Führer quote

Pure Christianity—the Christianity of the catacombs—is concerned with translating the Christian doctrine into facts. It leads quite simply to the annihilation of mankind.

Hitler’s Table Talk, page 146

Published in: on August 1, 2018 at 12:16 pm  Comments (50)  

50 Comments

  1. This recalls Schopenhauer’s remark that “Talent hits a target no one else can hit; genius hits a target no one else can see.” But why did it take a genius to see this about Christianity? It’s a truth about Christianity that’s hiding in plain sight. Even on a personal level, a sincere implementation of Christian doctrine leads to rapid death. Love your enemies? Sell all that you have and give it away to the poor? RUFKM?! Even Christians aren’t crazy enough to do these things. But they are big enough liars to swear they believe it.

    Also interesting is Hitler’s curt two-paragraphs-up dismissal of Kerrl’s attempt to fuse NS and Christianity as an impossible creation stillborn from the start. This “positive Christianity” was the NS version of CI. Followers of CI aren’t following Hitler’s words and example. The NS Gleichschaltung of Christian churches was a failure. CI is repeating a failed experiment, deceiving people with the false hope that some form of Christianity can be retained in a racial context. They will inevitably subvert any racial movement in which they’re allowed to participate, just as German Christians subverted Hitler.

    What’s needed is to account for the persistence of Christianity despite high-level attempts to eradicate it, first by Julian the Apostate, and then by the NS regime over a millennium and a half later. I’ve proposed the role that it’s assumed as the ideology of the technological system as an explanation. Whether we like it or not, it’s historical fact that the technological system only got its start in Christendom, and spread over the entire globe with the support of the churches. Probably it will always remain debatable whether the Christian takeover of white civilization was necessary for the ascendancy of the technological system, but it certainly would appear to be the case that the system is so firmly entrenched now that only an utter catastrophe will bring both it and its racially toxic ideology down. When this happens, the two will fail together.

    • “Whether we like it or not, it’s historical fact that the technological system only got its start in Christendom…”

      No, my friend. Our civilization has advanced despite Christianity, not because of it. Technology included.

      “What’s needed is to account for the persistence of Christianity despite high-level attempts to eradicate it…”

      I can tell you quite plainly why Christianity has never been successfully eradicated: because Christianity, along with Islam (the other “Abrahamic” offshoot), act as counter-balances to Judaism. They are controlled-opposition, in simple terms. The Jews have merely feigned opposition to Christianity, even though I do realize that many, many millions of people have been tortured and killed by Jewish persecutors of Christianity.

      You have to understand something: Jews need Christianity. It lends verity and substance to their constant claims of being eternal victims of “bigotry” at the hands of European peoples. The controlled “antisemitism” of Christianity (with the Jews seen as the killers of God, the children of Cain/the devil, the money-lenders who Jesus whipped, the “synagogue of Satan”, etc., etc. is a great benefit to the race-religion known as Judaism! And on the flip side, those Christians who claim that the Jews are “God’s chosen” also fulfill an important and obvious role. And, the split-paradigm between “antisemitic Christians” vs Jew-worshipping Christians (or Christian Zionists as they’re called today) offer the Jews a very entertaining way to psychologically warp “gentile” mental processes. It creates a conflict of “facts” that are both opposites but both “true”, much like newthink in Orwell’s novel. It provides a basis for a type of mental-retardation of the gentile sense of reason, one that Jews at the top exploit to the fullest in myriad ways.

      I could actually write a book on this, and may some day actually. But space is limited here, so suffice it to say, if Jews wanted Christianity truly eradicated it would have been eradicated centuries ago. Jews want us to think that they are “antichrists”. It serves a very powerful purpose in their overall genocidal plan against us. That’s as simple as I can explain it here. The subject is just too complicated to expound upon further.

      • “No, my friend. Our civilization has advanced despite Christianity, not because of it. Technology included.”

        Please read what I wrote again. I don’t attribute technological civilization to Christian efforts, but merely point out that it began in Christendom. Sorry if you don’t like it, but it’s true. My ideas as to the role Christianity played in desacralizing Nature and enabling the scientific attitude necessary for that system of technology to arise I’ve explained previously.

        “I can tell you quite plainly why Christianity has never been successfully eradicated …”

        Your theory attributing all power to Jews and none at all to whites is inconsistent and illogical, not to mention counter-productive as it deprives whites of all responsibility for their own condition. If white people are only helpless puppets manipulated at will by Jews, who have the goal of exterminating them, why then didn’t they just get on with it? Why has it taken two thousand years? It should be clear even to the most delusional conspiracy theorist that if whites have no power to resist, they are doomed anyway. It’s just thinly-veiled defeatism to think in such terms.

      • “Please read what I wrote again. I don’t attribute technological civilization to Christian efforts, but merely point out that it began in Christendom. My ideas as to the role Christianity played in desacralizing Nature and enabling the scientific attitude necessary for that system of technology to arise I’ve explained previously.”

        So… without Christianity, you think that we Aryans wouldn’t have became technical, that science wouldn’t have been such an integral part of who we are today? Examine pre-Christian ideas on science some. Technology and science emanates from the Aryan mind much the same way that a snail’s shell emanates from his very body!

        “our theory attributing all power to Jews and none at all to whites is inconsistent and illogical…”

        I never wrote that Jews are all-powerful and that Aryans were powerless. That’s something you’ve assumed that I’ve implied. Do you not agree that Jews have had quite an enormous negative impact upon Aryan societies? Facts speak for themselves, Jews have and they still do. But, no, that does not mean they are all-powerful… or that we are the opposite.

      • “Examine pre-Christian ideas on science some.”

        The scientific method wasn’t discovered until after a thousand years of European Christianity. The ancients had no science at all as we understand the term now. It’s strictly a post-Christian phenomenon.

        “[That Jews are all-powerful is] something you’ve assumed that I’ve implied.”

        I’m not assuming anything. You didn’t “imply” it, you claimed it outright. Viz: “if Jews wanted Christianity truly eradicated it would have been eradicated centuries ago.”

        “I have read Oliver extensively, and I know for a fact that he believed that Christianity was cunningly invented by the Jews as a means of paralyzing the healthy instincts of the Aryans, regardless of external evidence.”

        I would agree he gives that impression, and maybe he did personally believe it, but he is scholar enough to know that the claim is unsupportable on the basis of the evidence. Thus his disclaimer.

        Oliver is a brilliant man, an accomplished stylist (though given to prolixity), and quite learned in his field of classics studies, but he is unfortunately clueless as to the role technological development has played in causing the problems he complains about.

      • @JimB… “Jews need Christianity….. The controlled “antisemitism” of Christianity…. on the flip side, those Christians who claim that the Jews are “God’s chosen”…… the split-paradigm between “antisemitic Christians” vs Jew-worshipping Christians ….offer the Jews a…..way to psychologically warp “gentile” mental processes….” And help divide ‘n’ conquer Whites.

        Terribly important insights.

      • “Oliver is a brilliant man, an accomplished stylist (though given to prolixity), and quite learned in his field of classics studies, but he is unfortunately clueless as to the role technological development has played in causing the problems he complains about.”

        Calling Mr. Oliver “clueless” about a topic as basic as the effects of technological development on our society is just… just… well, clueless, spahn.

        Sorry, but you’ve outdone yourself with that doozie.

      • “I’m not assuming anything. You didn’t “imply” it, you claimed it outright.”

        spahn, you might need to stop taking hallucinogenics. Or do you have Asperger’s or something? I like the Occidental Dissent version of you, but this version is stuck-on-stupid or something! I never said that the Jews were all-powerful, and you did in fact assume that! But, just for the sake of argument, let’s say that I say something like “If the government of America really wanted North Korea nuked, it would be done”… does that translate to you that I’m saying that the American government is all-powerful?? It shouldn’t, because that’s not what I’d mean by it. I’d only mean that America has the means to do that. And if you think that the same Jewish power who managed to get our ancestors converted to Christianity at the tip of the sword, the same Jewish power who run all forms of mainstream media, who control all Western wealth through their banks, the same power that created two hellacious world wars that holocausted many millions of Aryan lives, couldn’t manage to manipulate the world powers to eradicate Christianity itself, you’re delusional. They certainly do have enough power to do that. All-powerful? No. But don’t you think for one second that they aren’t damn powerful!!

    • Many of us Jew-aware types have graduated Jewology101… but if you read Revilo P. Oliver’s “The Jewish Strategy” (also titled The Jewish Plague, a 10-part series by Alfred Strom at National Vanguard), you will enter into an Advanced Jewology course that will greatly enhance your education. He explains quite eloquently how Christianity began, for what purpose and to what ends.

      • Indeed: I excerpted it for this site: here.

      • “[Oliver] explains quite eloquently how Christianity began, for what purpose and to what ends.”

        No. He specifically says there’s not enough evidence to say it was a plot. Viz: “The evidence does not permit us to affirm that Christianity was cunningly invented by the Jews as a means of paralysing the healthy instincts of other races …”
        – Oliver, The Jewish Strategy, p. 87

        You also might want to listen to his famous 1966 speech “Conspiracy or Degeneracy?” in which he comes to the conclusion that white degeneracy is a bigger problem than conspiracy, much like C.T. has pointed out that the Aryan problem enabled the Jew problem.

      • It’s so symptomatic that the quote on the sidebar—:

        The sign of the times is degeneracy. This term—degeneracy—sums up all that is happening to the West.

        —was authored by a non-white Iranian…

        Yesterday I was listening to Andy Donner’s first normal podcast after Covington died and could not help but feel revulsion while listening to the rock music in the middle of the podcast. Apparently, even would-be revolutionaries ignore that what the Nazis called degenerate music is a major factor in the destruction of the Aryan spirit.

      • “No. He specifically says there’s not enough evidence to say it was a plot.”

        Who said anything about “evidence”, Spahn? Do you need external confirmation from an objective source to know that it’s raining outside? I have read Oliver extensively, and I know for a fact that he believed that Christianity was cunningly invented by the Jews as a means of paralyzing the healthy instincts of the Aryans, regardless of external evidence.

        “You also might want to listen to his famous 1966 speech “Conspiracy or Degeneracy?””

        I have. And I actually agree, for the most, with the summation of the speech. But saying that this problem is a more serious problem than that problem is merely prioritization… it doesn’t mean that the latter problem doesn’t exist. But, like I said, I agree with the speech for the most part. From my own vantage point, it’s like the old “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” riddle: both Jewish conspiracy coupled with our own degeneracy are symbiotic. Each, in the sense of what has happened in terms of the degeneration and subversion of our Aryan societies, have a common denominator, the Jews, and each problem begets the other problem. I don’t expect you to understand this, because it’s a very complicated issue that requires unbiased thought and consideration.

      • It took me years to properly read MacDonald’s trilogy (and many of his posts at the Observer). Now I can say that I understand the JQ. But even MacDonald says that the Aryan Question is far more difficult to penetrate.

        It certainly is.

        What Joseph Walsh and many other racialists that comment on this site cannot see is that we older guys have lived in times when the overwhelming messages of TV and the movies were largely positive and pro-white.

        When I was a kid I watched Walt’s Disneyland every Wednesday, in black and white: beautiful and always pro-Western and pro-white messages for a young audience. The same can be said of the other TV programs: Daniel Boone and Custer, who fought the Indians, also in our black-and-white TV. Indians were always portrayed as the bad guys of course. And let’s not speak of every single film that I saw on the big screen in full color…

        So younger people cannot imagine a world that they have not lived: a world that in my first visit to Europe’s largest cities I didn’t see non-whites.

        All happened in the last few decades, and if someone would have told that kid of yore who became in love with the white world (thanks to that healthy media) that whites would commit ethnic suicide within his lifespan, he would have laughed at that most grotesque idea ever occurred.

        But it happened.

        Understanding whites really belongs to another level of complexity than understanding the kikes.

      • @Cesar You say if someone told you as a kid in the 1960’s that whites would commit ethnic suicide in your lifespan you would have laughed at the idea but nevertheless it happened. The rate of change since WWII has been incredible, so much has occured over the past 73 years that it would take many books to cover it (and many books have been written attempting to cover the changes). Global events like the white race throwing away it’s virtual dominion over the earth within half a century, a mastery that had taken nearly 500 years to build up and achieve, coupled with large scale migrations of non-whites to European lands to the point where Europeans will be a minority in those lands in the near future are unprecedented in history. Other changes like the enormous population explosion and increasing developments in technology also add to the significance of the period we are living through.

        The ethnic suicide of whites was already in motion when you were born in 1958 though Cesar. Fundamental events like the retreat of the British from India in 1947 and segregation being ruled illegal in the USA in 1954 were signs of what was to come. The process had begun but I grant you the process has been exponential and it would be very difficult in 1958 to imagine things like a Muslim mayor of London, whites being a minority in Texas, Rhodesia ceasing to exist, homosexual marriage, widespread Muslim terrorist attacks in Western Europe etc. Just what is going on during this period is going to require serious study by whites if we survive.

        I say there are two broad explantions of this period. If whites go extinct this was simply the total destruction and ruination of our race before extinction in which case the Third Reich was the ‘last gasp’ of our race and the White Man is already defeated and will increasingly become a thing of the past as we transition into a coloured, third world earth. Or, if whites survive this period was something like a necessary collapse of the Old Order, a prelude to a new beginning. It could be the collapse of Western Christian civilization which itself began after the fall of the Western Roman Empire for example. In that case Hitler and NS Germany are not the last gasp of the white race but it is the Jews and the coloured races who are experiencing their last gasp.

        Also that was a great point you made about the AQ being far more difficult to penetrate than the JQ. Indeed it is relatively straightforward to understand Jewish behaviour but white behaviour over the millennia does lead one to bafflement and understanding whites belongs to another level of complexitiy, I am in full agreement there.

      • The AQ is something so tremendously difficult to understand that it would take several geniuses in several generations of surviving whites to ponder it. Maybe we should content ourselves for the moment with what I wrote five years ago about a World Chess Champion:

        Botvinnik had called chess “an inexact problem,” just as the problems of the living. “To solve inexact problems,” maintained Botvinnik, “it is very important to limit the scale of the problem to avoid getting bogged down. Only then could one hope to solve it satisfactorily.” For this champion, chess reflected objective reality and what a person thought, and every problem should be reduced to manageable analysis and thought.

        But Botvinnik was a kike. We need a Magnus Carlsen, or rather several Carlsens of the future to see what the hell happened with whites in the West’s darkest hour. For the moment I can only see a case of mass psychosis that whites suffer around the globe, something similar to the times after Constantine, so well described by the English Catherine Nixey. My previous research on the trauma model of mental disorders (I mostly wrote my latest post of Day of Wrath ten years ago, in 2008) provided me with some tools to understand psychiatric conditions, but the wholesale suicide of a whole race is too much even for me!

        And speaking about Botvinnik✡, the Aryan Carlsen and chess, do you remember the day when in a pub we all took beers with Chris White & several young BNP men outside London? When I watched the level of two of these guys playing a Nimzo-Indian Defence I knew that I could beat them, but I was concerned that we would miss the last bus and didn’t want to spend money in another taxi, so we missed a good time!

        By the way, I’ll now change the name of the tag category from ‘Aryan problem’ to ‘Aryan question’, which sounds a little better.

      • A case of collective psychosis in an entire race (really a species) has to prove that there is some sort of psychic connection between members of a race, something like Jung’s collective unconscious. That would partly explain how an entire species, scattered around the world, can spontaneously manifest the same death wish and suicidal behaviour at the same time.

        Revilo Oliver once wrote “we are the only known species that has lost interest in perpetuating itself and surviving on this planet.” Perhaps this phenomenon has occured with other species before but as far as I know this is unique to Aryans. In that case I consider this to be related to Aryans being the most advanced form of life on Earth in certain aspects. Other human races, and other species, just follow their survival instincts but Aryans have come to question and doubt their existence. This is a unique challenge unique to whites. That’s why I say white genocide is a good thing. If Jews were the catalyst for this then it is like Nature’s way of testing us. Not an orginal thought I know. But maybe, being the highest form of life or at least the form of life with the most potential, our species has the hardest challenges to overcome?

        I remember that day in that shabby rundown pub with the BNP guys. Sorry you had to pay for the taxi then, I just couldn’t find the way to the place!

        It’s also interesting that you are the most insightful thinker on the AQ not even being Aryan yourself. It’s baffling how before the tragic defeat of Germany in 1945 there were Aryans like Fritz Lenz, Eugen Fischer, Hans F.K. Gunther, Erwin Baur, Alfred Rosenberg etc. examining Nordics and working on a future for them and then as soon as the war ends all that work seemingly disappears overnight and by the 2010’s it’s left to guys like you to do the most incisive research.

      • So surreal (and Mexico is also surreal as most browns want to be whites while, on the other hand, Iberian whites idealize the browns to the point of marrying them!).

        If real Aryans survive I wonder what will they say about this unbelievable crazy generation?

  2. I now see Christardanity for the Jew SCAM it IS!

    • I’m glad you finally see it. And don’t miss my latest post today, the one that starts with my red letters as an ‘editor note’.

    • Good on you, Denise. The C.Q. is probably the hardest one to finally face squarely. Because the fear of going to hell began at such an early stage for most of us. The pathology runs far too deep for many to overcome. And, on some level, many of us never fully get rid of the more subtle programming deep in our subconscious minds. There’s the “Yes, I understand now… but what if you’re wrong?” doubt, there are the frames-of-reference that we’ve used every day of our lives, things we never give thought to, that we say automatically, like “that person has a demon or something!” or even “Jews are Satan’s children” (no, Jews are just a race of parasitic, rotten people). There are a whole lot of residual traces of the indoctrination that many of us never get over.

  3. OT: Are you familiar with the Malvern conferences of the early 1940s in Britain and the United States? if not, you may wish to look those up.

  4. Great feature

  5. Nietzsche said that many words should be considered cursed (god, saviour, redeemer, saint). But even such words as good and evil are tainted! You heard it, “Jesus came with good, while people continued being evil with their cruel wars and such.” But it is precisely the healthy people’s “Christian evil” that makes them good in our eyes! The problem is that now people aren’t “evil” anymore.

    In truth, the REAL good is the stench of 15 million Jewish corpses, whereas Christianity is the REAL evil – the death of all things, of all beauty, of all material and immaterial, and the survival of but one fleshless idea – that of the eternal [Jewish] God.

    It impresses my mind how such an explicitly hateful towards existence philosophy could be born and then root itself in the Aryan. It’s like the machine code; “turn the other cheek” is so obviously insane, like the primordial letters of destruction.

    Nietzsche was right about the Germans. You have to blame the Germans. It was the Germans who did not let Christianity die with Rome. It was the Germans who spread it to the West Slavic tribes in the 7-8th centuries, and then later to the Balts in the 13th. It was the Germans who infected the Scandinavians with it in the 10-11th centuries. It was the Germans who started the Reformation. Blame the Germans and the Irish!

    The ironic thing is that Christianity won’t kill the Mestizos, so it’s actually NOT the worst thing from this website’s perspective (because the torture of children and animals is worse than non-existence, if I understand the 4 Words correctly).

    P.S. I asked myself if destroying all the Bibles in the world would hurt the understanding of history for the upcoming millennia. But then, if a modern idiot with healthy instincts can see Picasso for the crap it is, won’t brilliant minds of the healthy future see it even more clearly?

    If 5000 years from now, the Bible were found, it would the reverse to how in our history Europe rediscovered the genius of Aristotle, with the difference that the Bible would be appreacited for its hypnotic effect on Neanderthals.

    The triumph is only finite and total if the mere name of your enemy is forgotten.

    • Nietzsche was right about the Germans. You have to blame the Germans. It was the Germans who did not let Christianity die with Rome. It was the Germans who spread it to the West Slavic tribes in the 7-8th centuries, and then later to the Balts in the 13th. It was the Germans who infected the Scandinavians with it in the 10-11th centuries. It was the Germans who started the Reformation. Blame the Germans and the Irish!

      You nailed it.

  6. @ C.T.

    What you and everyone else are ignoring is that the assimilationist model of technological civilization more or less guarantees race suicide. Rome brought the Jews into white civilization because they conquered them, not because they were conquered by them. America follows this Roman plan of assimilating foreign peoples, and Christianity and the Jews only facilitate this. When you have a multi-racial empire, people have to get along in order for the system to run smoothly. If the Jews and Christians weren’t promoting race mixing, some other group would have to step forward the promote it to avoid societal breakdown. The extermination of discrete races is built into the technology of empire, an unintended side effect of expansion.

    The white man’s problem as a race is that he loves his civilization more than his race. The incorporation of aliens is actually an expression of his civilizational confidence; his confidence in technology over blood loyalty. Should that civilization, either by accident or on purpose, permanently disappear, then for whites it will be back to blood loyalty and tribalism again.

    On a side note, I should add too that in media in the 60s, Indians weren’t always the bad guys. Tonto, for example, wasn’t a bad guy. The noble savage myth was a big seller even in the nineteenth century in America, the same white America that freed the negro and made him a citizen equal to whites themselves. Mark Twain wrote a hilarious piece lampooning this noble savage myth about the red man.

    The first film that pushed race mixing in a big way was 1961’s West Side Story, based loosely on Romeo and Juliet. It was a wildly popular movie with whites, made tons of money, and won 10 academy awards.

    • > “What you and everyone else are ignoring is that the assimilationist model of technological civilization more or less guarantees race suicide…”

      Perhaps we ignore it because the Chinese and the Japanese don’t seem to have an unconscious death wish as today’s whites, otherwise they’d be importing masses of non-Asians into their countries and idealizing mixed marriages (in my last trip to London the miscegenation propaganda of mixed couples was truly ubiquitous on the streets).

      Technology alone cannot explain whites’ extremely Evil mania of trying to imitate St Francis, even atheist whites, to the point of self-harm (as those psychiatric cases of self-harming among women):

      There are two ways of looking at western history. The accepted view is that Christianity reached its peak in the times of St Francis of Assisi and St Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century. This is only true if our glance is purely dogmatic (Aquinas), not axiologic (St Francis). The novel approach is that Christianity did not decay; it mutated like a virus for the white mind. To put it succinctly, the so-called Enlightenment and liberalism are but Secular Christianity. From the axiological viewpoint, Christianity, a red giant star that is about to die, that fateful experiment that started with Constantine, has reached its peak in our twenty-first century. Essays by Revilo Oliver, Manu Rodríguez and Tom Sunic explaining this claim will be included in this section.

      Cited in a now obsolete version of The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour.

      • The Chinese and the Japanese don’t have an empire. In fact, both have tried to avoid contact with other races and with Western culture in general, but were forced open by the West — China by the British Empire during the Opium Wars and Japan by America’s navy under Commodore Perry.

        Christianity is just a means to an end, a way to create a global empire.

      • Tech would explain capitalism, but not white pathology. Didn’t Jack Frost said at The Occidental Observer years ago that understanding the world as a moral contest was a unique Christian feature?

        If all whites were not suffering from a malignant folie en masse—and I’m talking especially about commoners—they wouldn’t be experiencing the extreme self-loathing that is rapidly destroying the race.

        Just see what I recently said about Greggy. Tech alone cannot explain his ethnosuicidal mind. You need to have seriously screwed his spirit since childhood (as many WNsts have screwed spirits) to produce a ‘white nationalist’ who’s basically on the same page of a rabbi’s son—literally.

      • “Christianity is just a means to an end, a way to create a global empire.”

        Christianity is just a means to an end, a way to create (((a global empire))).

        There, that’s better.

      • “Tech would explain capitalism, but not white pathology.”

        Christianity is a technology, specifically, a technology of empire and social control. In this case, creating the behavior you call pathology is what it’s doing, and what it’s done. It adjusts the old citizens of the empire to accept the new citizens; it provides them with a rationale and an emotional basis for doing so. That’s a feature, not a bug.

  7. This thread is now long and we all agree to disagree. Perhaps we should move our discussion to other threads, but first:

    @ Jim B,

    I wonder if you are familiar with our ‘bicausalism B’ stance?—first come white sins that form enormous swamps, then the (((mosquitoes))) thrive. Jewish power is an epiphenomenon of something infinitely more serious than that power.

    @ S Ranch,

    I don’t see Christianity after Constantine as a ‘technology’, at least not in the traditional sense of the word: I see it as a truly astronomic sin that will probably cost whites their very existence.

    Again, the cases of Greggy et al exemplify it. Self-righteously, they see themselves as the good guys but are evil to the core (‘human rights’, respect for ‘human [exterminable Neanderthals IMHO] life’, etc.).

    In other words, their love for a despicable species makes them evil in my Book.

    • “first come white sins that form enormous swamps, then the (((mosquitoes))) thrive. Jewish power is an epiphenomenon of something infinitely more serious than that power.”

      I am familiar with it and I agree. To borrow a phrase from the “Good Book” itself: Wherever there is a dead body, there the vultures will gather. And to further explain my stance, I believe that the (((infestation))) we suffer is in direct and equal proportion to our own myriad mental, moral and ethical weaknesses. Indeed, as Corneliu Zelea Codreanu has said, “A country has the Jews it deserves. Just as mosquitoes can thrive and settle only in swamps, likewise the former can only thrive in the swamps of our sins.”

      That’s why I don’t “hate” the Jews, but rather view them as the inevitable parasitical consequences of Aryan degeneracy. Our work should always begin at home, and we ought to save our contempt for those weaknesses within ourselves that have caused our societies to degenerate so.

      This will be it for me. Sorry for being such a spaz and going on so long with my back-n-forths.

      • So unlike most white nationalists, you do get it!

        Yes: putting our house in order is the very first step.

        The trouble I see with most WNsts is that, in their self-righteousness, they seem to believe in a sort of Lamarckism: the spontaneous generation of the mosquitoes as if whites were innocent, and that for mysterious causes they took over the media, the banks, etc.

        A solid step in the drying up of the mosquitoes’ swamp is to debunk Christianity. This would mean a paradigm shift in the WN community, which is why almost nobody among them links the content of this site.

        But if the swamp is dried up in the West, the mosquitoes will start dying like flies or, better said, like mosquitoes in winter.

      • “…which is why almost nobody among them links the content of this site”

        National Alliance/Vanguard and of course Renegade Tribune take a pretty anti-Christian stance… and there are some very good blogs, like Modern Heretic, The Ugly Truth and some others. Do you ever post anything on these people’s platforms? If not, you should. If only to make more people aware of what you’re doing here. I discovered you through a link at Shitlord Hub (aka White Right Hub), I think.

      • Anti-Christian sites indeed, but they still ignore my ongoing translation of Deschner (they have not even linked to the masthead ‘Judea vs Rome’).

        I am a very busy man. I leave to others the advertising in those sites you mention.

  8. “I don’t see Christianity after Constantine as a ‘technology’, at least not in the traditional sense of the word: I see it as a truly astronomic sin that will probably cost whites their very existence.”

    Casting this in Christian moral terms such as sin is a mistake because it causes confusion. By doing so, you are perpetuating the Christian worldview, casting Christianity out the front door while inviting it in through the back. Understanding this behavior in more neutral terms such as “technology” or “technique” allows a more comprehensive view with greater explanatory power. For example, above you ask about China and Japan, because framing this in terms of sin or moral weakness leads you away from the actual reasons for white behavior (i.e., empire building). Once you understand that China and Japan have no use for an empire-building technique because they don’t have an empire, the reason they don’t employ the technique (i.e., don’t have the “pathology”) becomes obvious. It’s like asking why a fish doesn’t use a bicycle. And this is not just a problem with our conversation here. The entire right has similarly been distracted and confused by this objection about China and Japan. This shows that using proper terminology is very important. To borrow a phrase from Nietzsche, we have to move beyond good and evil.

    • “beyond good and evil”

      Fond memories. The title of the first Nietzsche book I ever read.

    • Spahn, you are completely right about this, that Christianity is a tool of imperialism. In my book I say that: “The main reason I believe Joseph Atwill is correct, is because the social teachings that come out of the mouth of the Jesus character support how an empire, which holds captive one or more foreign peoples, would want those captive peoples to behave in that empire. Thus, as a tool of Roman imperialism and imperialism in general, this constructed religion of Christianity teaches thru its main character Jesus and his so-called apostles the following: Egalitarianism [some detail given]; Pacifism [some detail given]; Submissiveness to the imperial center (in this case Rome) [some detail given].”

      America is the new Rome, and the current largest empire on Earth. Your analysis of Christianity is very good. My only criticism is you calling Christianity a technology, since there are better words or phrases you can use (to me the word technology refers mostly to physical machines including electronic machines such as, for example, cell phones and desktop computers).

      • I have been refraining to include Deschner’s footnotes but his references are in several languages. And Deschner is not even a NT scholar properly, only of the history of Christianity.

        One of the things I dislike of commenters of this site is that none of them, except Ciaran, have researched the serious studies about the NT done by non-Christians. Atwill, or Arch Stanton for example, are mere amateurs. Serious researchers learn Latin and Greek, and some know even the basics of Hebrew.

        Serious research on the NT starts with the book by Schweitzer I’ve been advertising. Compared to such research Joseph Atwill is, to put it bluntly, a conspiracy theorist (see e.g., here, here, here).

        The same I could say of those Covingtonistas who believe that the US will only suffer a gradual decline, as for example Norman Spear apparently maintains (see my first comment in the other thread, ‘Revolution’ and listen to what Spear says in about 1:38). These guys have not studied the basics of Austrian economics, not even the super-didactic Crash Course by Chris Martenson. The collapse of the dollar won’t be gradual; it will unfold very rapidly.

        But anyway: in this blog sometimes I end up talking to myself.

      • Cesar, we both agree that Christianity is a false, man-made religion. There are different mental paths to this same conclusion, not just one path as you seem to be advocating above, which is to either be a biblical scholar oneself and read Greek and such, or at least read the writings of such scholars.

      • I am not a biblical scholar, but for biblical scholars (see e.g., the article of the first-linked biblical scholar above) Joseph Atwill is a crank myther.

      • Properly speaking, technology is only a technique or a set of techniques. There are plenty of techniques that don’t necessarily involve machinery, e.g.., propaganda techniques, exercise techniques, even techniques of mastication. So religion as a technology isn’t actually too odd of a way of speaking of it. Now, it’s essential to understand that a more efficient technique will always be used over a less efficient one. This points to Darwinism among techniques, and that they evolve according to similar rules, i.e., ultimately only the fittest, most efficient technique survives. E.g., spears and arrows supersede fists and sticks; guns supersede spears and arrows, and so on. Unfortunately, the efficiency of a technique can take no account of what using the technique does to race or culture. Using the most efficient technique may destroy both. If your culture is built around the use of the bow, it will be destroyed if you encounter guns This shows the inhuman nature of technology. It evolves according ot its own rules, and can’t consider its effect on man.

        It’s important to appreciate the Roman model of assimilating conquered peoples to full citizenship was as successful as it was because it was a more efficient technique than other possible techniques, such as merely exterminating them, or keeping them permanently enslaved, as did Sparta. Once this is understood, it follows that Rome was in a sense forced to use the technique of assimilation, because not to use it would mean that it would have been vulnerable to conquest by some other power that did use it. However, we do know that by using the technique, they doomed their own race. Historian Michael Grant estimates that by the end of the first century AD, 90 percent of the population of Rome were non-Italians of slave origin, including a large part of the equites and patrician class. Tacitus writes of that time: “Most knights, many senators are descended from former slaves. Segregate the freed – and you will simply show how few free-born there are.” (The World of Rome, p. 120.)

        The bottom line is a multi-racial empire leads inevitably to the death of discrete races within it. However, in this world, the size of your country matters, its power matters, and you must either conquer and build an empire, or be conquered yourself by someone else who does. With powerful technologies comes the ability — which the Romans did not have — of building a global empire. America is attempting to do this today, and is following the same assimilationist strategy as Rome, with the same destructive consequences to race. The only way to preserve race is to destroy the technological system down to a point that a global empire isn’t possible. A forced, permanent return to a Roman level of technology after a global collapse would do this. It would have to be a forced collapse though, because people would never do it voluntarily. Either a natural disaster of sufficient power, or a planned attack could cause it. There’s at least a chance that a global catastrophe of this kind could preserve the three major races indefinitely into the future. Otherwise, I think they are doomed.

  9. Spahn, you say: “With powerful technologies comes the ability — which the Romans did not have — of building a global empire. America is attempting to do this today, and is following the same assimilationist strategy as Rome, with the same destructive consequences to race.”

    True, very true.

    Then you say: “The only way to preserve race is to destroy the technological system down to a point that a global empire isn’t possible.”

    I’m not so pessimistic myself. Instead, I think that modern technology (machinery, electricity, electronics, computers, the Internet) is here to stay and will simply outlive the imperialist Anglosphere that is currently led by the USA.

    In other words, the current Anglosphere in its current form is currently dying for multiple reasons, the most important reason being that its replacing its European peoples with low-IQ third-world people. However, Japan, Korea, and China aren’t doing that, and they will keep modern technology alive on this Earth, even if the USA and Britain were to become completely third-world. Also, as far as I know, Russia is not importing low-IQ third-world people. And, of course, there is recent resistance, including government resistance, in parts of Europe against importing low-IQ third-world people.

    • Lots of scenarios are possible, but if the technological system survives, all of them that I can envision result in the destruction of race. For example, it might be possible, perhaps using a virus or similar means, to target all races but whites for extermination. In fact such bioweapons have been a topic of research for some time. They’re difficult to develop with the required specificity though, and it would probably be easier to crash the entire system. But as technological systems continue to evolve, even if whites were the only race left, eventually they would be changed by the technology itself into something quite different than what they are today. They would have so little in common with present-day whites that they might as well be a different species, even if they remain biological and don’t evolve into machines, as some transhumanists think will happen and even desire. The technological system is re-engineering humans according to its own requirements. It’s been doing so since civilization began, but particularly since the Industrial Revolution, and I expect that trend to continue to accelerate. A technological future will necessarily be an anti-human one.

      • The discussion about technology’s effect on humanity is utterly pointless. Serves no purpose whatsoever.

        Spahn, when you say the rise of technology comes at the cost of freedom(s) you are 100% correct. I won’t argue with that. But you seem to forget that that rise of technology is also 100% inevitable.

        To deliberately NOT develop something, an idea, despite one could, hence get ahead of biological competitors and thus enhancing one’s own species chances of survival is about the dumbest notion I’ve ever heard in my life. Mentally a very unhealthy way of reasoning. Against nature’s laws. Sort of communism, intellectual communisn.

        In my world view the Aryan, as the most advanced life form on earth, would literally be considered gods by all other races, certainly the dark skinned races. Simply because we have developed technologies beyond their wildest imagination and intellectual capabilities.

        The knowledge and science behind our technology should be considered holy, absolutely NEVER to be shared with non-Aryans. Anyone fool or deliberate traitor who does will be executed on the spot. THAT should be our religion.

        This is in line with our Fuhrer’s world view. He saw the Aryan as the leader of humanity, not necessarily its supressor. If we would live according to this one simple rule we wouldn’t have to worry about any other race ever because we would be by far the most populous race on earth with superior – god like powers – compare to any other and totally untouchable.

        A negro or a Papua hasn’t got any business sitting in an aeroplane, driving a car, wearing a watch, have indoor plumming or using a computer, let alone living outside his stone age jungle habitat. Just like nature has intended.

        The way I see it it’s not even Christianity which is the root cause of our decline. That is just one of the weapons developed against us by this planet’s ‘human’ vermin. It is the temptation of the ‘ring’. Also spawned by that same vermin. This capitalism has caused by now a practically irreversible individualism amongst Aryans putting the enemy in power for the simple reason it thinks collectively.

        I think National Socialism was/is the greatest mental leap forward in mankind. Or a leap back to normality if you like.

      • “But you seem to forget that that rise of technology is also 100% inevitable. ”

        The evolution of technology has been inevitable, but there is reason to think it will be permanently arrested after a collapse. This is because in ancient times, there was still plenty of easy to find materials with which to build technological civilization. Those are gone now, all used up. Resources vital to the technological system such as oil, iron, copper, aluminum, zinc, tin, gold, silver, etc., now require high technology to obtain. If that technology goes away, then they will in effect be permanently unobtainable.

        “The knowledge and science behind our technology should be considered holy, absolutely NEVER to be shared with non-Aryans. ”

        Yet there were assimilationist trends even in the Third Reich. They worked with the Japanese and Arabs, and there were Muslim and Indian divisions in the SS.

      • Well, there was such a thing as cooperation against a common enemy, absolutely. But i higly doubt that the third reich would have shared vital technologies with anyone. Japan was already highly industrialised anyway. However the center of tech development was in white nations.

        But look at if this way. What would be the point in being aryans or wanting to preserve that race if we could not be ourselves? It is the extra inquisitiveness and creative spark that separates us from the only other advanced race. It is who we are. It is my opinion that our specific kind of biological hardware renders our concsiousness on a higher level. Unfortenately this comes at the price of also having a higher chance of straying from instinctive thinking and acting. You could think of it as our achilled heel. Something a vermin species as the jew knows how to exploit.

        Technology makes society more complex which indeed equals less freedom. But we simply have to deal with that. Humans are a social species, therefore it is always, without exception, up to the leadership to determine what direction we follow to the future.

      • Sorry for the many typos. This is due to me typing on my phone. Damn this technolgy 😁

      • “Well, there was such a thing as cooperation against a common enemy, absolutely. ”

        Right. And of course, you will want that cooperation to be as effective as possible, which will necessarily involve sharing technology. This is what happens when ideology encounters reality. “Compromises” have to be made if you want to win. To choose to use an inferior technique is just choosing to lose. This is how technique (collectively, technology) restricts freedom and by degrees corrupts even the purest ideologies..

        I see technique as the fundamental building block — the atomic structure, if you will — of reality. As I mentioned previously, DNA can be understood as chemical coding for a set of techniques; this presents animals as biological machinery. And of course, all human behavior can be broken down into its component techniques too. Darwin’s rule of survival of the fittest governs both realms: both physical evolution of life forms (race or species), and which techniques will be used in the realm of human behavior. Once this is grasped, then you can understand many things that are otherwise inexplicable.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: