Is Kevin MacDonald a charlatan?

by Robert Morgan

Kevin MacDonald is more or less a charlatan who, by exclusively focusing on Jews, is unable to explain a great deal of self-destructive white racial behavior. For example, in his magnum opus The Culture of Critique, he confines his analysis to the twentieth century without considering what went before, so naturally a distorted picture results. He neglects to even note in passing that in the nineteenth century, an America nearly 100% white and Christian, in the grip of a religious mania, tore itself in two in order to free their negro slaves and grant them full citizenship and the vote.

All the rest of the racial disaster that has unfolded since then has only been a matter of living up to commitments written in the ocean of white blood shed in that conflict.

It would seem that almost the only way to explain this behavior in the absence of a “hostile elite” (trade mark) is to say that Christianity itself from the beginning has been a Jewish plot to undermine the white race; and indeed, some (Nietzsche, Revilo Oliver, and others) have taken this tack. For MacDonald, this isn’t a satisfactory alternative though, since that would entail giving credit to Jews for white civilizational accomplishments (or at least, what MacDonald considers accomplishments) during the period of Christendom’s expansion. It would amount to admitting that there’s been a symbiosis between whites and Jews that has been at times beneficial to whites.

Because he tries to view everything through this distorting lens of cultural conflict between Jews and whites, and to scrupulously avoid indicting Christianity, he has to come up with absurdities like “pathological altruism”, and white “guilt”, which supposedly the Jews are able to manipulate and direct outside of white control. He sees these psychological mechanisms as rooted in genetic difference between the races, yet is unable to explain why pre-Christian or non-Christian societies never suffered from such problems. Ancient Rome even had plenty of powerful Jews and didn’t; nor, at least until after the Christian takeover, did it have a “hostile elite”.
 

______ 卐 ______

 
Editor’s Note:

I placed a quotation mark after the title only because I believe that MacDonald is still useful when trying to debunk the lunatic fringe in white nationalism. (See, for example, what I responded here to a regular visitor who literally considers Jews as non-human, demonic entities.)

Don’t miss my point

The following was my today’s comment on yesterday’s thread, ‘Night King theme’. It still surprises me that visitors don’t get what I have been trying to say about the Game of Thrones phenomenon, whose finale millions watched on Sunday, a week ago.

______ 卐 ______

 
But don’t miss my point.

Whites are stupid. Jews are right: they’re just cattle and behave like cattle:

Linder is wrong. He believes that by solving the JP everything will be automatically all right. But he has not answered why, sans Jews, Iberian whites screwed big time in the Americas by polluting their blood, or why the Yankees fought for Lincoln against ‘evil’ racists, again sans Jewish press.

Whites (cattle) need a Fourth Reich so that the mythmakers will use (as Hitler dreamt) Germanic sagas to feed the proles instead of Judeo-Christian myths. Yes: prolefeed for the proles but with good messages; good stories instead of a show directed by two kikes and whose novels were authored by an extremely liberal goy.

Again: don’t miss the point of my dozen posts about the Game of Thrones craze. We need good stories. We need a sort of Game of Thrones TV show for mass consumption but this time directed by priests of the 14 words.

Published in: on May 26, 2019 at 10:54 am  Comments (8)  

Robert Morgan’s comment

Jerry Attrick: To anyone curious—you cannot go wrong with The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald if you want to know more.

Robert Morgan: Actually, you can. By focusing exclusively on Jews, MacDonald suggests that other causes of cultural developments are unimportant.

Yet American whites advanced the negro to citizenship and legal equality with themselves even before mass Jewish immigration began, and when the country was virtually 100% white and Christian.

Given such a history, subsequent developments in the 20th century would likely have followed sooner or later even without Jewish agitation.

Published in: on April 7, 2019 at 12:11 pm  Comments (1)  

On accusing commenters of being Jews

Today Arch Stanton said that Jack Halliday is probably a Jew (link: here). A few months ago he said the same about Spahn Ranch, another respectable commenter of this site. In that April (link: here) Stanton wrote:

I note your tone is considerably different than the “Spahn Ranch” that presented a civil war battle flag juxtaposed with a portion of the national socialist flag as his avatar. Do I detect a Jew troll hiding behind an identity theft? How typical of the cowardly Jew.

What had ignited the flaming was a monocausal comment by Stanton (link: here):

Considering Jews are the sole force behind the social programming that has led to the nihilistic, suicidal bent of the white race, how can the problem with whites be any more effectively addressed than the root Jewish problem?

As far as I can guess, what moves Stanton to do these accusations is his ideology of the single-cause hypothesis: that the Jews are to blame for white decline while the Aryans are, basically, innocent of their own decline.

I have discussed monocausalism elsewhere and won’t do it in this entry. But I must say that monocausal visitors of The West’s Darkest Hour who want to discuss their views must not accuse bona fide commenters of being crypto-Jews. I myself have been called ‘Jew’ in a Majority Rights featured article for not believing in the 9/11 conspiracy theories, and know how exasperating it is trying to prove my innocence before a dogmatic author or commenter.

Arch Stanton,

If you cannot provide reliable evidence that some commenters of this site are Jews, please abstain from further accusations if you want to continue to comment here.

Thank you.

Published in: on September 1, 2018 at 9:34 pm  Comments (42)  

Traitors are worse than Jews

I find it increasingly exasperating to discuss with white nationalists, even with those who come regularly to comment on this blog.

A few seconds ago I had the following soliloquy remembering a taxi driver, a native Englishman, who took me to the train station in Essex, just outside of London, a few years ago. I asked him what he thought of the coloured immigrants in the area. He answered:

‘I love them!’

Now, what is worse: this native Englishman or the Jews of London?

It is obvious that the white is worse, as the traitor is worse than the enemy.

The monocausalists who leave their comments on this site are unable to see something so obvious. And don’t come up with the lame excuse that the poor Englishman was brainwashed by the Jewish media. Twenty years ago, when I lived in England for a year, I was shocked to see black men with English roses on the street. It was a time when I did not even know there was such a thing as white nationalism. I was a normie in many senses. But my instincts were noble.

If we take as a parameter of elemental nobility my sentiments when I was a normie twenty years ago, any Englishman—or white European or American male—who does not feel the same shock to see a subhuman walking with a white woman is a thousand times worse than any fucking kike you can mention. The traitor is worse than the enemy.

How is it possible that monos are so blind, so absolutely unable to see something so obvious?

Is it is because they suffer from the gravest sin of all: pride, and a sort of self-righteousness for their race? As I said in the epigraph of a recent entry: And why beholdest thou the mote that is in the Jude’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

Published in: on May 22, 2018 at 11:12 am  Comments (41)  

Are monos to blame?

And why beholdest thou the mote that is in the Jude’s eye,
but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

What I said in the previous entry has left me so upset this morning that I have been going around and around in the dining room outside my library that can barely be seen in this photo.

At this time members of my family went to the christening of one of my white cousins who, instead of getting married and reproducing as God intended, adapted a completely Indian baby. The father of that cousin, whiter than me, is one of the most conservatives of the family. But here conservative Catholicism is completely blind to issues of race.

Latin America is gone, but in my desperate pacing in the dining room for what happens in England, I thought that the monocausalists were, in part, responsible for the problem, including a regular commenter of this site (see here), who cannot even see that all the native English who are now cheering the ape wedding are guilty of high treason.

I would define strict monocausalism as the doctrine that preaches on the Internet that Jews are one hundred percent responsible for the Aryan decline, and the latter completely innocent.

It’s a psychotic doctrine, which can only end up in lots of internet sites (see my recent entry that links them all) whining and whining about the latest villainy the Juden did—not daring to move a finger to settle accounts.

On the other hand, for bicausalists like me, who blame the Aryan more for their sins (having embraced the Christian ethics and worshiping Mammon), rather than whining as girls, the natural thing would be to do something. And if direct action is a little premature this very day, as we are broke, at least prepare for war in a legal way. (For example, working hard to save precious metals that will give us more than a thousand percent of purchasing power after the dollar crashes; money to buy guns.)

But the monos don’t do any of that. They just bawl and bawl. By believing that the Jews are responsible for each and every one of our evils, instead of seeing the beam in their own eyes, they just bawl through the length and breadth of the internet because these poor whites are completely innocent!

I’ll be honest: I can no longer read The Daily Stormer and other online newspapers because, after a few months, complaining without doing anything sickens the hell out of me. There are things that cannot be discussed on the internet. Wouldn’t it be good to come together to a place to discuss what we are going to do when the system pops? Why don’t you visit Mexico City as tourists: here there’s is zero antifa because all Iberian whites that remain are castrated. They’re like my cuck relative. What’s the point of continuing to complain if you do nothing?

If white nationalists abandoned their monocausalism to convert to the true religion, Hitlerism, what happened in England and many other places would not hurt us so much. It is obvious that our enemies are going to suffer, and suffer a lot in the not too distant future.

That would boost our morale…

Published in: on May 19, 2018 at 12:35 pm  Comments (47)  

WDH Radio Show – Episode 9

— Listen to it here! —

WDH host: Joseph Walsh
Special guest: Vegainator

Published in: on April 8, 2018 at 10:02 pm  Comments (8)  

On the admin of this site

Below, an excerpted translation from the German Metapedia’s
article about me
(the below pic was taken in 1973):

 

______ 卐 ______

 

C.T. (born 1958) is a private scholar and writer living in Mexico City. He publishes in Spanish and English, with emphasis on analysis of childhood trauma related to abuse. He acts as a staunch advocate of combative white self-assertion, including his blog The West’s Darkest Hour. In 2017, C.T. recorded the production of English-language radio broadcasts.

C.T. is the son of a composer known in Mexico in the tradition of classical music; his mother was a concert pianist. Remotely, he traces his origins back to Spanish ancestors.

The parental home was not only very Catholic, it was also the place where he experienced maltreatment as a teenager: experiences that shaped his character. Decades later, he made this topic the subject-matter of various publications that aim to prevent such events.

 
Christianity as the downfall of Whites

Mentally and spiritually, C.T. turned his back on Christianity in adulthood. He considers this religion to be an outrageous ‘death cult for whites’. All white values have been inverted by Christianity since its emergence in Europe, so that sub-humanism can be spread and triumph unhindered, while the white race is increasingly degenerating, to such an extent that it must fight for its bare survival.

In his investigations and assessments C.T. uses the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the champion of white race interests, William Pierce, whom he considers the greatest spirit America has produced.

Already at the conquest of the American continent, the Spaniards and Portuguese had spoiled their blood due to an ignominious, racial mixture of Christian convictions (‘all human brethren in Christ’). In this context C.T. strongly disagrees with what he calls ‘monocausalists’, who only blame the long-lasting, vicious Jewish influence, for the decline of whites. Long before Jews had set foot on American soil, the Christian European conquerors and colonists, including Englishmen and Frenchmen, were driven by greed to ensure that the conquered territories were filled with mestizos and Mulattoes.
 
Attitude to the Germans

C.T. shows an exceptionally strong understanding and sympathy for the Germans, especially as far as their historical fate is concerned. In his opinion, the two world wars fought against Germany in the 20th century were the most fatal crimes that whites ever instigated. Instead of living peacefully in the guise of the ‘crown of evolution’, the Germans of that time, the leaders of the Anglo nations decided to create a world in which the cloaca gentium of the human race is on top.

The most indispensable book that every white man should read to focus on the monstrous acts done to the Germans, and to provide a foundation for contemporary historical education and judgment, explains C.T., is Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947.

Blue-pill continent

Last year I sent an email to Prof. Kevin MacDonald complaining about an influential Mexican Jew and he asked me if I’d okay publishing it in his webzine, with a little editing. Of course I accepted and it can be read: here. But I knew that if I had written a lengthier piece I’d have mentioned something even more alarming. In Latin America, Jew and gentile intellectuals are on the same page. A single example will illustrate my point.

Every Monday the Mexican viewers of Foro TV can watch a roundtable with two Jews and two gentiles. Leo Zuckermann presides the program Es la Hora de Opinar. On Mondays he usually invites another Jew, Jorge Castañeda (second from left) and two non-Jews, the mestizo Héctor Aguilar Camín and the criollo Javier Tello Díaz.

Earlier this year I heard Castañeda pronouncing these lovely words in that program (my translation): ‘…the fact that Angela Merkel has allowed almost two million refugees to enter—and how good she did it! How good—I mean: we should congratulate ourselves, and congratulate her for having done so’. [1]

Not surprisingly, the two gentiles, Tello and Aguilar, not only agreed with such outrageous statement but even expanded Castañeda’s premise, concerned about the recent surge of nationalist sentiments in Germany in face of the so-called refugee crisis.

This has been my experience with intellectual gentiles in Latin America: the way they see the world is the same as the Jews do. This is why I have so many difficulties with the single-cause hypothesis of Western malaise. Not even those gentiles who phenotypically are indistinguishable from the Spaniards, like Javier Tello and many others, think different. In fact, there’s no single notable intellectual in the whole of Latin America that I am aware of who defends the white race from the ongoing exterminationist campaign.

That’s why I call it the blue-pill continent. That’s why I have almost zero contact with the intelligentsia in the country where I happen to be living. That’s why I have been forced to blog in a second language.

________________

[1] ‘…el que Angela Merkel haya dejado entrar a casi dos millones de refugiados—¡y qué bueno que lo hizo! Que bueno, o sea: hay que felicitarse, y felicitarla, por haberlo hecho’.

Hunter hunts Ben

“Racism” became stigmatized in the United States between 1938 and 1945. American racial attitudes, particularly in the Northern states, softened during this period. It became dogma that blacks were equal to Whites.

Benjamin Garland blames it all on the Jews. Why were millions of Jews let into the United States in the first place though? Why were they allowed to hijack our institutions? Why were they allowed to become so culturally, politically and economically powerful? Why were they praised by George Washington who said that the United States “gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance”?

The answer to all of the questions and more is one that Benjamin Garland refuses to entertain: it is because American Nationalism is civic nationalism. That’s why slavery was abolished. That’s why blacks were given citizenship. That’s why women were given the right to vote. That’s why universal manhood suffrage triumphed. That’s why husbands lost authority over their wives and children. That’s why Jews were accepted and treated as equal citizens from the beginning. That’s why traditional morality and religion has collapsed into this orgy of nihilism and consumerism.

We’ve simply taken the axioms and logic of American Nationalism to greater and greater extremes and we are living with the consequences.

(Read the full article on Ben Garland: here.)

Published in: on April 2, 2018 at 6:01 pm  Comments (25)