into dust and be pecked by carrion eaters and bored through by worms….a fitting forgettable end to forgettable worthless – nay traitorous – people. Such people if they were truly spiritual would have been at least intellectually interested in what came before the noxious tradition to which they are thinking of leading. Such people if they were actual acolytes of “the way, the truth, and the light” would find that light in their own traditions and not the rantings of an anti-European, pseudo-vagant, itinerant Jewish millenniarian who may or may not have even existed.

    As for “Saint Peter’s Basilica” built on top of an ancient European holy site just like the Nordic churches and another building given over to another of Judaism’s hag bitch daughters of Islam – the Babri Masjid built atop Ram’s Mandir in Ayodhya – I am all for following Publius Scipio Aemilianus’ approach and sowing salt so nothing else may grown in such a place….desecrated by that worthless, should-have-been-aborted, afterbirth of the desert called Christianity.

    A religious grand-mother of mine wanted me to join the lickspittle criminal priesthood of the Jewish polemicist when i was in my later teenage years. She was a lovely Aryan woman and she’d no clue of what her religion even really preached but even at that time I was filled with a great loathing of Christianity. I am so glad I was not deluded enough to join such a body of alienage and corruption.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: