Robert Morgan’s comment

This idea, pervasive on the right, that white people can’t defend themselves is a pet peeve of mine. Granted, there would be penalties for doing so, but they could be a race of Brenton Tarrants if they wanted to be. The truth is, nobody is responsible for white compliance with the culture of political correctness but white people. White people invented this culture of totalitarian control and worship of the Other. They enforce it and inflict it on themselves. The idolization of the Jew Jesus is the prototype for 2000 years of it. For what was and is Christianity but worship of the racial Other? During the Christian takeover of Western civilization almost every vestige of what preceded was intentionally destroyed by the fanatic devotees of the crucified rabbi. Temples to the gods were demolished, pagan philosophers were tortured and murdered, whole libraries consigned to flames, and—the ultimate in “de-platforming”—even the possession of pagan literature was declared a capital offense.

That these totalitarian trends again visible in the modern world continue and arguably even originate from America, a country founded by Christian religious fanatics, does not surprise me, nor should it surprise anyone. Americans have their own history of worship of the racial Other. They fought a Civil War over it, the point of which was to elevate the negro to a status equal to themselves, as shown by the subsequent passage of amendments to the Constitution granting him citizenship and the vote. A big part of this was again driven by religious mania, notably white and Christian.

So, “Whites do not enjoy these same privileges, …”? I don’t buy it. They have all the privileges they allow themselves. The only thing keeping them in check is their own unwillingness to act in their own defense. Throwing off two thousand years of religious nuttery and prostration before the racial Other isn’t going to be easy. It will take a cultural revolution, and can’t happen without lots of bloodshed and tears. But possible? Yes.

Fuck white nationalism!

Or:

On American schizophrenics

See what American racists are saying this Easter: — ‘Be kind. Love one another. Go to church or read the Bible’ (Occidental Dissent). — ‘Christ is Risen!’ (The Daily Stormer). — ‘This Easter Sunday we need to go back to church’ (Adam Piggott). — ‘The Promise of Easter’ (The Political Cesspool). — ‘Dr. Duke and Mark Collett on Taking Christ Out of Easter’ (David Duke). — ‘Happy Easter, in Spite of the Christophobia-inspired Spring Bunny’ (VDARE). — By referring to ‘god’, just before Easter while speaking about Notre Dame, Jared Taylor inadvertently was referring to the god of the Jews that his silly parents taught him in Japan.

With schizophrenics such as them and many others, who fancy they’re doing some work to save the Aryan but still worship the god of the Jews, no wonder why whites will go extinct. Look, in this Alt-Right aggregator, how most of these folks with split personalities didn’t pay yesterday any homage to Adolf Hitler on the 130th anniversary of his birth. Instead, they pay homage to the Big Jew, who didn’t exist by the way!

I won’t add any post tomorrow to give new visitors a chance to ponder on the main texts of this site:

The masthead of this site

The Hellstorm Holocaust

WN is a farce, NS is the real thing

 

______ 卐 ______

 

 

Fuck white nationalism!

Fuck American southern nationalism!

Eternal glory to our eternal Führer!

 

Robert Morgan’s comment

Seeing whites as a helpless victims of “outside forces” is self-defeating, since if whites aren’t masters of their own destiny, then what hope can there be? The truth is whites created political correctness and willingly accede to its main tenets. Racial and sexual equality have very deep roots in the Christian religion, and today all of the mainstream Christian churches subscribe to “politically correct” doctrine.

Some say these churches no longer represent “real” Christianity, but this isn’t persuasive, since for two thousand years, Christians have been arguing about who the “real” Christians are. Also arguing against its imposition by an outside force is the fact that the vast majority of whites approve of racial and sexual equality, keep voting for it, and keep voting for representatives who make laws and policy based on it. They decry racism and have spilt a lot of their own blood to prove it, e.g. in the American Civil War and in WWII.

Christianity has been a very good religion with which to found a global empire, but its universalism and its obsessive concern with an imaginary afterlife makes it a very poor religion for the preservation of race.

Published in: on April 19, 2019 at 12:01 am  Comments (3)  

European civilisation’s foe

Yesterday a blogger posted an article, ‘The burning of Notre Dame’ on his WordPress site that Counter-Currents republished today. I would like to take issue with its first paragraph:

As news spread of the fire consuming the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, the first reaction of most people was shock and sadness. You don’t have to be Catholic or French to feel as if some part of you has been lost. That was not just an old building or a historically important place. It was a symbol of Western civilization. Stand inside a great church and you feel the awe and power that inspired the builders. That cathedral was the primal roar of a people celebrating their creator and the essence of who they were as a people.

I am sorry, but Notre Dame was not ‘a symbol of Western civilisation’, but of Western Christian civilisation. Big difference, as explained in one of the essays, excerpted on this site under the title ‘The Red Giant’, that moved me to start a blogging career.

In ‘The Red Giant’ the term ‘Western Christian civilization’ is repeated twenty-eight times, in contrast to ‘European civilization’. As the author put it:

It’s the Western Christian civilization that feeds all these processes (population explosion etc.). So the Western Christian civilization is in fact the worst enemy of what I call European civilization: another reason for wanting the Western Christian civilization to go away.

Even sophisticated intellectuals of the Alt-Right cannot see the difference between Western Christian civilisation and European civilisation, the latter so beautifully expressed in the sculpture of Apollo or in the immense temple of Artemis in Ephesus, one of the Seven Wonders that I would call the Notre Dame of the Ancient World. In fact, not even Lord Clark himself, the author of the 1969 TV series Civilisation, could distinguish between the two.

Robert Morgan’s comment

“There was a Christian alliance which defended Europe from Ottoman/Muslim onslaught.”

Because Christianity is congenitally anti-racist, any Christian alliance that defends race defends it only accidentally, not as the main point of the alliance. Christians in those days would have been glad to accept Muslims as their Christian brothers and intermarry with them if they had agreed to convert. Some of them did. See Shakespeare’s play Othello for a literary depiction of this.

This is shown in another way by the nowadays little-acknowledged fact that Christianity first expanded to the east before it went west and conquered Europe. Christianity penetrated as far as India and China before many of these outposts were overrun by the Muslim onslaught centuries later. So there never was any racial barrier as far as Christianity was concerned.

My point stands. Christianity is anti-racist, and anti-racism is obviously toxic to the continued existence of the white race, because it encourages race mixing and hence its extinction.

Published in: on April 17, 2019 at 10:35 am  Comments (2)  

Robert Morgan’s comment

“So Christianity is responsible for the rise of the current progressive ideology that sees all nonwhites as victims of omnipresent white supremacy (a.k.a. critical race theory)? I didn’t realize that the Frankfurt School was full of bible-thumpers.”

I’m sure it’s only one of a great many things you haven’t realized.

“All Communist systems in the West are in fact derived from Christian theological thought… Christian theology is the grandmother of Bolshevism.” – Oswald Spengler, in The Hour of Decision.

This is equally true of so-called cultural Marxism. It’s not at all surprising that a civilization shaped by Christianity, given that religion’s obsessive concern with and championing of the underdog, should give rise to something of the sort. It’s even happened before, and with no Jewish involvement, unless Christianity itself is conceded to be a Jewish influence.

The American abolitionists of the nineteenth century are a paradigm case. Their fanatic Christian “virtue” led them into America’s bloodiest war, rending their nation apart, all in order to lift up the negro and place him on parity with whites. Back then, that was the ultimate in being anti-white supremacy.

It’s very interesting to me that you, evidently a garden variety anti-Semite, want to defend Christianity, a destructive product of Jews just as much as the Frankfurt School ever was, or even more so. How do you explain your double standard? Or are you one of those lunatics who claim that Jesus and the apostles were all white men?

Published in: on April 16, 2019 at 9:54 am  Comments (13)  

Bad messages in Game of Thrones

In past years I have talked about the bad messages in previous seasons of Game of Thrones. In the first episode of the last season we see, once again, the masculine and aggressive female Yara Greyjoy that even hits his brother, the castrated Theon, when he rescues her. In the history of the West the norm has not been astute warrior women like Yara and silly and timid brothers like Theon, but on TV the goal is to invert the values. (Cersei Lannister, pic above, is another queen instead of her brother Jaime Lannister who is no king at all.)

I have said that white nationalism errs by calling this subversion ‘cultural Marxism’, a rather superficial term. Instead, I have been referring to subversion as ‘neo-Christianity’, in the sense that Christianity is an extension of the Jewish problem into the minds of whites. But even my term is inaccurate inasmuch as, throughout Christendom, men and women were not represented as in Game of Thrones, nor in modern times until the last decades. (I remember as if yesterday the first movie that reversed the roles of man-woman: Alien, which I saw on the big screen in 1979.)

Thus, more accurate than the term neo-Christianity is ‘neo-Franciscanism’, as St. Francis (1181–1226) was the saint who tried most to take the message of the gospel in all its purity into the real world.

Today this neo-Franciscanism is largely a secular phenomenon—think of Sweden for example—, although Pope Francis also wants to follow St. Francis’ steps, as explained in my last post about the humble man of Assisi.

MacDonald’s failure

by Robert Morgan

“The Catholic Church and other Christians were bamboozled into accepting the integration of the races…”

This idea that whites don’t know what they’re doing is malicious. Once you assume that whites have no responsibility for their own actions, the battle is lost.

Cultural pressure is intimidating, but no external force compels whites to act as they do, or have the culture that they do. It wasn’t Jews who launched and fought the American Civil War, or who freed the negro slaves and made them citizens, the legal equals of whites. Nor was Jewish control of mass media necessary to achieve that result. America was virtually 100% white and Christian at the time.

They weren’t bamboozled into anything. Denial of the importance of race flows very naturally from the basic tenets of Christianity.

“Christianity was cucked in recent times, and prior to the cucking it was the single and only cohesive group strategy that we had, as Kevin Macdonald has observed in his brilliant work.”

It can be argued that whites (i.e. Europeans) cucked when they accepted Christianity from Jews (i.e. non-whites), as Kevin MacDonald has failed to observe in his rather stupid books. MacDonald tries to pass his theories off as science, yet if Jews and whites are competitors locked in Darwinian struggle as he claims, haven’t they always been so? And if so, what does it say about Christianity? Letting the enemy draw up your game plan isn’t a wise decision.

Nietzsche and others drew the obvious conclusion that Christianity itself was the original subversion. MacDonald’s failure to address this issue of Christianity-as-subversion is a fatal flaw in his so-called scholarship.

Published in: on April 13, 2019 at 12:02 am  Comments (10)  

Robert Morgan’s comment

Pro-white racism has always, ever since the founding of the USA, been only a minor theme of white America. Far more important to it has been wealth, power, and growth of empire. Yes, you had white supremacy as in race-based slavery, but you also had America’s most costly war fought to abolish it and establish citizenship for the negro and grant him legal equality with whites. Yes, you had the Naturalization Act of 1790 which specified whites only as qualified for naturalization, but you also had many non-whites who became citizens in ways other than being naturalized (for example many non-whites became citizens automatically when Texas was added to the Union). Even at the time of the ratification of the Constitution free negroes were allowed to vote in several of the states. So the country as a whole has never been explicitly racist. Largely this is due to Christianity having shaped its culture.

The ideal of racial equality is built into the Christian worldview, as are many other racially harmful ideas. White pride? Look into what the Bible says about pride. Nothing good. The Bible preaches the opposite, humility and meekness. The cult of the victim? Jesus is the ultimate victim, the archetype. People only began seeing virtue in being a victim because of his example. God is love? What does that make you, if you hate negroes? It means you are against God. The Christian worldview acts against white survival in all kinds of ways. It not only inhibits a proper response, but it actively encourages race suicide.

Because a final solution to the racial problem necessarily involves transgressions against Christianity’s moral strictures, it’s obvious that nothing effective can or will be done until that morality is eradicated. White survival will take a cultural revolution, and the political organizing you’re calling for can’t and won’t take place until that’s accomplished.

Anti-Galilean quote

Since you are a Roman Catholic, you believe that Jesus is God, that Yahweh is God and that the Holy Spirit is God.

Which means that you believe that Yahweh and Jesus represent the same exact entity, the same power, will, being, essence—just and only in a different form.

That means that every time you read about Yahweh in the Old Testament—you could simply change his name to Jesus because, whatever Yahweh did, Jesus would do exactly in the same fashion since he is the exact same entity.

Axe of Perun

Published in: on April 6, 2019 at 9:07 am  Comments (7)