Satan

by Joseph Walsh

This is a long piece that I decided to write in response to a post of yours made a week or so ago. [Editor’s note: Walsh refers to ‘On empowering birds feeding on corpses’.] I remember you wrote, in response to what some woman said about Satan ruling the modern West, that it is not Satan that rules but Christ. That is quite correct.

In Judaism the god Satan is the enemy of Yahweh, the god of the Jews. The Hebrew name ‘Satan’ literally means Enemy, the Adversary, the Accuser etc. It is useful to think of Satan as the god of the Gentiles. According to the Jews Yahweh is the one true god and all the pagan gods of the Gentiles are false gods, idols. Collectively, all the heathen gods of the Gentiles could be described as ‘Satanic’ i.e. enemies of Yahweh and the Jewish people. This metaphysical dualism was inherited by the Jews disciples the Christians, who portrayed as ‘Satanic’ evil and demonic all the pagan gods of their enemies that they forcibly converted to Christianity or killed. The god of the Jews and the son of God Jesus became the only true God, and Jesus Christ’s enemy Satan the god that all the Pagans worshipped (including the Jews themselves, which creates the absurdity of the Jews being described as worshipping Satan, an absurdity that continues to this day. It is not Satan that the Jews worship but Yahweh!).

To put things into proper perspective before the ‘transvaluation of values’ done by the Judeo-Christians, the Ancient World was pagan and polytheistic and the Jews cut themselves off from the people around them. They not only saw themselves as unique and the rest of mankind as goyim, but metaphysically they viewed themselves as having knowledge of the one true god, a monotheistic god whose chosen people they were, in contrast to the false polytheistic gods of the pagan goyim around them, who their god YHWH-JHVH had given them dominion over.

Of all the Satan’s (i.e. enemies) that the Jews have ever faced, the greatest was Adolf Hitler. Moreover, just as Satan represents the Gods of the pagan Gentiles as a collective, it is the Gods of the Nordic-Aryan race who represent the biggest enemy of Yahweh and his children. Many have spoken about Hitler being an avatar of the Germanic god Wotan. To the Jews Wotan would be the same figure as Satan. So while Esoteric Hitlerists can talk about Hitler being an Avatar of Wotan, we could also say Hitler was an Avatar of Satan, the enemy of the Jews. For us Aryans, Yahweh, who doesn’t exist, can be viewed as the negative force that possesses the collective unconscious of the Jews while Satan can be viewed as the positive force that represents the collective unconscious of the Aryan race. The Judaized Christians in WN who say that Satan is the god of the Jews and Adolf Hitler is a good Christian man truly have things the wrong way round, brainwashed victims of the inversion of values that the Jews have brought into the world with Christianity.

Also, to look at things through the false perspective of the Christians, Adolf Hitler is The Anti-Christ, or at least an Antichrist figure, as He is the polar opposite of Jesus Christ. National Socialism is the polar opposite of Christianity. The Swastika symbolizes the opposite value system to that of the Crucifix. The morality of the Hitler and the Swastika is as Nietzschean morality system, basically one where the Christian Evil is recognized as what is actually Good, and the Christian ‘good’ recognized as that which is evil and harmful to the Aryan race. “And whoever wants to be a creator in good and evil, must first be an annihilator and break values. Thus the highest evil belongs to the greatest goodness: but this is—being creative.” (Thus Spoke Zarathustra, II, 34.)

It is also important that Nietzsche acted, through his character Zarathustra, as the Prophet of the Superman. He saw that his own people-Europeans, but more especially Germans, were in the process of becoming supermen and correctly stated the Superman would arise out of them. Arise he did in the form of the annihilator of Christianity and the creator of the New Order Adolf Hitler. It is also noteworthy that Nietzsche proclaimed himself as The Antichrist. As Nietzsche wrote in Ecce Homo: “You highest men whom my eyes have seen, this is my doubt about you and my secret laughter: I guess that you would call my overman—devil.”

How accurately that describes the Western Christian civilization in its modern (and final) stage. Hitler, the Superman, the Antichrist, is branded as the most evil man who ever lived for overcoming Christian values on a large scale.

To include some of my personal life story, I first became introduced to National Socialism through what came to be called National Socialist Black Metal (NSBM), a type of degenerate rock music. In the early 1990’s numerous Black Metal bands, particular those in the Nordic countries, began to introduce NS into their music due to its association with Evil as they were Satanic bands. Varg Vikernes was one of the pioneers in this respect. Many of them believed in the false Hollywood version of Nazism, but were attracted to it because its Nietzschean revaluation of all values made sense in their combat against Christianity (Black Metal is extremely anti-Christian). So they used the Swastika and integrated the pagan aspects of NS with Satanism. Eventually many of them replaced Satan with Wotan/Odin and The Antichrist with Hitler. So I read about Adolf Hitler being described as The Beast 666 from the Book of Revelation in the Bible and I began to embrace Nazism from then (2005) onward.

This embrace of Hitler as an anti-Christian figure was done earlier by, among others, the American white prison gang the Aryan Brotherhood. The Aryan Brotherhood formed in San Quentin Prison in California in the 1960’s in response to the aggressive attacks coming from Negroes who had formed their own prison gang the Black Guerrilla Family. During the 1960’s Black militancy was widespread across the USA with many riots carried out by niggers across the country throughout the decade. This race war was magnified inside integrated prisons in the US. A quote from a book on this racial war reads:

The racial turmoil in the world outside prison, where fires were burning in Watts, Detroit, and Chicago, was magnified in San Quentin. Blacks and whites were stabbing one another, not because of anything anyone had done, but simply because of their skin color. “Your hate was at peak” Scott recalled. “Your adrenaline was at a peak, everything was at a peak level all the time. It was like a jungle. You’d get yourself fired up, so by the time the cell doors opened, you’d be ready. You’d have a whole head of steam. You didn’t have time to analyze or rationalize or philosophize, you just got strapped (got yourself a knife) and went out of your cell and did what you had to.

So while misled, traitorous white youth outside prison were embracing Negroes as their “black brothers” the reality inside prison was hatred and race war. The Aryan Brotherhood used the symbol of the Swastika with 666 imposed on it to, according to one member, signify that they stood in complete opposition to the values of Christianity, and instead embraced paganism and pagan morality which had been demonised as ‘Satanism’ as well as Nazism which was also demonised as evil.

Simply put, in American prisons it is impossible for White Men to live according to anti-racist Christian morality. Prison populations are segregated by race and many white males who have been brainwashed anti-racists have suddenly come into contact with the stark reality of Nature when thrown into prison. One sticks with their own kind and the morality is fully anti-Christian. Those who have the highest kill counts rise to the top. Those who won’t fight or kill are turned into bitches and sexual toys for Negroes. Hence, White Men in US prisons tattoo themselves with symbols of their race like the Swastika as well as Germanic runes etc. Prison is one of the only places I can think of where White Men are still somewhat manly, and then that is only because they cannot escape fighting with their racial enemies.

Another thing I remember about NSBM was that The Holocaust was looked at as a Satanic genocide against God’s chosen people. That Aryans were the evil race and were genociding the holy race of the Jews. This interpretation is also upheld by Christians who say things like The Holocaust was an attack on God himself and an evil attempt to wipe out the Jews to prevent the Second Coming of Jesus. Of course it’s all rubbish as the Holocaust never happened but I just thought I’d include these lines of thinking to demonstrate this alternative perspective on WWII.

So in conclusion, yes today it is not Satan which rules the modern West for that would mean the spirit of Hitler had won over that of Christ. Instead it is the son of Yahweh Jesus Christ (who is the embodiment of the Jew as he is the ultimate deceiver) whose spirit fully dominates the white race and will soon achieve final victory if Aryans become extinct.

12 Comments

  1. Your post corroborates everything I’ve said about the collapse.

    Just as white prisoners have to grow a par or die, in the post-crashed-dollar US whites will have to grow them or perish. This is why I am an optimist.

    The American Alt-Righters who are afraid to become vicious or mean, in the post-collapse US will be culled off. Pure Darwinism. No more porcelain guns. Either you have a real one and use it if necessary or you die. (Recently I acquired a sabre and have it sharpened but I’ll need a gun for home protection. )

  2. Obviously, I am not a Satanist. I am trying to take over the preconciliar Catholic Church. However, a few observations.

    ‘Satya’ in Sanskrit ,the sacred Aryan language, means “truth.” The Jews hate truth. The Jews, for instance, hate the truth of Holocaust denialism and criminalise it where they can. The truth is no defence.

    In witchcraft, the arms of the cross are blasphemously broken. In a sense, the Swastika is a Christian cross with all four arms broken. The broken idol of Golgatha.

    In Catholicism, Satan is kicked out of heaven for upholding the natural law. Satan, an angel, refused to adore his natural inferiors, the human Jesus and Mary. Satan had “pride” – the worst sin, and the root of all other sins in Christian Theology – in his Natural superiority to Rabbi Yeshua and “the proliferous ever-virgin mother of 8 children” as Whelass put it. We white Nationalists refuse to adore our Natural Inferiors: Trannies, blacks and Jews, and we are demonized and kicked out of polite society because of it.

    • myth. where is the empirical evidence, independently corroborated and statistically accumulated supporting your satan hypothesis? your time is better served in the present, doing daily house chores, than evangelizing utter nonsense.

      ps,
      and while i’m on the subject of hypotheses, i much prefer yukon jack’s “How the Anunnaki Created the White Race” hypotheses to the bible’s. because it weaves the narrative that the aryan’s are the pinnacle genetically engineered man and the rest mortally hate the white man as such. (which earth’s history of the jews’ forever warring and their yahweh war god’s forever directives to kill everything that moves) more likely supports.

    • A polite question, did you bugger a child any time in your church ? or got erection while sniffing his underpants.

      I was told that every christian gets high when he sniffs the underpants of children, how is the ceremony of childs sodomy done in your church

      • @Devan,

        A person who would even ask that and describe such a detailed scenario is suspicious.

        I haven’t been to the Novus-Ordo “Mass” in 10 years. The last time that I saw a traddyland priest I told him to fuck off. This was 2014.

        If you read Kirksville today, I am constantly calling out paedophilia in Catholicism.

        I also call out paedophilia in the Bible.

        I find praying in Classical Latin a good mental exercise.

        I don’t hang out with traditional Catholics on a day-to-day basis. They hate me anyway. I am “home alone.”

        However, Catholicism taught me Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Church History, Mathematics, self-control. I want to take it over for worldly purposes. Such an Institution would be great in the hands of white nationalists.

  3. “the proliferous ever-virgin mother of 8 children” as Whelass put it.

    The reference above is to Joseph Wheless, not “Whelass.” By far, Mr. Wheless presents the most convincing proof ever written, exposing and condemning Biblical lies and inaccuracies. (I got my copy for a couple of dollars) By definition, the Torah is a book of legal instruction. So who better than a lawyer to dissect the lies therein.

    With surgical precision of the mind instilled by legal training, Wheless eviscerates the sickening, twisted, putrid entrails of Bible myth. Yet how many know his name or bring forth his writing as proof of why the Bible has no logical connection with the perceived (un)reality of its adherents?

    Traditional methods of appealing to logic and reason will never successfully alter or bring the Christian religion into question among its adherents. Wheless’ magnificent 1925 treatise, Is it God’s Word? provides ample proof of that fact.

    Clarification is required before continuing, The word “Satan,” is translated as “opposition,” (“enemy”) while “Devil” or “Diablo” is translated as “accuser/slanderer.”

    Of all the Satan’s (i.e. enemies) that the Jews have ever faced, the greatest was Adolf Hitler.

    Here one finds a very mortal adversary instead of some ephemeral, mythical Jewish figure, with horns and pitchfork, that dances on one’s shoulder to whisper “evil” into their ear.

    Satan had “pride” – the worst sin, and the root of all other sins in Christian Theology

    Pride is a very human emotion, one of man’s seven deadly sins. Interestingly, both the “God” and “Satan” of the Jews are depicted as having very human characteristics. Perhaps that is why there is an angel dancing on the other shoulder of the Jews’ religious victims.

    The question is, if Satan is depicted as having very human traits, who then is the first century “Hitler” with the power to tempt Jesus by offering him “the world” of the Jews, i.e. Jerusalem and first century Judea?

    Who is the “enemy,” the “adversary,” the “accuser,” “slanderer,” “opposition” Jesus rebukes throughout the Gospels? Obviously, it was not the Romans because they are never described, or referred to, in the Bible as being “satanic” in nature.

    Who in the first century would have had the power of a “Hitler,” who would have been the Satanic “opposition” the devilish accuser, slanderer of first century Judea?

    Who is your enemy? Whom do you rail against on this website? Whom do you consider the most destructive element in the world today? The Jews’ organized religion with its churches and temples! It was no different in first century Judea. It was the Jews’ organized religion then, as it is the Jews’ organized religion today, that is the enemy of mankind.

    Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat.

    Non-sense! Scribes and Pharisees did not sit in “Moses seat,” a term that denotes the leaderships’ legal authority over Temple Jews. It was the Sadducee, the Temple priests that officially held the tribal authority of “Moses seat,” not the note-taking, secretarial scribes that merely transcribed the words of law, nor the Pharisee lawyers of the day that argued the law; it was the legal authority held by the Sadducee priesthood that condemned Jesus to death.

    All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders

    Who had the authority to “bind?” Only Temple priests had the power to “bind” one to sacrificial law. First century Jews were legally bound to Temple law and its sacrificial system by their priests. Only those priests could exonerate one from their sins or condemn their citizens with the proclamation of death.

    And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi. But be not ye called Rabbi.

    .

    Pharisees were sort of a “citizens patrol,” whose “lawyers” sought the higher authority wielded by priestly judges.

    Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

    Once again, one finds scribes and Pharisee taking the brunt of the blame for the crimes of the Temple priests, as only the Temple could take legal ownership of a widow’s house after the death of the husband. Note that women in first century Judea had no legal rights and therefore could not own property. Therefore, lacking a male representative, the Temple’s legal authorities, the priests, had the power to assume legal ownership of a widow’s property. With Jews, it has always been about sanctifying their bogus law in the eyes of the people.

    Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

    There can only be one “house” made by this reference – the Temple. The Temple held the one religion, the one “god,” ruled by priestly authority that made sacrificial law binding onto the people. It is the Temple left desolate by corruption.

    Sounds just like the Christian church doesn’t it? In fact, as made obvious in Catherine Nixey’s book, the early Catholic Church and its priests wielded the very same power over their people as first century as Temple held over its followers.

    The Catholic church was naught but a mirrored-image offshoot of the original Temple, holding the very same power over life and death as the one that condemned Jesus to death. Christians merely removed the blood sacrifice and why not, as it had already become archaic by the first century. By then money had become the Jews’ new god as evidenced by references to the Temple’s gold and Jesus’ attack on the Temple’s money changers.

    Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!

    Thus money, of which a percentage was demanded by religious law, had replaced the archaic system of blood sacrifice, established centuries before by the primitive Tabernacle. This passage clearly indicates it is not the Temple’s religion, but the gold in Temple coffers that held the real power, i.e. debt creation.

    Gold and its power was property of the Temple and its priests, not the scribes and Pharisee. It was the Temple’s power to create debt that held the people in subservience to the Temple. Was it any different in Wiemar Germany? Is it any different with the Jews’ Federal Reserve central bank today?

    Obviously, Gospel authors, ether because of fear or ignorance, intentionally or unintentionally confused and obfuscated the Temple’s power structure. It should be just as obvious it was the Temple and its entire structure, including scribes and Pharisee as well as the priests, that were oppositional, “adversarial,” to Jesus. It was the Temple that was the Satanic “enemy” Jesus preached against, even as the Christian Church is the adversary now exposed and railed against on this website.

    Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

    Is there a better description of the deceitful, lying, murdering, greedy, avaricious Jew? Elite Jews and their organized religion were the “Satanic” enemy of Jesus in the first century and the Jews’ organized religions are still the “Satanic” enemy today.

    • @Cesar,

      Correction noted.

      If you type in ‘Wheless,’ into Google, my articles on Kirksville Today show up first.

      I am popularizing the great infidels as much as you are. Indeed, it was me who introduced you to Catherine Nixey and Richard Carrier.

      • You are responding to A.S.

      • Sorry, Cesar.

        @arch Stanton.

        I was reading a National Satanist blogpost on the web archive.

        Lucifer was Alexander the Great.

        That “Satan” who offered Christ all the Kingdoms of the World might have been Alexander the Great.

        “slanderer.”

        ‘Dia-‘ in Greek means ‘apart,’ and ‘bola,’ means ‘to throw.’ Hence, the ‘diabolus,’ to use Ecclesiastical Latin, “throws out stories that stand apart from the truth.” The Devil throws out lies so as to accuse the brethren.

        The Jewsmedia, who slander white men every moment of every day are thus diabolical. They are slanderers.

      • Alexander the Great – Alexander III of Macedon 356BC – 323BC

        Jesus – 4BC – 33AD (give or take a few years.)

        This would have to have been a magical, mystical event for someone who died well over three hundred years before the individual he ostensibly influenced was even born. I never have been one for magic and mysticism. The physical principals of the world in which we presently exist is the same as the world in which man has always existed. The only thing that changes is the way man perceives his existence and its relationship to his world.

        Ancient man believed weather was an act of god. Well maybe, but the fact is the “gods” have always functioned within a framework of immutable, unchanging physical laws (Thank god for that!) Thus, by man’s understanding of these laws, he can now foresee, and to a certain extent, predict weather patterns. Of course, the new wrinkle is man’s increasing ability to influence weather patterns by use of various man-made devices that also function within the same physical framework.

        There are things that lie beyond man’s physical senses, things that lie far beyond man’s comprehension. However, since that is the case why waste time trying to fathom the unfathomable or tying to ascribe certain features to what cannot be understood?

        Man demands explanations. When those explanations cannot be conveniently found, man makes up his own versions that satisfy his expectations. Other men, greedy for wealth and power, soon learned they could make up their own explanations that would satisfy man’s innate craving to understand his world, allowing power over those searching for answers. That is what religion is all about, the comfortable assuaging of man’s ignorance and fears. The priests said, “look no further, for we know god and can explain his mysteries!” for a price of course.

        The first principal of religion is to separate man from god, for if man has god, then what need has he for priests or their services? By separating man from god, priests created anxiety over man’s natural longing to unite with his source, “god” if you will. By inserting themselves as spokesmen between man and his god, priests are able to manipulate men to do things that would otherwise be against their fundamental nature. The priests accomplish this by hiding behind a veil of ignorance and bellowing out “god’s words” to their believers. Thus, religion is nothing more than a powerful control mechanism for greedy, power hungry men.

        To be sure, there are priests that do not understand the true nature of the system they serve. Men who truly believe the lies other men of higher status tell them, but those lies cannot alter facts that cannot be denied once the eyes have been opened. Some of these men eventually come to realize they have been had. Finding they have been deceived by the liars, they fall away from religion, moving on to other matters more in tune with the real world in which they exist.

        A few go in search of the truth denied them by the priesthood and are never heard from again. Others, fewer still, undertake the monumental task of working to help free their brethren from the lies told by the priests. These men try telling others they have no need for priests or religions. Since god is already within man, there is no need for priestly intercession to unite with god.

        Such rare men, with names like Jesus, Rumi, Siddhartha, have been revered throughout history for their efforts to free man from his “demons” of belief. Unfortunately, greedy priests soon found ways to alter their teachings, twisting and subverting the truths of these teachings back to beliefs that once again served the priests’ own avaricious ends.

        Like the cargo cultistof the South Pacific, modern religious adherents continue ceremonial practices whose function they fail to understand. Ceremonies like the cannibalistic Eucharist, actually a mockery of the practices of the Temple priests’ ceremonial sacrifice of the Paschal lamb. Or the baptism that originally served to cleanse man of carefully delineated sins on a cyclical basis; a ceremony for which priests charged. Other, now empty ceremonies were once practical exercises specifically tailored for a time, place and culture. The whirling of the Dervishes is such an exercise that outlived its time and functional design to become religious ceremony.

        Because the Cargo Cult diverted people from productive and rewarding activities it was discouraged by the authorities. In New Guinea, the Australian authorities enlisted the aid of the son of a famous warrior to discourage the Cargo Cult. He was effective and as a reward the Australians gave him a trip to Sydney. While in Sydney, this man visited an anthropological museum. There he saw the sacred cult objects of his people on display. When the man returned to New Guinea, he spread the word that the source of the Australians power was that they had stolen the sacred art of his people and built a temple to house it. A new cult developed around this idea.

        Like automatons empty of reason, religious patrons go through the motions, observing their religion’s holidays and solemn ceremonies, never understanding the original motives or intent behind the ceremonies they practice. What is most incredible however, is how religious Christians can rationally view the cargo cultist, saying, “How primitive! How could people ever believe such obvious nonsense?” How indeed.

  4. On Satanism. The Antichrist is not Satanist. The Satanist simply hears what the Christian says, and goes 180 degrees the opposite way. Thus remaining entrapped in the latter’s worldview.

    The only Antichrist is racist. Because the ultimate motive of Christianity is establishing peace among the races. The Antichrist brings war, adherence to your own race. Striking at the notion of equality of [non-existing] souls is the truest possible anti-Christianity!

    On Nature. Christians say the JEW has created Nature, that Nature is subservient to the JEW, that the JEW will remake it in his image. On the contrary, the Antichrist posits that Nature encompasses the JEW, Nature will triumph over the JEW and will be better for it. The Antichrist affirms the supremacy of Beauty & Order over the nihilism and hatred of all that is of the JEW.

  5. We are that which is diametrically opposed to the Magian demiurge in the Kali Yuga, and in that regard we are indeed what you could designate as “satanic”.

    2/26/2019


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: