Adunai vs. Morgan

An icon depicting Emperor Constantine, accompanied by the bishops of the First Council of Nicaea (325), holding the Creed of 381.

I’ve been watching the recent discussion between Adunai and Robert Morgan in the comments section of The Unz Review. Morgan seems to hold a classic view of Christianity: the one I held before reading a conservative Swede in Gates of Vienna. Now I see that Christianity is not just its dogmatic part, let’s say, what we who were Catholics used to hear during the Creed on Sundays:

I believe in one God, the Father Almighty,
maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible:
And in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only-begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all;
God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God;
begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father,
by whom all things were made;
who for us men and for our salvation descended from heaven.
[Etcetera.]

The above is the dogmatic part that not all westerners believe now. But Christianity is also the axiological part, what we have been calling Christian ethics. And from this angle westerners continue to be Christians. As Adunai summed it up in his discussion with Morgan: Christianity, in essence, means not the number of priests ordained: but the number of niggers loved.

This means that secular, atheist or agnostic whites continue to be Christians. It doesn’t matter that they have left behind the dogmatic side of Christianity, the Credo quoted above. The axiological part of Christianity (secular neochristianity I call it) is today in its red giant phase: incinerating, with its suicidal ethics, the nations that used to be traditional Christian.

It was not Darwin, or the revolution of ideas that started 1789, as Morgan seems to believe, what marks real apostasy. Adunai is right that Hitler was the first one who tried to transvalue Christian values back to pagan times (see also our ongoing translation of Savitri Devi’s book). This is our litmus test: If you are willing to do something similar to the Nazis’ Master Plan East, then you have left Christianity behind.

Otherwise you’re a fucking neochristian.

Published in: on September 5, 2021 at 11:36 am  Comments (5)  

5 Comments

  1. Reblogged this on Adûnâi and commented:
    > “Christianity in essence, means”

    Here Chechar again slanders me – I never put a comma between the subject and the predicate! And until the sodomites banned me from Paediwikia for homophobia, I was removing such commas there as well wherever I went.

    This is actually a poignant point. The Russian language is unwieldy, both in orthography/spelling and in punctuation, and Russians neglect their rules all the time. Whereas Anglophones have always impressed me in that they write like machines, exactly the same and with no mistakes – only the kids and the niggers can be confused at times by such cases as its/it’s, your/you’re and they’re/their/there. And of course, in the more arcane aspects of English such as the split infinitive (not to do vs to not do) and “I saw you[r] walking”.

    Aside from the comma between the subject and the predicate, that is. I have no idea why this is such a huge issue for the Anglophones.

    …Yes, the Red Giant article by Conservative Swede from the 2000s was an eye-opener for me. The strong are considered evil – it’s that simple! It’s that stupid! Take that, Marxists, counting economic power.

    The Red Giant

    Even worse, the Christian Aryans worship weakness, and are actively trying to lose. Just like the GKChP in 1991 – had all the power to execute the traitor Gorbachev, chose to cuck in during their own coup d’état instead! And in America, capitalism always took a secondary place to Christian love – an anti-racist efficient civilisation would still not try actively to undermine their own lawful and high-IQ population stock.

    > “Otherwise you’re a fucking neochristian.”

    I actually never asked myself whether Dr. Robert Morgan is a Hitlerian (he’s racist, and that’s enough to me). But now I do wonder how his efficient Marxist civilisation can conquer planet Earth. With the strength of its ideas? Hilarious. Genocide is far easier, efficient and lasting.

    • > ‘Here Chechar again slanders me – I never put a comma between the subject and the predicate!’

      I never put quotation marks, which means that I was not quoting but rephrasing you.

      (Incidentally, in my recent lessons of German I could not make sense of the way commas are use in German: more common than in English and in places I’d never had expected a comma.)

  2. “The worst blow which Christianity ever took against us has been the blow against ancestors and ancestor worship”
    ~ Heinrich Himmler, Institut für Zeitgeschichte Mikrofilmarchiv 311 (18 February 1937: Tölz).

    • Christianity speaks of entering an afterlife, regardless of race, blood, hereditary and ancestry. The present day liberals are trying their utmost best to make the christian heaven an earthly reality by creating a egalitarian raceless utopia. The main difference between christians and liberals is that christians are realizing and fullfilling this “kumbaya” universal utopia in the here-after and “divine” or “spirtual” realm, not on this rock floating in space called Earth.

  3. The term ‘axiology’ is related to the Latin word: ‘agō’ which means: ‘to drive‘, ‘to conduct’.

    If you imagine the scales of justice; the scales of ethics, then Christianity is, etymologically, the driving force which balances the scales.

    Artificial Intelligence algorithms, time and time again class blacks as non humans; as animals; as apes as AI has not been affected by Christian axiology. AI has never heard of soul equality.

    If we whites were never infected with Christianity, we would not class blacks as humans. We would class them as a pest; a hostile species of apes. A species in competition with us for our white women.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: