Extremely dishonest Molyneux

Stefan Molyneux has reacted on the massacre of Jews by Robert Bowers.

By the sixth minute, he mentioned Hitler shaking his head in disapproval. From the 7:20 minute on, he gave many statistics about the Jewish community in the diaspora and in Israel (the statistics are irrelevant to those who understand the Jewish problem). From minute 20 he began to talk about anti-Semitism and confessed ‘I had a Jewish step-grandmother’.

At no time did he address the Jewish problem, which on this site I have defined in a nutshell (Jews are never over-represented in organisations or movements that represent the interests of the white majority, only in those that weaken that majority).

Molyneux’s extreme dishonesty is obvious. He has uploaded thousands of videos and invited many intellectuals… but cleverly eludes every intellectual conscious of the Jewish problem. Not only does he fail to invite a Jew-wise blogger. He does not even debate with the most elemental writing of, say, Kevin MacDonald. Molyneux could, without inviting the professor, answer what MacDonald says only in the preface of his best-known book: an essay that summarizes his life’s work. But the dishonest Molyneux fails to do it…

Nor does he mention, even in passing, the webzine that best explains the Jewish problem, The Occidental Observer. At minute 28:47 Molyneux exclaimed: ‘Blaming Jews I do not see it! In fact I see the opposite’ in the sense that he sees the Jews as a positive influence for the West. He says that the Dark Ages had more to do with Islam than with Judaism, which makes him an ignorant (cf. the masthead of this site, ‘Rome vs. Judea; Judea vs. Rome’).

From minute 34 Molyneux launched such a passionate speech against gentile hatred of Jews that it makes me think he has Jewish blood; he almost cries. He ends by saying ‘We must reason with each other. Reason. Evidence’—but he violates exactly these words because of what I’ve said above!

Molyneux ends his clip with teary eyes. He reminded me that at some time in his life he represented works by Shakespeare. His YouTube show is more theatre than substantial ‘philosophy’.

He’s obviously trying to do a psyop trick on us.

Published in: on October 29, 2018 at 12:18 am  Comments (25)  


  1. Making a list, and checking it twice

    • Molyneux has stated in a video that his mother was born “in Berlin in 1937 to a pretty Jewish clan”. Now he’s saying that the clan was only a step-grandmother. Whatever the truth, rebutting him on the JQ is easy precisely because of his dishonesty.

      • How is the virus of Judaism transmitted? From mother to child. Correct?

  2. That Stefan is very dishonest is clearly seen in his hypocritical stance about free speech. Gab is down now because Robert Bowers used it:

    Gab.com is under attack. We have been systematically no-platformed by App Stores, multiple hosting providers, and several payment processors. We have been smeared by the mainstream media for defending free expression and individual liberty for all people and for working with law enforcement to ensure that justice is served for the horrible atrocity committed in Pittsburgh. Gab will continue to fight for the fundamental human right to speak freely.

    As we transition to a new hosting provider Gab will be inaccessible for a period of time. We are working around the clock to get Gab.com back online. Thank you and remember to speak freely.

    Will Stefan say something condemning this suppression of free speech? He seems to imply that he supports free speech as long as the speech does not mention the JQ.

  3. Funny how white websites must look like this:

    We here at the Daily Stormer are opposed to violence. We seek revolution through the education of the masses. When the information is available to the people, systemic change will be inevitable and unavoidable. Anyone suggesting or promoting violence in the comments section will be immediately banned, permanently.

    While Judaeocommunist websites look like this:

    We are not pacifists. Redneck Revolt believes in using any and all means at our disposal to gain our freedom and true liberty, provided those methods do not violate our basic humanity or integrity. We believe in the inherit right of every individual and community to defend themselves from those who exploit or oppress them. We believe in empowering each other to participate in the defense of our communities with the knowledge and equipment to do so. It is our duty and obligation to defend our families and communities by all means from those who profit from our misery and destruction, or call for violence against any of us for our race, gender, religion, country of birth, or cultural background.

    Take another look at the military firearms and open advocacy for violence on this Judaeocommunist website and then find a white nationalist website displaying such obvious, open aggression. If they did, they would have the F.B.I. crawling over them within minutes.

    Whites are all over themselves to stay “within the law” – the Jew’s law – and “no advocacy for violence,” while there adversary continually scream “KILL WHITEY!!! KILL WHITEY!!!” with utter impunity. These inverted attitudes are all due to the Jews’ immense economic, political, legal and cultural influence. While Jews jump to the forefront with millions for legal defense, Arthur Topham is hard pressed to generate 2000 loonies for his legal defense fund.

    Jews control all sides of the arguments with their arbitrary, iron fisted law. This is why whites are doomed, why they do not have a prayer fro survival. As we used to say in the Marines – you can bend over and kiss your ass goodby.” That’s not blood you’re smelling, it’s Koolaid from the Jew’s jungle Jim play yard.

  4. Stefan Molyneux is a Jew… He tries to hide this, but why do you think he never really discusses the Jewish problem and how he has access to all the Kingpins of Social Media that he interviews!? All the people he interviews are the big names on Social Media Blogging. This doesn’t happen by accident… Did you ever see the video where Stefan actually admitted his Jewish Ancestry?

    • Yes: it’s linked in another of my posts where I basically iterate what I said above. What bothers me is that he hides his ancestry. I am reminded of Fjordman, who at Gates of Vienna hid the fact that his father is a kike.

      • C.T. yes true, well Stefan does hide his ancestry now because he is aware of opinions on things relating to the JQ these days, but when he admitted it in public lectures in past, it was during times which were far less politically turbulent when the JQ wasn’t talked about as much in the mainstream. Also the guy that runs Black Pigeon Speaks is another jew himself. A lot of formerly military (who are jewish or scots-irish) and other agents have created YouTube channels to act like they are fighting for justice but what they do is run these channels for data mining and getting the opinions and information from the public to see how they react and report this data back to data firms, government agencies, military personnel and others… There are many low level versions of these pages including Prepper pages run by them as well as Financial News pages and a lot of the low level ones will always ask for people’s opinions or to ask what they are doing to survive the coming crisis… All to report this information back to secret agencies.

  5. One thing too that should be cleared up, anyone who has a Jew on either side of the family (Man or Woman) can have Jewish ancestry but the thing is their ancestry is weakened. They are still evil but the difference with the Jewish Race is that the actual root of the Jewish DNA Race is found in the mother, rather than the father, and this race (or anyone who has Rh Negative Blood Type, which is the Bloodline of the Jews) is specifically different in that regard, whereas all other races of Humanity, the father carries the Spirit and Bloodline DNA source.

    • This explains why Stefan has a split personality: he seems to be pro-white sometimes but rapidly enters in inner conflict when pro-whiteness enters in conflict with Jew interests.

      • C.T. yes precisely, you got it… Even if a Jew (such as in Molyneux’s) case has mixed Ancestry with any Aryan or other people, they become confused and at war with either side, but default always to their Jewish personality. This was also true with Winston Churchill, who was part English and part Jewish (as many British are), and his half-Jewish side made him unable to accept Hitler even though at times he would claim magnificent things about Hitler’s achievements or even make positive statements, the contradictory statements would come out from his Jewish side which always asserts dominance over whatever other Ancestry they have.

    • Horse feces. A Jew is a Jew is a Jew.

      • Exactly!!!

    • @ rhnegatives

      There is no evidence that I know of that Churchill has Jewish ancestry. I believe it’s just a myth. And why do you say that many British people have Jewish ancestry? The DNA evidence refutes this.

      • Yes there is evidence of Churchill’s Jewish Ancestry, along with most people in the British Crown. You need to read your history and research their blood types.

      • @ rhnegatives

        There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Churchill has even a drop of Jewish blood. You’re a crank.

        Sorry, but I can’t let this pass. You know there is no evidence. That’s why you have not posted a link or directed me to a specific web source. There is no such link or source. All you have is other websites that make the same claim you make that can be sourced back to an old article in the Jerusalem Post written by a Jew that makes the unfounded claim.

        Also, most people under the British Crown are NOT Jews or have any Jewish ancestry. Again, you have not a shred of evidence for this. If you did, then you would have already referred me to it. In fact, the published DNA evidence, widely-circulated online, shows that most British people have no Middle Eastern DNA.

  6. Did you receive the kikepal donation today?

    • Yes. Thank you very much! I really appreciate…

  7. Even Churchill at times spoke openly about the Jewish Question (being a part Jew himself) but noticed how he always defaulted back to his Jewish side and obeyed the Rothschilds.

    • Churchill didn’t have a Jewish side. It’s a load of rubbish.

      • You need to read your history. Churchill and the British Crown throughout history are ripe with Jewish Ancestry / Rhesus Negative Blood.

    • @ rhnegatives

      You’ve now disingenuously altered your claim slightly. Instead of telling us Churchill is “part Jew”, you now tell us that he had Jewish ancestry.

      What exactly are you claiming? You need to be specific and clear. It’s unfair and intellectually dishonest to dance around and shift your language to suit the moment.

      There is no evidence – not a shred – of Jewish ancestry in Churchill’s family. The claim is of long-standing and has already been discredited. It is based on a newspaper article written by a Jew, who offers no evidence. If there is evidence, then you will presumably direct us to it now, so that we can see.

      Of course, that does not mean there is no Jewish ancestry further back in the mists of time, but telling me to ‘read my history’ tells me you are trolling. If what you are trying to say is that Churchill’s ancestry must have included Jews because it was aristocratic, that doesn’t tell us that he had Jewish ancestry. It’s sloppy thinking. On that basis, virtually any of us could be labelled ‘Jewish’ or some other undesirable ethnic group and have a ‘Jewish side’ or a ‘Native American side’.

      • @ rhnegatives,

        I had to ban you.

        You posted three comments in a row claiming that Andrew is a Jew with no proof at all (comments that I’ve now removed).

  8. Apropos of the picture above – from John Carpenter’s ‘They Live’, arguably a more awake film than the entire WN Movement:

    – I thought you understood. It’s business, that’s all it is. You still don’t get it. There ain’t no countries anymore. They’re running the whole show. They own the whole planet. They can do whatever they want. We can have it good for a change. If we help them, they’ll leave us alone to make some money. You can have a taste of the good life. It’s what everybody wants.

    – You’d do it to your own kind?

    – What’s the threat? We all sell out every day, might as well be on the winning team.

    And this is Molyneux, a sell-out. A spiritual decrepit.

  9. Let’s see, the story goes that Churchill’s mother Jenny Jerome was a daughter of a Jewish department store owner in New York who got knocked up by the Prince of Wales(allegedly a descendant of Nathan Rothschild). Randolph Churchill received a large payoff to make her a decent woman. That is the unofficial story of Winston Churchill’s origins.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: