Why Europeans must reject Christianity, 3

by Ferdinand Bardamu

 
The quintessential Middle Eastern religion

Christianity is, first and foremost, the invention of mostly illiterate 1st century Palestinian Jews, among whom Saul of Tarsus was the most influential. He later changed his name to Paul. He was the prototypical “ugly little Jew” of the ancient world. Even Paul was forced to admit that he was often denigrated by his opponents as “weak” or “unimpressive” in person. A 2nd century extra-canonical source reinforces this impression, describing the apostle as short, bald, “bandy-legged,” with long unibrow and hooked nose. He was the living embodiment of the stereotypical Jew. If Paul was merely a caricature, he would have been right at home with the Jews of Streicher’s Der Stürmer. Paul was the first to spread Christianity across the Mediterranean, imbuing the new missionary religion with a thoroughly expansionist character. He laid the groundwork of Christian theology, serving as the original catalyst for the “syphilitic” infection that has now ruined Europe.

Christianity is the quintessential Middle Eastern religion. Just because the language of the New Testament is koine Greek does not make this religion any less of a Semitic invention. To claim otherwise would be like translating the Analects of Confucius into English and then claiming that Confucianism is a Western religion because the medium used for its transmission is the English language. Even the few pagan elements in the religion, such as the Johannine prologue’s use of the Stoic Logos, is filtered through the lens of Old Testament Judaism. The Gospel narratives are Jewish legends based on Jewish ideas of Messiah, resurrection, kingdom of god and so on. Not only is Christianity thoroughly Jewish in origin, but the major theological doctrines of the New Testament are derived from the Old Testament and the intertestamental Judaism of the Greek and Hasmonean periods. The spread of Christianity across the Mediterranean was the work of enterprising, itinerant Jews.

As Christianity developed an established institutional framework within the empire, theologians began to find themselves in dialogue with Jews and pagans who were hostile to the new religion. These discussions necessitated the borrowing of Greek and Latin philosophical terminology to better express orthodox teaching with greater precision and clarity. This was done not only for apologetical purposes, but to win over cultured pagans by applying a thin veneer of intellectual respectability to the Semitic doctrines of primitive Christianity. Despite these cultural borrowings, Christianity remains a fundamentally Semitic religion.

3 Comments

  1. This is why I consider goners those WNsts who subscribe Christian Identity. Unless WNsts break free from ‘The Source’ (see the previous Linder quotable quote), like normies they’ll be heading toward extinction.

  2. Unfortunately, C.T., there is a complete lack of intellectual rigor on the right, and that prevents them from understanding Christianity’s inherent and irreparable defects. But if Darwinism is true, then all that we think of as truth, including Christianity itself, is merely something that has been believed because it aided survival.

    • Can you really apply Darwinian principles to a two-millennia-long period? If we’re talking about capitalism, it did bring immediate benefits for the first 400 years – which are now ending in a demise.

      Plus, from a Checharist perspective, a lot of those who were fit to survive should have better not.

      Nature only wants survival, no matter the suffering involved… Whereas humans can want about anything – and everything that is not survival is death.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: