Persistent scepticism

A visitor to this site sent me the following e-mail:

This comment of mine was originally going to be posted in response to a comment of yours about abducting and raping the Sabine women on your blog post entitled ‘Initial scepticism’. Though my comment was not addressed to you directly but to anyone who reads your blog:

It’s sad that white males seem to be only able to talk about solutions to such problems as the Female Problem in future tense. White males speak about what they’re going to do “one day”, “in the future”, just not now. We’re going to abduct and rape our women “one day”…. meanwhile Muslims and Blacks abduct and rape our women now. In the UK Muslim men are having their lust fulfilled with thousands of white girls. Granted UK law is not hard on these Muslim men and actively favors them but at the same time Black men in America do suffer long imprisonment for rape, yet they still rape white women each year on a colossal scale. In addition Black men and Muslim men have their own women under greater control than white men have their women. Black women in Africa have the highest birth rate in the world and Blacks are projected to become the largest race on Earth as we near the end of the century. And Muslim men have their women following a patriarchal rule, covered up with burkas and banging out babies. Meanwhile they rape our own women on the side.

White boys (I’m not going to call us White Men, most of us don’t deserve to be called Men) talk about what they’re going to do “after the collapse”, hoping for a collapse that will cause society to collapse into chaos so the police are dispersed and they can get away with what it is they want to do. But the collapse may never come. What white males have to be prepared for is that killing their enemies and raping their women could very well require breaking their enemies laws. That the only way forward is to become outlaws. True revolutionaries. If the minority of us white males who want our race to survive won’t sacrifice our meaningless ‘freedom’, pleasures and life and endure prison, torture and even death then our race may not be able to survive. If we’re not willing to put anything on the table we don’t deserve to get anything back. Our forefathers sacrificed for their race time and time again. If white males have become incapable of doing what’s necessary for survival then our race is unfit to survive.

If white males were serious about their race’s survival they would be dropping out of society, draining the enemy system for all the welfare money they can, radicalizing themselves and other white males with racist literature, living a lifestyle where they are constantly in and out of prison due to their subversive activities, and finally carrying out terrorist attacks. There are thousands of radicalized Muslims in countries like France and the UK and they successfuly commit terrorist attacks. Imagine if there were thousands of radicalized neo-Nazi extremists in France and the UK. We would be unstoppable! A 1,000 Robert Bowers=11,000 dead Jews! Ultimately White Men have no-one to blame but themselves for their failure to secure a future for white children. White Men are deliberately holding themselves back for various reasons. It appears most white males don’t have the imagination or capability to break with the System and its programming. They are victims and slaves of their own making. Their ‘resistance’ will always be safe non-violent activism within legal parameters.

Thanks for reading, Cesar

T.

As we can see, the visitor used the phrase ‘But the collapse may never come’. In reality, the collapse is inevitable: as can be seen in these four videos by Mike Maloney that, five years ago, I embedded on this site (first, second, third and fourth).

Regarding what the visitor says above, that the coloured ones are already raping white women while the Aryan males only fantasise about doing so in the future, this is obviously due to the fact that the anti-white empire that reigns in the West forbids to some what it allows to others. The author of ‘Lycanthropy: How will the Castilian Wolf deal with Little Red Riding Hoods after the crash’ made it very clear that it is necessary for ZOG to be fatally wounded before white males recover their wives.

The good news is that the System will soon suffer a huge blow with the looming financial accident: a golden opportunity for white nationalists, finally, to grow a pair.

Published in: on January 12, 2019 at 11:55 am  Comments (27)  

27 Comments

  1. Those who want to approach Maloney’s ideas in purely textual (non-audiovisual) form may save the PDF of his book Guide to Investing in Gold & Silver.

  2. The primary reason that none of this does happen is due to the fact that there are simply not “Thousands of radicalized Neo-Nazi extremists” in any one place, with a social support network that remotely resembles that which Muslims have in Western and Central Europe.

    It would not be logistically possible for these attacks to be anything other than one off suicide attacks.

    As for

    “if white males were serious about their race’s survival they would be dropping out of society, draining the enemy system for all the welfare money they can, radicalizing themselves and other white males with racist literature”

    I’ve met innumerable people who were doing, coming close to doing, and striving to do just that. I don’t really see how going to prison for anything is constructive as in the U.S. some arguably minor offenses can see you locked up for over twenty years. Burglary, for instance, can net you ten and rape could see you put away for life (statutory rape for fifteen years).

    Being “in and out of prison” isn’t really an option.

    In some states, such as Texas, there is a “three strikes law”, which allows someone who has convicted of three felonies to be potentially imprisoned for life (minimums are 15-25 years).

    • Indeed. What you say should be considered seriously by young commenters, not only by “T.” who sent me the above email, but by Jack (cf. what he just said below).

      That’s why I advise—for now—the perfectly legal strategy of saving gold and silver: a great investment for the freedom fighter right after the dollar crashes.

    • “I don’t really see how going to prison for anything is constructive …”

      Going to prison isn’t in itself a good thing, but it’s necessary in order to build a culture of crime, and keep in existence a revolutionary class. The very success of white civilization in eliminating crime has made whites soft. This softness is proved by their underrepresentation in prisons. Here we have another example of how the right, with its worshipful attitude towards police and the law, is the very antithesis of what’s needed for a racial revolution.

      Civilization has made whites not only culturally soft, but physically soft as well. Almost everyone I see around me when out in public is obese. Some of them look too fat to even raise their arms, and can’t walk without assistance. To expect a racial revolution from such a nation of Pillsbury doughboys is ridiculous. It simply won’t happen.

      In connection with Manson, note that Charles Manson is a figure from a time when white America still had a remnant of crime culture. He came from the very lowest white social class, and was well-accustomed to committing crimes from his earliest years. Among whites, that social class is now extinct.

      • It’s much easier to get into fighting shape outside of prison than in.
        I’m not apologizing for the racial right’s quasi-religious adherence to ZOGlaws, not at all, simply stating that under current circumstances going to prison is not a viable, constructive or positive outcome or experience.

        If anything, our revolutionary class should abstain from being caught engaging in criminality entirely, and go out of their way to be forgotten by the system. Being locked in one of their nigger-warrior tanks isn’t particularly helpful when you’re attempting to maintain a low profile.

        If you see prison as a mere means to unplug one’s self from society, that is understandable, though I would argue that grinding your anti-Christian axiological axe using sites such as this, along with a bit of petty criminality for sake of reassurance, is more than enough to do so.

      • “It’s much easier to get into fighting shape outside of prison than in.”

        Not necessarily. If it’s so easy, then why so many obese and physically weak white people?

        ” … under current circumstances going to prison is not a viable, constructive or positive outcome or experience. ”

        It teaches you to hate the law, the police, and anyone connected to the system. From a revolutionary point of view, that’s a positive outcome. You emerge from such an experience ready and able to kill.

      • Hating anyone connected to the system also involves those who work in the so-called mental health professions and the so-called professional economists: a blind spot in the worldview of most WNsts.

      • “Not necessarily. If it’s so easy, then why so many obese and physically weak white people?”

        The reason most people don’t is because they’re given the opportunity to gorge. In prison you’re malnourished and surrounded by diseased, dysgenic criminals.

        The advice you’re giving seems like it’s geared more towards lemmings than anyone here. None of us need to
        “Learn to hate the system”

        As being here, commenting is evidence enough of such feelings. In many cases prisons have the opposite effect, as Christians are allowed to prey on people there when they’re at their most psychologically vulnerable.

        There is literally no positive outcome that stems from going to prison.

      • Prison in the West is something I’ve kept a watchful eye over for some time now since I noticed that some of the most masculine looking White Men in the 1960’s-1980’s were White Men in American prisons. Look at photographs of White Men in the 19th century-early 20th century. None of them are smiling. They all have a fierce look in their eyes while wearing large bushy moustaches. After WWI and with the advent of Feminism White Men become increasingly soft looking. The only White Men I could find in the late 20th century who had the same look as those in the 19th century were White Men in prison. To me that demonstrates a very strong link between masculinity, crime and prison.

        If we are to have revolutionaries it is unavoidable that they will be involved in the criminal underworld. A revolutionary can become a political prisoner if anything. And to fund his revolutionary activities and acquire weapons can involve criminal activity. So there is an overlap between the revolutionary and the outlaw. Both are criminals in the ‘law’s’ eyes. As RevileChrist says, it is not a good thing that so many whites are law abiding. In the UK it is Muslim gangs that dominate British prisons, and these Muslim gangs with their culture of crime overlap with and support the terrorist Muslims in and outside prison. If white males wanted to survive strongly enough then they would have a similar dynamic at work between White Supremacist gangs and so-called neo-Nazi terrorists. To some extent this exists in the US prison system. In the 1980’s the most secure prison in America was Marion in Illinois. It was built to replace Alcatraz. The prison was dominated by the Aryan Brotherhood gang who were having a race war with the D.C. Blacks. It was at this prison where members of The Order like David Lane and Gary Yarbrough were first imprisoned. Soon enough the Aryan Brotherhood struck up an allegiance with Aryan Nations and today many white prisoners in America have the 14 Words tattooed on them. Thus there was an overlap between revolutionaries and criminals.

        Resistance within ‘legal’ (whatever that means) parameters can only achieve so much. It speaks to the lack of initiative among white males and their cringing submission before the law that they are unable to break with their enemies laws and society’s mores and forge a path of their own for the survival of their race.

      • And ZOG will just let the newly honed super Alt-Whites out of prison, will it? Encouraging Whites to end up in prison as a ‘career’ choice is imbecilic drivel. If it toughens up those who find their way in there, then all well and good; however, a great ‘recruiting drive’. Let them ‘eat cake’ for a while; 99% of Whites need to go the way of the Dodo, anyway.

      • Joseph Walsh: “So there is an overlap between the revolutionary and the outlaw. Both are criminals in the ‘law’s’ eyes. ”

        There it is.

        Revolutionaries are criminals. There’s no such thing as a law-abiding revolutionary. Among them, having been to jail or prison should be a badge of honor. Any among them who have never been the target of the system’s attentions by being prosecuted for a crime should be suspect for a lack of sincerity. If you’ve never broken the law in a serious way, you haven’t been trying hard enough; your opposition isn’t sincere. All this should go without saying, but some here seem to think a theoretical, armchair dislike for the system is the same thing as the sort of visceral hatred of it that will be beaten into you should it ever get you in its clutches. In this connection, we should remember Nietzsche’s “What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger.” Anything strong enough to cure whites’ bourgeois softness will also be strong enough to kill.

        Manson, addressing America in a jail interview: “I can do anything I want to you — because of what you have done to me.”

        @C.T.

        “Who among the German national socialists would’ve taken C. Manson seriously? ”

        Wanting to take over the state and wanting to destroy it are two different, mutually opposed things. Hitler and the National Socialists of the 20s and 30s were in the former category, Manson in the latter. Under Hitler, Manson and anyone like him would have ended up in the T4 program. I also suspect that in Manson’s ideal world, there would have been no place for Hitler.

      • So do you side Manson or Hitler? I side Hitler.

        (Incidentally, was your former penname “Spahn Ranch” in honor of the notorious ranch that was a residence of the “Manson Family”?)

  3. What this commenter says further enforces my belief that Charles Manson will, inevitably, be revered as a folk hero, if not a God-in-a-flesh-body. I know that you do not take him seriously, nor do I expect or require you to, but I think that if it is necessary for Whites to drop out of the system and become rebels, then it is only natural that they will look up to Charlie Manson. Children, in particular, need heroes, and for White kids, who are being alienated more and more, Manson will fit the bill. In an interview, Penny Daniels asks him “why do kids come to you?” and he replies “because I am kids”. Why would they not see a saving grace in him?

    I believe that whatever Whites in the future, especially the children, see in the figure of Manson and whatever philosophy they can interpret from him, it will pave a way, whether we take this figure seriously or not.

    • I recently saw a drawing that featured a collection of various ‘heroes of our folk’ most of them American such as Bob Mathews and David Lane but amongst them was a drawing of Charles Manson. At one time you would never have seen that in the movement. Manson was regarded as degenerate trash by all but an elite few. I thought “finally, Charles Manson is getting his due”. The younger generation, Generation Z, has really taken to Manson. When I first read James Mason’s Siege 11 years ago I liked the parts on Manson very much. Mason’s support for Manson seemed logical and made sense to me. But others would review Siege and say “it’s great, apart from the bits about Charles Manson.” To me Mason’s praise for Manson completed the Siege newsletters not marred them.

      I noticed by 2016 that Siege was becoming a cult book among those associated with the Iron March forum and I liked this development as I always felt Siege was underrated. Then the likes of Iron March, Rope Culture, National Action, Atomwaffen Division, Siege Culture, System Resistance Network, Sonnenkrieg etc. all began paying homage to Charles Manson. What a positive development! It seems James Mason was finally being understood by a lot of the younger generation nearly four decades since he had first embraced Manson.

      Years ago I read some Feminist male writing on the internet saying men are evil and he pointed to us producing men like Adolf Hitler and Charles Manson, two of the most evil men in history. I noticed both men he chose were White Men. Both were racists. And both were associated with the Swastika. Both were also James Mason’s heroes. Both are regarded as ‘losers’ and bottom of the rung by conventional post-WWII Western society. In Siege Mason writes how Hitler and the Swastika were regarded by Americans after WWII as a symbol of the ‘threshold of anger’. Only those who had broken with the System like members of Rockwell’s ANP, outlaw motorcycle gangs and white prison gangs could be expected to adopt the Swastika as a symbol of their hatred for and alienation from the ZOG System. Mason goes on to say that Manson and the Swastika (that Manson had tattooed on his forehead) represents a new ‘threshold of alienation’. Only those truly alienated by society would embrace this demonized outlaw figure as a folk hero, as an Ubermensch figure who went beyond good and evil and made up his own right and wrong as he went along.

      It is good to see various groups that LARP at being terrorists like Atomwaffen Division and System Resistance Network have adopted Hitler and Manson as their ‘patron saints’ along with Siege as their Holy Bible. Using our creativity we could invoke a jihad for Prophet Hitler and Prophet Manson. Both Hitler’s concept of National Socialism and Manson’s conept of Universal Order bear many similarites. Both are manifestations of the ancient Aryan Faith of Arya Dharma at different times and in different places by seperate Aryan Avatars.

      • Who among the German national socialists would’ve taken C. Manson seriously? Not even Pierce, the author of the Diaries, took him seriously. (And J. Mason is a deeply flawed man because of his Xtianity.)

        The fact that younger racists take Manson seriously can only mean that they “are unhinged, to say the least” (words of our friend Jake F. while referring to the Atomwaffen Division).

      • That’s a silly appeal to authority, Cesar. And what are we to make of 1920s/30s Germans, very cultured, moral, civilised, and middle class, not taking Manson seriously? It is only to be expected, and does not make Manson any more crazy than he may seem to you.

        And yes, young people are unhinged. Jake F ought to see this as a good thing, as it only shows that our times are having an actual impact on Whites, rather than us all being completely immune and oblivious to it. If they are unhinged it is only due to further and further alienation on the social and Racial basis which draws them to figures like Manson. Let us say Manson was just a nut-job, then it should still not matter if he is an idol for the White children who take up the mantle and fight. Surely, if he is the catalyst for their hatred and violence against ZOG, then it is something we should not stop but just let be.

      • A wrong catalyst. Remember, I was about to title my 3rd autobiographical book From St Francis to Himmler, as genocidal Himmler should be the right human model, the right catalyst.

        Manson ordered to kill those bourgeoisie people for the wrong reasons. In that house of the Hollywood neighbourhood previously inhabited a man who failed to hire Manson when the latter wanted to become a rock star. Manson was very resentful even according to his female acolytes. So he didn’t kill Sharon Tate (et al) because she had opened her legs to a kike. That was not his reason or motivation. Manson unconsciously wanted to take revenge on those who had inhabited that house.

        A frustrated rock music career for a hippy on drugs and a petty vendetta: Very very bad model for a freedom fighter today.

      • That’s only if you believe that the official story about Manson is true. Why should we? We should be questioning everything the media and the newspapers tell us, if they are so against us. Why am I to believe that they are lying about Hitler but, for whatever reason, are telling the truth about Manson? The man throughout his entire life proclaimed his innocence and was not allowed to defend himself in court. The people who claimed they were being “influenced” by him were high on LSD at the time. What fair judicial system would take such testimonies seriously?

        The System was against Manson for the same reason that they were against the Branch Davidians: Because they were drop-outs of the System at least to a high enough degree that they were to be considered suspect by the Government and crazy by the populace. Who are we to say what his actual motivations were if the stories are true? He may have been resentful, but that doesn’t prove guilt. But I am losing the plot here.

        “Very very bad model for a freedom fighter today.”

        The Alt-Right have been following Hitler and Himmler as models, and that is where they get their inspiration to follow democracy and stay passive. Beer Hall Putsch aside, the NSDAP followed the democratic laws and were voted in. This is what precisely leads the young “vanguard” to believe violence only makes the Government more repressive and we need to save America and Whites through reforming and peaceful activism. It also makes them care about optics, as Hitler and co. were very typical Germans of their time, very cultured and well-dressed in nice tailored suits and ties. They would never in a million years fall for biker gangs and the Aryan Brotherhood.

      • Many would agree with me that the Alt-Right and NS are two completely different animals. One is the real thing the other an impossible compromise with Americanism.

        I didn’t obtain the above Manson info from the System, but from an odd interview with Manson’s female acolytes.

        Again, I don’t believe that any high-ranking Nazi—for example, any of those who shared meals with Hitler—would even understand any sort of remote admiration for someone like Manson. As RevileChrist said on this thread, “Under Hitler, Manson and anyone like him [my emphasis] would have ended up in the T4 program. I also suspect that in Manson’s ideal world, there would have been no place for Hitler.”

        Those WNsts who admire Manson are people of pretty unsound mind. It’s impossible to do something for the 14 words with such “unhinged” people. If they really want to emulate Manson they should end up in the T4 (Tiergartenstraße 4) program.

        I am light-years closer to Hitler’s Germany than with any degenerate WN who really admires Manson. No wonder why the present-day movement cannot fly—and won’t fly IMO until people of far sounded mind joins the cause.

      • You are repeating yourself, Cesar. Just because the NS Germans would have a disdain for Manson does not make it correct. We are falling into this trap of just believing things and doing things just because Hitler did so. So, did Hitler condone the use of weapons of mass destruction, as outlined in Pierce’s novel and which you agree with? Would Hitler have agreed with the abduction of White girls to use for sexual purposes? Would Hitler agree with terrorist activities that result in 90+% of the Human population dying out?
        I doubt it, but that does not mean we should not make those our goals. Hitler and his System were not perfect or far from fault.

        “Those WNsts who admire Manson are people of pretty unsound mind. It’s impossible to do something for the 14 words with such “unhinged” people.”

        Why? Isn’t there a passage in Siege where James Mason proclaims that we must recruit from an army of the worst? In other words, those who you call unhinged, are potential fighters and allies who will be ready to use their pent-up distrust and hatred of the System in a war to come. If they are unhinged then I am unhinged. And it is precisely because I am “unhinged” that I will be of great use, as will those like me.

        “No wonder why the present-day movement cannot fly—and won’t fly IMO until people of far sounded mind joins the cause.”

        With all due respect, that is utter nonsense. Those Racially aware who revere Manson are in the vanguard. To attribute Movementarian cowardice to those such as myself and AWD is ignorant of what drives said cowardice. The Movement are made up of American Nationalists, worshippers of the democratic institution (like Chris White), Feminists, worshippers of the law, and young Whites who have no real direction nor any clue as to what on Earth they are doing. What do all these people have in common – they are all trying to emulate Hitler. They see how Hitler and his friends were: civilised, law-abiding (Beer Hall Putsch aside), cultured, and to them, this reeks of the very pacifism which they show.

        The unhinged people: AWD, Sonnenkrieg, System Resistance Network, have the ability and motivation to come in on the jump, because their craziness causes them to have little moral scruples which holds the Movement back. And, you know, I don’t think I even understood this, that following Hitler to the letter just isn’t working out as intended.

      • I’ve never followed Hitler to the letter, as every regular visitor of this site knows. But the Manson model is really for extremely disturbed persons. You have not addressed what I said about genocidal Himmler: the right model for freedom fighters that should appear in our T-shirts (instead of Manson). Americans could also find inspiration in Pierce’s novels and in the trouble trio (Norman Spear is not fictional: he knows a lot about these tactics).

        The trio, at least in Covington’s fictional dramatization of the revolution, has absolutely ZERO to do with a hippy movement in Spahn Ranch; promiscuous females high on drugs worshiping a guru like a god, and whose purpose, as RevileChrist says, had nothing to do whatsoever with something like building a Fourth Reich.

        “Those Racially aware who revere Manson are in the vanguard”.

        Those racially aware who revere Manson are schizophrenics, or have suffered from a severe mental disorder in the past. I’ll never join a movement with crazy people that, I bet, will never do something similar to what the heroes do in Pierce’s and Covington’s novels. Reason for this is that Mason’s advice that you “must recruit from an army of the worst” is double-edged. If you do it you may end like Commander Rockwell: gunned not by the System but by “one of worst” who Rockwell recruited. Pathetic.

        Revolutionaries should have, as models, people of fairly sound mind. The SS pamphlet that this blog advertises (which also appears in The Fair Race), a pamphlet endorsed by Himmler, should be the starting point for such revolution—not poor losers like C. Manson and those other poor bastards who admire him. No wonder why J. Mason ended up as a Jesus C.I. freak.

        The purpose of this blog is precisely to show that mental health matters, starting with rejecting Judeo-Christianity so that the Aryan mind would be free.

      • “You have not addressed what I said about genocidal Himmler: the right model for freedom fighters that should appear in our T-shirts”

        Hitler, Himmler, it makes no difference. The Movement sees in them only law-abiding figures to emulate. They see middle class men in fancy suits being chauffeured from one opera stadium to the next. Manson shows us that this is really all superficial, especially so when those who dress in fancy suits and are “law-abiding” in the modern day are those who seek to kill us, and themselves.

        “Norman Spear is not fictional: he knows a lot about these tactics”

        And what has Norman Spear done to actually put this into practise? As far as I am concerned, he – And Andy Donner – are just more talkers with big dreams of a revolution which would never work (being crammed into one corner of a Nation which has proven that it is willing to nuke enemy countries) while his own “organisation” has no leader, and a bad reputation (with good reason). Nobody cares for the NWF anymore, and they have lost. As soon as Fat Man Covington died, all those little Irish boys trying to wear big boy pants died too. How many Trouble Trios do they have that are actually ready for some action? The Brigade was set in 2008. It’s 11 years after, so what is happening? Covington just made enough noise for some to pay attention, now I hear little to no news from any of his ilk.

        If we are following anyone, it should be Atomwaffen Division (who Jake says are “unhinged, to say the least”) and Sonnenkrieg.

        “a hippy movement in Spahn Ranch; promiscuous females high on drugs worshiping a guru like a god”

        And yet he is the only one in a million years who actually created a functioning White commune. Has Norman Spear been able to do that? Did Covington ever do that while he was busy slandering William Pierce and Ben Klassen and conning his donators? Manson wasn’t perfect, sure. He was a bit eccentric, but he turned out well for someone who was abused physically and verbally by every adult whose care he was in.

        “that Mason’s advice that you “must recruit from an army of the worst” is double-edged. If you do it you may end like Commander Rockwell: gunned not by the System but by “one of worst” who Rockwell recruited. Pathetic.”

        No, Cesar. Rockwell being killed by a traitor connects in no way to James’s quote. The man who shot him was trying to spread Marxist propaganda, so GLR kicked him out – Simple. It has nothing to do with Mason’s quote.

        “not poor losers like C. Manson and those other poor bastards who admire him.”

        NS are also losers. Therefore, those who follow Hitler and Himmler are just “poor bastards”.

        “starting with rejecting Judeo-Christianity so that the Aryan mind would be free.”

        Charles Manson wasn’t a Christian.

  4. What it comes down to is “the right to act”, (eg.) criminal muslims in the west can do so because they believe it is right for them to steal from the westerners.

    But the MAJORITY of white people still are trying to make a multi-cult civil society and trying to get along with everyone, “to turn the other cheek” as christians say.

    I believe the younger generations are waking up super-fast that they have been setup by their short sighted elders, and they don’t have a lifetime of multi-cult brain-washing to break out of….

    • If there had been hundreds of Dylann Roofs by now instead of just one I’d find your thesis more believable. Even twenty or thirty Roofs might suffice to demonstrate the point. But, alas, one Dylann Roof is only a statistical outlier, not a trend.

      • The elders of the non-whites are telling their children in the west that they can take whatever they want and are not part of white mans culture.

        The white peoples elders (since WW2) have been telling them to get along with all races, don’t discriminate and help other races fit into our society by turning the other cheek to their non-compliance.

        Today we are in the process of over-coming in each generation of white people that WE have the RIGHT to put our own interests first above others.

  5. @CT Adolf Hitler was a miscegenator and a feminist (built and shamelessly praised the Autobahnen, didn’t institute White Shariah). The NS movement is not unlike modern WN in that it is more conservative than revolutionary. It does not break and shock – it plays safe. It’s just playing safe was much closer to healthy in the 1920s Germany.

    Nevertheless, Manson was a small man in a suffocating American land. I myself can’t imagine how one would be inspired by him, but I wouldn’t despise him. Maybe, I’m wrong, but CT’s unapologetic contempt of him reminds me a bit of the contempt Christians show towards Anders Breivik; “he’s a murderer!” and that’s it. Does America even have proper heroes to begin with (aside from Rockwell)? Manson at least had a swastika, that’s something.

    Himmler was indeed the best guy since the last Ice Age, but is his name even known enough to be culturally significant? An American will most likely fail to find Prussia on the globe, it’s silly to blame those morons for choosing the wrong heroes. See @JackHalliday – how could an educated person confuse for a “middle class man in a fancy suit” the executioner of the last Jew in Vinnitsa? As glorious as it gets! But can’t be marketed to the rabble.

    • You & Jack Halliday above,

      The exchange of this thread in a nutshell:

      • Let’s have as a model a man (Himmler) who actually killed millions of our racial enemies.

      • No!: NS are also losers and middle-class men in fancy suits being chauffeured from one opera stadium to the next. Let’s follow instead a hippy Guru of a 1968 cult; a Guru who did his infantile tantrum because a Hollywood contractor did not hire him to popularize his degenerate music, and thus he ordered a bloody massacre at the contractor’s house.

      Since the latter opinion prevails in this thread, no wonder why the white nationalist movement is in such good shape!


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: