Check, Stefan – your move

A JFG review of contradictory statements made
by Stefan Molyneux about his Jewish heritage:

Published in: on November 8, 2018 at 12:01 am  Comments (12)  


  1. As rabbi Saul puts it: “For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:”

    In other writings Rabbi Saul says that a man must be a spiritual Kike to be a true Kike. Christians are these spiritual Kikes.

    I never understood the appeal of these alt-lite personalities. All of a sudden, Jordan Peterson took over my YouTube feed. I knew by this alone that he was a fraud, someone being promoted by the Jews.

    Molyneux is a spiritual Jew. Like Rabbi Saul, he has delusions of grandeur. Molyneux considers himself a “philosopher” n’ shee-it. Only Molyneux stands between you and a dystopia of irrationality. Molyneux has a palm that itches for gold. He mocks small donations.

    I can just sense rats by instinct. I never gave Peterson or Harris or Molyneux and the other Jewish-approved distractions the time of day.

    I listen to Christopher Hitches… but I do so critically, well aware that his mother was Jewish, and that he was descended from Rabbis.

  2. i use the duck test. the guy is bald. double-talking. all the homing device sensor active in my subconscious reflexed latvik the first time i saw and listened. and see: the reflexors were correct!!! all praise and honour to nature. now the truth comes out. stephi-boy is in it — youtubing — for the $$$. fuker.

  3. His ethnic ancestry seems to be occluded. Much like with Tommy Robinson, who once admitted to being a Jew but doesn’t elaborate on the subject. That said, I apply Occam’s razor in evaluating these charlatans. Recognising their practical utility as stepping stones, I hope not for revelations about their past, only that they fade into diminishing relevancy as the real questions are promoted to front and centre.

    In all fairness to Molyneux, it’s also important to note that he has, in the past, consistently criticised Jews as a class. I know about his ideological trajectory because I watched his videos from the start, right back to when he was podcasting in his car on the way to work. Until about 2014/15, he was a typical NAP-type naive contract libertarian. From about 2015, his politics and ideological perspective began to evolve rapidly and he became more receptive to identity politics.

    Regardless, the purpose of figures like Molyneux – the reason they are tolerated – seems to be that of ‘safing’ dissent from both the Left and the Right into acceptable and manageable dead-ends. I think that what the Left have in mind is some sort of very broad pan-white nationalism, possibly with one or more Jew-friendly ethno-states. That’s what I would aim for if I was working for the other side. I think that the key point about nationalism is that the broader and bigger tent, the less efficacious it becomes. This is because, unlike socialism, nationalism is not an ideology or representative system of ideas that can be adopted by anybody, instead nationalism (like its sister, paganism) is biological.
    Barring a few noble and honorable exceptions like César, we are the thing that we talk about. That being the case, a clever way for the Left to kill off a nationalist resurgence would be to give Doctor Queer and Dicky Spencer exactly what they want. “Want a pan-white ethno-state? [whatever that means, any clue?]. Well step this way Doctor Queer! Oh yes, that definition of ‘white’, well we thought well of course Ashkenazis are Huwhite”.

    Of course, it’s not all one-way traffic: there is downside for the Establishment with these tactics, which is that Molyneux also acts as a stepping stone for those who are more intelligent and radically-inclined.

    I would unfashionably maintain that liberalism in the reactionary sense is innate to the English sensibility – it’s our ‘special way’ – so Molyneux’s ideas (and also those of Sargon), in so far as they reflect an English tradition, are of some use; but the problem is that Molyneux and Sargon (and others like them) then proceed to distort and twist liberalism into something deracinated, de-ethnicised and universalised, using the coinage of the relevant classical English thinkers – which of course goes to the centrality of this blog, that Nordics (and conniving, impure biological mimics) have construed to transvalue values.

    We should remember what ‘transvaluation of values’ means in terms of practical implications. Nobody declared ethnocide as an agenda, as such, and the bio-mimics like Molyneux and Sargon did not declare this as such. Instead, the transgression of natural morality and the Natural Order was pervasive through all pre-existing ideas. Liberalism and anarchism are fine in a world that is Nordic and under a Natural Order. It’s how Nordics, especially the British hybrids, can and probably should live. Tolstoyan morality and the essentials of Jesus’ teachings are also workable for Nordics in a Nordic world – look at Varg. Marxism has validity as a critique of industrial capitalism and we could have a Nordic world based on entirely co-operative principles. But in a Magian world, the relevant precepts can be twisted, weaponised and turned into poison. That’s what these Sophists on YouTube are doing.

    • Molyneux and his ilk have no idea that they’re providing the stepping stones to cross the psychological Rubicon.

      My first step in this direction was counter-jihad. After a few months of discovering it, I hit the site of a counter-jihadist, (((Larry Auster))), that touched on topics that most counter-jihadists evaded, such as race and a critique of feminism (the second stepping stone). Auster was shocked to see that, after some months, I jumped onto the third stepping stone, Jew-wise white nationalism.

    • This is because, unlike socialism, nationalism is not an ideology or representative system of ideas that can be adopted by anybody, instead nationalism (like its sister, paganism) is biological.

      I define paganism as a state of reconversion; those religious beliefs, or lack thereof, once you have rid yourself of all alien religious propaganda. Hence I consider Atheists as fellow pagans.

      I only use preconciliar Roman Catholicism to give a disciplinary framework to my druidic beliefs.

      • *deconversion. Autocorrect.

  4. off subject: dna programming language questions.
    i’m an old programmer. c language. dna is the programming language of life: our 23 chromosomes contain the dna program the makes each of us. each cell nucleus holds a copy of the dna code that makes us just like the computer hard drives hold all the programs that our computer runs.
    – why won’t google return search results on which genes make the racial facial features? the prominent signatures our homing device uses to navigate us through life. don’t tell me the professionals don’t know how to program the distinguishing middle eastern nose. and similarly black ape facial features. more specifically, what genes make what races!!! why is goggle hiding this info from the public? because then science destroys the state religion of the left, egalitarianism.
    – how many labs have funding for racial dna programming? do any of you folks have info on this subject? i’m guess the funding for such a target is nigh-to-impossible to get from our litvak-owned elites. still, i’ll guess some is being done and its top-secret.
    – we’re all created equal? bull shit. diff the genome of the races. just like coders diff their code modules to review their changes during the program development cycle.

  5. dna, con’t:
    why does not the left elites propose a new government administration, the Department of Sameness, to produce genetically identical eggs. and sterilization of the masses — permitting only the elites to reproduce naturally. the application for an state ID includes the sterilization status. if couples what children, they must apply to the state for wifey to be implanted with an egg from the Dept of Sameness egg bank. then the leftist elites can scientifically lay claim that the masses at least were started from the same dna program.

  6. dna, con’t++
    at some point in the near future — decades, the litvaks are going to begin human features capitalism: buy IQ; buy big breast size; buy eye color; buy noses. available on amazon. seriously.

  7. MolyJew and Carl Benjamin are blood Jews. Why can’t you tell?

  8. “He hath disgraced me and hindered me half a million, laughed at my losses, mocked at my gains, scorned my nation, thwarted my bargains, cooled my friends, heated mine enemies – and what’s his reason? I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions; fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer as a Christian is? If you prick us do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? And if you wrong us shall we not revenge? If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that. If a Jew wrong a Christian, what is his humility? Revenge. If a Christian wrong a Jew, what should his sufferance be by Christian example? Why, revenge. The villainy you teach me I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction.” – Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice

    • This merits a quotable quote in this site.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: